Sandy Hook shooting PREDICTED in 2010

Kathaksung hasn't stopped posting on the internet. He hasn't disappeared. Why are you making things up? Where is your evidence that he disappeared? Because his account was blocked on a site or two? He posts EVERYWHERE. In fact, he posted on the Beyond Politics message board today.

[link to www.beyondpoliticsand911.com]

Use Google - you will find that he never went anywhere, and his postings are as wide spread and erratic as they have ever been.


The poster had at least 10 years of steady prolific posting until then.
..they only surfaced recently in the last couple months to warn of a nuclear false flag in march...


Wrong. Kathaksung has had over thirteen years of steady, prolific posting. He didn't stop between 2010 and now, nor did he only resurface to warn of a nuclear false flag. He has continued to post with no interruptions.

PROVE that he stopped posting.

Also, I DARE you to find any other place on the internet where kathaksung posted an identical message to the December 2010 message in question. After, of course, you confirm that he does indeed post the same warnings multiple times, multiple places.

Just stop..


You are only helping to prove the point and really making yourselves look more foolish the further we go.

The very fact you are defending this to the death and have not actually thoroughly read this thread, because obviously you personally do do not care, because you are only doing you job is quite obvious and surely sickening to many who read this.

In fact the further we go and harder we push the easier it becomes to see the truth.

It's like those treasonous "news" people currently propagating the abolishment of the 2nd amendment. ..lol we can have guns, just not equal guns..

You are causing harm to humanity, unwittingly... The time to choose sides is at hand.

Who's side are you on,

The people?? Or the powers that be???

..incidentally, yes blah blah blah he stopped posting everywhere on the web, until recently, when the poster resurfaced in the last couple months TO WARN OF A NUCLEAR FALSE FLAG IN MARCH...

Yes we know they've been around since sandy hook.... but disappeared for a couple years entirely from the web and anyone who's tried a search whole heartedly knows im right..... and thank you!!!!

Please, pretty please prove me wrong!!!

So that we can both be ok with your having a job inadvertently(or intentionally) spreading dis information for the Obama regime and n.w.o. and go back to eating twinkies and theorizing about Obama's past.

Rather than exposing an even sicker agenda involving purposefully harming children or plodding to harm Americans with weapons of mass destruction.

Kathaksung hasn't stopped posting on the internet. He hasn't disappeared. Why are you making things up? Where is your evidence that he disappeared? Because his account was blocked on a site or two? He posts EVERYWHERE. In fact, he posted on the Beyond Politics message board today.

[link to www.beyondpoliticsand911.com]

Use Google - you will find that he never went anywhere, and his postings are as wide spread and erratic as they have ever been.


The poster had at least 10 years of steady prolific posting until then.
..they only surfaced recently in the last couple months to warn of a nuclear false flag in march...


Wrong. Kathaksung has had over thirteen years of steady, prolific posting. He didn't stop between 2010 and now, nor did he only resurface to warn of a nuclear false flag. He has continued to post with no interruptions.

PROVE that he stopped posting.

Also, I DARE you to find any other place on the internet where kathaksung posted an identical message to the December 2010 message in question. After, of course, you confirm that he does indeed post the same warnings multiple times, multiple places."""""""""""""""""
""""

""""""Hmmm, suddenly website not letting me quote this post from 2 posts up, just above the bumb."""""""" ...I tried a few times and something is is prohibiting me.""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""​""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" so here goes!...











Just stop..


You are only helping to prove the point and really making yourselves look more foolish the further we go.

The very fact you are defending this to the death and have not actually thoroughly read this thread, because obviously you personally do do not care, because you are only doing you job is quite obvious and surely sickening to many who read this.

In fact the further we go and harder we push the easier it becomes to see the truth.

It's like those treasonous "news" people currently propagating the abolishment of the 2nd amendment. ..lol we can have guns, just not equal guns..

You are causing harm to humanity, unwittingly... The time to choose sides is at hand.

Who's side are you on,

The people?? Or the powers that be???

..incidentally, yes blah blah blah he stopped posting everywhere on the web, until recently, when the poster resurfaced in the last couple months TO WARN OF A NUCLEAR FALSE FLAG IN MARCH...

Yes we know they've been around since sandy hook.... but disappeared for a couple years entirely from the web and anyone who's tried a search whole heartedly knows im right..... and thank you!!!!

Please, pretty please prove me wrong!!!

So that we can both be ok with your having a job inadvertently(or intentionally) spreading dis information for the Obama regime and n.w.o. and go back to eating twinkies and theorizing about Obama's past.

Rather than exposing an even sicker agenda involving purposefully harming children or plodding to harm Americans with weapons of mass destruction.

Lol, just realized all the threads made yesterday exposing the new HD close up zoom in shots of the now OBVIOUS assault weapon in the trunk, have been removed from the forum.P

Please spread the word and share the images.
Please repost them if you did before.. anyone have a link?

It is there people, the assault weapon was removed from the trunk by police clearly. 

Please help spread the word!!!

There is more than enough evidence that Sandy Hook was staged already.

Even a HD video of the actors getting their instructions the day before would not change much.

The remaining problem is not the digging done by concerned citizens. It is that no respected journalists or officials do it.

If you want Sandy Hook to be the stone that flips the evil Behemoth over, then you have to change tactics.

What you need to do now is start ACTING. You need to send the best material concerning SH to as many hopefully not so crocked journalists, politicians, attorneys and cops you can think of.

You need to wake up more people IN POWER. Even if the ones that don't have the guts to do anything with it, it will make them nervous. The evil Behemoth is totally dependant on the servants fear and respect. Can you cause doubt among the servants about that, then TPTB will crumble.

Start acting. Write your local politicians, journalists, DAs, sheriffs, detectives. Send them the best YT-clips and printouts. Ask polite questions what they think.

Yes! do this!
so that they can laugh at you and know that youre a gullible, untrustworthy idiot ...

Yo, "korean" shill... The pay's good?

Ok, answer these questions:

1. Who is Gene rosen talking to on this tape? There is no one there except him and "Matt the camera man"...



2.Why does he and "Matt" start giggling when Gene says "fuck"?

3. How do you explain that you don't see ONE single genuine autonomic reflex or sign of emotional stress and grief in ANY of the interviewed parents, staff or siblings?

4. Why does Parker look completely relaxed and at ease, laughs and smirks before saying "okey!" and then suddenly starts hyperventilating? Has he learned from this YT clip?


5. Why does so many of the victims relatives and friends LAUGH and SMILE hours and a few days after their CHILDREN and loved ones were brutally killed? Why do we see so many officials at the scene smiling?



6. How do you explain the fact that the Phelbs parents and Soto's siblings are an exact match to the Greenberg-Sextons in Florida?

7. Why are so many people wearing badges around their neck in the photos?

8. Why is there a big sign behind Gene Rosen in the interview, saying "Everyone must check in"?

We can play 20 questions like we have been for the past 3 months and then when those are answered you disinfo shills will have 200 in their place. We can play that till the cows come home and it can all be proven wrong with one simple step.

Question: Does any of that matter, any of it...

When the law enforcement investigative team produces many detailed crime scene photos showing the dead victims at Sandy Hook?

Answer: no, not one of your disinfo questions can override that.




Another question for you and all the other shills...

You are the ones making outrageous claims of many many people being involved in a horrendous conspiracy.

In the real world, when people accuse others openly and publicly of lying about something major, they are putting their own credibility on the line by making such claims. Thus, it tempers accusations except when people have proof that their claims are correct of the liar. If they are then proven wrong, they are responsible for their false accusation and it hurts their credibility.

Would any of you making claims of serious conspiracy involving Sandy Hook be willing to put your full identity onto your claims and stand behind them with your credibilty on the line over it? Do you yourselves believe what youre saying enough to do that?

Payed shill, debunk this:



2:30 --->

AC 34806083 nobnody is going to post their full name because this is obviously a board rampant with federal activity.

you are clearly a shill, you do nothing to promote your side except debase people's opinions.

If I didn't know any better I would assume you work for the gov't and are pumping for info to get the names of serious conspirators on this website. you are a shill. nobody is reading what you have to say anymore because it's all just distracting garbage, taunting and teasing and personal attacks.

Honestly I can't believe this thread is still going but good on OP for cataloging so much info.

oh I'm sorry did this happen?

are there new crime scene photos of Lanza entering the school, or the confirmed body count of the dead children? you know... like how we had screens from columbine???

did that come out yet you fuckin shill?????

how dare you say that FACTUAL DATA doesn't matter. this is fucking disguising how obvious you are.

Last Edited by SteamrolledGobias on 03/22/2013 04:45 AM

[link to www.wtnh.com]

No dumbass the shills are the ones spreading the goddamn disinfo around here.

If they felt so certain about their claims of hoax and no proof of real event, then theyd stand by those claims wouldnt they?

Yes! and no one does in real life.

Oh wait the federal gov kills everybody who speaks out right? Fuck off

WOOH..

IM THE ONE SAYING THAT GODDAMN FACTUAL DATA DOES MATTER YOU FUCKING EMBICILE!

ITS THE FUCKING SHILLS THAT ARE NOW SAYING NO MATTER WHAT EVIDENCE IS PROVIDED THEY WILL STILL CALL IT A HOAX!

FUCK THEM AND FUCK YOU!

YOU WONT DO THIS SHIT IN REAL LIFE WILL YOU YOU FUCKING INTERNET COWARD BITCH!

yeah the fuckin do..

Philip marshall and his 2 kids, lots of BP whistleblowers, I'm sure they want Bradley Manning dead too but it would turn up suspicuous.

The MSNBC Exec's 2 kids are now dead.

I don't really understand what you are arguing, but nobody either shills or believers will post their names here. nobody. it's just not a safe public area for personal information.

Some dumb cunt doesn't know what the word 'perspective' means, or the difference between a telephoto and a wide angle lens, and this is your 'proof'?

And then you wonder why people laugh at you and point...

well dude I really dont know what you want me to say.

you seem to argue 2 different points and you've been very distracting in this entire thread..? I am by no means a coward and I will happily refute any points I've made

but I do not think caps lock is the way to approach your stances. Nor personal attacks. I think we should re-read what you posted:



you are not asking for shills, you are asking for conspiracy believers. do you not understand this? you come across as two-faced trying to stir up confusion.

you are saying people who believe conspiracies and who are then proven wrong should put their name out there to have a bad reputation. but you are defending sandy hook as a conspiracy? you do not make your stance very well known which is why you come across as a shill.

so the shills are the same people who are making the 'conspiracy' claims?

do you honestly not understand how you come across as a two-faced distraction? you say one thing, then argue the complete opposite.

what do you actually believe?

in your own opinion, is sandy hook a conspiracy or not? is everybody who believes this an immediate shill? I mean seriously...

You say that the idea of this whole event being staged is, quite literally and I quote, an "outrageous claim"

it is not outrageous in any way. it is most likely true.

so honestly either pick a side or stop attacking people in this thread. you have no right to act upset or angry when people call you out for making absolutely no sense. nothing in this thread is outrageous and the idea of a conspiracy surrounding higher-ups in the Sandy Hook school administration/state police is very realistic.

Last Edited by SteamrolledGobias on 03/22/2013 05:00 AM

100% wrong

an event really happened, in fact there was a FEMA drill scheduled for that exact same day.

[link to www.dailypaul.com]

[link to www.ct.gov]


it is very very likely that no children were actually shot, they are mostly gone by now anyways. this includes families who still had children. and how about the nurse, and multiple teachers shot too? we really cannot see a single crime scene photo to prove this happened?

no we will never see crime scene photos because they do not exist. sorry that you seem to be a staunch believer AGAINST the conspiracy... but hey, in case you didn't notice, this is a conspiracy forum. people come to GLP to discuss conspiracies.

so if you don't believe in conspiracies why are you even here?

oh, of course, to be confusing and distract people.

Last Edited by SteamrolledGobias on 03/22/2013 05:08 AM

Nope Ive clearly stated how this works and youre either idiot or shill to all this.

Most of the ones creating and spamming the so-called conspiracy theories surrounding Sandy Hook are NOT truthers or conspiracy theories. They are black propaganda disinformation shills trying to undermine gun rights advocates with disinformation surrounding Sandy Hook..

^ fair point, however there is a lot of strange coincidences surrounding the event no??

is it really all just black-ops propaganda? I find that hard to believe.

not saying it's 100% unfounded but there really are factual misnomers in the official story.

^ fair point, however there is a lot of strange coincidences surrounding the event no??

is it really all just black-ops propaganda? I find that hard to believe.

not saying it's 100% unfounded but there really are factual misnomers in the official story.

It wasnt a drill you idiot. It was a normal emergency management CLASS being taught nowhere near Sandy Hook.

And oh yes I do believe in conspiracies. That would be like not believing in water. Thats exactly why I am here - because there is a conspiracy to spread sandy Hook BS.


And as far as Sandy Hook being a hoax.

Before you call someone a liar, in the normal world we wait for their proof before saying they have none and are lying. Thats the way rational thinking goes - you dont call someone a liar before you even see the facts. To call someone a liar before you even see their evidence is irrational.

Thats what the disinfo agents(shills) WANT people to do
- they want people to make false and disprovable claims before the evidence is even shown.

So Gobias, Ill add you to the list of dumb muthafuckers to call out when youre proven wrong, and I will be reminding you of it.

just so we're clear, I lean more towards conspiratorial after seeing how many conspiracies have been proven to be right. However I suspend judgement while looking at evidence, I am merely a spectator gathering information - my current opinion is that something fishy happened at SH which is not what the official story tells us.

this could be proven wrong, and I am fluid as the facts come to me.

but to argue somebody is overall ignorant and proven wrong is even more ignorant. you can look through my post history and see that I am nothing more than a speculator.

color your opinion of me any way you'd like because there are hundreds of thousands if not millions of posters on here. but you should have a little more patience arguing your points, and be clearer from the start. that being said I will not simply call SH a black-ops affair and walk away

I will continue to research and see what happens. if it turns out to be proven as you say, nothing more than a tragedy being used to pain gun owners as 'conspiracy fringe', then so be it. you are right. but either way it will not deter me from looking because I am not afraid to be wrong. I am not afraid to look into facts and see what the truth is.

that is what I am after, the truth. if that makes me a "dumb mothafucker" then hey I'm glad to be one

Last Edited by SteamrolledGobias on 03/22/2013 05:31 AM

Sorry for the attitude but Im getting extremely frustrated after dealing with known liars for 3 months here.

Gobias, its really happening too.

There was a large public meeting in NC with multi-county sherrifs and gun rights advocates fed up with threats of federal gun control in January. The meeting itself is a good thing to see.

However, one of the prominent claims thrown out by many of the more vocal citizens was 'Adam didnt even use the AR-15!' repeatedly

I hope you can see the variety of problems that sort of thing can cause for their cause.

1) it can be proven that he did, hurting their credibilty and appearance of rationality and intelligence and reducing any further points they might make

2) gun rights dont depend on which criminal used which gun where and when. None of that matters to gun ownership rights, and theyre falling into the trap of saying it does when they make the argument 'he didnt use the AR'

3) it wastes time in a discussion that should be spent on real issues

Does everyone on base have to take shifts shillin' or just geniuses like you?

Total Failure. Your C.O. is ashamed of your shilling skills.

He's totally right. Any photographer or amateur physicist versed in optics knows how this effect is created. If I have a camera with a focal length of 200mm focused on people 200m away with a shed 50m behind the people, the perspective is skewed such that depth is compressed. Furthermore depth of field increases, so that objects over a wide range stay in focus.

Watch and learn

Im not a shill, but Ill debunk


Its an effect of a telephoto lens called compression

[link to www.youtube.com]


That guy said someone would be a messiah if they debunk

Do I get messiah cookies?

Nothing in that video magnifies the things behind the objects in front of them to any greater extent.

We're not talking about "people 200m away with a shed 50m behind them", we are talking about people maybe 10-20m away with a shed 1½km behind them.