REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
Message Subject
|
Three Experts Explain Why North Korea Keeps Ratcheting Tensions
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
Post Content
|
If it is so easy to use ICBM’s, Why does America still use B52’s that are 50 + years by now? Why spend so much money on B-2’s? There is a limit on the payload you can put onto a Rocket. Remember all the hype about the Scud missiles in the beginning of the Iraq war? How much influence did they have on the outcome of the war? Zilch.. The guys in the pentagon are no idiots, belief me. The stealth bombers we know about are old head. (30 Years +) If a real Thermo nuclear war was about to start, the US will get their new toys out. The US is not going to sit quietly and wait to get evaporated. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36545374 I will go slow so you fucking inbred limey's can understand. Strategic forces Triad. That means 3 layers of nuclear weapons delivery systems. Manned bombers are politically the best because they are re-usable, controllable and in the air, very survivable to deliver a nuke. ICBMs are weapons that will never be used. Once you do fire them, they are gone. Usually fixed site, vulnerable to first strike. Last, Sub launched weapons. Stealthy, they are the insurance policy. If you hit a nations ICBMs in a first strike, it is a good bet that the subs (or bombers) will zap your population centers and industrial targets later, thus deterring that first strike in the first place. Got it?
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|