New Hampshire Bill Introduced to Re-Instate ORIGINAL 13th Amendment - The Truth Is Coming Out | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16568137 United States 03/27/2013 05:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35170672 United States 03/27/2013 05:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35170672 United States 03/27/2013 05:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36900338 United States 03/27/2013 05:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23406053 United States 03/27/2013 05:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31297288 United States 03/27/2013 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35861227 United States 03/27/2013 05:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | es·quire (skwr, -skwr) n. 1. A man or boy who is a member of the gentry in England ranking directly below a knight. 2. Abbr. Esq. Used as an honorific usually in its abbreviated form, especially after the name of an attorney or a consular officer: Jane Doe, Esq.; John Doe, Esq. 3. In medieval times, a candidate for knighthood who served a knight as an attendant and a shield bearer. 4. Archaic An English country gentleman; a squire. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36876191 United States 03/27/2013 05:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 24543661 United States 03/27/2013 06:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Actually, it's "Attorney" that is a Title of Nobility...hey, it just is!...haha. Seriously. "Esquire" as many of them are so proud to tack on after their name is also a Title of Nobility. Thing is, to get the original re-inserted into the Constitution, it would require ratification by other state legislatures....and we know THAT isn't going to happen unless the people wake up en masse.....and that just may happen. But just seeing it in a state public record is a major deal. The existence of the original 13th has been denied, mostly by ATTORNEYS, for a long time and ridiculed as patriot mythology....just to shut down debate on the subject. For a state legislature to do this increases the validity of the argument. Here's the original from the Bill: 2 New Chapter; Thirteenth Amendment. Amend RSA by inserting after chapter 1-A the following new chapter: CHAPTER 1-B ORIGINAL THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT 1-B:1 Original Thirteenth Amendment. The following shall be recognized as the original Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution: Article XIII If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any Emperor, King, Prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them or either of them. 3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1394321 United States 03/27/2013 06:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 24543661 United States 03/27/2013 06:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | who are the 1 star bandits? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35170672 obviously paid shills what is happening here? Those would have to be gov shills....or complete idiots. This is very big news for anyone that has known about the original 13th for a long time and heard all the shills deny it. A lot has been written about this FRAUD. And the bill also brings to the fore the Act of 1871, the altering of the national government of one of, by, and for The People, to a God-forsaken CORPORATION. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 24543661 United States 03/27/2013 06:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | es·quire (skwr, -skwr) n. 1. A man or boy who is a member of the gentry in England ranking directly below a knight. 2. Abbr. Esq. Used as an honorific usually in its abbreviated form, especially after the name of an attorney or a consular officer: Jane Doe, Esq.; John Doe, Esq. 3. In medieval times, a candidate for knighthood who served a knight as an attendant and a shield bearer. 4. Archaic An English country gentleman; a squire. Ah, thank you for looking that up in order to quash the nay-sayers. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 24543661 United States 03/27/2013 06:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 24543661 United States 03/27/2013 06:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm actually surprised that this isn't pinned... I don't really care about my threads being pinned, but people need to see this. The 13th Amendment argument has been going on for a long, long time. And now the details of how it was removed without consent of a properly assembled Congress is in the public record. Man, this is big....pin the mo-fo. |
Eggcellent Re-Instate Smith-Mundt! User ID: 30199236 United States 03/27/2013 06:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thanks for finding and posting this, OP! 5 stars and a ity !! "I have come to the conclusion that all news should be treated like 9/11, assume it is a psyop with actors participating in a staged event complete with props, until proven otherwise, in which case assume whatever is being recorded, reported, televised, is distortions/lying by omission/outright lies, until proven otherwise." - Anonymous, 4-13-12 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31005227 United States 03/27/2013 06:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Another change that would be justified is one similar to what the Country of Jordan passed: nobody holding a public office can have, or ever have had, dual citizenship to any other country. I heard that when that was passed people who had dual citizenship, even if they relinquished it, had to leave their position. Go figure, but don't know if that would be legal to do that here.... |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 24543661 United States 03/27/2013 06:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hey, you're welcome, man. Funny thing, I was going back and forth by email every few minutes with a guy in regard to sovereignty issues and processes and in the middle of it, he drops this on me. I couldn't fucking believe it! Shit, when I read the bill on the NH site, I was like, WOW! And to tell you the truth, I figured if this guy had it and sorta nonchalantly passed it to me in the middle of other stuff, it had to already be here on GLP. But I searched and it wasn't here yet. I'm telling ya, this is a major increase in public awareness....at least, it ought to be. Pretty difficult for the longstanding shills to call a state legislature, some of them anyway, guilty of believing a patriot "myth". I just hope it blows through their legislature and then other state people will hopefully hear of it....not in the lamestream media, but it will get out. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 24543661 United States 03/27/2013 06:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Another change that would be justified is one similar to what the Country of Jordan passed: nobody holding a public office can have, or ever have had, dual citizenship to any other country. I heard that when that was passed people who had dual citizenship, even if they relinquished it, had to leave their position. Go figure, but don't know if that would be legal to do that here.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31005227 Hey, you can make anything "legal" here. :) And it would be LAWFUL, too. Hey, it's meant to protect The People from foreign agents, you know, like John McCane and Lindsey Graham....clearly acting in capacity of "agent" for the STATE OF ISRAEL. Like that Dov Zackheim clown that was Comptroller of the Pentagon when 3.2 Trillion went "missing" and was announced the day before 9/11.....when the Navy investigators at the Pentagon who had all the documents and were investigating the matter had a cruise missile hit their office, direct hit, to end the 3.2 Trillion THEFT orchestrated by DUAL U.S.-Israeli citizen, Dov Zackheim. Hell yeah it would be legal to not only kick them out of any government job, but arrest them for espionage.....fooking pukes....destroying my country like they've been doing. It's over soon for them, I think. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36587745 United States 03/27/2013 06:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 24543661 United States 03/27/2013 06:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Another change that would be justified is one similar to what the Country of Jordan passed: nobody holding a public office can have, or ever have had, dual citizenship to any other country. I heard that when that was passed people who had dual citizenship, even if they relinquished it, had to leave their position. Go figure, but don't know if that would be legal to do that here.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31005227 Hey, another thing. See, since the Act of 1871 mentioned in the bill, when our government went from our true government to a corporation, ANYONE can be an officer or employee of the corporation, including dual citizens. That's the issue with Obamma. His citizenship is extremely clouded, but that's why no one in government is looking at it...because ANYONE can be elected by the "U.S. citizen" subjects of the Government to a corporate office. Seriously, this is why no one in the corporation, especially the majority ESQUIRES/ATTORNEYS, will say anything about it, because it's A-OK! Now, people need to wake up to the fact that they need to reclaim their status as both an "American National" and a capital "C" "Citizen of the United States of America" "Without the United States" (the corp) and deny the presumption that they are lower-case "c" "U.S. citizens" of the corporation. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26044775 United States 03/27/2013 06:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP has it all correct. I've studied this stuff for years and everything he has said is 100% correct! Salute and 5 stars for you, OP! Thank you for picking up this and bringing it to us. This is huge! ...and very good news. It shows large cracks in the armor of the corporation. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 24543661 United States 03/27/2013 06:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As soon as NH passes this I'm betting others will follow Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36587745 Maine for example should step up to the plate pass this seeing as this is where the original 13th amendment was actually found I hope so. What must happen is that people in all of the union states need to understand that with the Act of 1871 our government was converted into a corporation and that the original jurisdiction government of/by/for The People still exists, it's just not currently populated with legitimate non-corporation actors. Same thing with the states. The republic states still exist, but no longer populated in their legislatures and very few among the population. The states were over-laid with Federal Districts like Md. for Maryland became MD for the Federal District. And ZIP Codes are codes for Federal Revenue Districts. There is a lot of info on this and it is vilified in the lamestream media as the Sovereign Citizen movement. Look into it and return to original jurisdiction! That's the key. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26044775 United States 03/27/2013 06:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Another change that would be justified is one similar to what the Country of Jordan passed: nobody holding a public office can have, or ever have had, dual citizenship to any other country. I heard that when that was passed people who had dual citizenship, even if they relinquished it, had to leave their position. Go figure, but don't know if that would be legal to do that here.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31005227 Hey, another thing. See, since the Act of 1871 mentioned in the bill, when our government went from our true government to a corporation, ANYONE can be an officer or employee of the corporation, including dual citizens. That's the issue with Obamma. His citizenship is extremely clouded, but that's why no one in government is looking at it...because ANYONE can be elected by the "U.S. citizen" subjects of the Government to a corporate office. Seriously, this is why no one in the corporation, especially the majority ESQUIRES/ATTORNEYS, will say anything about it, because it's A-OK! Now, people need to wake up to the fact that they need to reclaim their status as both an "American National" and a capital "C" "Citizen of the United States of America" "Without the United States" (the corp) and deny the presumption that they are lower-case "c" "U.S. citizens" of the corporation. Another change that would be justified is one similar to what the Country of Jordan passed: nobody holding a public office can have, or ever have had, dual citizenship to any other country. I heard that when that was passed people who had dual citizenship, even if they relinquished it, had to leave their position. Go figure, but don't know if that would be legal to do that here.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31005227 Hey, another thing. See, since the Act of 1871 mentioned in the bill, when our government went from our true government to a corporation, ANYONE can be an officer or employee of the corporation, including dual citizens. That's the issue with Obamma. His citizenship is extremely clouded, but that's why no one in government is looking at it...because ANYONE can be elected by the "U.S. citizen" subjects of the Government to a corporate office. Seriously, this is why no one in the corporation, especially the majority ESQUIRES/ATTORNEYS, will say anything about it, because it's A-OK! Now, people need to wake up to the fact that they need to reclaim their status as both an "American National" and a capital "C" "Citizen of the United States of America" "Without the United States" (the corp) and deny the presumption that they are lower-case "c" "U.S. citizens" of the corporation. Wow! Hats off to you, buddy! You know your stuff! A few million of us and we could shut this fake government down. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26044775 United States 03/27/2013 06:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35147438 United States 03/27/2013 07:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why do they need an act to recognize it? It can, and has been, proven to have been printed as part of the constitution for 50 years. What they need is the balls to stand up for their sovereign rights under our founding fathers original docs. |
Truthnow User ID: 14786143 United States 03/27/2013 07:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Propagandiated User ID: 7365566 United States 03/27/2013 07:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36842606 United States 03/27/2013 07:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | this post is not orderly because that is my intent the original 13th is still active ... its just .. most people who went to public school have testified (under penalty of perjury) on the forms they signed that they are government employees (US Citizens, there is an oath on the voting form) right next to the signature line) No need to explain why no one was told this, i think its pretty obvious ... continue ... US Employees do not have protection that free men do because they are in a position of trust ... The "attornies" figured that out and got everyone to declare they are employees (using commercial legal name, or registering to vote in a system not ordained by the us constitution (which is treason), or by use of federal resreve notes without redeeming your paycheck for lawful money all those are treasonable offenses ... so any "US Citzen" can not convict any official of "treason" because all of them are committing treason .. including the regular US Citizen . This is why the 14th amendment was created, they needed a new form of citizenship (subject to the jurisdiction thereof) .. section 4 says no USCitizen can question the debt... nowhere does it say it applies to freed slaves , or black people .. its applies to those "subject to the jurisdiction of the US" (article 1 section 8 clause 17-18 will show you what is subject to the US) If you look at the trading w/ they enemy act (1917) it was originally for Germans in WW1 .... It was amended to include those "subject to the jurisdiction of united states" )i.e. federal employees in the district and in the several states) in 1933 along with the New Deal and the federal reserve takeover .. This is because they were tricking everyone into endorsing counterfeit money (i.e. treason) (signing the back of your check without intent to redeem lawful money) The only proof anyone is a USCitizen is the forms you signed checking that box ... Police can not identify you by using your ID because thats a person ... and it is not you .... They have to have you say you are it (this is different than seeing you affront someone and cause a crime) They need you to bond yourself to a commerical instrument to enforce commercial laws (let me see your license) "I am only showing you this to show I passed the driver's test and not for identification" State ID means your a state employee but its upto you to choose the character you are operating in at any given time (could use a passport, certificate of search also as ID (this is when you have the county clerk check for outstanding warrants (use true name first middle) but its upto you ... Police should already check on warrants before pulling you over talking to you etc .. Use this info as you will End of Line |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31297288 United States 03/27/2013 07:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26614631 United States 03/27/2013 07:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |