Are ZetaTalk fans welcome now?

I would like you to give me specific examples where Zetas have correctly predicted something

It's elemental my dear Elemental. You click on the links and you READ the top sentence. You click on the YouTube and you LISTEN and WATCH for 3-5 minutes. Or can't you read? Or are you blind? Gosh, the ZetaTalk debunking crew has sunk to a new low. I knew that a low IQ was a requisite ...

Nirububu ate me baby

Nirububu ate me baby

Theres, and also and umh ........

Nancy is the greatest disinfo shill in the entire Nibiru-tard community.

There are many many of us who are completely reasonable who turn our backs to nutjobs like this and keep our thoughts to ourselves in order to avoid being associated with such a wacky sack of shit...

Some comedy gems from your first link:

"On Aug 6, 1995 ZetaTalk stated that the newly announced Hale Bopp comet was in fact a Fraud, being a nova on the opposite side of the skies from Orion, where the inbound 12th Planet could be found. The ESO subsequently announced they could find No Comet Emissions in what was being claimed to be the comet Hale Bopp, which would be outgassing beyond where any other comet had before, then stopped outgassing for over a year until early 1997 when it came close to the Sun. , and other reports on the Size and unusual outgassing beyond NASA reported that the Appearance of this supposed comet. By mid-year 1996 ZetaTalk warned that the second part of the fraud was emerging, to line the nova up with a Real Comet sighted by the NEAT program before it had outgassed. Repeated ZetaTalk Predictions on Hale Bopp proved to be correct."

And this one:

"The Zetas have long stated that magnetic trimesters exist, ending at approximately the end of December, April, and August. The strongest of these is the Summer trimester.

Since magnetism is viewed as polarized, a N Pole and a S Pole, with particles flowing from one to the other, the idea that there would be trimesters is confusing. We have explained that the Sun's magnetism reaches to the ends of the solar system and beyond, and dominates. Mercury and Earth, for instance, align with the Sun's permanent alignment, and for those who say the Sun flops about, reversing fields every 11 years, NASA's own Ulysses probe proved them wrong in 2001. Imagine the solar system itself aligned along a magnetic flow line of a larger field, which pulses. It is no accident that the Earth, a magnetic planet, is going round the Sun every 365 days or so, as the magnetic trimesters have something to do with this progression.
ZetaTalk: Magnetic Trimesters, written December 20, 2006"

(Notice Nancy can't even get the meaning of the word trimester right).

Just a couple of examples of FAIL on the page you linked to.

So that's who Nancy Leider is. Someone made a post about her being sexy the other day, and I had no clue who she was.

Oh dear, a typical resort to insult. Surely you can give me just one prediction that has come to pass? No? Thought not.

Honey, this is the LIST.
http:/www/zetatalk.com/theword/tword232.htm
Just click! They all have proven accuracy. ALL of them!

For more recent proven-true, go to the Pole Shift ning blog,
[link to poleshift.ning.com]


TOPIC: ZetaTalk Accuracy

ZetaTalk continues to gain credibility as what the Zetas have said is confirmed to be true. To date, ZetaTalk fans have pointed out the accuracy of their past statements, on:
2001 Predictions,
AIDS,
Airforce One Flyover,
Air France 447
Airplane Crashes,
Albinos,
Animal Illness,
Annunaki Gold,
Antartica Ice Fractures,
Anthrax Attack,
Area 51,
Assassinations,
Asteroid Threat,
Atlantic Rift,
Atlantis,
Attack on America,
Australian Artifacts,
Autism,
Bank Freeze,
Bank Supports,
Barter,
Bee Colony Collapse,
Bigfoot,
Big Bang/Black Holes,
Billy Meier,
Bin Laden,
Bird Flu Pandemic,
Blaming the Sun,
Booms,
Brazilian Roswell,
Brown Dwarf,
Bush Clone,
Bush Insanity,
Bush Decapitation,
Cataclysm Masks,
Cattle Mutilations,
Cell Evolution,
Centrifugal Force,
Chemtrails,
China as Investor,
China Threats,
Chinese Pyramids,
Chupacabras,
Clinton Demise,
Columbia Shuttle,
Comet Behavior,
Comet Origin,
Contradictory,
Cover-up Increase,
Cover-up Crack,
Crane Collapse,
Crash at Kecksburg,
Crop Circles,
Crop Circle Video,
Crop Failures,
Dark Matter,
Deflecting Asteroids,
Deformed Frogs,
Devil's Triangle,
Dinosaur Dieoff,
Discovery Shuttle,
Dogon Tribe,
Domino Quakes,
Dr. Reed,
Early Man,
Earth Core,
Earth Hum,
Earth Plates,
Earth Plate Movement,
Earthquake Reports,
Earthquake Quickening,
Earth Torque,
Earth Twin,
Earth Wobble,
Easter Island,
Ebola Spread,
Economic Collapse,
Face on Mars,
Faked Terrorism,
Faster than Light,
Fisheries,
Flashes,
Flying Triangles,
Fossett Disappearance,
Frog Populations,
Giant Hominoids,
Global Warming,
Gold Bar Fraud,
Gonzales Resignation,
GPS Failure,
Great Pyramids,
Hale Bopp,
Hezbollah,
Hoagland,
High Tides,
Human Combustion,
Hurricanes, Atypical,
Implants,
Imploding Building,
Iowa Floods, Israel Aggression,
Jet Stream Changes,
JFK,
John, Jr.,
JP Morgan,
Lebanon Invasion,
List to Left,
Living on Light,
Illness,
Iran Invasion,
Iran Oil,
Loch Ness,
Magma Slam,
Magnetic Field,
Magnetic Whamy,
Magnetic Trimesters,
Mammoth Lake,
Marilyn Monroe,
Mars Exploration,
Mars Water,
Martial Law,
May 5 2000,
Melting Poles,
Memphis Bridge,
Meteor Upticks,
Migrations,
Military Rebellion
Mississippi Bridges,
MJ12 Documents,
Moon Base,
Moon Cities,
Moon Plume,
Moon Rotation,
Moon Swirls,
N America Bowing,
Neanderthal Man,
New Land,
Newman's Machine,
Newton's Laws,
Ocean Rebound,
Ocean Vortex,
Omnipotent Krlll,
Orbit Halt,
Outages,
Pakistan Sinking,
Permafrost Melt,
Philadelphia Experiment,
Planet X,
Planet X Denial,
Planet X Gravity,
Planet X Triangulation,
Pole Shift Equator,
Probe Behavior,
Red Rain Microbes,
Red Sea Stretch,
Repulsion Force,
Roswell,
Rotation,
Russian Overflights,
Santilli Tapes,
Satellite Failure,
Saudi Takeover,
Sea Level Rise,
Seaway Rip,
Shroud of Yurin,
Sighting Aliens,
Slowing Rotation,
Social Security,
Solar Reversals,
Solar System Magnetism,
Starvation Denial,
Stretch Zones,
Summer Snowstorms,
Sun Binary,
Sun Scald,
Suppressing Word,
Swine Flu,
Syria Strike,
Tornadoes,
Traveling Planets,
Triangular UFO,
Troops Home,
Tunguska,
TWA800,
UFO Increase,
UK Food and Mouth,
Ummo,
Volcano Uptick,
Vote Fraud
Wandering Planets,
Warm Winters,
Waves, Monstrous,
Weather Changes,
Weather Swings,
Weather Predictions,
Whirlpools,
Work Camps,
Worldwide Infertility,
Yellowstone

What about the two examples I took from your list. Care to explain how her prediction that Hale Bopp was not real constitutes a successful prediction? I randomly picked two things on the list and both are bullshit. Try again, zetatard!

It should be easy enough for you to choose one then. Take your pick.

OK, blind, low IQ, and lazy. You're cute sweetie but you're not earning your catfood!


Prior to July, 1995 ZetaTalk stated that Neanderthal Man had died out, been replaced actually, during mankind's genetic engineering, due to digestive system problems - an inability to eat with ease what the Earth provided. On June 12, 2000 the Associated Press confirmed this!

Study suggests Neanderthals ate meat and little else
By Paul Recer, Associated Press, June 12, 2000

If a Neanderthal walked into a hamburger joint today, he probably would order a double burger. And hold the bun, the lettuce, tomato and onion. A new study of 28,000-year-old Neanderthal bones suggests the ancient hominid ate meat, lots of it, and very little else. "Their diet was about 90 percent meat," said Paul B. Pettitt of Oxford University in England, co-author of a study appearing Tuesday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. "This means they were efficient hunters and not just scavengers as some have suggested." A life style so centered on meat, said Pettitt, means that the lowbrowed, hairy Neanderthal was able to organize complex hunts that brought down big and dangerous game. "This study suggests that the difference between Neanderthals and modern humans was only a matter of degree," said Erik Trinkaus, a Washington University at St. Louis anthropologist and co-author of the study. "Modern humans were probably more efficient in terms of their organization, but the Neanderthals were very close."

Trinkaus said the new study does not settle that debate, but it does show the Neanderthal was not just simple, stupid and brutish. "This study implies a much higher degree of social organization complexity than is frequently attributed to the Neanderthals," said Trinkaus. "They were much more equal to modern humans in many ways." One big difference, though, was food choices. Studies of bones from the early modern humans in Europe suggest they had a more varied diet, eating smaller animals, such as rabbits, and lots of fish - up to 30 percent of their diet. But for the Neanderthal, it was meat, meat and more meat. Europe of 28,000 years ago was enjoying a warm period between two extremes of the ice age, Pettitt said. The plains of Europe were grassy and probably included vast herds of animals, which he calls "lawn mowers." As a result, the Neanderthal hunter preyed on mammoth, horse, deer, woolly rhino and other large animals. When conditions changed and fewer of these animals were available, the Neanderthal may have had a more difficult time adjusting than did the competing humans who lived on a more varied diet, said Pettitt.The researchers probed the diet of the Neanderthal by measuring the isotopic ratios of nitrogen in skulls and jawbones recovered from a cave in Croatia.
.....................
On Jan 6, 2006 the Zetas stated that the evolution of life required that the cell be present before DNA could develop, as it needed that protection, a nest.

Life, whether it evolves naturally or is seeding to expedite the process, does not develop in a day. It develops in steps and stages. One stage is in place before the next step can be taken. DNA supports the ability of life to replicate itself and carry forward the dictates of biological function. Since man comes late to examining his own beginnings, he cannot determine if DNA arrived before the cell, or the cell was in place before the DNA. The assumption is that DNA came first, links forming in some kind of primordial soup, and the cell developed later as a protective device. Now, they know otherwise. DNA in a soup would be subject to assault, continually, and thus not perpetuate itself with any certainty. Life does not develop in chaos, but rather where a soup with rich ingredients exist. The cell body does not dissipate without DNA, as human scientists know. It feeds, and continues. It does this without assistance, as long as the soup it finds itself in allowed growth. Death of a cell occurs only when it is attacked, exposed to attack, so that the molecular functions that allowed it to form and retain form are disrupted. The evidence dropped to Earth was encased in an asteroid chunk that protected the molecular composition of these cells from the formerly life bearing planets in the Asteroid Belt. They thus had no reason to die. But as the shape clearly presents, this was a stage of life prior to DNA insertion, the next stage. DNA naturally forming in primordial pools needs a nest, a shelter. With cells about, it can migrate through the skin of a cell to interior chambers, which it does today. Is this not what the virus does, when infecting a cell? Is this not what RNA does when it travels between cells, communicating?
ZetaTalk: Space Dust, Alive?, written Jan 6, 2006

On October 6, 2007 breaking news declared that scientists had "created life" by stripping down DNA strands and inserting them into an existing cell. It was not possible for the DNA to be kept alive without the cell.

[see the ZetaTalk site for the link re this]

..........................
Early in the ZetaTalk saga, the Zetas made the point that the speed of light is not the fastest that a physical object, such as a planet, can move through space.

Speed, in space, is a relative thing. In the dozen or so years prior to a passage, Planet X speeds up from almost a standstill to a zoom, toward the foci it is approaching. Imagine the Earth without atmosphere, and a rock some miles overhead. What is the speed limit on this rock as it plummets? There is no limit in space, only that which mankind assumes. During math discussions on sci.astro, it has been surmised that the speed of Planet X approaches the speed of light during its most rapid approach, and this astonishes those in the discussion. Why is it assumed that light is the fastest thing in the universe, re travel? Man thinks this because it is something he can measure. He is aware of such a small percentage of matter and energy about him that to say that he comprehends 1% of what the universe is composed of would be an overstatement. Our space travel, in 4th Density and even 3rd Density, is faster than light, and we do not melt. Man does not understand, so we cannot give him satisfaction in our explanations. Suffice it to say that our explanation is correct, and Planet X travels rapidly into our midst, thence the Repulsion Force is invoked, thence it floats past between the Earth and Sun.
ZetaTalk: Planet X Speed, written 2001

Now, anticipating the time when they will have to admit to a planet next to the Sun, and how it arrived quickly and took them by surprise, the establishment is laying the groundwork. Then now admit that Planet X can move through space rapidly! Zetas RIGHT Again!

Runaway Planets Zoom at a Fraction of Light Speed
March 22, 2012
[link to www.sciencedaily.com]
Seven years ago, astronomers boggled when they found the first runaway star flying out of our galaxy at a speed of 1.5 million miles per hour. The discovery intrigued theorists, who wondered: If a star can get tossed outward at such an extreme velocity, could the same thing happen to planets?

........................
In early 1995, in one of the first ZetaTalk writeups, ZetaTalk described the 12th Planet as a Wandering Planet spending most of its time hovering between two suns. In the March-April of 2002, the American Scientist reported that scientists had recently been astonished to find such wandering planets.

Why does the 12th Planet swing so far away from your Solar System, and why bother to return, having done so? There is a balance between the attraction of your Sun and another, unseen by you but nevertheless present and in force. The 12th Planet travels interminably between these two forces, not able to settle on an orbit around just one because of the momentum and path it originally took. It is caught. The path of the 12th Planet is such that it spends most of its life out in dark space, slowly moving from one giant tug to another.
ZetaTalk™

Free-Floating Planets and Stellar Clusters
American Scientist, Vol 90, Mar-Apr, 2002

For centuries a planet has been defined as an object that orbits a star. This notion was recently upended when several groups of astronomers reported the discovery of planet-sized objects wandering through space on their own, with no parent star in sight. The discovery of these objects within dense stellar clusters has unsettled the astronomical community and raised questions about the nature of planets and how they might form. Jarrod R. Hurley and Michael M. Shara review these recent discoveries and consider how the dynamic interactions between the stars in a dense stellar cluster may free planets from the gravitational bondage of their parent stars. Jarrod Hurley is a postdoctoral investigator at the American Museum of Natural History. His research involves studying the evolution of star clusters through computer simulations. His models have helped to explain the formation of blue-straggler stars in the open cluster M67, and he has recently begun to investigate the behavior of planetary systems in star clusters. Michael Shara is curator and chair of the Department of Astrophysics at the American Museum of Natural History. His research interests include the structure and evolution of novae and supernovae, collisions between stars, and the nature of stellar populations in star clusters and galaxies.


.....................
In September, 1995 ZetaTalk stated that gravity is balanced by a Repulsion Force:

[link to www.zetatalk.com]

Scientists are acutely aware of the attraction force inherent in gravity, as are folks in general. The babe learns about this early, while taking his first few steps. Oops. Ouch! It is assumed that gravity has only an attractive force, and that the planets, in orbit around the Sun, are held in place by their momentum. Does this make sense? What caused the momentum in the first place? Children play with a ball on the end of a string, swinging it around and around their head. As long as the arm is tugging, the ball maintains its orbit, else stops. Why would the planets not drift into the Sun? Are the orbits all that swift so that centrifugal force is extreme?

The reason Mankind is Unaware of a repulsive force, also inherent in gravity, is that for this to become evident there must be a semblance of equality in size and weight, i.e. the mass of the objects, and freedom of movement such as exists in space, and lack of undue influence from other nearby objects. Objects on the surface of the Earth have none of these. They are infinitesimal in proportion to the Earth itself, and thus any repulsion the Earth may have toward a tiny speck on its surface is also infinitesimal. Proportionally, its all gravity, a one way trip. The object on the surface, pushing away, is overwhelmed by the Earth's gravitational pull, the attraction. The repulsion force is generated as a result of two bodies exerting a gravitational force on each other. In the case of a tiny object on the surface of the Earth, its gravitational pull on the Earth is scarcely noticed by the Earth. A gnat or mite. A nothing. Where the repulsion force has not been invoked within the Earth by any objects placed on the surface of the Earth, this is in play between the Earth and her Moon. The repulsion force is invoked between objects on the surface of the Earth, incessantly, but this is masked by the intense force of gravity the Earth presents and other factors such as surface tension or friction or chemical bonding so that the repulsion force cannot be recognized.

The gravitational force exists first. It is the static condition. The repulsion phenomena only manifests when, as we said, the objects are of equal size, are free to move, and dominate the immediate environment. Where the repulsion force comes to equal the force of gravity by the time the objects in play would make contact, it builds at a rate that differs from gravity. Humans have calculated the force of gravity, which at first they assumed was equal for all objects but lately have come to understand is stronger for larger objects. They have formulas for the force of gravity which have proved accurate on the face of their home planet. These formulas are incomplete, and would not work as expected elsewhere, however. The repulsion force is infinitesimally smaller than the force of gravity, but has a sharper curve so that it equals the force of gravity at the point of contact. For experimental purposes, one would have to be almost at the point of contact for it to come into play at all, and this in an environment where other factors are eliminated or negated. To examine the phenomena, Earth scientists would have to set up a lab in space, far enough away from any planetary body so that free movement is possible. Place two balls in a cage. Put one in motion toward another. Microscopically examine the interchange. They do not touch. They do not bounce off one another. They do not touch.


Scientists learned in March, 1998 that the Universe is expanding due to what they call a repulsion force which Counteracts Gravity.

Tuesday, March 3, 1998
Copyright 1998 The New York Times
Astronomers See a Cosmic Antigravity Force at Work
James Glanz

An international team of astronomers who have used the brightness of distant exploding stars called supernovae to gauge how cosmic expansion has changed over time has reluctantly concluded that space itself appears to be permeated by a repulsive force. Gravity should have gradually slowed the outward rush of cosmic expansion, but as announced at a recent meeting, the dimness of the supernovae - pointing to unexpectedly great distances - implies that cosmic expansion has actually sped up in the billions of years since the stars exploded.

Volume 279, Number 5355, Issue of 27 February 1998, p. 1298
1998 by The American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Cosmic Force May Be Acting Against Gravity
By Kathy Sawyer, Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, February 27, 1998

The universe is expanding at an accelerating rate, according to startling new evidence suggesting that a mysterious antigravity force permeates "empty" space and is counteracting the pull of gravity on a cosmic scale. If the new results hold up, scientists said, they could have enormous ramifications for theories of cosmic evolution, resolving some conflicts and creating new ones as they reverberate through studies of the largest-scale structures in the cosmos and the smallest particles in nature, and the frustrating quest for a "theory of everything" that would unify those fields. Scientists have reacted to the findings with a mix of shock, amazement, horror, excitement and suspended disbelief. The question of the fate of the universe - whether it will expand to infinity, contract in a "cosmic crunch" or flatline somewhere in between - is one of the oldest and most controversial in cosmology.

February 27, 1998
Scientists stunned to learn universe may be accelerating

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Scientists are scratching their heads over a finding that indicates the universe, rather than slowing down, is being expanded by a mysterious force at an accelerating rate. And if the finding is correct, it also supports a concept first proposed by Albert Einstein, who later dismissed it as his biggest blunder. "It is such a strange result we are still wondering if there is some other sneaky little effect climbing in there," says Adam Riess, an astronomer at the University of California, Berkeley. Riess said he, Kirshner and others in the 15-member international team that made the discovery "have looked hard for errors" but found none.

Parallel study confirms finding.

Rocky Kolb, a University of Chicago astronomer, said in Science that the finding is so startling, "I think everyone should reserve judgment." Kirshner said the conclusion will go through an intensive review before the results are accepted, although he noted that preliminary results from a parallel study by another astronomy group are in agreement. "We are scratching our heads to think if there could be an alternative explanation for it," says Riess, "something more mundane than a repulsive force." It is being called a repulsive force because it seems to be working against gravity to speed up the expansion of the universe. "If it's confirmed by other results and other approaches, it's going to tell us there is something important, another constituent to the universe," says Kirshner.

A fifth force at work?

Unlike matter, which slows down as it moves through space, the new force - if the researchers are correct - moves faster. Four forces are accepted by modern physics: the strong force, which holds the nucleus of an atom together; the weak force, which causes atomic decay; electromagnetic force, which holds electrons in orbit in an atom; and gravity. Kirshner says a fifth force could be at work. The idea of a fifth force has been speculated about by physicists, he says. Over short distances, said Riess, this repulsive force can't be detected, but over distances of 7 billion to 10 billion light-years, "this force becomes something to reckon with, and is strong enough to overcome gravity and cause the universe to accelerate." Riess said he isn't surprised that the force hasn't been detected before. "The force is very weak on a small scale and it only becomes important when you are looking back," he said. "It's like a lot of little ants - one is weak but a lot of them can lift a big weight."

Correspondent Ann Kellan, The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.

Simply quoting the site itself isn't proof of accuracy. Show me original links where and when these claims were made.

And when you've done that we can then discuss this:

[link to docs.google.com (secure)]

Readership continues to increase? That statement isn't supported by the evidence. According to Alexa.com, the number of page views is down 15% over the last 3 months. The number of page views by user is down 22.98% for the same period. Traffic rank is also down 393. Care to try again?

Just one problem with that statement - it was the Democrat controlled Congress that came up with bailout program. President Bush simply signed the bill. Even if he vetoed it, the bill would still have passed because there would have been enough support in the Democrat controlled Congress to ratify it.

In addition, the market did not crash until AFTER Democrats took control of Congress.

So, you really need to stop doing what your messiah Obama does and quit blaming Bush for all of the problems in the U.S.

Where's your supporting evidence that this is true? Do you have any? Or do you believe it simply because Nancy told you? Or are you Nancy? BTW, when is that announcement going to happen...oh, wait, that's right. It was supposed to happen SIX months ago. Care to try again?

+10,000.

Where's your proof that Trinty wanting to sell the website has anything to do with ZetaTalk? Until you can provide some, all I can say is:

Copying and pasting a list from ZetaTalk doesn't mean squat. Explain how each of those items represents an accurate prediction and provide supporting evidence. When you're done with that, you can address these infamous failures:

"Pole Shift" to occur May 15, 2003
"Pole Shift" to occur May 27, 2003
"Pole Shift" to occur by June 1, 2003
"Pole Shift" to occur within "weeks not months" as stated on July 21, 2003 on Coast To Coast AM
"No need to pay October's bills" due to "Pole Shift" as stated in September 2003
"Pole Shift" to occur by Christmas 2003
"Dark Twin" to collide with Earth in June 2004
Earth is halted in orbit
Adam Airlines Flight 574 crashed in some inland lake.
2012 is too far out
Obama to announce presence of "Planet X" in September 2012
Obama to announce presence of "Planet X" in October 2012

That's a whole lot of fail.

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 03/16/2013 08:54 AM

I doubt very much that he or she will do it because facts and logic are foreign concepts to zetatards.

Hi Elemental, we like your avatar.

Loving those claws :))

Ditto. They are welcome to debunk it though...
Been waiting to this day for some solid arguments..

It should be mentioned that this is also just ONE of MANY similar documentations that occured over the time.
Nancy always evaded these and quickly hyped her remaining believers into something else.... this time the infamous NObama announcement.

But I dont expect much to be followed to be honest.
Probably some emotional responses i.e. ad hominem and logical fallacies as usual.
It seems they're currently in the down-phase which triggered a lot of responses lately... even bringing some ol'followers back to the stage.

[link to www.imagebanana.com]

Earth Twin
ZetaTalk: Earth Twin
written on Oct 15, 1995
"... your Earth has a dead twin that shares her orbit and is placed so exactly opposite the Earth that it can never be seen. ..."
[link to www.zetatalk.com]

I take the easy approach and just quote Wikipedia.
If one of the Poleshit-Ningers thinks, Wikipedia is wrong: Do the math and prove it wrong.

"... if such a planet actually existed it would be detectable from Earth, according to the laws of physics and cosmology, for a number of reasons.
* Earth's orbit is elliptical, while a Counter-Earth would have difficulty staying 180 degrees from Earth unless both planets' orbits were circular. Following Kepler's second law, a planet revolves faster when it is close to the star, so a Counter-Earth following the Earth on the same orbit with half a year of delay would sometimes be visible from Earth.
* It would have gravitational influence upon the other planets, comets and man-made probes of the Solar System. No such influence has been detected, and indeed space probes sent to Venus, Mars and other places could not have successfully flown by or landed on their targets if a Counter-Earth existed.
* Furthermore, the mass of the planet Jupiter is so great it affects the movement of the sun, preventing it from blocking the view of a planet 180 degrees from earth. Jupiter actually revolves not around the sun but a point (a "barycenter") lying outside of the Sun, which the Sun in turn revolves around. Since part of the Sun would have to lie in the barycenter to block Earth's view of a Counter-Earth, this slight effect on the position of the Sun (and the fact that this orbital rotation is not synchronous with Earth's orbit) means a Counter-Earth should sometimes be visible from Earth.
* Any planetary sized body 180 degrees from Earth should also have been visible to some space probes, such as NASA's STEREO coronagraph probes (two spacecraft launched into orbits around the sun in 2006, one farther ahead of and one behind the Earth's orbit) which would have seen the Counter-Earth during the first half of 2007. The separation of the STEREO spacecraft from Earth would give them a view of the Lagrangian "L3" point during the early phase of the mission."
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Counter Earth (Earth Twin) not possible.
ZETAS WRONG AGAIN

----------------------------------------------------------


Earth Wobble
ZetaTalk: a Twirling Wobble
written May 25 2004
"An Earth wobble developed in 2004, under the influence of Planet X, the Zetas first warning of the extent of this on May 25, 2004. By Nov 27, 2004 the wobble had become obvious. ...
The Figure 8 pattern was documented by people all over the world ..."
[link to www.zetatalk.com]

In 1996 Meade introduced the ETX-Series, computer aided Telescopes. The smallest, ETX-60 and ETX-70, come with the Autostar #494 that can not be updated (lates firmware still from 2001).

Please dear Poleshit-Ningers explain, how a computerised telescope, programmed in (at best) 2001 can still go to and track celestial objects, when Earth wobbles uncontrollable since 2004.

Perhaps you can ask Flareberto (aka Alberto Cardin) - he owns (or owned) one. Unfortunately he never made one of his famous sun shots with his ETX.
Was it because he couldn't find Planet X and the moon swirls with the ETX? Yep - they don't produce lense flares.

No Earth wobble
ZETAS WRONG AGAIN

----------------------------------------------------------


Hale Bopp
Hale-Bopp - What's Going Down
ZetaTalk dated August, 1995
"The Hale-Bopp comet does not exist. It is a fraud, perpetrated by those who would have the teeming masses quiescent until it is too late. Hale-Bopp is nothing more than a distant star, and will draw no closer. ..."

ZetaTalk dated August 14, 1995
We, ZetaTalk, are telling you that the announcement will be made that Hale-Bopp has utterly fragmented, long before its trumpeted arrival date. Why so? How else to explain an exploding star that winked out.
[link to www.zetatalk.com]

Ooops, an exploding star with ion and dust tail that passed Earth exactly as calculated?
Hale Bopp was watched and photographed from more people as any comet before.
Exploding star? LOL

Unfortunately Poleshit-Nancy refused to look at it herself: [link to www.laughton.com] (funny story :)

No exploding star
ZETAS WRONG AGAIN

----------------------------------------------------------



Just three examples of the 100% ZETAS WRONG AGAIN.
May be other debunkers like to extend the list.


.

Well, how nice is that STO attitude, Nancy. Not even brave enough to put your own *name* on your posts, now? And I notice your post hasn't been deleted -- Zetas wrong again, dear.

Never mind, I'll play.

We are coming up on the tenth anniversary of your failed prediction of May, 2003. You have still, to this day, failed entirely to explain how the stars could be rising and setting predictably were the Earth halted in orbit, since Earth's motion around the Sun is what makes the Sun move into the various constellations of the Zodiac. You, more recently, have made such lovely claims as Jakarta under 80 feet of water, and that Obama will be announcing *real soon now* that PX is inbound and the Zetas are real.

Tell me, although I know you will totally lack the courage to do this: what wager are you willing to make that such an announcement won't be made throughout the year? I've got $1000 bucks that says no such announcement will be made by the Administration throughout 2013.

But since you lack the courage to even sign your name to your posts here, I expect you'll similarly lack the courage to make such a wager.

Have a nice day.

And calling yourself Clear Eye'd and Logical, Nancy? Another irony meter blown to smithereens...

Comment by Nancy Lieder

... Sunrise or sunset bend light in the red light spectrum along the Earth, by the Earth's gravity, which is why the Sun also appears huge during sunrise or sunset.
[link to poleshift.ning.com]

Is this ZetaTalk or NancyTalk?

If it's ZetaTalk, I must say ZETAS WRONG AGAIN.

If it's NancyTalk, I must say: Lear some physics.


.

Nancy and her lot are EVIL.