So Mr Darkwin, how do you suppose baby birds pecked through their shells before 'evolution' NON-intelligently created their beaks?

hi dgn,

good to see you back.

another person who doesn't understand evoloution

Try English

I am thinking about becoming a christian, just so I can pray to your god. My request will be for it to hurry up and "rapture" you freaks out of here once and for all....

Your threads really piss me off..

You are trying to be smart/sarcastic/witty.... and you are so NOT pulling it off...

I'm not going to heaven, those invited to serve as assistant kings with Jesus were chosen before my time.
"And I saw, and, look! the Lamb standing upon the Mount Zion, and with him a hundred and forty-four thousand having his name and the name of his Father written on their foreheads. 2 And I heard a sound out of heaven as the sound of many waters and as the sound of loud thunder; and the sound that I heard was as of singers who accompany themselves on the harp playing on their harps. 3 And they are singing as if a new song before the throne and before the four living creatures and the elders; and no one was able to master that song but the hundred and forty-four thousand, who have been bought from the earth." Rv14;1

Let me take a stab in the dark here... probably the same way every reptile ancestor did?


Seriously, you go after evolution by attempting to attack one of the most complete evolutionary chains?

with their peckers. 1 star

" probably the same way every reptile ancestor did?"
Which is what?

maybe the ones who didn't simply died. the ones with beaks had babies.

If it took 'evolution' a million years to design and construct their beaks why didn't birds go extinct?

maybe some birds had little noses. 90% of those died
maybe some birds had bigger noses. 74% of those died
maybe some birds had hard noses. 37% of those died.

X 50000 generations.

An egg tooth... which most birds (other than kiwis) still use, not their beak.

Maybe?

You're a moron, and nobody (nobody of importance anyway) gives a shit about you and your imaginary friends...... You and your little baby Jesus, and your evil Devil, can all fuck off!

What do you suggest?

plenty of other animals without beaks get out of shells. another christetard fail.

Really? How do suppose their liquid embryos survived in the million years it took Chuck's 'evolution' thingy to NON-intelligently design and construct egg shells for them?

It's either Darkwing or Darwin.

And hard shells is a land animal thing.
The bird's ancestors (you know, FISH), lay very soft eggs.
The egg tooth (and its many analogues) and the shell evolved together.

Dude you friken rock!!!!! keep up the good work.

Mega thumbs up from me

If you actually understood evolution you wouldn't need to ask this question. It is not a bad question. But for someone so obsessed with evolution you should at least know the answer.

And no I will not enlighten you. You will not listen.

What a stupid question... the chicken came before the egg

When an argument is lost, change the subject!

No, just try again it's free.

The answer is at Ps139:16

proof???

GO READ ORIGIN OF THE SPECIES - you don't have to agree with it but you do have to actually know the material to argue it effectively.

THEN

GO READ SOCIAL DARWINISM IN AMERICAN THOUGHT by Richard Hofstadter for a look at how Darwin's theories get twisted into all sorts of shapes by people looking to justify things. Kind of like happens with the Bible.

It's more time efficient to read DNA, being the blueprint for cellular assembly, it exposes the ignorance of Darwin's theory of NON-intelligent design.


Last Edited by DGN on 03/02/2013 01:32 PM

Or accept the truth, what have you got to lose by gaining knowledge?