BILL GATES FUNDS Scheme To SPRAY ARTIFICIAL ‘PLANET-COOLING’ SULFUR PARTICLES INTO ATMOSPHERE | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19818372 02/26/2013 06:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We already have that, its called jet exaust. I'm pretty sure that jet fuel has sulfer in it unless the government has claimed it to be a pollutant and regulated its presence in jet fuel like it has diesel fuel there should be plenty already being sprayed around. And then theres this. [link to phys.org] |
| The Loophole Because humans are like that User ID: 35159364 02/26/2013 06:08 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | He is missing the evil villain laugh. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22004273 02/26/2013 06:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We already have that, its called jet exaust. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19818372 I'm pretty sure that jet fuel has sulfer in it unless the government has claimed it to be a pollutant and regulated its presence in jet fuel like it has diesel fuel there should be plenty already being sprayed around. And then theres this. [link to phys.org] The costs and benefits of introducing ultra-low sulfur fuel for aviation have been weighed up in a new study, and there are unexpected pros and cons. Modelling showed that desulfurising jet fuel would improve air quality, preventing between 1000 and 4000 deaths globally each year. It would cost the global aviation industry $1-4 billion (£0.63-2.5 billion) per year - ¢2-7 per gallon of jet fuel - which equates to an increase in the cost of jet fuel of around 2%. But the study also pointed to climate downsides: desulfurising fuel would reduce the formation of cooling sulfate particles, which currently offset some global warming. 'Overall, desulfurising jet fuel would reduce aviation's impact on public health by perhaps a quarter, but may increase its climate impact by about a tenth,' notes lead author Steven Barrett of the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), US. 'If you compare the costs and the benefits they come out as being broadly even in our analysis.' [link to www.rsc.org] take the sulfur out of jet fuel, save 1000 to 4000 lives per year then Bill dumps sulfur from a balloon!!! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 35194437 02/26/2013 06:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 35224753 02/26/2013 06:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Aquarius58 May The Faith Be With You User ID: 14235188 02/26/2013 06:23 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And those particles at NIGHT keep the heat of the day from venting off, thus the unintended consequence of a libtard billionaire will INCREASE warming. Way to go dumb ass Gates, Last Edited by Aquarius58 on 02/26/2013 06:23 PM The Physical World is a mystery, wrapped in an enigma, coated in a conundrum, basted with a paradox and garnished with uncertainty… Look to Orion... [link to www.nderf.org] |
| YosefHayim User ID: 4436791 02/26/2013 06:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Mordier L'eft (OP) User ID: 35054254 02/26/2013 06:32 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We already have that, its called jet exaust. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19818372 I'm pretty sure that jet fuel has sulfer in it unless the government has claimed it to be a pollutant and regulated its presence in jet fuel like it has diesel fuel there should be plenty already being sprayed around. And then theres this. [link to phys.org] well....seeing as it IS a pollutant....which is discussed in the article. thanks for not reading. --"In this era of great big brains anything that can happen will. So hunker down." -- Kurt Vonnegut, JR. -- Galapagos. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 35224753 02/26/2013 06:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 29091069 02/26/2013 06:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Globally sulphuric substances can have the following effects on human health: - Neurological effects and behavioural changes - Disturbance of blood circulation - Heart damage - Effects on eyes and eyesight - Reproductive failure - Damage to immune systems - Stomach and gastrointestinal disorder - Damage to liver and kidney functions - Hearing defects - Disturbance of the hormonal metabolism - Dermatological effects - Suffocation and lung embolism [link to www.lenntech.com] |
| Mordier L'eft (OP) User ID: 35265907 02/27/2013 02:59 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 34938019 02/27/2013 03:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Mordier L'eft (OP) User ID: 35265907 02/27/2013 03:11 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 35278024 02/27/2013 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | omFG how do we accept this!!! WTF are we going to do about it. we are forced to pay tax on one hand due to particles in the atmosphere and then this guy gets to dump a load into the atmosphere, just to see how its going to react.. to combat global warming. which is not even needed. we are truly fucked! game over man |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 381452 03/01/2013 09:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The U.K.’s Guardian and others are reporting that a multi-million dollar research fund, which just so happens to have been started and funded by Microsoft founder and vaccine enthusiast Bill Gates, is being used to fund the project. A large balloon hovering at 80,000 feet over Fort Sumner, New Mexico, will release the sulfates into the atmosphere within the next year. Quoting: Mordier L'eft The stated purpose for this massive release of toxic sulfate particles is that doing so will allegedly reflect sunlight back into the atmosphere, and thus cool the planet. But many environmental groups and advocates of common sense are decrying the idea as dangerous, and one that could result in permanent damage to ecosystems all across the globe. “Impacts include the potential for further damage to the ozone layer, and disruption of rainfall, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions, potentially threatening the food supplies of billions of people,” said Pat Mooney, Executive Director of the ETC Group, a Canadian environmental protection group. “It will do nothing to decrease levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere or halt ocean acidification. And solar geo-engineering is likely to increase the risk of climate-related international conflict, given that the modeling to date shows it poses greater risks to the global south.” [link to www.secretsofthefed.com] ![]() |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17557891 03/01/2013 09:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Jascar User ID: 17557891 03/03/2013 10:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 381452 03/03/2013 11:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Globally sulphuric substances can have the following effects on human health: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29091069 - Neurological effects and behavioural changes - Disturbance of blood circulation - Heart damage - Effects on eyes and eyesight - Reproductive failure - Damage to immune systems - Stomach and gastrointestinal disorder - Damage to liver and kidney functions - Hearing defects - Disturbance of the hormonal metabolism - Dermatological effects - Suffocation and lung embolism [link to www.lenntech.com] |