SANDY HOOK 911 Calls will prove without a doubt who is responsible

I don't know, the cops also said they had him proned out Fred, but we must have been hearing things.

Must have been an officer farting swamp gas that we heard...

Last Edited by Propagandiated on 03/08/2013 10:41 PM

This was already settled earlier in the thread.


- No one was claimed by LE to have been running from them.
- No witness saw ayone running from cops.
- The video does not! show anyone running from them.


The cops running means someone was running from them? No, thats a logical flaw. Cops running means theyre trying to get to where the man is located in a hurry.


Tell me again where exactly the video shows someone running from cops ...


There are only TWO kinds of people who claim the video shows someone running from cops - J-M conspiracy disinfo agents, and the naive foolish ones who fall for their disinfo.

so we agree. if they try.. it means they believed... maybe by mistake. But even if they were wrong, it doesnt means it doesnt existed.

and here... you are wrong, this is reference to the radio recording. and someone say clearly: they are coming at me!

045 is right. The video does not show man running from the police. Also audio is not correct as there was no audio for helicopter footage as I watching it live and there is footage of it on net without that audio.

nobody say: i see the man trying to escape from cops.
but if cops are running.. there is a purpose, no?


and with the same logic. nobody have seen dead bodies. so no victims at Sandy Hook.

"they are coming at me!"

yes, thats correct. That means they are coming through the woods towards the school and towards me(a cop saying that).

In other words, not running from them, but walking towards them.

who told you that the radio record was in same time that the run in the wood?

"they are coming at me!" is a lot earlier.

Finally, you just dont know well the evidences, this is why you are wrong.

maybe... but sometime weapons turn against their owner...

09:39AM: “Yeah, we got ‘em. Their coming at me. Gun point” (2)

[link to www.insanemedia.net]


do you really believe that helicopter was here at 9:39?

i'm curious, are you saying that this event happened exactly as LE amade saying and the official story is true, or are you just saying there was no swat team member detained in the woods?

I like to keep an open mind about everything i research, and i'm firstly making it clear that this is not an attack on you, but you have shown no evidence to prove your statements, just wanting your words to be believed, as little evidence as anything else on sandy hook at this point.

no ones words are good enough at this point i'm afraid. and that is all you have offered your audience. you seem hell bent on this man in the woods subject, but no other important evidence in this case. how are you the only civilian with such inside knowledge?

The nurse, the 911 operators and all the cops and Feds know who was responsible for the shooting and it was not Adam Lanza. Have we seen an ounce of evidence against Lanza yet?

The 911 call operators are trained to get the details and you can bet that they did get the detailed ID of the shooter

Lanza is a total patsy.

I am amazed that these morons still think that they can keep the genie in the bottle. They need all the witnesses to lie or stfu. It aint gonna happen

Sally Cox clearly identified the shooter as the son of a experienced kindergarten teacher(UNEQUIVOCALLY). Another shooter was taken into custody and SWAT raided his house. And a SWAT guy was busted at the scene too.


This house of cards will fall

[link to godlikeproductions.com]

They won't release crap until AFTER they have passed the legislation they want to. Who was the first to call for gun control after the incident? It is clearly politically motivated, otherwise, why no nationwide call for gun control after other shootings? Our guns, one of the last threats to "their" ultimate rule. Its coming down to it, fellows. The final chips are falling into place. We truly are living in what will be a pivotal time in human history. It could either go really bad, or really good. It depends on the citizens.


Because there are two kinds of people in this world: 1. the ruling class, 2. the rest, which are little more than livestock to the ruling class.

Cough... Newtown fire dept secretly houses nuclear missile silos and trucks... Cough.

I thought 36 Yogananda is where Lanza lived.

My apologies - yes, 36 Yogananda.

The 12/16 call was to 39 Yogananda.

Really sorry for the Hockley mistake, here, guys.

So that begs the question as to who the officer is referring to when she says "they're there." Members of the Lanza family? Media?

Interesting.....but the chatter on the next day was about "Dylan"?

There's a call to 39 Yogananda...some back and forths, and then an officer says something like, "Just to be clear, I'm looking for a 'Dylan?"

I'd better find the actual transcript though...

THIS!



MATT MARRIOTT = EXPOSED "NO PLANES" on 9/11 FIRST AS WELL!!

/\look, another low-numbered disinfo shill

A lot of the black propaganda disinformation shills have low-numbered ID #'s


9/11 'no planes' and Sandy Hook hoax both = black propaganda disinformation campaigns by the Jew-Masonic clowns

It would be interesting to brainstorm on reasons for sealing the records.

1) Records reflect negatively on individual LE/EMS/school staff/public officials' actions, opening them to endless criminal or certainly civil litigation

2) Records reveal names of additional suspects

3) Records reveal call actually came in much earlier, and LE response time was slow

4) Records reveal multiple shooters, thus weakening Sandy Hook as an anti-semi-automatic rifle story

5) Records reveal use of illegally-modified, full-auto weapon, thus weakening Sandy Hook as an anti-semi-automatic rifle story

6) Records reveal Sandy Hook was a kidnapping, the revelation itself of which is against the kidnappers' demands

7) Records reveal identity of real killer, possibly a relative of LE, state officials, or high-finance mucky-mucks.

8) Records reveal something we don't even know we don't know yet (thanks, Rumsfeld)

9) ...?

I really got to get up to speed on those police scanner recordings of the days after.

How do I go about getting them again?

And what would be the biggest surprised you've gleaned from them?

Police audio:

bit DOT ly SLASH YwwBsE

The biggest surprise so far was discovering that someone at St. Rose was the ongoing, "intended target" of shooting on 12/14 and continued to be an intended target 12/16 when the church was evacuated for what was called a bomb threat in the media, but in the police audio is clearing a threat of "continued shooting."

The second biggest surprise was, while St. Rose was being evacuated, hearing the call to the Hockley residence looking for a "Dylan" who possibly wanted to hurt himself.

The third biggest surprise was discovering three families on Great Ring Rd who have individual officers assigned to them--as far as I know, this will bring new names into the "victim" list.

The fourth biggest surprise was discovering that after a threat was made against Head O' Meadow school 12/18, a call went out to transport/attend to two female adult patients in that school, and then the school was closed (closed that day - unsure when/if Head O'Meadow re-opened).

Thanks for the info. I'm going to try to get myself up to speed.

There's a LOT to go through. 12/16 is a really big day, but in fairness I haven't listened to hardly any of 12/15 yet, so that could be very active as well.

I'm concentrating on 12/14 and subsequent days, but after that will need to review the days leading up to 12/14 to see if anything's hinky.

Really worth the time, though. I encourage everyone to listen, and to subscribe to RadioReference for those who feel like it--I'm really grateful for their service, and it costs next to nothing.