SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible

I'm saying it's a better place to discuss the topic, not that it can do anything. In my experience with this topic on conspiracy forums, there are only a select few interested in the topic, there are far more people on YT discussing it than here. In my opinion anyway.

prob for asking the wrong questions

correction:

'probably for asking the right questions'

youtube? a talking place?
since when?
youtube is video hosting...


And we talk about Gladio. really there is not much members here who talk about Sandy Hook honestly. with references and sources... asking question...

and if he is banned, how much "less" visible were banned?

so, i tell to everybody. if you get banned, use proxy and be twice more active... they will unban you!

Yes, in the comments and via private message. I just saw new photos of Peter Lanza that until today, I had never seen before...sent via private message on YT. I'm just saying,there aren't many people on these forums who are even open to this topic anymore. I also don't trust the forums themselves when it comes to this topic. To each his own though.

AC 6045, you aren't fooling anyone, so STFU.

Gladio and Fred, please keep up the good work. There are still those of us out here who appreciate logic, evidence and truth. Rock on!

Last Edited by AwakeDreamer on 03/08/2013 08:50 PM

how do you know?

and i would say... it's easy, if you ban them...

oh... thanks!

wanna be my friend?

"AC 6045, you aren't fooling anyone, so STFU."


Im not trying to fool anyone. Who are you trying to fool?

Do you approve of intentional disinformation? Like that when someone makes a video of police running into the words, and intentionally dubs into that video some deceptive audio sequence that makes it sound like someone is running from them? yeah thats intentional disinfo. Do you approve of that?

Why haven't you answered the question: How do you have firsthand knowledge of "graphic evidence"? In what context did you see this evidence? If you want people to trust your word, why aren't you backing up what you're claiming? How are you not spreading disinformation by claiming to have seen "graphic evidence," and then offering no proof of this? We don't expect to see the evidence, but why not at least explain when, where, why you saw it? Otherwise, it's really just a baseless claim.

What massacre? I didn't see a massacre.

In fact, I haven't seen a single person willing to say that they have.

HERE COME THE DISINFO AGENTS!

'No shooting at Sandy Hook!'


'No planes on 9/11'

I am not here to provide evidence to you or anyone else AG. Thats not my purpose and I couldnt care less about providing any.


I am here to show what 'evidence' is false. ie. what is disinformation.

It appears that YOU have a problem with me doing that and are trying to turn it around on me. That means that you have a problem with someone exposing a lie, and not a problem with someone who is bringing evidence, because im not bringing evidence.


Do you claim that someone was running from police at Sandy Hook?[/b]


Because that has been shown to be clearly unsubstantiated, and to have been clearly misrepresented.

Do you have a problem with that?

good question..why are you here?

on around 99% of internet places, you will find people thinking like you...



ps: Gladio, where are you?

you are the first to mix the subject...

this is not disinformation to say: we havent see any drop of blood at Sandy Hook.

Actually, you should stop jumping to conclusions. I have NO problem with someone pointing out things that are inaccurate, I never have. I am not looking to "solve" this case. I want the truth. I want to know what happened because I don't believe it happened exactly as we've been told. Nothing more, nothing less. I don't care to be "right," none of my interest in this is guided by my ego. If I've come to the wrong conclusion about something, I have no problem with someone pointing that out. Honestly, I have no clue what you're even talking about. The topic of this thread was the 911 calls. I posted (either in here or another thread like this one), that I don't believe these calls will be released. If someone manipulated a video to misrepresent something, then of course, I'd pay it no attention. And no, I don't "approve" of people doing that kind of thing; it doesn't help our cause at all, and people who do that aren't on the search for truth, imo.

The problem I have is why would you even throw out there that you've seen graphic evidence then? What does that have to do with anything you're posting about? I don't understand your motivation behind posting that comment, especially if you're not even going to bother to clarify how you came into contact with the evidence. That's my problem. It seems completely irrelevant to what you're claiming to be here doing. So I'm asking you why you put it out there at all?

I had the decency to respond to your questions, hopefully you'll do the same.

Oh yeah AG, you also attacked me in the Sandy Hook law enforcement / EMS thread where disinformation was being passed that LE and EMS didnt follow protocol.

When I was the first one correctly showing that was plainly false with the correct info, you attacked me there as well.



Intentional disinformation is extraordinarily harmful and I will continue to expose it.

how you could feel attacked, you are "anonymous" here...

The fact that you avoid answering any questions proves exactly what I thought all along. I did not "attack" you. As soon as someone questions you or asks you to justify your claims you cry "attack" Grow up.

You're not exposing anything. All you're doing is "intentionally" avoiding any questions asked of you.

@045 I didn't see a shooting.
Can I not say this?
Can you show us evidence of a shooting?
No.

Who said I or any other person is obligated to listen to Lt Vance or any other man in uniform sans corroborating evidence?

So, still a Hoax.

You are not psychologically strong enough to have "seen" any evidence. You are either a 15 year old kid or a typical idiotic government shill who couldn't even get a job at McDonald's.

Im not exposing anything?

On top of many things Ive exposed, Im also exposing you as someone who supports disinformation and dislikes anyone who exposes it for being false.


- Claim was made man was running from police at sandy Hook. There is absolutely no sign of anyone running from police, despite disinfo claims there was.


- Claims were made that EMS and LE did not follow protocol at Sandy Hook. I showed that protocol was followed. LE crime scene management protocol precedes EMS mass casualty protocol, and that sequence was followed at Sandy Hook.


Both of these you had a problem with and attacked me directly instead of the issue at hand. Both of these you refused to acknowledge the claims were false in any way.

Got it! Thanks. Investigations are to make people look like fools. Whodathunkit.

Camera footage does not even get mentioned in the media these days. But when cops do crazy stuff on film, guest what? found innocent :)

@045 First response protocol = Casualty collection point without treatment to casualties? Bull.

You expect me or anyone else to take you seriously - Or to be guilt tripped into feeling bad about families who are not only now made rich, but chose to enter the national spotlight? Pffft!!

Tard.

Prove it. My post a few posts above proves the exact opposite of what you just posted. You've just proved yourself to be a liar. Thanks. :)

Again, lets hear that single 911 call, where is it...

Where is that final report on Sandy Hook? Damage control taking up too much of their resources? Scared that they can't hold the illusion of the hoax much longer?

[link to www.youtube.com]

i dont understand? cops are running, no?
maybe they fake to run after someone?

but if they fake, why?