| Users Online Now: 899 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 225,309 | |
| Pageviews Today: 366,677 | Threads Today: 114 | Posts Today: 2,186 |
| 04:51 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 899 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 225,309 | |
| Pageviews Today: 366,677 | Threads Today: 114 | Posts Today: 2,186 |
| 04:51 AM | ||
NOW WHO IS IT AGAIN THAT WANTS SEQUESTRATION? OBAMA, THATS WHO. | |
| Desert Fox Offer Upgrade  User ID: 8786935  United States02/28/2013 02:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Desert Fox (OP) User ID: 8786935 United States02/28/2013 02:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| iBYTE on 2 User ID: 1225549 United States02/28/2013 02:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Carol B. User ID: 30598717 United States02/28/2013 03:00 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Desert Fox (OP) User ID: 8786935 United States02/28/2013 06:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation |  for shin di pits this!! obama sets the fires hides in the crowd and watches the destruction, blames you me George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Bush, Romney and never himself for his failed policies. sick of this shit.Truer words were never spoken. :TOMABANEFOX: It's more humane this way ya know, or burn on totem pole. Choice is yours. |
| Desert Fox (OP) User ID: 8786935 United States02/28/2013 06:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Desert Fox (OP) User ID: 8786935 United States02/28/2013 06:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | When the man who wanted sequestration in the first place, then acts like it is someone else s idea, then threatens to veto any bill easing its effects, who owns it? OBAMA. Last Edited by Desert Fox on 02/28/2013 06:15 PM :TOMABANEFOX: It's more humane this way ya know, or burn on totem pole. Choice is yours. |
| Desert Fox (OP) User ID: 8786935 United States02/28/2013 06:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Mods, am I the only one that thinks this is an important fact about who the president really is? He is a liar among other things. It is a total lie that Sequestration was anyones idea but his. Worthy of a pin I think. Last Edited by Desert Fox on 02/28/2013 06:22 PM :TOMABANEFOX: It's more humane this way ya know, or burn on totem pole. Choice is yours. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33652263 United States02/28/2013 06:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Desert Fox (OP) User ID: 8786935 United States02/28/2013 06:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Mods, am I the only one that thinks this is an important fact about who the president really is? He is a liar among other things. It is a total lie that Sequestration was anyones idea but his. Worthy of a pin I think. Quoting: Desert Fox Who me, lie?  Sadly, this has become his MO. :TOMABANEFOX: It's more humane this way ya know, or burn on totem pole. Choice is yours. |
| SmuRidley User ID: 591627  Canada02/28/2013 06:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Desert Fox (OP) User ID: 8786935 United States02/28/2013 06:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 7803284 United States02/28/2013 06:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Desert Fox (OP) User ID: 8786935 United States02/28/2013 06:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| SmuRidley User ID: 591627 Canada02/28/2013 06:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Desert Fox (OP) User ID: 8786935 United States02/28/2013 06:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My mistake, I assumed that most knew what has been in the news for weeks on end. Sorry I confused you. not meant at you OP. just a general comment on the word they chose. it's a bit telling that they don't speak plain anymore. Oh, ok, no problem. why in the hell the Obama regime picked that word to use was stupid. The word sequester has nothing to do with what is happening. It just sounds evil to the low information voter. :TOMABANEFOX: It's more humane this way ya know, or burn on totem pole. Choice is yours. |
| KoFFee_ User ID: 1373078 United States02/28/2013 06:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My mistake, I assumed that most knew what has been in the news for weeks on end. Sorry I confused you. not meant at you OP. just a general comment on the word they chose. it's a bit telling that they don't speak plain anymore. Oh, ok, no problem. why in the hell the Obama regime picked that word to use was stupid. The word sequester has nothing to do with what is happening. It just sounds evil to the low information voter. I know, every time I see the word I think of Ryan Seacrest riding a horse. :gjg: Anyways... Reason words from Judge Napolitano Obama’s False Alarms In an effort to remove the hot-potato issue of excessive government spending from the 2012 presidential campaign, and calling the bluff of congressional Republicans who always seem to favor domestic spending cuts but increased military spending, President Obama suggested the concept of "sequester" in late 2011. His idea was to reduce the rate of increased spending by 2 percent across the board – on domestic and military spending. To his surprise, the Republicans went along with this. They did so either because they lacked the political fortitude and the political will to designate specifically the unconstitutional and pork barrel federal spending projects to be cut, or because they thought that with the debt of the federal government then approaching $15 trillion (it is now $16.6 trillion and growing), any reductions in spending money the government doesn’t have are preferred to no reductions. So, instead of enacting a budget, and instead of recognizing that much of its spending is simply not authorized by the Constitution, Congress enacted the so-called sequester legislation, and the president signed it into law. Read more: [link to lewrockwell.com] However, I consider my life worth nothing to me; my only aim is to finish the race and complete the task the Lord Jesus has given me—the task of testifying to the good news of God’s grace. Acts 20:24 "This man really is the Savior of the world!" John 4:42 Look, he is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him, even those who pierced him; and all the peoples of the earth will mourn because of him. So shall it be! Amen. I am the Alpha and the Omega, " says the Lord God, who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty." Revelation 1:7 |
| Desert Fox (OP) User ID: 8786935 United States02/28/2013 06:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Desert Fox (OP) User ID: 8786935 United States02/28/2013 06:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Desert Fox My mistake, I assumed that most knew what has been in the news for weeks on end. Sorry I confused you. not meant at you OP. just a general comment on the word they chose. it's a bit telling that they don't speak plain anymore. Oh, ok, no problem. why in the hell the Obama regime picked that word to use was stupid. The word sequester has nothing to do with what is happening. It just sounds evil to the low information voter. I know, every time I see the word I think of Ryan Seacrest riding a horse. :gjg: Anyways... Reason words from Judge Napolitano Obama’s False Alarms In an effort to remove the hot-potato issue of excessive government spending from the 2012 presidential campaign, and calling the bluff of congressional Republicans who always seem to favor domestic spending cuts but increased military spending, President Obama suggested the concept of "sequester" in late 2011. His idea was to reduce the rate of increased spending by 2 percent across the board – on domestic and military spending. To his surprise, the Republicans went along with this. They did so either because they lacked the political fortitude and the political will to designate specifically the unconstitutional and pork barrel federal spending projects to be cut, or because they thought that with the debt of the federal government then approaching $15 trillion (it is now $16.6 trillion and growing), any reductions in spending money the government doesn’t have are preferred to no reductions. So, instead of enacting a budget, and instead of recognizing that much of its spending is simply not authorized by the Constitution, Congress enacted the so-called sequester legislation, and the president signed it into law. Read more: [link to lewrockwell.com] Exactly, and thanks for posting that for all to read.  :TOMABANEFOX: It's more humane this way ya know, or burn on totem pole. Choice is yours. |
| Epic Beard Guy User ID: 24840423 United States02/28/2013 06:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The sheeple will never remember that it was his idea, they just remember he didn't want it to happen. His followers will never notice that was his idea to begin with. Now the Liar in Chief is telling them the repuglicans are doing this, and it will destroy the economy. Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst. "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe |
| davvi User ID: 3677166 United States02/28/2013 07:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Desert Fox (OP) User ID: 8786935 United States02/28/2013 07:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Desert Fox (OP) User ID: 8786935 United States02/28/2013 07:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The sheeple will never remember that it was his idea, they just remember he didn't want it to happen. His followers will never notice that was his idea to begin with. Now the Liar in Chief is telling them the repuglicans are doing this, and it will destroy the economy. Quoting: Epic Beard Guy Truth. He is a master. :TOMABANEFOX: It's more humane this way ya know, or burn on totem pole. Choice is yours. |
| Desert Fox (OP) User ID: 8786935 United States02/28/2013 07:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The sheeple will never remember that it was his idea, they just remember he didn't want it to happen. His followers will never notice that was his idea to begin with. Now the Liar in Chief is telling them the repuglicans are doing this, and it will destroy the economy. Quoting: Epic Beard Guy :TOMABANEFOX: It's more humane this way ya know, or burn on totem pole. Choice is yours. |
| Carol B. User ID: 30598717 United States02/28/2013 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Natures Wrath User ID: 3811846 United States02/28/2013 07:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I want it too...it's about damn time we stop with the monthly handout checks. My magic is both from Source and Soul. I love everything for what it is...a means to an end. I love the fact we are all puzzle pieces to a Grand Master Design. Oh God, where art though? Why must our souls be shards, is it a dirty trick or lesson or a test? Our free will is nearly begotten. |
| Desert Fox (OP) User ID: 8786935 United States02/28/2013 07:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Desert Fox (OP) User ID: 8786935 United States02/28/2013 07:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Dr. Manhattan User ID: 28822130 United States02/28/2013 07:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Desert Fox My mistake, I assumed that most knew what has been in the news for weeks on end. Sorry I confused you. not meant at you OP. just a general comment on the word they chose. it's a bit telling that they don't speak plain anymore. Oh, ok, no problem. why in the hell the Obama regime picked that word to use was stupid. The word sequester has nothing to do with what is happening. It just sounds evil to the low information voter. I know, every time I see the word I think of Ryan Seacrest riding a horse. :gjg: Anyways... Reason words from Judge Napolitano Obama’s False Alarms In an effort to remove the hot-potato issue of excessive government spending from the 2012 presidential campaign, and calling the bluff of congressional Republicans who always seem to favor domestic spending cuts but increased military spending, President Obama suggested the concept of "sequester" in late 2011. His idea was to reduce the rate of increased spending by 2 percent across the board – on domestic and military spending. To his surprise, the Republicans went along with this. They did so either because they lacked the political fortitude and the political will to designate specifically the unconstitutional and pork barrel federal spending projects to be cut, or because they thought that with the debt of the federal government then approaching $15 trillion (it is now $16.6 trillion and growing), any reductions in spending money the government doesn’t have are preferred to no reductions. So, instead of enacting a budget, and instead of recognizing that much of its spending is simply not authorized by the Constitution, Congress enacted the so-called sequester legislation, and the president signed it into law. Read more: [link to lewrockwell.com] This ^^^ They had so much to choose from... but they choose the worse things to cut. Things that pertain to national security. I'm not saying we do not have an over inflated budget for our military, but why start there? Almost like they are setting it up for a blame game to get their way. |
| Desert Fox (OP) User ID: 8786935 United States02/28/2013 07:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: SmuRidley not meant at you OP. just a general comment on the word they chose. it's a bit telling that they don't speak plain anymore. Oh, ok, no problem. why in the hell the Obama regime picked that word to use was stupid. The word sequester has nothing to do with what is happening. It just sounds evil to the low information voter. I know, every time I see the word I think of Ryan Seacrest riding a horse. :gjg: Anyways... Reason words from Judge Napolitano Obama’s False Alarms In an effort to remove the hot-potato issue of excessive government spending from the 2012 presidential campaign, and calling the bluff of congressional Republicans who always seem to favor domestic spending cuts but increased military spending, President Obama suggested the concept of "sequester" in late 2011. His idea was to reduce the rate of increased spending by 2 percent across the board – on domestic and military spending. To his surprise, the Republicans went along with this. They did so either because they lacked the political fortitude and the political will to designate specifically the unconstitutional and pork barrel federal spending projects to be cut, or because they thought that with the debt of the federal government then approaching $15 trillion (it is now $16.6 trillion and growing), any reductions in spending money the government doesn’t have are preferred to no reductions. So, instead of enacting a budget, and instead of recognizing that much of its spending is simply not authorized by the Constitution, Congress enacted the so-called sequester legislation, and the president signed it into law. Read more: [link to lewrockwell.com] This ^^^ They had so much to choose from... but they choose the worse things to cut. Things that pertain to national security. I'm not saying we do not have an over inflated budget for our military, but why start there? Almost like they are setting it up for a blame game to get their way. It is a scare tactic to try and get the Republicans to cave in to more taxes. Trying to get public pressure to get revenue measures passed. :TOMABANEFOX: It's more humane this way ya know, or burn on totem pole. Choice is yours. |
| chuckles User ID: 35248406 United States02/28/2013 07:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
request...
