Was Jesus Christ the legendary King Arthur? | The TRUE origins of JESUS CHRIST

Some freemasonfordummies or infidels site isnt a 'source'.

twelve days of christmas

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

twelve holy days...

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Please send me and everyone else here, if you have time, your list of what can and cannot be discussed on GLP.

Thanks!

No, what's deceptive are you idiot Christians that believe some fairy book that was compiled by a bunch of Romans based on old legends.

Science & History proves your God is fake. Move on.

I like these new "theories".

They are your new Fairy Tales

Few know our truth. Most who do keep it quiet.

can you please link to this "verified" history you claim?



cuz Simcha Jacobovici, an archaeologist, tears apart biblical "archaeology" every day.

I've researched every single one of those and not one of them shows evidence of Jesus of the Bible.

The Josephus mention has been a proven and known forgery for YEARS. The rest make mention of Christians but not Jesus. The term "Christian" during that time did not always mean what you think.

A correspondence of Emperor Hadrian refers to Alexandrian worshippers of Serapis calling themselves Bishops of Christ:

'Egypt, which you commended to me, my dearest Servianus, I have found to be wholly fickle and inconsistent, and continually wafted about by every breath of fame. The worshipers of Serapis (here) are called Christians, and those who are devoted to the god Serapis (I find), call themselves Bishops of Christ.'

Hadrian to Servianus, 134A.D. (Quoted by Giles, ii p86)

Read more: [link to www.touregypt.net]

How do you know the information contained in the bible itself and all the editing/censoring/manipulating done by the Roman emperors and Roman Catholic officials is not the 'disinformation'???

If I had a red house and you said "bullshit Russell, you have a green house." I would allow you to scream it from the tallest mountain.

If you know something to be true, you should have complete comfort in that knowledge.

Allowing differing opinions and conversation is how belief is strengthened in those with conviction.

What are you worried about?

No, the big bang and primordial soup are the fairytales. Stick with SCIENCE and verified HISTORY. Good luck to you.

We must be on the exact same wavelength today OP - I was contemplating the exact same thing this morning.

Check the people i listed, maybe they were all in on the same big lie? Even Lucian and Celsus who openly mocked Jesus and Christianity yet still recorded it? How can you trust anything you learned if you dont believe ALL history?

dont try to act like you can reveal truth when you cant even differentiate between catholicism and christianity. you watched a video on youtube and now you think you have everything figured out, lol

Dude! Lucian wasn't even born until 125AD and Celsus is also from the 2nd century

is there a historical figure who lived during the time of jesus, personally knew jesus and also wrote about him?

Im concerned about people deliberately spreading information they KNOW deep down is FALSE.

I've already looked into those explanation in the past and they do not hold water or prove anything... It's passing hearsay which isn't even to this day admissable as 'evidence' in a court of law. Were any of those individuals actually alive at the time that Jesus was alleged to have been?

Which makes them much more qualified than YOU to know, doesnt it, dude?

What would 'hold water' for you? For example, how do you know Tiberius Caesar was emperor at the time of Jesus? Why would you trust THOSE records, and not the thousands more documents on Jesus?

OMG! You CAN'T be serious! They both lived over 100 years AFTER Jesus was suppose to have.

How on earth does that qualify them as reliable witnesses?!

Ouch!

I hate to pipe in here, but you are very incorrect in saying "thousands more documents on Jesus". I'm afraid all scholars would agree that it is in fact the reverse.

No

....looooooolll, how could you humans talk those enormous crap and nonsense , and you realy belived in what are you saying ??? ....i am not surprised that most of the humans are so duummy and alienated by some banch of lies ....go fish all of you ...still are people who belive in santa claus or coca-cola !! or some bullshit story invented by , alcoholic or perverted humans imagination and fear !!!....this tell me that we have 0 chance to evolve !!!..unfortunatelly..

I've done my research on this subject matter and the stories/traditions/beliefs in christianity are rooted in pre-existing myths/stories/traditions/belief systems of prior cultures & religions. My finding is that none of it can be seen as unique or original. Just a re-hashing of the old in a new form as an attempt to unify the masses for purposes of political control by those who held power. The expression "there is nothing new under the sun" comes to mind. Everything can be linked back to ancient Egypt and Sumeria. Those are my conclusions. I'm not asking you to believe me, if you do your own research without fear and with an open-mind, I think you will find that the 'official' story is clearly NOT representative of the 'truth' of the matter.

Can anybody (referring to atheists or anti-Christians) give an example of a historian that WAS recording history around 27-33 AD? Please share.

Here's an example of how and when history is recorded. The Greek historian Herodotus, whose work 'The Histories' details the Greek-Persian war, as well as the Battle of Marathon and Thermopylae, wrote his work 40 YEARS after events. History doesnt get recorded until AFTER THE FACT.

yeah, but everyone knew jesus was coming before the fact. herod killed a lot of babies trying to slay jesus, a star shined during his birth, wise men came and there was a big party in the barn, and then...

***crickets***

jesus turned 12

***morecrickets***

jesus turned 30 and got mad at a fig tree because it wasnt producing fruit out of season...

Let us start with Philo-Judaeus (20 BC - 50 AD) Philo wrote an account of the Jews covering the entire time that J.C. is said to have existed on earth. Philo was living in or near Jerusalem when J.C.’s miraculous birth and Herod’s massacre occurred. He was there when J.C. made his triumphal entry into Jerusalem. He was there for the crucifixion and all the world shattering events that followed — earthquakes, the sun becoming dark at noon, the graves opening and the dead and long dead saints roaming about the place., supposedly seen by many, also when J.C. himself rose from the dead and in the presence of many witnesses ascended into heaven, but Philo saw nothing, heard nothing, wrote nothing.

Flavius Josephus, the renowned Jewish historian, born 37 AD was a contemporary of the apostles. He was for a time the governor of Galilee, where J.C. lived and taught. Josephus wrote of every important event during the first 70 years AD but J.C. did not get a mention. Later the Josephus writings were interpolated and forgeries which mention J.C. added on. This short forgery was labeled by Bishop Warburton as “a rank forgery and a very stupid one too…” It is mentioned in the Church History, that this was the word of the very dishonest bishop Eusebius. The Catholic Encyclopedia admits that the forged passages were not known to Origen and earlier church writers.

Justus Tiberius was a native of Galilee, he wrote a history covering the period of J.C.’s reputed existence. This work was destroyed, but Photius a Christian scholar and critic of the 9th century who was acquainted with it says that Justus made not a mention of J.C. or his wondrous works.

There were also interpolations and forgeries in the works of Pliny the younger and historian Tacitus (who was born about 20 years after the purported death of J.C.

Due to modern science these are now recognized as forgeries by all scholars both Christian and secular. A total of about 40 to 50 interpolated lines are the only supporting evidence of the existence of J.C. a man-god who supposedly shook up the whole world of that period.

The other historians of that time, Arrian, Lucius Seneca (4 BC - 65 AD) Dion Pruseus, Pliny the Elder, Pater Calus, Suetonius, Juvenal, Theon of Smyran, Martial, Phlegon, Persius, Pompon Mela, Plutarch, Quintus Curtius, Lucian, Apollonius, Pausanias, Valerius Flaccus, Quintilian, Forus Lucius, Lucanus, Phaedrus, Epictetus, Damis, Silius Italicus, Alulus Geuius, Statius, Ptolemy, Columella, Diochry Sostom, Hermogones, Lysias, Valerius Maxiimus, Cornelius, Titus Livius, Cluvius Rufus, Publius Petronius (the Roman consul) who lived in Jerusalem. All these heard nothing, not a word was written about J.C.

These historians wrote about early religions but never mentioned J.C. or the spectacular events that the church said accompanied J.C.’s life.

When I studied the Bible under Presbyterian ministers, I was shocked when Reverend Jim told me; "The people in my church, the people sitting in the pews... they haven't read the Bible, if they did they would know most of what is said and done in a church has nothing to do with it!

We were able to speak candidly about the Bible and he believed it to be mainly myth and allegory.

All Presbyterian ministers must have a degree in divination and be able to read one of the ancient texts. In his case, he could read ancient Greek and read from the Septuagint.

Doesn't surprise me. When I delved deeply into finding the truth, I ran across many Pastors who had also embarked on the same journey - and all them ended up leaving Christianity.

'4] Reginald Fuller, The Formation of the Resurrection Narratives (New York: Macmillan, 1980), 10.
[5] Of the vast number of scholars who agree, some examples include John Kloppenborg, “An Analysis of the Pre-Pauline Formula in 1 Cor 15:3b-5 in Light of Some Recent Literature,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly, Vol. 40 (1978), especially 351, 360; Jerome Murphy-O’Connor, “Tradition and Redaction in 1 Cor 15:3-7,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly, Vol. 43 (1981), 582-589; John Meier, A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus (New York: Doubleday, 2001), Vol. 2:139; Sanders, The Historical Figure of Jesus, 277; Pinchas Lapide, The Resurrection of Jesus: A Jewish Perspective (Minneapolis: Augsberg, 1983), 97-99.'