BRKG; Obama and Netanyahu agree: No Israeli strike on Iran without US assent!!! | |
Primus-Cura (OP) User ID: 6019394 Netherlands 03/20/2013 05:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Following the reports of a chemical attack in Syria and a Syrian air strike inside Lebanon this week, neither Obama nor Netanyahu showed any inclination toward possible military intervention for containing the expansion of the civil conflict raging there, although the US president did use some strong words. Having ordered a thorough inquiry into the reported chemical attack, he said: “If true, it would be a game changer and there will be consequences,” adding: “When you let that genie out of the bottle - a weapon that can cause mass devastation and death - you have to act on the information. I would be deeply skeptical of any claim that the Syrian opposition used chemical weapons.” Same source! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5146667 United States 03/20/2013 05:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5763636 United States 03/20/2013 05:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Primus-Cura (OP) User ID: 6019394 Netherlands 03/20/2013 05:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ASV User ID: 12733917 United States 03/20/2013 05:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In their news conference that night, both reiterated the principle that Israel has the right to independently defend itself against a perceived palpable threat from Iran - even if Washington does not share that perception. Quoting: Primus-Cura The practical application of this principle was rather different: Obama and Netanyahu spoke highly and repeatedly of the close military and intelligence cooperation their governments had developed and which they would hate above all to jeopardize. READ mORe; [link to www.debka.com] Well, of course not, silly rabbit. No Israeli strike without Big Daddy's approval. But, you know...Totally Random Spoonteneous Combustions -- like the one recently at under-ground Fordo -- DO happen. Isfahan already had 2 mishaps. That missile base along with its chief expert... even Busher reactor has been experiencing all sorts of accidental, um, issues since its inception. Dozen Iranian and Russian nuke experts had unfortunate plane accidents & some weird slip-on-a-banana in the most secure part of Teheran mishaps... Stuxnet's, Flame's, Duqu's.... Who's to say Iran won't have 5 times as many of such, uh, snafus, going forward? Something in Iranian air and seismology, I'd wager. Nothing else. Strictly random stuff. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5146667 United States 03/20/2013 05:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Primus-Cura (OP) User ID: 6019394 Netherlands 03/20/2013 05:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In their news conference that night, both reiterated the principle that Israel has the right to independently defend itself against a perceived palpable threat from Iran - even if Washington does not share that perception. Quoting: Primus-Cura The practical application of this principle was rather different: Obama and Netanyahu spoke highly and repeatedly of the close military and intelligence cooperation their governments had developed and which they would hate above all to jeopardize. READ mORe; [link to www.debka.com] Well, of course not, silly rabbit. No Israeli strike without Big Daddy's approval. But, you know...Totally Random Spoonteneous Combustions -- like the one recently at under-ground Fordo -- DO happen. Isfahan already had 2 mishaps. That missile base along with its chief expert... even Busher reactor has been experiencing all sorts of accidental, um, issues since its inception. Dozen Iranian and Russian nuke experts had unfortunate plane accidents & some weird slip-on-a-banana in the most secure part of Teheran mishaps... Stuxnet's, Flame's, Duqu's.... Who's to say Iran won't have 5 times as many of such, uh, snafus, going forward? Something in Iranian air and seismology, I'd wager. Nothing else. ictly random stuff. [/quote) Do you have any proof for that? Lett me see. It is stil not a fact at this time!! Youre a very arrogant about this! I do not think so!! Israel have react many times not have any bigg daddy approvel in the past!! Facts please. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36536661 United States 03/20/2013 05:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In their news conference that night, both reiterated the principle that Israel has the right to independently defend itself against a perceived palpable threat from Iran - even if Washington does not share that perception. Quoting: Primus-Cura The practical application of this principle was rather different: Obama and Netanyahu spoke highly and repeatedly of the close military and intelligence cooperation their governments had developed and which they would hate above all to jeopardize. READ mORe; [link to www.debka.com] Well, of course not, silly rabbit. No Israeli strike without Big Daddy's approval. But, you know...Totally Random Spoonteneous Combustions -- like the one recently at under-ground Fordo -- DO happen. Isfahan already had 2 mishaps. That missile base along with its chief expert... even Busher reactor has been experiencing all sorts of accidental, um, issues since its inception. Dozen Iranian and Russian nuke experts had unfortunate plane accidents & some weird slip-on-a-banana in the most secure part of Teheran mishaps... Stuxnet's, Flame's, Duqu's.... Who's to say Iran won't have 5 times as many of such, uh, snafus, going forward? Something in Iranian air and seismology, I'd wager. Nothing else. Strictly random stuff. It's so easy to be brave when you live thousands of miles away from the war zone, isn't it. |