Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,956 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,659,778
Pageviews Today: 2,254,085Threads Today: 535Posts Today: 9,511
07:30 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.

 
ladyannie2009

User ID: 35124498
United States
02/28/2013 07:52 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
sequestration? there wasn't a more confusing word to use?
 Quoting: SmuRidley

My mistake, I assumed that most knew what has been in the news for weeks on end. Sorry I confused you.
 Quoting: Desert Fox


not meant at you OP. just a general comment on the word they chose. it's a bit telling that they don't speak plain anymore.
 Quoting: SmuRidley



confused I agree with you 100%....I had never heard the word used in this manner either. However, I doubt ~he~ chose the word.




se·ques·ter [si-kwes-ter] verb

1. to remove or withdraw into solitude or retirement; seclude.

2. to remove or separate.

3. Law. to remove (property) temporarily from the possession of the owner; seize and hold, as the property and income of a debtor, until legal claims are satisfied.

4. International Law. to requisition, hold, and control (enemy property).

[link to dictionary.reference.com]
"the truth will stand up, when nothing else will"
- annie's mom

"When a great ship is in harbor and moored, it is safe, there can be no doubt. But that is not what great ships are built for."
- Dr. Clarissa Pinkola Estes
Desert FoxModerator (OP)
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 8786935
United States
02/28/2013 07:54 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
Barry will never get the blame, the lame stream media will cover for him. Joseph Goebbels would jealous of his press coverage!!!
 Quoting: chuckles 35248406


That is how he gets away with turning things around to make the other party look to blame, a bought and paid for media.
TOMABANEFOX
It's more humane this way ya know.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17141163
United States
02/28/2013 07:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
It was his idea in the first place, remember? [link to hosted.ap.org]
 Quoting: Desert Fox



Speaker of the House boasted that he GOT 98% of what he wanted... that 2% he didn't get is not looking good for him!!!
ladyannie2009

User ID: 35124498
United States
02/28/2013 07:55 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
...


Oh, ok, no problem. why in the hell the Obama regime picked that word to use was stupid. The word sequester has nothing to do with what is happening. It just sounds evil to the low information voter.
 Quoting: Desert Fox


I know, every time I see the word I think of Ryan Seacrest riding a horse.
:gjg:

Anyways...

Reason words from Judge Napolitano
Obama’s False Alarms

In an effort to remove the hot-potato issue of excessive government spending from the 2012 presidential campaign, and calling the bluff of congressional Republicans who always seem to favor domestic spending cuts but increased military spending, President Obama suggested the concept of "sequester" in late 2011.

His idea was to reduce the rate of increased spending by 2 percent across the board – on domestic and military spending. To his surprise, the Republicans went along with this. They did so either because they lacked the political fortitude and the political will to designate specifically the unconstitutional and pork barrel federal spending projects to be cut, or because they thought that with the debt of the federal government then approaching $15 trillion (it is now $16.6 trillion and growing), any reductions in spending money the government doesn’t have are preferred to no reductions. So, instead of enacting a budget, and instead of recognizing that much of its spending is simply not authorized by the Constitution, Congress enacted the so-called sequester legislation, and the president signed it into law.


Read more:
[link to lewrockwell.com]
 Quoting: KoFFee_


This ^^^

They had so much to choose from... but they choose the worse things to cut. Things that pertain to national security.

I'm not saying we do not have an over inflated budget for our military, but why start there?

Almost like they are setting it up for a blame game to get their way.
 Quoting: Dr. Manhattan

It is a scare tactic to try and get the Republicans to cave in to more taxes. Trying to get public pressure to get revenue measures passed.
 Quoting: Desert Fox




agreed


it'd be the ~perfect~ time for a false flag event, doncha think?


wave
"the truth will stand up, when nothing else will"
- annie's mom

"When a great ship is in harbor and moored, it is safe, there can be no doubt. But that is not what great ships are built for."
- Dr. Clarissa Pinkola Estes
Desert FoxModerator (OP)
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 8786935
United States
02/28/2013 07:59 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
sequestration? there wasn't a more confusing word to use?
 Quoting: SmuRidley

My mistake, I assumed that most knew what has been in the news for weeks on end. Sorry I confused you.
 Quoting: Desert Fox


not meant at you OP. just a general comment on the word they chose. it's a bit telling that they don't speak plain anymore.
 Quoting: SmuRidley



confused I agree with you 100%....I had never heard the word used in this manner either. However, I doubt ~he~ chose the word.




se·ques·ter [si-kwes-ter] verb

1. to remove or withdraw into solitude or retirement; seclude.

2. to remove or separate.

3. Law. to remove (property) temporarily from the possession of the owner; seize and hold, as the property and income of a debtor, until legal claims are satisfied.

4. International Law. to requisition, hold, and control (enemy property).

[link to dictionary.reference.com]
 Quoting: ladyannie2009


That is the correct description. I think they chose it for the sensationalist effect that the word would have on the uneducated masses.

Last Edited by Desert Fox on 02/28/2013 08:00 PM
TOMABANEFOX
It's more humane this way ya know.
Desert FoxModerator (OP)
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 8786935
United States
02/28/2013 08:02 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
It was his idea in the first place, remember? [link to hosted.ap.org]
 Quoting: Desert Fox



Speaker of the House boasted that he GOT 98% of what he wanted... that 2% he didn't get is not looking good for him!!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17141163


Now he wants no part of it, funny actually.
TOMABANEFOX
It's more humane this way ya know.
Desert FoxModerator (OP)
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 8786935
United States
02/28/2013 08:03 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
...


I know, every time I see the word I think of Ryan Seacrest riding a horse.
:gjg:

Anyways...

Reason words from Judge Napolitano
Obama’s False Alarms

In an effort to remove the hot-potato issue of excessive government spending from the 2012 presidential campaign, and calling the bluff of congressional Republicans who always seem to favor domestic spending cuts but increased military spending, President Obama suggested the concept of "sequester" in late 2011.

His idea was to reduce the rate of increased spending by 2 percent across the board – on domestic and military spending. To his surprise, the Republicans went along with this. They did so either because they lacked the political fortitude and the political will to designate specifically the unconstitutional and pork barrel federal spending projects to be cut, or because they thought that with the debt of the federal government then approaching $15 trillion (it is now $16.6 trillion and growing), any reductions in spending money the government doesn’t have are preferred to no reductions. So, instead of enacting a budget, and instead of recognizing that much of its spending is simply not authorized by the Constitution, Congress enacted the so-called sequester legislation, and the president signed it into law.


Read more:
[link to lewrockwell.com]
 Quoting: KoFFee_


This ^^^

They had so much to choose from... but they choose the worse things to cut. Things that pertain to national security.

I'm not saying we do not have an over inflated budget for our military, but why start there?

Almost like they are setting it up for a blame game to get their way.
 Quoting: Dr. Manhattan

It is a scare tactic to try and get the Republicans to cave in to more taxes. Trying to get public pressure to get revenue measures passed.
 Quoting: Desert Fox




agreed


it'd be the ~perfect~ time for a false flag event, doncha think?


wave
 Quoting: ladyannie2009

No doubt. It would allow him to escape out the back door.
TOMABANEFOX
It's more humane this way ya know.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24064882
United States
02/28/2013 08:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
sequestration? there wasn't a more confusing word to use?
 Quoting: SmuRidley

My mistake, I assumed that most knew what has been in the news for weeks on end. Sorry I confused you.
 Quoting: Desert Fox


not meant at you OP. just a general comment on the word they chose. it's a bit telling that they don't speak plain anymore.
 Quoting: SmuRidley


Oh, ok, no problem. why in the hell the Obama regime picked that word to use was stupid. The word sequester has nothing to do with what is happening. It just sounds evil to the low information voter.
 Quoting: Desert Fox


The reason they picked that word is because...they are playing Chess while the rest of the world is playing Checkers.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3048052
Canada
02/28/2013 08:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
Everytime I look into American politics....Obama is doing what has been predicted.....destroying jobs, and tanking the economy....will his zombies ever see he is not working in their best interests?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1121611
United States
02/28/2013 08:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
I wonder why Boehner hasn't just come right out and called him a damn liar and told the world that it was obummer's idea to begin with?
Desert FoxModerator (OP)
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 8786935
United States
02/28/2013 08:59 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
...

My mistake, I assumed that most knew what has been in the news for weeks on end. Sorry I confused you.
 Quoting: Desert Fox


not meant at you OP. just a general comment on the word they chose. it's a bit telling that they don't speak plain anymore.
 Quoting: SmuRidley


Oh, ok, no problem. why in the hell the Obama regime picked that word to use was stupid. The word sequester has nothing to do with what is happening. It just sounds evil to the low information voter.
 Quoting: Desert Fox


The reason they picked that word is because...they are playing Chess while the rest of the world is playing Checkers.
 Quoting: Chop's


You nailed it friend.
TOMABANEFOX
It's more humane this way ya know.
Desert FoxModerator (OP)
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 8786935
United States
02/28/2013 09:00 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
I wonder why Boehner hasn't just come right out and called him a damn liar and told the world that it was obummer's idea to begin with?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1121611


I get so sick of all their political correctness bullshit. Call a spade a spade. I agree much with you, lay it all out on the line.
TOMABANEFOX
It's more humane this way ya know.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33838111
United States
02/28/2013 09:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
I wonder why Boehner hasn't just come right out and called him a damn liar and told the world that it was obummer's idea to begin with?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1121611


Because the race card would then be played !
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1121611
United States
02/28/2013 09:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
I wonder why Boehner hasn't just come right out and called him a damn liar and told the world that it was obummer's idea to begin with?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1121611


Because the race card would then be played !
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33838111


Calling the man a liar is not racist, it's fact!
Desert FoxModerator (OP)
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 8786935
United States
02/28/2013 09:07 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
I wonder why Boehner hasn't just come right out and called him a damn liar and told the world that it was obummer's idea to begin with?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1121611


Because the race card would then be played !
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33838111

He would be attacked big time for sure.
TOMABANEFOX
It's more humane this way ya know.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34884778
United States
02/28/2013 09:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
i am watching woodwar on hannity and woodward refuses to say Mr. o has lied over the sequestration deal....this does not bode well for us...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16178844
United States
02/28/2013 09:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
The sequestration will happen. OMG!!!!!
Desert FoxModerator (OP)
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 8786935
United States
02/28/2013 09:10 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
i am watching woodwar on hannity and woodward refuses to say Mr. o has lied over the sequestration deal....this does not bode well for us...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34884778


I think Woodward is worried about a heart attack.
TOMABANEFOX
It's more humane this way ya know.
Desert FoxModerator (OP)
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 8786935
United States
02/28/2013 09:11 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
The sequestration will happen. OMG!!!!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16178844


Not to worry, there will still be more spending in this years budgets than there was last year.
TOMABANEFOX
It's more humane this way ya know.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1161392
United States
02/28/2013 09:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
Okay, the real cuts will actually begin on March 27, so the Congress critters will play chicken up until that time, then they will make a last minute sweetheart deal that makes both parties look good, but is really a bravo sierra arrangement that does nothing useful.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1121611
United States
02/28/2013 09:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
Yeah, it's coming. Everybody get a hat and a big umbrella, the shit is about to roll dowhill and in a big ass hurry.

If you're unemployed, see about working under the table to make ends meet. It's not perfect but it will do in a pinch.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35265404
United States
02/28/2013 09:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
When the man who wanted sequestration in the first place, then acts like it is someone else s idea, then threatens to veto any bill easing its effects, who owns it? OBAMA.
 Quoting: Desert Fox


You people will never get it, will you

the Pres has BOSSES and he is doing everything his BOSSES tell him to do, just like any other gov employee

duh, ya think there's some men a little more powerful than the pres? of course there is, and THEY call the shots

You're all being fooled by this front man that you get to see talk on TV, and thinking that he calls the shots

power equals control and the powerful men control the pres with ease

why can't you people get this?
Desert FoxModerator (OP)
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 8786935
United States
02/28/2013 09:15 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
Yeah, it's coming. Everybody get a hat and a big umbrella, the shit is about to roll dowhill and in a big ass hurry.

If you're unemployed, see about working under the table to make ends meet. It's not perfect but it will do in a pinch.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1121611

Do you think unemployment checks are gonna stop? They will not.
TOMABANEFOX
It's more humane this way ya know.
Desert FoxModerator (OP)
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 8786935
United States
02/28/2013 09:17 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
When the man who wanted sequestration in the first place, then acts like it is someone else s idea, then threatens to veto any bill easing its effects, who owns it? OBAMA.
 Quoting: Desert Fox


You people will never get it, will you

the Pres has BOSSES and he is doing everything his BOSSES tell him to do, just like any other gov employee

duh, ya think there's some men a little more powerful than the pres? of course there is, and THEY call the shots

You're all being fooled by this front man that you get to see talk on TV, and thinking that he calls the shots

power equals control and the powerful men control the pres with ease

why can't you people get this?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35265404


Sorry, I don't buy that.
TOMABANEFOX
It's more humane this way ya know.
Desert FoxModerator (OP)
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 8786935
United States
02/28/2013 09:23 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
Okay, the real cuts will actually begin on March 27, so the Congress critters will play chicken up until that time, then they will make a last minute sweetheart deal that makes both parties look good, but is really a bravo sierra arrangement that does nothing useful.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1161392


They will kick the can again.
TOMABANEFOX
It's more humane this way ya know.
Desert FoxModerator (OP)
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 8786935
United States
02/28/2013 09:23 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
Okay, the real cuts will actually begin on March 27, so the Congress critters will play chicken up until that time, then they will make a last minute sweetheart deal that makes both parties look good, but is really a bravo sierra arrangement that does nothing useful.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1161392


They will kick the can again.
TOMABANEFOX
It's more humane this way ya know.
Dom Diputs

User ID: 35329882
United States
02/28/2013 09:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
5stars

Damn straight bro.

clappa
Dom Diputs

User ID: 35329882
United States
02/28/2013 09:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
They will kick the can again.
 Quoting: Desert Fox


Ad infinitem.
Desert FoxModerator (OP)
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 8786935
United States
02/28/2013 09:55 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
Some Obama koolaid drinker left me a shitty note saying the GOP owned sequestration. He is one of those low information voters I referred to earlier. They are so out of it.
TOMABANEFOX
It's more humane this way ya know.
Dom Diputs

User ID: 35329882
United States
02/28/2013 09:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO.
When the man who wanted sequestration in the first place, then acts like it is someone else s idea, then threatens to veto any bill easing its effects, who owns it? OBAMA.
 Quoting: Desert Fox


You people will never get it, will you

the Pres has BOSSES and he is doing everything his BOSSES tell him to do, just like any other gov employee

duh, ya think there's some men a little more powerful than the pres? of course there is, and THEY call the shots

You're all being fooled by this front man that you get to see talk on TV, and thinking that he calls the shots

power equals control and the powerful men control the pres with ease

why can't you people get this?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35265404


Sorry, I don't buy that.
 Quoting: Desert Fox


It's a song the leftists sing to excuse their boys.
No high-information libertarian or conservative will ever say it.

Also, notice the 3rd grade level of reading comprehension evident in the "they both have the same bosses" posters.

Last Edited by Rorschach on 02/28/2013 09:57 PM

News