Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,427 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,270,843
Pageviews Today: 3,067,319Threads Today: 654Posts Today: 12,620
09:11 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible

 
Propagandiated

User ID: 7365566
United States
03/08/2013 10:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
I don't know, the cops also said they had him proned out Fred, but we must have been hearing things.

Must have been an officer farting swamp gas that we heard...

Last Edited by Propagandiated on 03/08/2013 10:41 PM
Propagandiated
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5331384
Canada
03/08/2013 10:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35346045
United States
03/08/2013 10:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
This was already settled earlier in the thread.


- No one was claimed by LE to have been running from them.
- No witness saw ayone running from cops.
- The video does not! show anyone running from them.


The cops running means someone was running from them? No, thats a logical flaw. Cops running means theyre trying to get to where the man is located in a hurry.


Tell me again where exactly the video shows someone running from cops ...


There are only TWO kinds of people who claim the video shows someone running from cops - J-M conspiracy disinfo agents, and the naive foolish ones who fall for their disinfo.
Fred-S

User ID: 33015295
Switzerland
03/08/2013 11:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
...
The cops running means someone was running from them? No, thats a logical flaw. Cops running means theyre trying to get to where the man is located in a hurry.


...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35346045


so we agree. if they try.. it means they believed... maybe by mistake. But even if they were wrong, it doesnt means it doesnt existed.
Fred-S

User ID: 33015295
Switzerland
03/08/2013 11:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
- No one was claimed by LE to have been running from them.
...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35346045


and here... you are wrong, this is reference to the radio recording. and someone say clearly: they are coming at me!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1452946
Denmark
03/08/2013 11:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
045 is right. The video does not show man running from the police. Also audio is not correct as there was no audio for helicopter footage as I watching it live and there is footage of it on net without that audio.
Fred-S

User ID: 33015295
Switzerland
03/08/2013 11:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
045 is right. The video does not show man running from the police. Also audio is not correct as there was no audio for helicopter footage as I watching it live and there is footage of it on net without that audio.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1452946


nobody say: i see the man trying to escape from cops.
but if cops are running.. there is a purpose, no?


and with the same logic. nobody have seen dead bodies. so no victims at Sandy Hook.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35346045
United States
03/08/2013 11:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
"they are coming at me!"

yes, thats correct. That means they are coming through the woods towards the school and towards me(a cop saying that).

In other words, not running from them, but walking towards them.
Fred-S

User ID: 33015295
Switzerland
03/08/2013 11:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
"they are coming at me!"

yes, thats correct. That means they are coming through the woods towards the school and towards me(a cop saying that).

In other words, not running from them, but walking towards them.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35346045


who told you that the radio record was in same time that the run in the wood?

"they are coming at me!" is a lot earlier.

Finally, you just dont know well the evidences, this is why you are wrong.
Fred-S

User ID: 33015295
Switzerland
03/09/2013 12:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
"where is Gladio? why banned?"


...

This isnt just a place run by a guy who wants to make money from ads on a conspiracy theory forum.

...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35346045


maybe... but sometime weapons turn against their owner...
Fred-S

User ID: 33015295
Switzerland
03/09/2013 12:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
"they are coming at me!"

yes, thats correct. That means they are coming through the woods towards the school and towards me(a cop saying that).

In other words, not running from them, but walking towards them.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35346045


who told you that the radio record was in same time that the run in the wood?

"they are coming at me!" is a lot earlier.

Finally, you just dont know well the evidences, this is why you are wrong.
 Quoting: Fred-S


09:39AM: “Yeah, we got ‘em. Their coming at me. Gun point” (2)

[link to www.insanemedia.net]


do you really believe that helicopter was here at 9:39?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1721869
Australia
03/09/2013 04:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
This was already settled earlier in the thread.


- No one was claimed by LE to have been running from them.
- No witness saw ayone running from cops.
- The video does not! show anyone running from them.


The cops running means someone was running from them? No, thats a logical flaw. Cops running means theyre trying to get to where the man is located in a hurry.


Tell me again where exactly the video shows someone running from cops ...


There are only TWO kinds of people who claim the video shows someone running from cops - J-M conspiracy disinfo agents, and the naive foolish ones who fall for their disinfo.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35346045


i'm curious, are you saying that this event happened exactly as LE amade saying and the official story is true, or are you just saying there was no swat team member detained in the woods?

I like to keep an open mind about everything i research, and i'm firstly making it clear that this is not an attack on you, but you have shown no evidence to prove your statements, just wanting your words to be believed, as little evidence as anything else on sandy hook at this point.

no ones words are good enough at this point i'm afraid. and that is all you have offered your audience. you seem hell bent on this man in the woods subject, but no other important evidence in this case. how are you the only civilian with such inside knowledge?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35617189
United States
03/10/2013 10:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
The nurse, the 911 operators and all the cops and Feds know who was responsible for the shooting and it was not Adam Lanza. Have we seen an ounce of evidence against Lanza yet?

The 911 call operators are trained to get the details and you can bet that they did get the detailed ID of the shooter

Lanza is a total patsy.

I am amazed that these morons still think that they can keep the genie in the bottle. They need all the witnesses to lie or stfu. It aint gonna happen

Sally Cox clearly identified the shooter as the son of a experienced kindergarten teacher(UNEQUIVOCALLY). Another shooter was taken into custody and SWAT raided his house. And a SWAT guy was busted at the scene too.


This house of cards will fall
Gladio
User ID: 1089628
United States
03/10/2013 12:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
[link to godlikeproductions.com]
George
User ID: 24738433
United States
03/11/2013 04:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
They won't release crap until AFTER they have passed the legislation they want to. Who was the first to call for gun control after the incident? It is clearly politically motivated, otherwise, why no nationwide call for gun control after other shootings? Our guns, one of the last threats to "their" ultimate rule. Its coming down to it, fellows. The final chips are falling into place. We truly are living in what will be a pivotal time in human history. It could either go really bad, or really good. It depends on the citizens.


Because there are two kinds of people in this world: 1. the ruling class, 2. the rest, which are little more than livestock to the ruling class.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35945685
United States
03/11/2013 04:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
Cough... Newtown fire dept secretly houses nuclear missile silos and trucks... Cough.
Stickywicket

User ID: 33865391
03/13/2013 08:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
Wow - there is definitely something up with the Hockley residence.

An officer has just relieved a Redding officer assigned to 36 Yogananda. An encrypted officer asks her a question. The officer responds, slightly agitated, "They, uh...they're THERE...they're cooperating. There shouldn't be an issue here."

Cooperating? Cooperating with police who are allegedly assigned to make your life easier and fend off reporters, etc.?

Sounds to me from this exchange as if the Hockleys are under some kind of mild house arrest, have not been cooperating so far, and have at times snuck out. Put this in context of another call to the Hockleys house the next day, and it's really interesting (never mind the "Dylan" reference).
 Quoting: Zephyr 36089857


I thought 36 Yogananda is where Lanza lived.
Zephyr
User ID: 36089857
United States
03/13/2013 08:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
My apologies - yes, 36 Yogananda.

The 12/16 call was to 39 Yogananda.
Zephyr
User ID: 36089857
United States
03/13/2013 08:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
Really sorry for the Hockley mistake, here, guys.

So that begs the question as to who the officer is referring to when she says "they're there." Members of the Lanza family? Media?
Stickywicket

User ID: 33865391
03/13/2013 08:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
Really sorry for the Hockley mistake, here, guys.

So that begs the question as to who the officer is referring to when she says "they're there." Members of the Lanza family? Media?
 Quoting: Zephyr 36089857


Interesting.....but the chatter on the next day was about "Dylan"?
Zephyr
User ID: 36089857
United States
03/13/2013 08:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
There's a call to 39 Yogananda...some back and forths, and then an officer says something like, "Just to be clear, I'm looking for a 'Dylan?"

I'd better find the actual transcript though...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35233454
United States
03/13/2013 09:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9066073
United States
03/13/2013 09:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
HEY BEASTS: * STOP * clicking SANDY HOOK "news": ALL was already said

SANDY HOOK conspiracy was now FULLY exposed (1).
So only beasts will continue clicking SANDY HOOK articles to get the "latest news".
Reductionism: from STOP clicking discrepancy type of "news" (2) to STOP clicking ANYTHING about Sandy Hook.

Notes
(1) SANDY HOOK conspiracy was FULLY exposed worldwide first by MattMarriott
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
 Quoting: THE SIMPLE TRUTH 35552265


THIS!

applause2

MATT MARRIOTT = EXPOSED "NO PLANES" on 9/11 FIRST AS WELL!!

applause2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35851256
Korea, Republic of
03/13/2013 09:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
HEY BEASTS: * STOP * clicking SANDY HOOK "news": ALL was already said

SANDY HOOK conspiracy was now FULLY exposed (1).
So only beasts will continue clicking SANDY HOOK articles to get the "latest news".
Reductionism: from STOP clicking discrepancy type of "news" (2) to STOP clicking ANYTHING about Sandy Hook.

Notes
(1) SANDY HOOK conspiracy was FULLY exposed worldwide first by MattMarriott
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
 Quoting: THE SIMPLE TRUTH 35552265


THIS!

applause2

MATT MARRIOTT = EXPOSED "NO PLANES" on 9/11 FIRST AS WELL!!

applause2
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9066073


/\look, another low-numbered disinfo shill

A lot of the black propaganda disinformation shills have low-numbered ID #'s


9/11 'no planes' and Sandy Hook hoax both = black propaganda disinformation campaigns by the Jew-Masonic clowns
To shill or not to shill

User ID: 36098642
United States
03/13/2013 10:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
bump
Zephyr
User ID: 36089857
United States
03/13/2013 10:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
It would be interesting to brainstorm on reasons for sealing the records.

1) Records reflect negatively on individual LE/EMS/school staff/public officials' actions, opening them to endless criminal or certainly civil litigation

2) Records reveal names of additional suspects

3) Records reveal call actually came in much earlier, and LE response time was slow

4) Records reveal multiple shooters, thus weakening Sandy Hook as an anti-semi-automatic rifle story

5) Records reveal use of illegally-modified, full-auto weapon, thus weakening Sandy Hook as an anti-semi-automatic rifle story

6) Records reveal Sandy Hook was a kidnapping, the revelation itself of which is against the kidnappers' demands

7) Records reveal identity of real killer, possibly a relative of LE, state officials, or high-finance mucky-mucks.

8) Records reveal something we don't even know we don't know yet (thanks, Rumsfeld)

9) ...?
Stickywicket

User ID: 33865391
03/13/2013 10:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
It would be interesting to brainstorm on reasons for sealing the records.

1) Records reflect negatively on individual LE/EMS/school staff/public officials' actions, opening them to endless criminal or certainly civil litigation

2) Records reveal names of additional suspects

3) Records reveal call actually came in much earlier, and LE response time was slow

4) Records reveal multiple shooters, thus weakening Sandy Hook as an anti-semi-automatic rifle story

5) Records reveal use of illegally-modified, full-auto weapon, thus weakening Sandy Hook as an anti-semi-automatic rifle story

6) Records reveal Sandy Hook was a kidnapping, the revelation itself of which is against the kidnappers' demands

7) Records reveal identity of real killer, possibly a relative of LE, state officials, or high-finance mucky-mucks.

8) Records reveal something we don't even know we don't know yet (thanks, Rumsfeld)

9) ...?
 Quoting: Zephyr 36089857


I really got to get up to speed on those police scanner recordings of the days after.

How do I go about getting them again?

And what would be the biggest surprised you've gleaned from them?
Zephyr
User ID: 36089857
United States
03/13/2013 10:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
Police audio:

bit DOT ly SLASH YwwBsE

The biggest surprise so far was discovering that someone at St. Rose was the ongoing, "intended target" of shooting on 12/14 and continued to be an intended target 12/16 when the church was evacuated for what was called a bomb threat in the media, but in the police audio is clearing a threat of "continued shooting."

The second biggest surprise was, while St. Rose was being evacuated, hearing the call to the Hockley residence looking for a "Dylan" who possibly wanted to hurt himself.

The third biggest surprise was discovering three families on Great Ring Rd who have individual officers assigned to them--as far as I know, this will bring new names into the "victim" list.

The fourth biggest surprise was discovering that after a threat was made against Head O' Meadow school 12/18, a call went out to transport/attend to two female adult patients in that school, and then the school was closed (closed that day - unsure when/if Head O'Meadow re-opened).
Stickywicket

User ID: 33865391
03/13/2013 10:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
Police audio:

bit DOT ly SLASH YwwBsE

The biggest surprise so far was discovering that someone at St. Rose was the ongoing, "intended target" of shooting on 12/14 and continued to be an intended target 12/16 when the church was evacuated for what was called a bomb threat in the media, but in the police audio is clearing a threat of "continued shooting."

The second biggest surprise was, while St. Rose was being evacuated, hearing the call to the Hockley residence looking for a "Dylan" who possibly wanted to hurt himself.

The third biggest surprise was discovering three families on Great Ring Rd who have individual officers assigned to them--as far as I know, this will bring new names into the "victim" list.

The fourth biggest surprise was discovering that after a threat was made against Head O' Meadow school 12/18, a call went out to transport/attend to two female adult patients in that school, and then the school was closed (closed that day - unsure when/if Head O'Meadow re-opened).
 Quoting: Zephyr 36089857


Thanks for the info. I'm going to try to get myself up to speed.
Zephyr
User ID: 36089857
United States
03/13/2013 10:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible
There's a LOT to go through. 12/16 is a really big day, but in fairness I haven't listened to hardly any of 12/15 yet, so that could be very active as well.

I'm concentrating on 12/14 and subsequent days, but after that will need to review the days leading up to 12/14 to see if anything's hinky.

Really worth the time, though. I encourage everyone to listen, and to subscribe to RadioReference for those who feel like it--I'm really grateful for their service, and it costs next to nothing.

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!