Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 21291600 United States 03/09/2013 12:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
sauron User ID: 35818634 United States 03/09/2013 12:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint The wizard of Oz is actually based on an old book. This new movie is just a bastardized version of the old one. You're not going to become a mind-controlled assassin for the CIA if you watch it, and Lucifer is just a literary character from the bronze age. Your medication: Take it. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 21291600 United States 03/09/2013 12:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint The wizard of Oz is actually based on an old book. This new movie is just a bastardized version of the old one. Quoting: sauron 35818634 You're not going to become a mind-controlled assassin for the CIA if you watch it, and Lucifer is just a literary character from the bronze age. Your medication: Take it. wow, you really think you brought me new info? you have to be kidding... bite my ass, noob |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 21291600 United States 03/09/2013 12:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint the porcelain doll character in Oz is portrayed as a fair child, very fragile, and without a father... her legs are fractured rendering her helpless. looks much like the Alice character in I Pet Goat Thread: I, Pet Goat II by Heliofant reveals emergence of the anti-christ on the heels of several false flag events Thread: Is this a newly acquired Illuminati MKUltra handler? This is who's singing to your kids... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9393008 United States 03/09/2013 12:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 773685 Canada 03/09/2013 12:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 21291600 United States 03/09/2013 01:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1141892 United States 03/09/2013 01:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint That Aiwaz drawing was drawn by Aleister Crowley, was it not? It was eithed him or someone equal in reputation. Cant remember. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 773685 You people ... Just Shakes Head Back & Forth ... Those images are of LAM. Aiwass is something completely different, and is the Planetary Spirit Soul Body Guardian; as in ''Ayahuasca''. [link to farm8.staticflickr.com] [link to farm8.staticflickr.com] Your Lucifer is here: [link to en.wikipedia.org] Guess this is what to be expected, with so much focus on ''FREE DUMB'' ... |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 21291600 United States 03/09/2013 01:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint That Aiwaz drawing was drawn by Aleister Crowley, was it not? It was eithed him or someone equal in reputation. Cant remember. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 773685 You people ... Just Shakes Head Back & Forth ... Those images are of LAM. Aiwass is something completely different, and is the Planetary Spirit Soul Body Guardian; as in ''Ayahuasca''. [link to farm8.staticflickr.com] [link to farm8.staticflickr.com] Your Lucifer is here: [link to en.wikipedia.org] Guess this is what to be expected, with so much focus on ''FREE DUMB'' ... thanks, but you fail to realize that LAM is a type of entity, not the name of one particular entity. do your homework and come back and share what you've learned. Aiwazz or Aiwass was of the LAM variety of entities. The Lam cults are an interesting study. They reveal themselves to be the luciferian gnostics, with the LAMs as vessels for such knowledge |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 21291600 United States 03/09/2013 01:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint That Aiwaz drawing was drawn by Aleister Crowley, was it not? It was eithed him or someone equal in reputation. Cant remember. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 773685 You people ... Just Shakes Head Back & Forth ... Those images are of LAM. Aiwass is something completely different, and is the Planetary Spirit Soul Body Guardian; as in ''Ayahuasca''. [link to farm8.staticflickr.com] [link to farm8.staticflickr.com] Your Lucifer is here: [link to en.wikipedia.org] Guess this is what to be expected, with so much focus on ''FREE DUMB'' ... thanks, but you fail to realize that LAM is a type of entity, not the name of one particular entity. do your homework and come back and share what you've learned. Aiwazz or Aiwass was of the LAM variety of entities. The Lam cults are an interesting study. They reveal themselves to be the luciferian gnostic, with the LAMs as vessels for such knowledge i will have to dig for some sources for you but a quick google search brings this up Who is Lam?: It is interesting to note that since Crowley's time, in occult terms at least, Lam is considered a class of entity rather than an individual being. When one invokes Lam, they are invoking an entity of that type, rather than a specific being. For occultists operating along O.T.O. lines, the idea is to invoke these Lam entities through Magickal Portals (intentionally created rents in time and space) into physical manifestation on planet earth. Why this is desirable is not always so clearly stated. (It often appears that within Crowleyian circles the working rule is often: "If Crowley did it, I want to do it, too.") Michael Bertiaux, a Lam contactee and invoker of note, viewed Lam as the "subterranean burgeoning of Lucifer-Gnosis." Considering that Gnosis means an intuitive knowing, this would mean that knowing Lam is to know a welling-up from the unconscious of an inner knowing of Lucifer. (The Occult being the occult, it is important to bear in mind that occultists at least may not necessarily see Lucifer as the devil, but rather as a "light bringer" who fell to earth.) Bertiaux goes on to say that Lam is the natural mode of human evolution in the present Aeon - indicating that to him and his followers this Lucifer-Gnosis is the appropriate path of human spiritual growth at this time. Crowley termed the intentional cultivation of spiritual growth the "Great Work." And the Great work for Crowley, "...involved precisely the establishment of contact with non-human intelligences." Intelligences such as Lam. Using the language of Crowley's time, certain non-human intelligences such as Lam were what we today would term "extraterrestrial." A Portal Opened: It is generally agreed within occult circles that Crowley intentionally opened a portal of entry via magick ritual in the Amalantrah Workings which allowed the likes of Lam and other similar entities a passageway onto the earth-world. The rift "in-between the spaces of the stars," created by the Amalantrah Working, created a gateway through which Lam and other extra-cosmic influences could enter the known universe, and most particularly, our earth-world. According to occultists involved in such things, the Portal has since widened. [link to groups.google.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13718874 Netherlands 03/09/2013 01:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 21291600 United States 03/09/2013 01:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint That Aiwaz drawing was drawn by Aleister Crowley, was it not? It was eithed him or someone equal in reputation. Cant remember. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 773685 You people ... Just Shakes Head Back & Forth ... Those images are of LAM. Aiwass is something completely different, and is the Planetary Spirit Soul Body Guardian; as in ''Ayahuasca''. [link to farm8.staticflickr.com] [link to farm8.staticflickr.com] Your Lucifer is here: [link to en.wikipedia.org] Guess this is what to be expected, with so much focus on ''FREE DUMB'' ... thanks, but you fail to realize that LAM is a type of entity, not the name of one particular entity. do your homework and come back and share what you've learned. Aiwazz or Aiwass was of the LAM variety of entities. The Lam cults are an interesting study. They reveal themselves to be the luciferian gnostics, with the LAMs as vessels for such knowledge and now that you see your mistake, i accept your apology |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28912132 United States 03/09/2013 01:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 961432 United States 03/09/2013 01:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint The wizard of Oz is actually based on an old book. This new movie is just a bastardized version of the old one. Quoting: sauron 35818634 You're not going to become a mind-controlled assassin for the CIA if you watch it, and Lucifer is just a literary character from the bronze age. Your medication: Take it. The original Oz was an allegory on paper money. The man behind the curtain represented the monopolies that create money from nothing. The original movie script had Dorothy wearing silver slippers as a symbol that silver was the path to economic freedom. They changed it to ruby slippers in the bastardization of the whole point of the movie. . |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 21291600 United States 03/09/2013 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 21291600 United States 03/09/2013 01:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint The wizard of Oz is actually based on an old book. This new movie is just a bastardized version of the old one. Quoting: sauron 35818634 You're not going to become a mind-controlled assassin for the CIA if you watch it, and Lucifer is just a literary character from the bronze age. Your medication: Take it. The original Oz was an allegory on paper money. The man behind the curtain represented the monopolies that create money from nothing. The original movie script had Dorothy wearing silver slippers as a symbol that silver was the path to economic freedom. They changed it to ruby slippers in the bastardization of the whole point of the movie. . yes, there were no ruby slippers in the book but there is a huge connection to the emerald, the ruby and other precious gems in the book/movie and the luciferian cult Thus says the Lord GOD: You were the signet of perfection, full of wisdom and perfect in beauty. You were in Eden, the garden of God ((Oz?)); every precious stone was your covering, carnelian, chrysolite, and moonstone, beryl, onyx, and jasper, sapphire, turquoise, and emerald; and worked in gold were your settings and your engravings. On the day that you were created they were prepared. With an anointed cherub as guardian I placed you; you were on the holy mountain of God; you walked among the stones of fire. You were blameless in your ways from the day that you were created, until iniquity was found in you. In the abundance of your trade you were filled with violence, and you sinned; so I cast you as a profane thing from the mountain of God, and the guardian cherub drove you out from among the stones of fire. Your heart was proud because of your beauty; you corrupted your wisdom for the sake of your splendor. I cast you to the ground; I exposed you before kings, to feast their eyes on you. By the multitude of your iniquities, in the unrighteousness of your trade, you profaned your sanctuaries. So I brought out fire from within you; it consumed you, and I turned you to ashes on the earth in the sight of all who saw you. All who know you among the peoples are appalled at you; you have come to a dreadful end and shall be no more forever" (Ezekiel 28:11-19, NIV). |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 961432 United States 03/09/2013 01:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint The wizard of Oz is actually based on an old book. This new movie is just a bastardized version of the old one. Quoting: sauron 35818634 You're not going to become a mind-controlled assassin for the CIA if you watch it, and Lucifer is just a literary character from the bronze age. Your medication: Take it. The original Oz was an allegory on paper money. The man behind the curtain represented the monopolies that create money from nothing. The original movie script had Dorothy wearing silver slippers as a symbol that silver was the path to economic freedom. They changed it to ruby slippers in the bastardization of the whole point of the movie. . yes, there were no ruby slippers in the book but there is a huge connection to the emerald, the ruby and other precious gems in the book/movie and the luciferian cult Thus says the Lord GOD: You were the signet of perfection, full of wisdom and perfect in beauty. You were in Eden, the garden of God ((Oz?)); every precious stone was your covering, carnelian, chrysolite, and moonstone, beryl, onyx, and jasper, sapphire, turquoise, and emerald; and worked in gold were your settings and your engravings. On the day that you were created they were prepared. With an anointed cherub as guardian I placed you; you were on the holy mountain of God; you walked among the stones of fire. You were blameless in your ways from the day that you were created, until iniquity was found in you. In the abundance of your trade you were filled with violence, and you sinned; so I cast you as a profane thing from the mountain of God, and the guardian cherub drove you out from among the stones of fire. Your heart was proud because of your beauty; you corrupted your wisdom for the sake of your splendor. I cast you to the ground; I exposed you before kings, to feast their eyes on you. By the multitude of your iniquities, in the unrighteousness of your trade, you profaned your sanctuaries. So I brought out fire from within you; it consumed you, and I turned you to ashes on the earth in the sight of all who saw you. All who know you among the peoples are appalled at you; you have come to a dreadful end and shall be no more forever" (Ezekiel 28:11-19, NIV). Ok so the luciferians use paper money to enslave us all. I think most of us here can agree on that. . |
M.A.G.E User ID: 12655659 United States 03/09/2013 01:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Redfan45x User ID: 3196156 United States 03/09/2013 01:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint Are you kidding me? Some of you people on here I swear... Do you ever leave your tin foil wrapped basement? Let the Dragon ride again on the winds of time Devour the world and create it new |
dirtstashe User ID: 35780391 United States 03/09/2013 01:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sir France's Beercan User ID: 1245590 Austria 03/09/2013 01:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint I've read H.P. Blavatsky's 'the secret doctrine' l and ll which are the basis of the Theosophical fraternity. I actually thought they were pretty cool and a lot of it made sense to me. Does that make me a satanist? |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 21291600 United States 03/09/2013 01:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 21291600 United States 03/09/2013 01:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint I've read H.P. Blavatsky's 'the secret doctrine' l and ll which are the basis of the Theosophical fraternity. I actually thought they were pretty cool and a lot of it made sense to me. Does that make me a satanist? Quoting: Sir France's Beercan considering that their philosophy is satanic in origin, it might not make you a satanist if you like it, but it will if you follow it |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 961432 United States 03/09/2013 01:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint I've read H.P. Blavatsky's 'the secret doctrine' l and ll which are the basis of the Theosophical fraternity. I actually thought they were pretty cool and a lot of it made sense to me. Does that make me a satanist? Quoting: Sir France's Beercan Probably means you have no discernible grid from which to filter out the negative material. You put a nasty brick in your brain, might take a sledge hammer to dislodge it. . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35574473 United States 03/09/2013 02:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
dirtstashe User ID: 35780391 United States 03/09/2013 02:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint I've read H.P. Blavatsky's 'the secret doctrine' l and ll which are the basis of the Theosophical fraternity. I actually thought they were pretty cool and a lot of it made sense to me. Does that make me a satanist? Quoting: Sir France's Beercan Yes. (nah, Im just kidding) I agree....those books were pretty awesome. That woman sure was dialed into some pretty interesting stuff. |
Sir France's Beercan User ID: 1245590 Austria 03/09/2013 02:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint I've read H.P. Blavatsky's 'the secret doctrine' l and ll which are the basis of the Theosophical fraternity. I actually thought they were pretty cool and a lot of it made sense to me. Does that make me a satanist? Quoting: Sir France's Beercan considering that their philosophy is satanic in origin, it might not make you a satanist if you like it, but it will if you follow it O. So just to clarify 'the logos' is Satan? |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 21291600 United States 03/09/2013 02:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint I've read H.P. Blavatsky's 'the secret doctrine' l and ll which are the basis of the Theosophical fraternity. I actually thought they were pretty cool and a lot of it made sense to me. Does that make me a satanist? Quoting: Sir France's Beercan considering that their philosophy is satanic in origin, it might not make you a satanist if you like it, but it will if you follow it O. So just to clarify 'the logos' is Satan? in reference to what? in scripture it is Jesus |
Sir France's Beercan User ID: 1245590 Austria 03/09/2013 02:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint I've read H.P. Blavatsky's 'the secret doctrine' l and ll which are the basis of the Theosophical fraternity. I actually thought they were pretty cool and a lot of it made sense to me. Does that make me a satanist? Quoting: Sir France's Beercan Probably means you have no discernible grid from which to filter out the negative material. You put a nasty brick in your brain, might take a sledge hammer to dislodge it. . I said it was pretty cool, not unfiltered ;-) |
Sir France's Beercan User ID: 1245590 Austria 03/09/2013 02:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Oz - a standard Illuminati production and the start of a new franchise - but, mostly it's the Diary of Lucifer from Luciferian standpoint I've read H.P. Blavatsky's 'the secret doctrine' l and ll which are the basis of the Theosophical fraternity. I actually thought they were pretty cool and a lot of it made sense to me. Does that make me a satanist? Quoting: Sir France's Beercan considering that their philosophy is satanic in origin, it might not make you a satanist if you like it, but it will if you follow it O. So just to clarify 'the logos' is Satan? in reference to what? in scripture it is Jesus Ok now I'm confused. The principles of theosophy talk about the logos as the life giver as it were (?). Bear with me as it was years ago I read them. Who does the logos represent and which figure in the Theosophical teachings is the satanic element? |