OP - Following up on my post about BHO's Connecticut SS#, I'd still like to know if it's possible Rich has it wrong (or something got lost along the way of the "telephone game") and it's not that BHO was claiming foreign birth, but that he was claiming foreign citizenship???

To me, this makes more sense ... if in fact, he is an Indonesian citizen and not an American citizen then there is a clearcut legal reason for him to be promptly impeached (or perhaps some other legal mechanism to invalidate his election) and removed from office.

Yet, it would still leave room for the Obots to make the argument that it doesn't matter a) because he was born in the u.s. b) he couldn't control what his mother and grandmother did legally when he was still a minor c) we're all just a bunch of racist bigots (lol) d) etc., etc.

Therefore, I could foresee the division/civil war/martial law scenario playing out under these conditions.

It also fits perfectly (maybe too perfectly?) with the notion that the entire birth certificate thing was a purposeful smokescreen/distraction designed to distract attention away from the Indonesian citzenship angle.

This, imo, would explain so much about the b.c issue. A few examples of why I think the b.c. issue is a manufactured distraction: 1) BHO actually layed the initial groundwork for the b.c issue in his autobiography when he mentioned "finding" his birth certificate in the closet. 2) I have always believed it was ludicrous to suggest that BHO Sr. was his father as they look nothing alike ... ergo, if that ain't his daddy, then why the fuck would he have been born in Kenya?? 3) The ludicrously theatrical entry of Trump, Arpaio, et al into the issue 4) even the obviously photshopped childhood photos which led many to begin the speculation. I could go on and on.