|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Comet C/2012 S1 ISON is Nibiru the great perturber.
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Dr. Astro |
|
Post Content
|
Either it's massive like he claims or it isn't. If it is it will detectably perturb mars. If it's not, it won't. You have two choices, you can either ignore the empirical data about the orbit of mars or you can accept it even if it proves McCanney wrong. Which will it be? The perturbation in the orbit could be small due to the distance, and we could need professional equipment to check that, which we don't have.
Quoting: glaucoWrong. If it is as massive as he claims it will produce a detectable perturbation in the orbit. The equipment I use is more than good enough. That will all be shown when I present the empirical data. You can either ignore it or accept it. Which will it be? Answer the question. Yes or no? Man, stop putting words in my mouth. I did not put any words in your mouth. I explained why you are wrong and I asked you a question which you still have not answered. McCanney said: "it is huge, so we may expect atmospheric and orbital changes". If you can bring informations regarding small to large orbital changes, that would be great, I didn't knew you're a professional.
Quoting: glaucoI'm not a professional but it does not require a professional astronomer to accurately measure the position and orbit of Mars. Atmospheric changes are not confirmation that the comet is massive, atmospheres change all the time in the absence of comets. Orbital changes or the lack thereof are direct proof that the comet is either massive or is not massive regardless of what the atmosphere does. I will look for perturbations in the orbit of Mars and if they do not appear then the comet was not massive as McCanney claimed. You can either ignore that empirical data or accept it, which will it be? Answer the question.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
