Growing Earth and Electric Universe team up to Explain 'missing mass'

[link to www.bing.com]

The Earth gains and loses mass every year, loses ~95K tons of Hydrogen annually, gains ~ 40k tons of dust from space, etc.

I'm little to0 tired will come later, everything have electric form ..

Anyway probably you all know that Tesla find the way to use free Electricity from ionosphere and similar area ..

He was our neighbor and my father tell me great stories when I was a child about Tesla and work from him, from that time I've always been very interested in his work ..

Some interesting and new info ..

Thread: Van Allen Probes Reveal New Radiation Belt Around Earth

The way I "see" it is that the energy in our energy belts (fed by the sun) is translated into the earth at/by our poles. It keeps the core hot and quite likely adds mass to our earth. Solar ejections aside, we are continually bathed in this energy 24/7/forever.


This^^^

Except....the energy doesn't have to be transmitted to the core via the poles. A magnetic core, being places in a magnetic field, would cause the core to heat-up.

As the energy of the sun increases so does the ability to induce the core......I think.

Peace



I have read that core hole temperatures in Alaska show a rising temp 50-100 down. I also understand that the earth's Air temperature is decreasing. Conclusion: The core is getting hotter causing volcanic activity to increase and most likely increases the earthquakes.

Imo the "particles" that come from the Sun in CME's [and also from other Galactic Events] are ... NEUTRINO's !!

Imo they are responsible for a lot of things related to expanding Earth and activated particles in and around Earth's crust [and in us].
It is said that the flux of neutrino's NOW is bigger in quantity then ever before studied.
The Cherencov-radiation is the proof when they DID INTERACT with matter/particles, its like the [light-]shadow left behind as a witness.
Nuclear facilities have more Cherencov-events ... and we have a lottttttt of nuclear(powered) facilities ... so make the maths ...

Neutrino's are not the only aspect responsible for this expansion, ... there is more to it.

We more and more often look at planets and planetary systems and bodies and Galactic structures, as towards our own body ... and thats totally legit coz we are all the same fractal expression in different levels.
If child-body's can expand, so why couldnt Earth ?
If Galaxy's expand, so why could a planet not ?

Nothing in this Universe is STATIC ...
Everything is MOTION, shrinking and expansion, inhale exhale, growth and decay ...

Where does a baby gets its "missing mass" when it grows into adolescence ? And where does that "mass" go when we shrink into grumpy tiny old people or when we die ...

PLASMA is triggered to grow in quantity in expansion events...
and it is released in extraction-events...
inhale, exhale ...


Plasma increase and neutrino increase are interlinked, imo.


XXX MzK

This^^^

Except....the energy doesn't have to be transmitted to the core via the poles. A magnetic core, being places in a magnetic field, would cause the core to heat-up.

As the energy of the sun increases so does the ability to induce the core......I think.

Peace



I have read that core hole temperatures in Alaska show a rising temp 50-100 down. I also understand that the earth's Air temperature is decreasing. Conclusion: The core is getting hotter causing volcanic activity to increase and most likely increases the earthquakes.

The based that 2012 movie off that theory about the new particles speeding the core of our earth...

ROFLMAO ... did you see that picture of the White House ?!
I have the notion, that they are not something new ... we just started collecting the data (pic) recently

I am on the "expanding" Earth Theory, band wagon ... makes all the sense in the world to me ... plain and simple


[link to www.youtube.com]

but it doesn't explain how or what "triggers" our growth (now) and personally I don't think sink holes are being caused by CMEs ... but very much part of an expanding earth's theory

Last Edited by SunnyDaze on 03/04/2013 01:06 PM

During an intense solar event the magnetosphere and the radiation belts become somewhat irrelevant as the structures peel away and particles stream into the poles.

I gather from my E Univ and Plasma reading that in-between the sheathed layers of polarity (forget the term they use, like around a lightning bolt) plasma reaches a state where the electron transfer threshold lowers and 'matter is created'.

As most planets show convincing evidence of stretch marks and growth it is theorized that this plasma state may exist or be possible within planetary bodies right down to geode scale.

The nail in the coffin for me is how with a smaller historical planet, there would be less gravity. That would explain sooo much from dinosaur vascular issues, megalithic construction, giant-like branches of humanity dying off or leaving, human back/neck and birth problems, flightless birds and male nipples.

Ok the male nipples are still a mystery.

End transmission

There is another good theory about ancient earth not having as much gravity. I'll look it up.

Thread: Macro Spin Levels and the Relativistic Universe Model

SO...then follow me here..

If magnetism causes 'gravity', would it be possible that all matter on this planet has a certain 'charge' that keeps us attracted to the Earth? Like attracted magnets? AND.. is levitation possibly achieved by somehow reversing the state of one's charge, OR an objects charge, causing a sort of reverse-propulsion, like 2 same-charged magnets pushing against each other.

Could a certain sound frequency activate this reversal of matter polarity?

Hmmmm....

what about the micro...
this may be a dumb question but...
what regulates how fast electrons orbit around the nucleus of an atom....does it change, and does that effect the distance that electrons orbit from the nucleus...
is there a quantum entanglement effect affecting all orbiting (spinning) bodies equally....
are universal frequencies shifting gradually..

Great question/s. I do not really enjoy the numbers game. For some reason they do not stick in my mind like concepts.

men have nipples because we first develop into females in the uterus, then into male! eve came from adams rib eh? i think not... mwahahahah

Hi again SS. I think one basic part of the thinking on this is 'how' one views the planet.

As a chunk of rock and some organic matter whirling through space, or as a living, concious entity, part of a larger living system.

As above so below almost doesnt cut it in my mind, as to just how above, and just how below the whole notion of life and concious goes!! Infinate.

I believe that our world is living, and has conciousness, and that we (Humans) belong to that. We've been some what disconnected over the past few thousand years, but at a basic level, we still hang in there and are connected by our very make up, in dna, rna etc.

The resonance(s) of our world (nice previous thread SS) shape so much of what we are and can do, as individuals and as a collective.

Whether we measure a flux transfer between worlds, or at a micro photonic level between DNA, we are always in communication with the greater Universe, whether we chose to see it or not, whether we chose to measure it or not, or whether we try to make sense of these exchanges of information or not.

But, getting back to the notion of what a planet may actually be, from my perspective, - a living entity, filled with 8 billion little 'intent' entities, all linked, but at this point disconnected from each other, and the planet, we, both planet and Humans, have the ability to littertally create our reality, by changing energy in to matter.

I have no issues at all with a growing planet, to the point where planet and occupants become less material based, and take on the form of a gasseous giant.

But it's the ability to convert energy in to matter that I see as being the missing link that science wont accept, and that conciousness and intent are the tools with which this occurs.

At a planetary level, a concious so large, with so much intent behind it, acting at a very slow pace, compared to our short life experience blocks, can achieve this.

A baby doesnt grow directly proportionately to the amount of food it is fed. It grows faster or slower depending on the amount, but it grows none the less, and continues to grow.

I think the planet is the same, but rather than food, energy is the nourishment, as well as what we Humans dream up.

I hope that wasnt too woo woo. Its just a personal favourite of mine SS. We're discussing this on bezerk atm, or a branch of it, with relation to the Schumann resonances.

i wonder if the aliens have been buying us time from us furthing/acelerating the planets growth into oblivion, to get things finished so to speak

... and Osiris died and lost his weewee

I resemble that last remark.

(posting from an unbanned isp)

Energy is only CONVERTED.

If you have enough of an understanding of THAT CONCEPT, anything goes (astronomically).

Yeah, nice. Have no issues with the concept at all.

Great post Bad Hair. I think other older cultures had it way more accurate than we do/did. We have been taught to view the planet in mechanistic ways, when it is a live organic entity. It is a beautiful living system. Sometimes, we humans just can't recognize it because it is a 'life' more complex and much greater than us. The planet used to be revered because of that knowledge. Now, we view it as ours, instead of us being hers.

Love this post !
I experience it the same way.


:rainbow:

this is NOT what this thread's about, it's about a PLANET getting HAMMERED from interstellar sources and radius growth 45cm per year for the last 20 million years.

May happen in spurts, too i.e. we could be in a quiet zone as far as Growth goes.

:)

The way I always understood this theory was that the Sun and the Earth have an intrinsic connection.

The kind of connection that keeps us in a (relatively) stable orbit;
the kind that the Sun shares with all of its planets;
the kd that connects everything together.

Anyway, this connection, as you know, is electrical in nature. And as you also know, electrical currents flow in three modes:
Dark current,
Glow current, and
Arcing current.

The intrinsic current that the Sun shares with the Earth is mostly in a continuous, dark current mode, from core to core. The Sun is constantly beaming (no pun intended) charged plasma into our planets core. It reacts with matter in our core to produce more, larger, and more complex elements.

Over time, these elements build up and the Earth grows. But like many other natural events, there is not a gradual change. Instead, a certain level of energy must be accumulated before the Earth quickly expands. Think boiling water or the changing of electrons from one orbital to the next or the action of enzymes (from a physics equation standpoint; do the math if you have the knowhow or textbook).

Anyway, for a short time before the "jump," strange signs can be witnessed, usually a greater than normal VIBRATION.

I'm not sure where that came from. Could have been a radio show, The Thunderbolts Project, or I could have just pulled it outta my ass. Who can tell these days?

Oh, I love this comment, it brings to mind an excellent sound-derived cup-levitate dream I had once.

[link to mikephilbin.blogspot.co.uk]