But what is the evidence for this?


By carefully checking the numerous up-dated pictures from both classes---Noah for example has grown and he looks like a very healthy 1st grader, but in his class photo he is clearly younger and smaller... all of the kids look bigger than the year before as one would expect of older kids, but Miss Soto looks much younger in her class photo-- too young. Her bio. is not right. She is listed as an intern the year before not a teacher. This years student hand-book is simply missing. Not a single school picture of activities from this year, as compared from the year before... just pictures of the courtyard.... did they stop taking pictures for any specific reason? NO.. until the 14th arrived there was no reason not to post the schools many activities, including the kids doing whatever in their daily school stuff. When things are missing that is when questions get asked....

This tragedy started as a man arguing with a Kindergarten teacher... his Mom... killing her and all of her kids in HER class.... this event narrative was then subsequently stranded, leaving incongruent facts as stubs of the original with no resolution when the narrative abruptly changed. The article says 20 signatures already on paper--- but two of those 20 were in the hospital and were not dead yet--- so he should have seen 17 signatures if his son was the last FROM the schoolroom to be identified-- his makes 18.... the parents at the hospital DO not need to identify their kids!

Do you see the pattern that develops? The script went sideways... but they kept going anyway until it was impossible to continue the Nancy was a teacher at the school... then the narrative went to the next scenario. And the class pictures were already to go so they up-dated the kids in one and left the other the same. Why up-date a photo? The pattern of deception is right there in plain site.