Answer my question. I would not ignore data if something occurs, but what you posited would not indicate that it was a massive comet as claimed, it's unrelated silliness. What is realistic is that more modest atmospheric changes over time will be detected by NASA's probes and you will inevitably try to use that to claim he was right. In fact it is not confirmation of his claim and the data I collect will directly refute his claim. Now answer the question, will you ignore the empirical data if it shows that Mars' orbit was not perturbed? Yes or no. I will keep repeating this question until you answer it.

Wow, that's quite the defamatory claim. Prove I am dishonest. Now.