Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,057 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,539,131
Pageviews Today: 2,556,788Threads Today: 1,023Posts Today: 18,147
11:47 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

FACT: When conspiracy theorists disagree with someone else's opinion, it doesn't mean the rebuffed person is NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.

 
UndercoverAlien
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 35257435
Brazil
02/27/2013 08:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
FACT: When conspiracy theorists disagree with someone else's opinion, it doesn't mean the rebuffed person is NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.
FACT: Most conspiracy theorists don't have their heads buried in their asses, have a visual range above the average sheeple, have a perspective of things not so impaired by status quo paradigms, think outside the box and above all, are not told and paid to manipulate others opinions with scripted cliches, according to secret agendas of social experiments and mind controlling.

Conspiracy theorists do not call people "shills" and "sheeple" because they disagree with their views. It's because we already spotted the usual cliches and limited way of thinking locked inside the box, that seek to prevent others from looking beyond the veil.

I rest my case!
"Do or do not. There is no try." (Yoda)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18401048
United States
02/27/2013 08:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FACT: When conspiracy theorists disagree with someone else's opinion, it doesn't mean the rebuffed person is NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.
the shill label gets WAY over used here.

often times when posters run out of counter-arguements they call you a shill.
UndercoverAlien  (OP)

User ID: 35257435
Brazil
02/27/2013 08:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FACT: When conspiracy theorists disagree with someone else's opinion, it doesn't mean the rebuffed person is NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.
In other words, just because we called someone else a "shill" or a "sheeple", it doesn't mean this person IS NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.

stfu
"Do or do not. There is no try." (Yoda)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11330901
United States
02/27/2013 09:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FACT: When conspiracy theorists disagree with someone else's opinion, it doesn't mean the rebuffed person is NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.
In other words, just because we called someone else a "shill" or a "sheeple", it doesn't mean this person IS NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.

stfu
 Quoting: UndercoverAlien


You sound like a sheeple, looking for some sense of belonging...tribalism. Instead of feeding in the big pen, you're feeding in the smaller CS pen. But a sheep nonetheless.

As far as shills, do you know what the term means?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12680882
United States
02/27/2013 09:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FACT: When conspiracy theorists disagree with someone else's opinion, it doesn't mean the rebuffed person is NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.
As far as shills, do you know what the term means?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11330901


UndercoverAlien  (OP)

User ID: 35257435
Brazil
02/27/2013 09:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FACT: When conspiracy theorists disagree with someone else's opinion, it doesn't mean the rebuffed person is NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.
the shill label gets WAY over used here.

often times when posters run out of counter-arguements they call you a shill.
 Quoting: Oyster


Buddy, we're no rookies! We are like 24/7 hooked in conspiracy threads. We can spot the average cliches of the "book of the shill" a thousand miles.

Eventually there are things that need more scrutiny, like videos of two suns, space phenomena and stuff like that, but shills are aggressively hitting on EVERYTHING that exposes an agenda.
"Do or do not. There is no try." (Yoda)
phoenixe

User ID: 34782429
Germany
02/27/2013 09:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FACT: When conspiracy theorists disagree with someone else's opinion, it doesn't mean the rebuffed person is NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.
me only calls shills a shill, when they do typical shill-stuff.

i´m fine with other opinions, in fact, i ask for them.

but people seem to confuse a question
"whats your personal opinion on <insert defined topic>"
with
"hey, what do you think about just everthing that comes to your mind"
UndercoverAlien  (OP)

User ID: 35257435
Brazil
02/27/2013 09:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FACT: When conspiracy theorists disagree with someone else's opinion, it doesn't mean the rebuffed person is NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.
In other words, just because we called someone else a "shill" or a "sheeple", it doesn't mean this person IS NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.

stfu
 Quoting: UndercoverAlien


You sound like a sheeple, looking for some sense of belonging...tribalism. Instead of feeding in the big pen, you're feeding in the smaller CS pen. But a sheep nonetheless.

As far as shills, do you know what the term means?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11330901


You sound like a slave, looking for some sense of servitude... obeying the master. You're not "feeding in any pen". You are sucking dick big time. Being morally butt-raped.

As far as shills, their attitude precede the term.

Last Edited by UndercoverAlien on 02/27/2013 09:12 AM
"Do or do not. There is no try." (Yoda)
UndercoverAlien  (OP)

User ID: 35257435
Brazil
02/27/2013 09:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FACT: When conspiracy theorists disagree with someone else's opinion, it doesn't mean the rebuffed person is NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.
me only calls shills a shill, when they do typical shill-stuff.

i´m fine with other opinions, in fact, i ask for them.

but people seem to confuse a question
"whats your personal opinion on <insert defined topic>"
with
"hey, what do you think about just everthing that comes to your mind"
 Quoting: phoenixe


Shills are walking cliches. Many don't even have their own ideas. They have a list of rebuff rhetoric scripts for specific topics. They are paid to manipulate people's opinions according to secret agendas.

There's nothing to argue about it. Is what they do for a living.

But you won't EVER see a shill admitting what they are doing in the middle of an argument. They try to mingle as if they are just a normal person with a different point of view.

Shills are DECEIVERS, before anything else.

Last Edited by UndercoverAlien on 02/27/2013 09:19 AM
"Do or do not. There is no try." (Yoda)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 428255
Bulgaria
02/28/2013 01:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FACT: When conspiracy theorists disagree with someone else's opinion, it doesn't mean the rebuffed person is NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.
True, but on the other hand it's full of close-minded fools who only "think" they are conspiracy theorists when they are just a faction of the status quo
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12680882
United States
02/28/2013 01:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FACT: When conspiracy theorists disagree with someone else's opinion, it doesn't mean the rebuffed person is NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.
True, but on the other hand it's full of close-minded fools who only "think" they are conspiracy theorists when they are just a faction of the status quo
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 428255


It's even better when 'awakened' individuals refer to those who do not espouse their beliefs as sheep or sheeple.

cruise
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32455990
United Kingdom
02/28/2013 02:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FACT: When conspiracy theorists disagree with someone else's opinion, it doesn't mean the rebuffed person is NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.
I always find it quite amusing (and sad at the same time) when people shout "Do some research" when it's clear that they've only researched it from their agenda.
Only presenting an argument based upon one side is the definition of a shill and conspiracy "nuts" are the worst offenders.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22004273
Australia
02/28/2013 02:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FACT: When conspiracy theorists disagree with someone else's opinion, it doesn't mean the rebuffed person is NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.
cheerspeedbanancheershillcheerspeedbanancheer
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35317009
United Kingdom
02/28/2013 02:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FACT: When conspiracy theorists disagree with someone else's opinion, it doesn't mean the rebuffed person is NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.
FACT: Most conspiracy theorists don't have their heads buried in their asses, have a visual range above the average sheeple, have a perspective of things not so impaired by status quo paradigms, think outside the box and above all, are not told and paid to manipulate others opinions with scripted cliches, according to secret agendas of social experiments and mind controlling.

Conspiracy theorists do not call people "shills" and "sheeple" because they disagree with their views. It's because we already spotted the usual cliches and limited way of thinking locked inside the box, that seek to prevent others from looking beyond the veil.

I rest my case!
 Quoting: UndercoverAlien


WEll I get called a shill all the time, thats ok. What is anoying is that you are a dick
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17250236
United States
02/28/2013 03:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FACT: When conspiracy theorists disagree with someone else's opinion, it doesn't mean the rebuffed person is NOT a shill and/or a sheeple.
the shill label gets WAY over used here.

often times when posters run out of counter-arguements they call you a shill.
 Quoting: Oyster


Sounds like something a shill would say.

shill





GLP