Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,125 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 238,164
Pageviews Today: 385,160Threads Today: 119Posts Today: 2,281
05:06 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Kubrick's "The Shining" - is it a parallel biography about his childhood, Faked Apollo moon landing, and Nazi Germany?
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
[link to saturndeathcult.com]

The Shining: A film crucial to understanding how Kubrick was able to get away with making films laced with occult references and alchemical imagery. Weidner believes this fraught adaption of Stephen King’s novel about an isolated writer going mad (King hated Kubrick’s adaption) is actually a cryptic confession by Kubrick of his involvement in the faking of the Apollo 11 moon landings!

And with that last statement we finally arrive at why Kubrick seems to have been allowed to embark on a career making movies with hidden alchemical messages and occult exposés.

Kubrick’s Apollo 11 deal

I first came across Weidner’s work on Stanley Kubrick when researching possible evidence for a faked 1969 moon landing by NASA. There are many theories claiming that the 1969 Apollo moon mission was faked, but Weidner caught my interest due to his comparative analysis of the moon landing footage with Kubrick’s special effects work in 2001: A Space Odyssey.

What Weidner was able to plausibly demonstrate was that the background sky in the Apollo 11 mission shots shared the same forensic tell-tale signs of Kubrick’s front projection technique used on 2001: A Space Odyssey.

I quote from the blurb to Weidner’s excellent documentary film Kubrick’s Odyssey Part 1:

“In Kubrick’s Odyssey, Part I, Kubrick and Apollo, author and filmmaker, Jay Weidner presents compelling evidence of how Stanley Kubrick directed the Apollo moon landings. He reveals that the film, 2001: A Space Odyssey was not only a retelling of Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick’s novel, but also a research and development project that assisted Kubrick in the creation of the Apollo moon footage. In light of this revelation, Weidner also explores Kubrick’s film, The Shining and shows that this film is, in actuality, the story of Kubrick’s personal travails as he secretly worked on the Apollo footage for NASA.”

Having extensive experience in film production myself, Weidner’s technical arguments were powerfully persuasive. What we also learn from Weidner is that Kubrick, in agreeing to fake the moon landings, brokered a deal that allowed him to make any movie he wished from that time on with full artistic control. Kubrick had become an insider in one of the greatest alleged conspiracies of the age, but it was to cost him dearly and he would use his artistic freedom to subtly expose those behind the conspiracy.
 Quoting: Salt


Bolding mine.

Unfortunately, Jay gets it wrong. One of his so-called tell-tale signs of front projection does NOT occur anywhere in the footage of 2001, and for very good reason; Kubrick and his people realized there would be a problem and did a clever thing to avoid it. Which Jay would know, if he had actually read anything about the TECHNICAL nature of the making of that film.

There is also an obvious obverse. There is a tell-tale sign of front projection in 2001. It isn't one that Jay mentioned (at least, as of his last editing of his site.) It is also something that WOULD have been particularly obvious not just in one moment, but over and over again in the Apollo footage.

And these are just the howlers. The lighting, the layout of the scenes...everything shown in the Apollo surface material is almost exactly opposite of how you want to set up for front projection, and, yes, almost exactly opposite of how Kubrick set up the shots he famously used in the early parts of 2001.
 Quoting: nomuse (not logged in) 2380183


Jay also said that he thinks we really did go to the moon with Apollo 11 and the kubrick footage was an effort to not reveal the real equipment used for the mission.

i don't buy that for one second.
Jay offers good stuff, but then he loses me in certain areas which makes everything he brings to the table suspect.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP