Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 3,000 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,568,566
Pageviews Today: 3,771,154Threads Today: 1,241Posts Today: 20,760
11:43 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25801142
United States
03/04/2013 11:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
[link to www.bing.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34544532
United States
03/04/2013 11:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
The Earth gains and loses mass every year, loses ~95K tons of Hydrogen annually, gains ~ 40k tons of dust from space, etc.
Rain-Man
User ID: 35557421
Bosnia and Herzegovina
03/04/2013 11:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
I'm little to0 tired will come later, everything have electric form ..

Anyway probably you all know that Tesla find the way to use free Electricity from ionosphere and similar area ..

He was our neighbor and my father tell me great stories when I was a child about Tesla and work from him, from that time I've always been very interested in his work ..

Some interesting and new info ..

Thread: Van Allen Probes Reveal New Radiation Belt Around Earth
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35350153
United States
03/04/2013 11:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
 Quoting: Cosmic Traveler


The way I "see" it is that the energy in our energy belts (fed by the sun) is translated into the earth at/by our poles. It keeps the core hot and quite likely adds mass to our earth. Solar ejections aside, we are continually bathed in this energy 24/7/forever.


This^^^

Except....the energy doesn't have to be transmitted to the core via the poles. A magnetic core, being places in a magnetic field, would cause the core to heat-up.

As the energy of the sun increases so does the ability to induce the core......I think.

Peace



I have read that core hole temperatures in Alaska show a rising temp 50-100 down. I also understand that the earth's Air temperature is decreasing. Conclusion: The core is getting hotter causing volcanic activity to increase and most likely increases the earthquakes.
Krispy71

User ID: 34333335
Netherlands
03/04/2013 12:00 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
There are a few considerations about this theory that need to be expanded upon, but it is an extremely interesting take on expanding earth theory.

When the sun ejects charged particles and energies most of it is deflected by the magnetosphere. The more highly charged the energy/particles the more the magnetosphere is 'activated' (so to speak) to block out the harmful radiation. This is inclusive of interstellar gamma particles (cosmic rays) that make it through the heliosphere and hit earth's magnetosphere.

Occassionally these charged particles are able to make it through the magnetosphere boundary. When they do, the majority of those get trapped between the Van Allen Belts. There are two Van Allen Belts though a third one has just been discovered (recently created), which scientists are now trying to figure out how that new belt was formed. The charged particles 'ping' back and forth between the two Van Allen Belts, trapped. Occasionally some of those that are trapped make it through one of the layers. If one of these charged particles make it through the top layer, I imagine it gets entangled in the magnetosphere, eventually to be released back out into our local heliospheric environment. Then there are ones that penetrate the bottom Vn Allen Belt and make a quick journey to the surface of the earth.

This second scenario, I believe, is what is being referenced to in the article.

Over long enough periods, and especially during solar maxes and higher magnetic density environments outside our heliosphere (as IBEX and Voyager 1 and 2 have proven we have recently entered), I can definitely envision this proposition.

At this point, it would be dependent on how much these charged particles would increase the size of the actual earth. Would it be enough to make the kind of changes that are theorized in the expanding earth theory?

I am a person who never sees in black and white. I see it all as percentages. In other words, this would not be the only solution to an expanding earth. But, would be inclusive as another piece of the puzzle.

Saying that, I am not for or against the expanding earth theories, though I do see more validation pointing to an expanding earth.
 Quoting: Septenary Man



Imo the "particles" that come from the Sun in CME's [and also from other Galactic Events] are ... NEUTRINO's !!

Imo they are responsible for a lot of things related to expanding Earth and activated particles in and around Earth's crust [and in us].
It is said that the flux of neutrino's NOW is bigger in quantity then ever before studied.
The Cherencov-radiation is the proof when they DID INTERACT with matter/particles, its like the [light-]shadow left behind as a witness.
Nuclear facilities have more Cherencov-events ... and we have a lottttttt of nuclear(powered) facilities ... so make the maths ...

Neutrino's are not the only aspect responsible for this expansion, ... there is more to it.

We more and more often look at planets and planetary systems and bodies and Galactic structures, as towards our own body ... and thats totally legit coz we are all the same fractal expression in different levels.
If child-body's can expand, so why couldnt Earth ?
If Galaxy's expand, so why could a planet not ?

Nothing in this Universe is STATIC ...
Everything is MOTION, shrinking and expansion, inhale exhale, growth and decay ...

Where does a baby gets its "missing mass" when it grows into adolescence ? And where does that "mass" go when we shrink into grumpy tiny old people or when we die ...

PLASMA is triggered to grow in quantity in expansion events...
and it is released in extraction-events...
inhale, exhale ...


Plasma increase and neutrino increase are interlinked, imo.


XXX MzK
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25801142
United States
03/04/2013 12:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
 Quoting: Cosmic Traveler


The way I "see" it is that the energy in our energy belts (fed by the sun) is translated into the earth at/by our poles. It keeps the core hot and quite likely adds mass to our earth. Solar ejections aside, we are continually bathed in this energy 24/7/forever.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35350153


This^^^

Except....the energy doesn't have to be transmitted to the core via the poles. A magnetic core, being places in a magnetic field, would cause the core to heat-up.

As the energy of the sun increases so does the ability to induce the core......I think.

Peace



I have read that core hole temperatures in Alaska show a rising temp 50-100 down. I also understand that the earth's Air temperature is decreasing. Conclusion: The core is getting hotter causing volcanic activity to increase and most likely increases the earthquakes.

The based that 2012 movie off that theory about the new particles speeding the core of our earth...
SunnyDaze

User ID: 25960618
United States
03/04/2013 01:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25801142




ROFLMAO ... did you see that picture of the White House ?!
I have the notion, that they are not something new ... we just started collecting the data (pic) recently

I am on the "expanding" Earth Theory, band wagon ... makes all the sense in the world to me ... plain and simple


[link to www.youtube.com]

but it doesn't explain how or what "triggers" our growth (now) and personally I don't think sink holes are being caused by CMEs ... but very much part of an expanding earth's theory

Last Edited by SunnyDaze on 03/04/2013 01:06 PM
'En Kai Pan

User ID: 7924988
United States
03/04/2013 01:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
During an intense solar event the magnetosphere and the radiation belts become somewhat irrelevant as the structures peel away and particles stream into the poles.

I gather from my E Univ and Plasma reading that in-between the sheathed layers of polarity (forget the term they use, like around a lightning bolt) plasma reaches a state where the electron transfer threshold lowers and 'matter is created'.

As most planets show convincing evidence of stretch marks and growth it is theorized that this plasma state may exist or be possible within planetary bodies right down to geode scale.

The nail in the coffin for me is how with a smaller historical planet, there would be less gravity. That would explain sooo much from dinosaur vascular issues, megalithic construction, giant-like branches of humanity dying off or leaving, human back/neck and birth problems, flightless birds and male nipples.

Ok the male nipples are still a mystery.

End transmission
...I was amazed that so little time had passed and that the identity and reality I was 'returning' to were so undeniably false
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
03/04/2013 01:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
During an intense solar event the magnetosphere and the radiation belts become somewhat irrelevant as the structures peel away and particles stream into the poles.

I gather from my E Univ and Plasma reading that in-between the sheathed layers of polarity (forget the term they use, like around a lightning bolt) plasma reaches a state where the electron transfer threshold lowers and 'matter is created'.

As most planets show convincing evidence of stretch marks and growth it is theorized that this plasma state may exist or be possible within planetary bodies right down to geode scale.

The nail in the coffin for me is how with a smaller historical planet, there would be less gravity. That would explain sooo much from dinosaur vascular issues, megalithic construction, giant-like branches of humanity dying off or leaving, human back/neck and birth problems, flightless birds and male nipples.

Ok the male nipples are still a mystery.

End transmission
 Quoting: 'En Kai Pan


There is another good theory about ancient earth not having as much gravity. I'll look it up.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
03/04/2013 02:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
Thread: Macro Spin Levels and the Relativistic Universe Model
[link to www.blazelabs.com]

In the following paragraph, we will see that on earth (were most experiments are done), no object is really at rest, and that the relativistic mass has to be considered even for a steel ball sitting motionless on a table. The only thing which is in fact at rest in the whole (closed) universe is its boundary, or its reference frame beyond which no matter can exist.

How fast is Earth going

For us who live on this planet, it looks as if our planet is stationary. In fact, a long time ago, it was believed that the sun and stars all revolved around the fixed earth, and that the earth was at the centre of the universe. We now know, that our Earth is just a tiny planet residing in a huge universe containing multiple galaxies of thousands of solar systems.

We know that our planet spins on its axis at one cycle every day. The solar system in turn, spins at one cycle every year. We normally refer to solar system spin as planet orbit motion, but in fact even the sun is known to be spinning, so it is more correct to call it solar system spin. Our whole solar system is thus spinning on its own axis while orbiting around our Sagittarius Dwarf galaxy (not the Milky Way galaxy) at one cycle every approximately 226 million years, and it's highly probable that other galaxies spin around as well, and this hierarchy goes on for five levels. All this happens within a closed fixed frame universe. So, saying that something is at rest means only that it is traveling at the same velocity as the observer and not at rest in relation to the universe frame of reference. So, your PC, your desk, your room are all traveling through space at the same speed as you are, and the velocity at which you are traveling right now is far greater than you would ever expect.

The table below shows the currently accepted velocities for the known universe.

•How fast is the Earth spinning? 0.46 km/sec
•How fast is the Solar system spinning? 30 km/sec
•How fast is the Galaxy spinning? 250 km/sec
•How fast is our super cluster spinning? 627 km/sec
•How fast is the CMBR frame spinning? Assumed at rest


So, when all these velocities happen to line up, we will have an absolute velocity of 907.46 km/sec or 0.3% the speed of light when 'stationary'!
 Quoting: Septenary Man
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
03/04/2013 02:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
Thread: Macro Spin Levels and the Relativistic Universe Model
[link to www.blazelabs.com]

In the following paragraph, we will see that on earth (were most experiments are done), no object is really at rest, and that the relativistic mass has to be considered even for a steel ball sitting motionless on a table. The only thing which is in fact at rest in the whole (closed) universe is its boundary, or its reference frame beyond which no matter can exist.

How fast is Earth going

For us who live on this planet, it looks as if our planet is stationary. In fact, a long time ago, it was believed that the sun and stars all revolved around the fixed earth, and that the earth was at the centre of the universe. We now know, that our Earth is just a tiny planet residing in a huge universe containing multiple galaxies of thousands of solar systems.

We know that our planet spins on its axis at one cycle every day. The solar system in turn, spins at one cycle every year. We normally refer to solar system spin as planet orbit motion, but in fact even the sun is known to be spinning, so it is more correct to call it solar system spin. Our whole solar system is thus spinning on its own axis while orbiting around our Sagittarius Dwarf galaxy (not the Milky Way galaxy) at one cycle every approximately 226 million years, and it's highly probable that other galaxies spin around as well, and this hierarchy goes on for five levels. All this happens within a closed fixed frame universe. So, saying that something is at rest means only that it is traveling at the same velocity as the observer and not at rest in relation to the universe frame of reference. So, your PC, your desk, your room are all traveling through space at the same speed as you are, and the velocity at which you are traveling right now is far greater than you would ever expect.

The table below shows the currently accepted velocities for the known universe.

•How fast is the Earth spinning? 0.46 km/sec
•How fast is the Solar system spinning? 30 km/sec
•How fast is the Galaxy spinning? 250 km/sec
•How fast is our super cluster spinning? 627 km/sec
•How fast is the CMBR frame spinning? Assumed at rest


So, when all these velocities happen to line up, we will have an absolute velocity of 907.46 km/sec or 0.3% the speed of light when 'stationary'!
 Quoting: Septenary Man

 Quoting: Septenary Man


:univaaa:

Macro Spin Levels

This great attractor is assumed by most, to be fixed in space that it can be taken as the fixed reference in the universe. As you see in my universe hierarchy diagram, and as highly debated within astronomers and scientists, we lack much data and knowledge to assume such thing, and the great attractor is probably orbiting around, with other great attractors around the real fixed centre of the universe. For the pre-eliminary calculations we shall abide to the conventional idea that the great attractor is fixed, and start from Spin level 4 which is the orbital velocity of the galaxy about the great attractor.
[link to www.blazelabs.com]


Macro Spin Level 2

Now let's consider level 2, the orbital spin of the earth and other planets around the sun. Actually it's not the planets that are spinning around the sun, but the entire solar system, including the sun is rotating on its own axis. In astronomy, the "ecliptic plane" is by definition, the 2D plane in space defined by the sun at its centre, and by the orbit of the earth, as shown below. The 12 zodiac constellations are all on the ecliptic plane. Let us assume that an observer outside our solar system is observing the motion from a fixed point in space on the same plane as the ecliptic plane. If he could measure the velocities of the sun and earth, he would note that the sun is moving at a constant 250 kps around the centre of the galaxy, but he would also note that the earth is not moving at a constant velocity.
[link to www.blazelabs.com]

Macro Spin Level 1

We know a lot of data on this level. The tangential velocity of spin level 1, can be easily calculated knowing the radius of earth and the time it takes for one complete spin (one sidereal day).

Calculation of mass variation for Macro Spin Level 1

Equatorial Earth's diameter : 12757km
Time for complete spin about its axis: 23hrs 56mins 4sec = 86164 seconds
Equatorial perimeter = Pi * 12757 = 40077.29km
Tangential velocity = 40077.29/86164 = 0.465 km/sec or kps
Earth's orbital velocity around the sun (spin level 2) is known to be 30kps.

[link to www.blazelabs.com]


Modern astronomy will agree with this model up to the Sagittarius A level. Beyond this hierarchy level, no one knows anything, even if most researchers would agree that they cannot exclude the possibility of the existence of higher hierarchy levels and that the highest known level could in fact be rotating about some yet unknown centre of the universe.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 865798
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30890652
United States
03/04/2013 04:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
SO...then follow me here..

If magnetism causes 'gravity', would it be possible that all matter on this planet has a certain 'charge' that keeps us attracted to the Earth? Like attracted magnets? AND.. is levitation possibly achieved by somehow reversing the state of one's charge, OR an objects charge, causing a sort of reverse-propulsion, like 2 same-charged magnets pushing against each other.

Could a certain sound frequency activate this reversal of matter polarity?

Hmmmm....hf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34471515
Canada
03/04/2013 06:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
Thread: Macro Spin Levels and the Relativistic Universe Model
[link to www.blazelabs.com]

In the following paragraph, we will see that on earth (were most experiments are done), no object is really at rest, and that the relativistic mass has to be considered even for a steel ball sitting motionless on a table. The only thing which is in fact at rest in the whole (closed) universe is its boundary, or its reference frame beyond which no matter can exist.

How fast is Earth going

For us who live on this planet, it looks as if our planet is stationary. In fact, a long time ago, it was believed that the sun and stars all revolved around the fixed earth, and that the earth was at the centre of the universe. We now know, that our Earth is just a tiny planet residing in a huge universe containing multiple galaxies of thousands of solar systems.

We know that our planet spins on its axis at one cycle every day. The solar system in turn, spins at one cycle every year. We normally refer to solar system spin as planet orbit motion, but in fact even the sun is known to be spinning, so it is more correct to call it solar system spin. Our whole solar system is thus spinning on its own axis while orbiting around our Sagittarius Dwarf galaxy (not the Milky Way galaxy) at one cycle every approximately 226 million years, and it's highly probable that other galaxies spin around as well, and this hierarchy goes on for five levels. All this happens within a closed fixed frame universe. So, saying that something is at rest means only that it is traveling at the same velocity as the observer and not at rest in relation to the universe frame of reference. So, your PC, your desk, your room are all traveling through space at the same speed as you are, and the velocity at which you are traveling right now is far greater than you would ever expect.

The table below shows the currently accepted velocities for the known universe.

•How fast is the Earth spinning? 0.46 km/sec
•How fast is the Solar system spinning? 30 km/sec
•How fast is the Galaxy spinning? 250 km/sec
•How fast is our super cluster spinning? 627 km/sec
•How fast is the CMBR frame spinning? Assumed at rest


So, when all these velocities happen to line up, we will have an absolute velocity of 907.46 km/sec or 0.3% the speed of light when 'stationary'!
 Quoting: Septenary Man

 Quoting: Septenary Man


:univaaa:

Macro Spin Levels

This great attractor is assumed by most, to be fixed in space that it can be taken as the fixed reference in the universe. As you see in my universe hierarchy diagram, and as highly debated within astronomers and scientists, we lack much data and knowledge to assume such thing, and the great attractor is probably orbiting around, with other great attractors around the real fixed centre of the universe. For the pre-eliminary calculations we shall abide to the conventional idea that the great attractor is fixed, and start from Spin level 4 which is the orbital velocity of the galaxy about the great attractor.
[link to www.blazelabs.com]


Macro Spin Level 2

Now let's consider level 2, the orbital spin of the earth and other planets around the sun. Actually it's not the planets that are spinning around the sun, but the entire solar system, including the sun is rotating on its own axis. In astronomy, the "ecliptic plane" is by definition, the 2D plane in space defined by the sun at its centre, and by the orbit of the earth, as shown below. The 12 zodiac constellations are all on the ecliptic plane. Let us assume that an observer outside our solar system is observing the motion from a fixed point in space on the same plane as the ecliptic plane. If he could measure the velocities of the sun and earth, he would note that the sun is moving at a constant 250 kps around the centre of the galaxy, but he would also note that the earth is not moving at a constant velocity.
[link to www.blazelabs.com]

Macro Spin Level 1

We know a lot of data on this level. The tangential velocity of spin level 1, can be easily calculated knowing the radius of earth and the time it takes for one complete spin (one sidereal day).

Calculation of mass variation for Macro Spin Level 1

Equatorial Earth's diameter : 12757km
Time for complete spin about its axis: 23hrs 56mins 4sec = 86164 seconds
Equatorial perimeter = Pi * 12757 = 40077.29km
Tangential velocity = 40077.29/86164 = 0.465 km/sec or kps
Earth's orbital velocity around the sun (spin level 2) is known to be 30kps.

[link to www.blazelabs.com]


Modern astronomy will agree with this model up to the Sagittarius A level. Beyond this hierarchy level, no one knows anything, even if most researchers would agree that they cannot exclude the possibility of the existence of higher hierarchy levels and that the highest known level could in fact be rotating about some yet unknown centre of the universe.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 865798

 Quoting: Septenary Man


what about the micro...
this may be a dumb question but...
what regulates how fast electrons orbit around the nucleus of an atom....does it change, and does that effect the distance that electrons orbit from the nucleus...
is there a quantum entanglement effect affecting all orbiting (spinning) bodies equally....
are universal frequencies shifting gradually..
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 14874606
United States
03/04/2013 06:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
Great question/s. I do not really enjoy the numbers game. For some reason they do not stick in my mind like concepts.
Mad Mandy
User ID: 19544790
United Kingdom
03/04/2013 07:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
men have nipples because we first develop into females in the uterus, then into male! eve came from adams rib eh? i think not... mwahahahah
BadHairDay

User ID: 30857551
Australia
03/04/2013 07:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
Hi again SS. I think one basic part of the thinking on this is 'how' one views the planet.

As a chunk of rock and some organic matter whirling through space, or as a living, concious entity, part of a larger living system.

As above so below almost doesnt cut it in my mind, as to just how above, and just how below the whole notion of life and concious goes!! Infinate.

I believe that our world is living, and has conciousness, and that we (Humans) belong to that. We've been some what disconnected over the past few thousand years, but at a basic level, we still hang in there and are connected by our very make up, in dna, rna etc.

The resonance(s) of our world (nice previous thread SS) shape so much of what we are and can do, as individuals and as a collective.

Whether we measure a flux transfer between worlds, or at a micro photonic level between DNA, we are always in communication with the greater Universe, whether we chose to see it or not, whether we chose to measure it or not, or whether we try to make sense of these exchanges of information or not.

But, getting back to the notion of what a planet may actually be, from my perspective, - a living entity, filled with 8 billion little 'intent' entities, all linked, but at this point disconnected from each other, and the planet, we, both planet and Humans, have the ability to littertally create our reality, by changing energy in to matter.

I have no issues at all with a growing planet, to the point where planet and occupants become less material based, and take on the form of a gasseous giant.

But it's the ability to convert energy in to matter that I see as being the missing link that science wont accept, and that conciousness and intent are the tools with which this occurs.

At a planetary level, a concious so large, with so much intent behind it, acting at a very slow pace, compared to our short life experience blocks, can achieve this.

A baby doesnt grow directly proportionately to the amount of food it is fed. It grows faster or slower depending on the amount, but it grows none the less, and continues to grow.

I think the planet is the same, but rather than food, energy is the nourishment, as well as what we Humans dream up.

I hope that wasnt too woo woo. Its just a personal favourite of mine SS. We're discussing this on bezerk atm, or a branch of it, with relation to the Schumann resonances.
It's all about the 'vibe'
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1634447
United States
03/04/2013 07:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
i wonder if the aliens have been buying us time from us furthing/acelerating the planets growth into oblivion, to get things finished so to speak
just a dude

User ID: 9618710
United States
03/04/2013 09:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
men have nipples because we first develop into females in the uterus, then into male! eve came from adams rib eh? i think not... mwahahahah
 Quoting: Mad Mandy 19544790


... and Osiris died and lost his weewee
Azeratel Axo

User ID: 20063747
Canada
03/04/2013 10:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
men have nipples because we first develop into females in the uterus, then into male! eve came from adams rib eh? i think not... mwahahahah
 Quoting: Mad Mandy 19544790


... and Osiris died and lost his weewee
 Quoting: just a dude


hmmm
BadHairDay

User ID: 30857551
Australia
03/04/2013 10:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
I resemble that last remark.
It's all about the 'vibe'
Free Planet
User ID: 4079500
United Kingdom
03/05/2013 07:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
(posting from an unbanned isp)

Energy is only CONVERTED.

If you have enough of an understanding of THAT CONCEPT, anything goes (astronomically).
BadHairDay

User ID: 30857551
Australia
03/05/2013 07:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
Yeah, nice. Have no issues with the concept at all.
It's all about the 'vibe'
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
03/05/2013 08:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
Hi again SS. I think one basic part of the thinking on this is 'how' one views the planet.

As a chunk of rock and some organic matter whirling through space, or as a living, concious entity, part of a larger living system.

As above so below almost doesnt cut it in my mind, as to just how above, and just how below the whole notion of life and concious goes!! Infinate.

I believe that our world is living, and has conciousness, and that we (Humans) belong to that. We've been some what disconnected over the past few thousand years, but at a basic level, we still hang in there and are connected by our very make up, in dna, rna etc.

The resonance(s) of our world (nice previous thread SS) shape so much of what we are and can do, as individuals and as a collective.

Whether we measure a flux transfer between worlds, or at a micro photonic level between DNA, we are always in communication with the greater Universe, whether we chose to see it or not, whether we chose to measure it or not, or whether we try to make sense of these exchanges of information or not.

But, getting back to the notion of what a planet may actually be, from my perspective, - a living entity, filled with 8 billion little 'intent' entities, all linked, but at this point disconnected from each other, and the planet, we, both planet and Humans, have the ability to littertally create our reality, by changing energy in to matter.

I have no issues at all with a growing planet, to the point where planet and occupants become less material based, and take on the form of a gasseous giant.

But it's the ability to convert energy in to matter that I see as being the missing link that science wont accept, and that conciousness and intent are the tools with which this occurs.

At a planetary level, a concious so large, with so much intent behind it, acting at a very slow pace, compared to our short life experience blocks, can achieve this.

A baby doesnt grow directly proportionately to the amount of food it is fed. It grows faster or slower depending on the amount, but it grows none the less, and continues to grow.

I think the planet is the same, but rather than food, energy is the nourishment, as well as what we Humans dream up.

I hope that wasnt too woo woo. Its just a personal favourite of mine SS. We're discussing this on bezerk atm, or a branch of it, with relation to the Schumann resonances.
 Quoting: BadHairDay


Great post Bad Hair. I think other older cultures had it way more accurate than we do/did. We have been taught to view the planet in mechanistic ways, when it is a live organic entity. It is a beautiful living system. Sometimes, we humans just can't recognize it because it is a 'life' more complex and much greater than us. The planet used to be revered because of that knowledge. Now, we view it as ours, instead of us being hers.
Krispy71

User ID: 34333335
Netherlands
03/05/2013 09:36 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
Hi again SS. I think one basic part of the thinking on this is 'how' one views the planet.

As a chunk of rock and some organic matter whirling through space, or as a living, concious entity, part of a larger living system.

As above so below almost doesnt cut it in my mind, as to just how above, and just how below the whole notion of life and concious goes!! Infinate.

I believe that our world is living, and has conciousness, and that we (Humans) belong to that. We've been some what disconnected over the past few thousand years, but at a basic level, we still hang in there and are connected by our very make up, in dna, rna etc.

The resonance(s) of our world (nice previous thread SS) shape so much of what we are and can do, as individuals and as a collective.

Whether we measure a flux transfer between worlds, or at a micro photonic level between DNA, we are always in communication with the greater Universe, whether we chose to see it or not, whether we chose to measure it or not, or whether we try to make sense of these exchanges of information or not.

But, getting back to the notion of what a planet may actually be, from my perspective, - a living entity, filled with 8 billion little 'intent' entities, all linked, but at this point disconnected from each other, and the planet, we, both planet and Humans, have the ability to littertally create our reality, by changing energy in to matter.

I have no issues at all with a growing planet, to the point where planet and occupants become less material based, and take on the form of a gasseous giant.

But it's the ability to convert energy in to matter that I see as being the missing link that science wont accept, and that conciousness and intent are the tools with which this occurs.

At a planetary level, a concious so large, with so much intent behind it, acting at a very slow pace, compared to our short life experience blocks, can achieve this.

A baby doesnt grow directly proportionately to the amount of food it is fed. It grows faster or slower depending on the amount, but it grows none the less, and continues to grow.

I think the planet is the same, but rather than food, energy is the nourishment, as well as what we Humans dream up.

I hope that wasnt too woo woo. Its just a personal favourite of mine SS. We're discussing this on bezerk atm, or a branch of it, with relation to the Schumann resonances.
 Quoting: BadHairDay


Love this post !
I experience it the same way.


rainbow
Free Planet
User ID: 35762155
United Kingdom
03/08/2013 11:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
The Earth gains and loses mass every year, loses ~95K tons of Hydrogen annually, gains ~ 40k tons of dust from space, etc.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34544532


this is NOT what this thread's about, it's about a PLANET getting HAMMERED from interstellar sources and radius growth 45cm per year for the last 20 million years.

May happen in spurts, too i.e. we could be in a quiet zone as far as Growth goes.

:)
Free Planet
User ID: 35818307
United Kingdom
03/09/2013 03:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
bump
skerry64

User ID: 1487396
United States
03/13/2013 12:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
The way I always understood this theory was that the Sun and the Earth have an intrinsic connection.

The kind of connection that keeps us in a (relatively) stable orbit;
the kind that the Sun shares with all of its planets;
the kd that connects everything together.

Anyway, this connection, as you know, is electrical in nature. And as you also know, electrical currents flow in three modes:
Dark current,
Glow current, and
Arcing current.

The intrinsic current that the Sun shares with the Earth is mostly in a continuous, dark current mode, from core to core. The Sun is constantly beaming (no pun intended) charged plasma into our planets core. It reacts with matter in our core to produce more, larger, and more complex elements.

Over time, these elements build up and the Earth grows. But like many other natural events, there is not a gradual change. Instead, a certain level of energy must be accumulated before the Earth quickly expands. Think boiling water or the changing of electrons from one orbital to the next or the action of enzymes (from a physics equation standpoint; do the math if you have the knowhow or textbook).

Anyway, for a short time before the "jump," strange signs can be witnessed, usually a greater than normal VIBRATION.

I'm not sure where that came from. Could have been a radio show, The Thunderbolts Project, or I could have just pulled it outta my ass. Who can tell these days?
Free Planet
User ID: 36077230
United Kingdom
03/13/2013 10:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
Could a certain sound frequency activate this reversal of matter polarity?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30890652


Oh, I love this comment, it brings to mind an excellent sound-derived cup-levitate dream I had once.

[link to mikephilbin.blogspot.co.uk]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35593749
United States
04/04/2013 05:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'
bump

News