The Daily Mail reports new details that could prove explosive in the Oscar Pistorius murder case. According to the reports, Reeva Steenkamp’s autopsy revealed that her skull was crushed by a bloody cricket bat before she was shot in the head.

Pistorius claims that he used the bat to break down the bathroom door, and it’s at that point that he realized he was shooting his girlfriend and not an intruder.

So, if these reports are true, why didn’t the prosecution mention the bat or the fact that Steenkamp’s skull was bashed in during last week’s bail hearing?

While Lis Wiehl said that it is common in the U.S. for prosecutors to withhold some evidence at bail hearings, she thinks that this is such key evidence that prosecutors probably didn’t have it at the time of the hearing(...)