Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,510 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,998,466
Pageviews Today: 2,771,310Threads Today: 698Posts Today: 12,231
08:42 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.

 
plzxplain

User ID: 37475914
Australia
04/05/2013 06:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
Isn't it strange though that mortality rates for children have decreased proportionately with vaccinations since 1940.

Isn't.
That.
Strange.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3335794


If you do some research you will see the mortality rates lowered and almost dropped off the charts BEFORE vaccs started.
This was due to very clever people learning HYGIENE,
washing hands, turning away when coughing, etc
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37381809
Colombia
04/05/2013 06:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
Very wise choice to not vaccinate your kids, OP. I suspect that, as more and more of us awaken, there will be a serious backlash against the bullshit vaccinations that kids around the world are forced to undergo.

Intelligence is definitely adversely affected by the poison they put in vaccines, and perceptive abilities are even MORE negatively affected. I think that is the primary goal of the vaccines, actually -- to so calcify the pineal gland (and then fluoride in every fucking thing is the maintenance program) that people can never properly perceive the world around them.

Case in point, I know two people very well who weren't vaccinated as children, and they are both fully awake and aware and are able to perceive things the average person is absolutely and completely unaware of.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1141627
Netherlands
04/05/2013 06:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
Forgot to mention. I do NOT vaccinate my kids, and ALL were breast fed until they were 3, except for our 2 year old(he still as a year to go).

They are 2,9, and 15.

All are VERY healthy and SMART.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25658088


Respect to you :)
It pleases me there are some some non-retarded parents out there. I got vaccinated and I got some bad eye damage due to it. The eye damage bothers me every single day. Sometimes when I sit behind the computer for a long time I have to keep 1 eye closed all the time due to the irritation due to the eye damage. I also had a bone marrow infection when I was 2 years old. Probably due to vaccinations (can you think of some other reason, I cannot) and they gave me antibiotics, which I was allergic to) Ah I was abused so much due to my stupid parents and the evil system. I don't like my parents much due to their evil stupidity.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37477531
United States
04/05/2013 07:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
Great pic OP.
Thanks for sharing.
--

:vaccinations:
 Quoting: wisc_natureboy


This is misleading?

As the 2012 column is based on vaccines upto the age of 6
1940 and 1980 are vaccines upto the age of 2


Am I missing something?




.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 37144263


There were not any other vaccines in routine use in 1940.


[link to www.historyofvaccines.org]


Some vaccinations have been recommended in the United States since the 1940s, although the official annual schedule endorsed by ACIP, AAP, and AAFP did not appear until 1995. A combined vaccine for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (whooping cough) was recommended in the 1940s; a combined vaccine for those three diseases is still recommended today. The smallpox vaccine, on the other hand, was on the schedule in the 1940s but is no longer recommended, as smallpox was declared eradicated in 1980 and eliminated from the United States much earlier.

The newly developed vaccine for polio was recommended in the 1950s. The specific vaccine used has changed since then, but polio vaccine remains on the current schedule. The combined measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine was added to the list of recommendations in the 1970s, after vaccines for all three diseases were developed in the 1960s.

The resulting recommended vaccination list included vaccines for seven diseases in the 1970s
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27476484
United States
04/05/2013 07:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
Isn't it strange though that mortality rates for children have decreased proportionately with vaccinations since 1940.

Isn't.
That.
Strange.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3335794


I also find it curious that mortality rates for children have decreased since public sanitation became the norm. Viruses are contained in shit. Who would have thought?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37477531
United States
04/05/2013 07:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
I also find it curious that mortality rates for children have decreased since public sanitation became the norm. Viruses are contained in shit. Who would have thought?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27476484


The reduction in human mortality around the time of the introduction of canned tomatoes has always interested me.


Just to see how change in life expectancy has occurred (or not) a nifty interactive graph. 1860-canned tomatoes!

[link to mappinghistory.uoregon.edu]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1153672
United States
04/05/2013 07:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
WOW AWESOME FIND!!!

stole from another thread....

"Seeing all division of government are infiltrated including FDA, EPA, CDC, USDA, ADA, it is easy for our enemy to place toxins into our mouth care products.

AMERICA IS UNDER ATTACK AND THE BRITISH EMPIRE IS COMING AGAIN. This time they have help from many traitors inside the USA. All are exposed and all names known. Most will face the death sentence when arrested therefor they have nothing to loose. They must kill all the American men, or face a certain death themselves.

WE ARE UNDER ATTACK"


I would print this chart, bring it to the Sheriff, demand they be stopped NOW and what ever you do do not let your kids get vaccinated.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1153672
United States
04/05/2013 07:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
WOW AWESOME FIND!!!

stole from another thread....

"Seeing all division of government are infiltrated including FDA, EPA, CDC, USDA, ADA, it is easy for our enemy to place toxins into our mouth care products.

AMERICA IS UNDER ATTACK AND THE BRITISH EMPIRE IS COMING AGAIN. This time they have help from many traitors inside the USA. All are exposed and all names known. Most will face the death sentence when arrested therefor they have nothing to loose. They must kill all the American men, or face a certain death themselves.

WE ARE UNDER ATTACK"


I would print this chart, bring it to the Sheriff, demand they be stopped NOW and what ever you do do not let your kids get vaccinated.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1153672


There is no telling what is in those vaccinations. With medical records online they can monitor results with ease. A report came out yesterday stating the West Cost infants are now at a 30% higher risk of thyroid issues due to Fukushima. REALLY???? I say its in the vaccinations...INTENTIONALLY.

The morning after pill will soon be making more birth defects and women sterile too.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26870740
United States
04/05/2013 08:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
also - DO NOT feed children any of the commercial US cereals - from Cheerio's onward. They contain a range of unlisted chemicals, as well as metal. Yes, ground-up METAL.

I forget which EU country has banned all 'fortified' Kellogs products, because of the added 'iron.'
freedomain

User ID: 23423659
United Kingdom
04/05/2013 08:36 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8704208
Germany
04/05/2013 08:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.

[link to doublethink.us.com]

Does this seem normal to you guys?

sheep
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25658088


OP, your title is misleading. It's vaccinations compared, not vaccines. I was expecting some details about the ingredients.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8704208
Germany
04/05/2013 08:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
also - DO NOT feed children any of the commercial US cereals - from Cheerio's onward. They contain a range of unlisted chemicals, as well as metal. Yes, ground-up METAL.

I forget which EU country has banned all 'fortified' Kellogs products, because of the added 'iron.'
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26870740


With iron, there's no problem. People used to stick iron nails into apples to get some additional iron. The nails had to be removed before eating the apples though.
I pity this site!
User ID: 24860333
United States
04/05/2013 08:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
You got some crazy ideas on this forum.....no wonder Web Of Trust thing has a yellow sign on this site....be cautious. a forum full of crazy ideas, and some people have some serious issues on here. this place is considered the laughing stock by most places on the net....nothing to be proud of either. the only good thing about this site NOT every topic on this site is crazy and nonsensical and absurd. I advise all sane people to get the hell off this site before you become a paranoid person filled with magical and illogical and irrational thoughts and ideas.
wisc_natureboy

User ID: 1118151
United States
04/05/2013 09:00 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
You got some crazy ideas on this forum.....no wonder Web Of Trust thing has a yellow sign on this site....be cautious. a forum full of crazy ideas, and some people have some serious issues on here. this place is considered the laughing stock by most places on the net....nothing to be proud of either. the only good thing about this site NOT every topic on this site is crazy and nonsensical and absurd. I advise all sane people to get the hell off this site before you become a paranoid person filled with magical and illogical and irrational thoughts and ideas.
 Quoting: I pity this site! 24860333


sheeple
.
-
.

We all breathe the same air.
.-.. --- ...- . / .- .-.. .-..
(love/all)
Daniel of the Rose

User ID: 15114131
United States
04/05/2013 09:06 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
Great pic OP.
Thanks for sharing.
--

vaccinations
 Quoting: wisc_natureboy


This is misleading?

As the 2012 column is based on vaccines upto the age of 6
1940 and 1980 are vaccines upto the age of 2


Am I missing something?




.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 37144263


There were not any other vaccines in routine use in 1940.


[link to www.historyofvaccines.org]


Some vaccinations have been recommended in the United States since the 1940s, although the official annual schedule endorsed by ACIP, AAP, and AAFP did not appear until 1995. A combined vaccine for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (whooping cough) was recommended in the 1940s; a combined vaccine for those three diseases is still recommended today. The smallpox vaccine, on the other hand, was on the schedule in the 1940s but is no longer recommended, as smallpox was declared eradicated in 1980 and eliminated from the United States much earlier.

The newly developed vaccine for polio was recommended in the 1950s. The specific vaccine used has changed since then, but polio vaccine remains on the current schedule. The combined measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine was added to the list of recommendations in the 1970s, after vaccines for all three diseases were developed in the 1960s.

The resulting recommended vaccination list included vaccines for seven diseases in the 1970s

 Quoting: zenobiaphobia


it's fueled by EUGENICS!!!!.........

stay sharp guys....that's around the time it was weaseled into California.
rainrose
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37439559
Canada
04/05/2013 09:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.

[link to doublethink.us.com]

Does this seem normal to you guys?

sheep
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25658088


It is NOT normal

but if you have worked in health care for any length of time
you know

why
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 37168806


Please clarify the "why". Thanks.
Vic-chick13

User ID: 37101101
Canada
04/05/2013 09:15 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
You got some crazy ideas on this forum.....no wonder Web Of Trust thing has a yellow sign on this site....be cautious. a forum full of crazy ideas, and some people have some serious issues on here. this place is considered the laughing stock by most places on the net....nothing to be proud of either. the only good thing about this site NOT every topic on this site is crazy and nonsensical and absurd. I advise all sane people to get the hell off this site before you become a paranoid person filled with magical and illogical and irrational thoughts and ideas.
 Quoting: I pity this site! 24860333


sheeple
 Quoting: wisc_natureboy


1rof1
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37367757
United States
04/05/2013 09:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
Please Sheeples THINK ---- TV commercials of prescription pills are mostly about what side effects can occur if you take the pill....

SOOOOOOO what about VACCINATIONS - WHAT ARE THESE SIDE-EFFECTS??????????

Everything that is happening to our children NOW.....

Does anyone have any documented info on the side-effects of Vaccinations??????????
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 536288


Here is a list of the package inserts for the typical vaccines! PARENTS BOOKMARK THIS!!
[link to www.vaccinesafety.edu]
+ Sparrow and Medicine +

User ID: 37473230
United Kingdom
04/05/2013 09:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
Yeah, what's wrong with it?
Rumour has it that I was not born,
I just walked in one frosty morn,
into the vision of some vacant mind.
veracious common sense

User ID: 1462016
Canada
04/05/2013 09:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
that's alarming , no ?
"we must make the world honest before we can honestly say to the children that honesty is the best policy! "
George Bernard Shaw.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34629421
United Kingdom
04/05/2013 09:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
lol as a pharmaceutical scientist I can tell you that picture is bullshit, and a lot of them are repeated up to 4 times!

I am fairly sure someone has exxagerated this, essentially, you can choose to get your child vaccinated from polio ages 6 months, 1 year, 1 year 6 months or 2 years. Not all 4 times.

I know plenty of parents with 2-3 year old kids, they had MMR, polio and that's about it. Most children have 3-6 by the time they're two.

Good luck to all parents not vaccinating their children, the reason they're healthy is because 99% of America has been vaccinated, so the disease has trouble spreading, but if an outbreak occurs (USUALLY BECAUSE OF NON VACCINATED PEOPLE!) they will be the first to suffer.

Around 6 in the picture are flu vaccines, which are definitely NOT compulsory unless there is a medical complication with the baby/child.

As to autism, autism, ADHD, aspergers etc are all social and mental issues, which funnily enough, cannot be diagnosed in a 3-6 month old baby, as their brains arent developed enough by then yet.

It is simple coincidence. A lot of injections are given around about the time babies start to socialise and can be tested mentally. They're then found to have autism.

Correlation does not equal causation.

Children also have a lot of E numbers, maybe that causes it?

You cant just see something and claim it is definitely that. No evidence at all.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37367757
United States
04/05/2013 10:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
lol as a pharmaceutical scientist I can tell you that picture is bullshit, and a lot of them are repeated up to 4 times!

I am fairly sure someone has exxagerated this, essentially, you can choose to get your child vaccinated from polio ages 6 months, 1 year, 1 year 6 months or 2 years. Not all 4 times.

I know plenty of parents with 2-3 year old kids, they had MMR, polio and that's about it. Most children have 3-6 by the time they're two.

Good luck to all parents not vaccinating their children, the reason they're healthy is because 99% of America has been vaccinated, so the disease has trouble spreading, but if an outbreak occurs (USUALLY BECAUSE OF NON VACCINATED PEOPLE!) they will be the first to suffer.

Around 6 in the picture are flu vaccines, which are definitely NOT compulsory unless there is a medical complication with the baby/child.

As to autism, autism, ADHD, aspergers etc are all social and mental issues, which funnily enough, cannot be diagnosed in a 3-6 month old baby, as their brains arent developed enough by then yet.

It is simple coincidence. A lot of injections are given around about the time babies start to socialise and can be tested mentally. They're then found to have autism.

Correlation does not equal causation.

Children also have a lot of E numbers, maybe that causes it?

You cant just see something and claim it is definitely that. No evidence at all.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34629421


THESE VACCINES ARE CHEMICAL LOBOTOMIES & DEATHBOMBS WAKE UP!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 36032765
United States
04/05/2013 10:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
Great post op

Go to youtube and watch congressman dan burton take these maniacs on
Daggo
The Lerker

User ID: 37343097
United States
04/05/2013 10:12 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
No it does not! Funny my coworkers are talking about the sharp rise of autism in recent history and I'm prone to blaming vaccines. Don't forget to add the mercury!
 Quoting: calx


I'm with you on this one Calx, also I do remember the post where the CDC said that the number of children affected with it was much higher than previously reported.

To me that means that either the truth has been hidden so no one would look for the cause, or that something has just been introduced to cause it.

Last Edited by Daggo on 04/05/2013 10:13 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24465034
United States
04/05/2013 10:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
lol as a pharmaceutical scientist I can tell you that picture is bullshit, and a lot of them are repeated up to 4 times!

I am fairly sure someone has exxagerated this, essentially, you can choose to get your child vaccinated from polio ages 6 months, 1 year, 1 year 6 months or 2 years. Not all 4 times.

I know plenty of parents with 2-3 year old kids, they had MMR, polio and that's about it. Most children have 3-6 by the time they're two.

Good luck to all parents not vaccinating their children, the reason they're healthy is because 99% of America has been vaccinated, so the disease has trouble spreading, but if an outbreak occurs (USUALLY BECAUSE OF NON VACCINATED PEOPLE!) they will be the first to suffer.

Around 6 in the picture are flu vaccines, which are definitely NOT compulsory unless there is a medical complication with the baby/child.

As to autism, autism, ADHD, aspergers etc are all social and mental issues, which funnily enough, cannot be diagnosed in a 3-6 month old baby, as their brains arent developed enough by then yet.

It is simple coincidence. A lot of injections are given around about the time babies start to socialise and can be tested mentally. They're then found to have autism.

Correlation does not equal causation.

Children also have a lot of E numbers, maybe that causes it?

You cant just see something and claim it is definitely that. No evidence at all.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34629421



Dont you see you silly fuck you are part of the problem, you are a modern day legal drug pusher. Probably make really good money thinking and making the bullshit drugs up some day someone will smack the shit out of you for killing the innocent.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37448396
United States
04/05/2013 10:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
lol as a pharmaceutical scientist I can tell you that picture is bullshit, and a lot of them are repeated up to 4 times!

I am fairly sure someone has exxagerated this, essentially, you can choose to get your child vaccinated from polio ages 6 months, 1 year, 1 year 6 months or 2 years. Not all 4 times.

I know plenty of parents with 2-3 year old kids, they had MMR, polio and that's about it. Most children have 3-6 by the time they're two.

Good luck to all parents not vaccinating their children, the reason they're healthy is because 99% of America has been vaccinated, so the disease has trouble spreading, but if an outbreak occurs (USUALLY BECAUSE OF NON VACCINATED PEOPLE!) they will be the first to suffer.

Around 6 in the picture are flu vaccines, which are definitely NOT compulsory unless there is a medical complication with the baby/child.

As to autism, autism, ADHD, aspergers etc are all social and mental issues, which funnily enough, cannot be diagnosed in a 3-6 month old baby, as their brains arent developed enough by then yet.

It is simple coincidence. A lot of injections are given around about the time babies start to socialise and can be tested mentally. They're then found to have autism.

Correlation does not equal causation.

Children also have a lot of E numbers, maybe that causes it?

You cant just see something and claim it is definitely that. No evidence at all.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34629421


As a pharmaceutical scientist you should understand that in order for you to have a job and your "owners" to have huge and consistent profits you don't need healthy people.....Healthy populous would render you jobless and whole med/insurance business model obsolete or Very LOW Profit.......YOU NEED SICK PEOPLE for you to serve your purpose.....this is why you're brainwashed from your first med book to embrace the "miracle of vaccine"....so your good conciseness gets rotten to the core by the time you graduate.
Master X

User ID: 37491714
04/05/2013 11:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
You got some crazy ideas on this forum.....no wonder Web Of Trust thing has a yellow sign on this site....be cautious. a forum full of crazy ideas, and some people have some serious issues on here. this place is considered the laughing stock by most places on the net....nothing to be proud of either. the only good thing about this site NOT every topic on this site is crazy and nonsensical and absurd. I advise all sane people to get the hell off this site before you become a paranoid person filled with magical and illogical and irrational thoughts and ideas.
 Quoting: I pity this site! 24860333


Plenty of the best doctors on the net (that actually give you health-giving advise, not "take this pill, and this pill...don't forget this one!") are usually against all the pointless vaccines. All these kids getting endless vaccines to stuff they ain't going to get at ages that fucks up their immune is bad enough, but when you realize all the extra "added poison" ingredients in these things, you've no sane choice but to assume they're deliberately trying to poison your kid.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 682262
United States
04/05/2013 11:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
You are a goddamn hippie.

End of story.

Vaccines do not cause autism. The study has been proven a fraud.

Moreover, it doesn't even make sense.

If vaccines caused autism it certainly wouldn't be by their ingredients, but by the effect on the immune system.

If the immune system were able to rewire your brain without killing brain cells, fine maybe vaccines cause autism.

But the immune system doesn't do this. Vis a Vis, you're a goddamn hippie.

Also, you're a fucking idiot.

Also, you really, really are stupid because you are a little sheep that believes in delusional ideas to comfort themselves from the realities of the world.

Have you thought that, possibly just possibly, autism happens because of a whole host of environmental factors? Maybe a virus in-utero? Maybe pollution?

It is for sure not vaccines. Why? BECAUSE IT DOESN'T MAKE FUCKING SENSE.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 682262
United States
04/05/2013 11:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
To all the people who don't vaccinate: THE ONLY FUCKING REASON YOU'RE ALIVE IS:

a) America has sanitation and hygeine
b) Everyone else vaccinates


I have never heard a respectable doctor say don't vaccinate. Only doctors who want to earn a quick buck off a book or want to give speeches to pathetic losers that believe these things.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 682262
United States
04/05/2013 11:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vaccines in 1940 compared to 2012.
lol as a pharmaceutical scientist I can tell you that picture is bullshit, and a lot of them are repeated up to 4 times!

I am fairly sure someone has exxagerated this, essentially, you can choose to get your child vaccinated from polio ages 6 months, 1 year, 1 year 6 months or 2 years. Not all 4 times.

I know plenty of parents with 2-3 year old kids, they had MMR, polio and that's about it. Most children have 3-6 by the time they're two.

Good luck to all parents not vaccinating their children, the reason they're healthy is because 99% of America has been vaccinated, so the disease has trouble spreading, but if an outbreak occurs (USUALLY BECAUSE OF NON VACCINATED PEOPLE!) they will be the first to suffer.

Around 6 in the picture are flu vaccines, which are definitely NOT compulsory unless there is a medical complication with the baby/child.

As to autism, autism, ADHD, aspergers etc are all social and mental issues, which funnily enough, cannot be diagnosed in a 3-6 month old baby, as their brains arent developed enough by then yet.

It is simple coincidence. A lot of injections are given around about the time babies start to socialise and can be tested mentally. They're then found to have autism.

Correlation does not equal causation.

Children also have a lot of E numbers, maybe that causes it?

You cant just see something and claim it is definitely that. No evidence at all.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34629421



Dont you see you silly fuck you are part of the problem, you are a modern day legal drug pusher. Probably make really good money thinking and making the bullshit drugs up some day someone will smack the shit out of you for killing the innocent.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24465034


I think you are delusional. Diseases aren't made up. There isn't a magical cure-all such as cannabis oil.

How about this: when you get sick, you don't get drugs since you don't want pharma companies. Let's play that game and just let your idiot ass die.

The second you have a life-threatening illness, you will be begging for drugs.

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!