Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,265 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,103,420
Pageviews Today: 1,439,881Threads Today: 269Posts Today: 4,995
10:36 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?

 
tmorais

User ID: 37263501
Brazil
04/06/2013 10:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
Angels are spirits just like us OP.

But their journey began much longer time ago than ours.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1135376
United States
04/06/2013 10:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
please stop your ridiculous approach to the topic
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 34798113
United States
04/06/2013 11:13 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
Angels are spirits just like us OP.

But their journey began much longer time ago than ours.
 Quoting: tmorais


Spirits are made of matter? What then are mammals made of?
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 34798113
United States
04/06/2013 11:14 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
please stop your ridiculous approach to the topic
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1135376


Take another shot at the answer. Try to be a little more concise next turn.
tmorais

User ID: 37263501
Brazil
04/06/2013 11:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
Angels are spirits just like us OP.

But their journey began much longer time ago than ours.
 Quoting: tmorais


Spirits are made of matter? What then are mammals made of?
 Quoting: DGN


Spirit is imaterial.

We have a perispirit, which is electromagnetic and is able to act as a bond between the physical body and the spirit.
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 34798113
United States
04/06/2013 11:24 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
Angels are spirits just like us OP.

But their journey began much longer time ago than ours.
 Quoting: tmorais


Spirits are made of matter? What then are mammals made of?
 Quoting: DGN


Spirit is imaterial.

We have a perispirit, which is electromagnetic and is able to act as a bond between the physical body and the spirit.
 Quoting: tmorais


Fa a a a rrrr out, share some data on this. My college is intrigued.
spock
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 36615239
United States
04/06/2013 12:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
Angels = Myth

Ameoba(spell checked) = Reality

Try another method to disprove evolution(or prove your mythos has validity over the other +2,000 gods). If you can...

You've managed to fail in all of the other threads you've posted. Maybe one day you can come up with a cohesive argument.
tmorais

User ID: 37263501
Brazil
04/06/2013 12:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
Angels are spirits just like us OP.

But their journey began much longer time ago than ours.
 Quoting: tmorais


Spirits are made of matter? What then are mammals made of?
 Quoting: DGN


Spirit is imaterial.

We have a perispirit, which is electromagnetic and is able to act as a bond between the physical body and the spirit.
 Quoting: tmorais


Fa a a a rrrr out, share some data on this. My college is intrigued.
spock
 Quoting: DGN


I think this link can help you: [link to www.explorespiritism.com]
G. House

User ID: 37381471
United States
04/06/2013 12:26 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
ufo56
 Quoting: DGN


AGAIN...

Darwin is dead, has been for a long time.

Yet constantly you want to argue with someone who can not respond or defend himself.

Says a lot about you.

Also...

I know of no angels in the fossil record.
"Everybody lies."
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 34798113
United States
04/06/2013 12:57 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
ufo56
 Quoting: DGN


AGAIN...

Darwin is dead, has been for a long time.

Yet constantly you want to argue with someone who can not respond or defend himself.

Says a lot about you.

Also...

I know of no angels in the fossil record.
 Quoting: G. House


Or even one single half and fossil.
violentoppisition

User ID: 28176860
United States
04/06/2013 01:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
this has to be your absolute best post dgn. it shows everyone EXACTLY where you are coming from, and firmly establishes your beliefs as FACT. with so much evidence, and proof, how could anyone NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT, or disagree at all?


please, continue to enlighten us.
we would all be completely lost without you.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33802491
United States
04/06/2013 01:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
ufo56
 Quoting: DGN


AGAIN...

Darwin is dead, has been for a long time.

Yet constantly you want to argue with someone who can not respond or defend himself.

Says a lot about you.

Also...

I know of no angels in the fossil record.
 Quoting: G. House


Or even one single half and fossil.
 Quoting: DGN


[link to www.transitionalfossils.com]
El_Duderino

User ID: 36994774
United Kingdom
04/06/2013 01:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
stupthrd
Luckily I'm adhering to a pretty strict, uh, drug regiment to keep my mind limber.
:Dudeism:
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 34798113
United States
04/06/2013 04:02 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
this has to be your absolute best post dgn. it shows everyone EXACTLY where you are coming from, and firmly establishes your beliefs as FACT. with so much evidence, and proof, how could anyone NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT, or disagree at all?


please, continue to enlighten us.
we would all be completely lost without you.
 Quoting: violentoppisition


'Comon, just a little fun with Darwin's atheist theory.... how far can it s t r e t c h?
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 34798113
United States
04/09/2013 12:59 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
stupthrd
 Quoting: El_Duderino


Ahhh.. an intellectually exquisite reply. Anyone know more about this question than that?

Last Edited by DGN on 04/11/2013 08:08 PM
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 34798113
United States
04/11/2013 08:10 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
this has to be your absolute best post dgn. it shows everyone EXACTLY where you are coming from, and firmly establishes your beliefs as FACT. with so much evidence, and proof, how could anyone NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT, or disagree at all?


please, continue to enlighten us.
we would all be completely lost without you.
 Quoting: violentoppisition


C'mon I'm just asking evolutionists if they think angels used to be humans, how far does the theory go?
ufo56
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37511744
Canada
04/11/2013 08:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
Dgn, You are my favorite member to 1 star
and also to bullshit flag

so

bsflagbsflagbsflagbsflagbsflagbsflagbsflagbsflag
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35710099
Australia
04/11/2013 08:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
I will never understand why you do this. Honestly, it makes me wonder how old you are. Don't bother telling me; I won't be back to find out.

You know, there are whole forums dedicated to the kind of questions you troll us with. Places where intellectual, educated people, scientists and Bible scholars, debate this with erudite and well thought-out arguments. As an added bonus, most of them are aware that amoebas aren't extinct.
 Quoting: Mycelium


Which proves they never 'evolved' at all doesn't it?
 Quoting: DGN


No it doesn't prove that. You assume that evolution means "amoebas evolved into something else, therefore amoebas don't exist any more, just 'something else' exists now." This is wrong, and a little bit of thought will show that the theory of evolution does not say this.

Your implication is that when organism A "evolved" into organism B, organism A no longer exists. If this was correct, there would be a chain of evolution A -> B -> C ... -> Z. Under this "theory of evolution", there would only be ONE SPECIES OF ANIMAL on the planet now. The only animals on the planet would be organism Z.

Obviously there is more than one species on the planet. Evolutionary biologists, including Charles Darwin, know this very well. Therefore, they would have to be complete retards to propose the theory you are proposing, because it does not describe the observable state of life on the planet.

Instead, biologists say that organism A can evolve into more than one species of organism, for example A evolves into B and C and D. Then B evolves into E and F, and C evolves into G, H, and I, and D goes extinct.

Hopefully you will now understand that the theory of evolution does not require amoebas to be extinct; and that the theory you are proposing is not the theory that biologists use.

Essentially by saying "amoebas should be extinct" you are using a strawman argument. Biologists don't say that evolution means that amoebas must be extinct, therefore it is simply wrong for you to say that they do say that.
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 34798113
United States
04/11/2013 08:49 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
I will never understand why you do this. Honestly, it makes me wonder how old you are. Don't bother telling me; I won't be back to find out.

You know, there are whole forums dedicated to the kind of questions you troll us with. Places where intellectual, educated people, scientists and Bible scholars, debate this with erudite and well thought-out arguments. As an added bonus, most of them are aware that amoebas aren't extinct.
 Quoting: Mycelium


Which proves they never 'evolved' at all doesn't it?
 Quoting: DGN


No it doesn't prove that. You assume that evolution means "amoebas evolved into something else, therefore amoebas don't exist any more, just 'something else' exists now." This is wrong, and a little bit of thought will show that the theory of evolution does not say this.

Your implication is that when organism A "evolved" into organism B, organism A no longer exists. If this was correct, there would be a chain of evolution A -> B -> C ... -> Z. Under this "theory of evolution", there would only be ONE SPECIES OF ANIMAL on the planet now. The only animals on the planet would be organism Z.

Obviously there is more than one species on the planet. Evolutionary biologists, including Charles Darwin, know this very well. Therefore, they would have to be complete retards to propose the theory you are proposing, because it does not describe the observable state of life on the planet.

Instead, biologists say that organism A can evolve into more than one species of organism, for example A evolves into B and C and D. Then B evolves into E and F, and C evolves into G, H, and I, and D goes extinct.

Hopefully you will now understand that the theory of evolution does not require amoebas to be extinct; and that the theory you are proposing is not the theory that biologists use.

Essentially by saying "amoebas should be extinct" you are using a strawman argument. Biologists don't say that evolution means that amoebas must be extinct, therefore it is simply wrong for you to say that they do say that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35710099


BillyBob her y'all, an i jis gotta tip ma hat to ya cuz ifn that dont provide proof positive evillution is true, i dont kno what would. Evn the good Lord gotta admit ta that. If anybody stil dont git it just git yurself some colored pencils. Draw an omeba, than a fish, than a mud skipper, a lizard, a mouse, a monkey and finlly draw a man standing tall n ya got yurself all the proof a inteligent person needs. Lemme sho y'all;

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35710099
Australia
04/11/2013 08:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
I will never understand why you do this. Honestly, it makes me wonder how old you are. Don't bother telling me; I won't be back to find out.

You know, there are whole forums dedicated to the kind of questions you troll us with. Places where intellectual, educated people, scientists and Bible scholars, debate this with erudite and well thought-out arguments. As an added bonus, most of them are aware that amoebas aren't extinct.
 Quoting: Mycelium


Which proves they never 'evolved' at all doesn't it?
 Quoting: DGN


No it doesn't prove that. You assume that evolution means "amoebas evolved into something else, therefore amoebas don't exist any more, just 'something else' exists now." This is wrong, and a little bit of thought will show that the theory of evolution does not say this.

Your implication is that when organism A "evolved" into organism B, organism A no longer exists. If this was correct, there would be a chain of evolution A -> B -> C ... -> Z. Under this "theory of evolution", there would only be ONE SPECIES OF ANIMAL on the planet now. The only animals on the planet would be organism Z.

Obviously there is more than one species on the planet. Evolutionary biologists, including Charles Darwin, know this very well. Therefore, they would have to be complete retards to propose the theory you are proposing, because it does not describe the observable state of life on the planet.

Instead, biologists say that organism A can evolve into more than one species of organism, for example A evolves into B and C and D. Then B evolves into E and F, and C evolves into G, H, and I, and D goes extinct.

Hopefully you will now understand that the theory of evolution does not require amoebas to be extinct; and that the theory you are proposing is not the theory that biologists use.

Essentially by saying "amoebas should be extinct" you are using a strawman argument. Biologists don't say that evolution means that amoebas must be extinct, therefore it is simply wrong for you to say that they do say that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35710099


BillyBob her y'all, an i jis gotta tip ma hat to ya cuz ifn that dont provide proof positive evillution is true, i dont kno what would. Evn the good Lord gotta admit ta that. If anybody stil dont git it just git yurself some colored pencils. Draw an omeba, than a fish, than a mud skipper, a lizard, a mouse, a monkey and finlly draw a man standing tall n ya got yurself all the proof a inteligent person needs. Lemme sho y'all;
 Quoting: DGN


You'll note that I didn't say anything about "proof positive that evillution is true". I simply pointed out that YOUR "theory of evolution" is not the one that biologists promote.

Also your reply seems to be quite retarded, weren't you saying earlier in the thread that you wanted some type of sensible discussion? Shouldn't you as OP lead the way and make some attempt at sensible discussion? Or do you think that by crayoning all over your thread you prove anything about evolution? It only shows people something about you.
6Gunfanatic-Foodhoard​er7

User ID: 37525993
04/11/2013 09:01 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
You all realize that Darwin was a member of the hidden hand secret society, right?

Last Edited by 6Gunfanatic-Foodhoarder7 on 04/11/2013 09:01 PM
Clandestine Cake Eater.
These bastards want the whole damn cake.
Au-Ra
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1565427
United States
04/11/2013 09:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
You are either the most dedicated troll ever or a complete fucking idiot. Your thread title contains so much fail as to be nearly unbelievable.
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 34798113
United States
04/11/2013 09:13 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
...


Which proves they never 'evolved' at all doesn't it?
 Quoting: DGN


No it doesn't prove that. You assume that evolution means "amoebas evolved into something else, therefore amoebas don't exist any more, just 'something else' exists now." This is wrong, and a little bit of thought will show that the theory of evolution does not say this.

Your implication is that when organism A "evolved" into organism B, organism A no longer exists. If this was correct, there would be a chain of evolution A -> B -> C ... -> Z. Under this "theory of evolution", there would only be ONE SPECIES OF ANIMAL on the planet now. The only animals on the planet would be organism Z.

Obviously there is more than one species on the planet. Evolutionary biologists, including Charles Darwin, know this very well. Therefore, they would have to be complete retards to propose the theory you are proposing, because it does not describe the observable state of life on the planet.

Instead, biologists say that organism A can evolve into more than one species of organism, for example A evolves into B and C and D. Then B evolves into E and F, and C evolves into G, H, and I, and D goes extinct.

Hopefully you will now understand that the theory of evolution does not require amoebas to be extinct; and that the theory you are proposing is not the theory that biologists use.

Essentially by saying "amoebas should be extinct" you are using a strawman argument. Biologists don't say that evolution means that amoebas must be extinct, therefore it is simply wrong for you to say that they do say that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35710099


BillyBob her y'all, an i jis gotta tip ma hat to ya cuz ifn that dont provide proof positive evillution is true, i dont kno what would. Evn the good Lord gotta admit ta that. If anybody stil dont git it just git yurself some colored pencils. Draw an omeba, than a fish, than a mud skipper, a lizard, a mouse, a monkey and finlly draw a man standing tall n ya got yurself all the proof a inteligent person needs. Lemme sho y'all;
 Quoting: DGN


You'll note that I didn't say anything about "proof positive that evillution is true". I simply pointed out that YOUR "theory of evolution" is not the one that biologists promote.

Also your reply seems to be quite retarded, weren't you saying earlier in the thread that you wanted some type of sensible discussion? Shouldn't you as OP lead the way and make some attempt at sensible discussion? Or do you think that by crayoning all over your thread you prove anything about evolution? It only shows people something about you.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35710099


Contesting the theory of NON-intelligent design does not put the burden of proof on me, but on advocates of NON-intelligence. When a child sees sticks woven into a nest he instinctively knows it was deliberately arranged, but due to arrogant brain washing in 'school' it becomes fashionable to deny accountability to the creator. No sin, no guilt, no accountability, and 'we are not the generation consequence'.

Last Edited by DGN on 04/11/2013 09:14 PM
CelestialMaiden

User ID: 30718771
United States
04/11/2013 10:36 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
ufo56
 Quoting: DGN


AGAIN...

Darwin is dead, has been for a long time.

Yet constantly you want to argue with someone who can not respond or defend himself.

Says a lot about you.

Also...

I know of no angels in the fossil record.
 Quoting: G. House


AGAIN.......

Darwin is dead, has been for a long time.

Yet constantly evolutionists who believed him want to argue against the living God who created all things


says a lot about them all

Last Edited by CelestialMaiden on 04/11/2013 10:37 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35710099
Australia
04/11/2013 10:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
...


No it doesn't prove that. You assume that evolution means "amoebas evolved into something else, therefore amoebas don't exist any more, just 'something else' exists now." This is wrong, and a little bit of thought will show that the theory of evolution does not say this.

Your implication is that when organism A "evolved" into organism B, organism A no longer exists. If this was correct, there would be a chain of evolution A -> B -> C ... -> Z. Under this "theory of evolution", there would only be ONE SPECIES OF ANIMAL on the planet now. The only animals on the planet would be organism Z.

Obviously there is more than one species on the planet. Evolutionary biologists, including Charles Darwin, know this very well. Therefore, they would have to be complete retards to propose the theory you are proposing, because it does not describe the observable state of life on the planet.

Instead, biologists say that organism A can evolve into more than one species of organism, for example A evolves into B and C and D. Then B evolves into E and F, and C evolves into G, H, and I, and D goes extinct.

Hopefully you will now understand that the theory of evolution does not require amoebas to be extinct; and that the theory you are proposing is not the theory that biologists use.

Essentially by saying "amoebas should be extinct" you are using a strawman argument. Biologists don't say that evolution means that amoebas must be extinct, therefore it is simply wrong for you to say that they do say that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35710099


BillyBob her y'all, an i jis gotta tip ma hat to ya cuz ifn that dont provide proof positive evillution is true, i dont kno what would. Evn the good Lord gotta admit ta that. If anybody stil dont git it just git yurself some colored pencils. Draw an omeba, than a fish, than a mud skipper, a lizard, a mouse, a monkey and finlly draw a man standing tall n ya got yurself all the proof a inteligent person needs. Lemme sho y'all;
 Quoting: DGN


You'll note that I didn't say anything about "proof positive that evillution is true". I simply pointed out that YOUR "theory of evolution" is not the one that biologists promote.

Also your reply seems to be quite retarded, weren't you saying earlier in the thread that you wanted some type of sensible discussion? Shouldn't you as OP lead the way and make some attempt at sensible discussion? Or do you think that by crayoning all over your thread you prove anything about evolution? It only shows people something about you.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35710099


Contesting the theory of NON-intelligent design does not put the burden of proof on me, but on advocates of NON-intelligence. When a child sees sticks woven into a nest he instinctively knows it was deliberately arranged, but due to arrogant brain washing in 'school' it becomes fashionable to deny accountability to the creator. No sin, no guilt, no accountability, and 'we are not the generation consequence'.
 Quoting: DGN


"Burden of proof" is just something people say when they can't prove their claims. They say "oh YOU have the burden of proof, not me!!". It's a cop-out.

The simple facts which are apparent from reading your messages are:

1. You do not understand the theory of evolution.

2. You stubbornly resist any attempts by anybody to explain it to you.

3. You think that your ignorant assumptions about the theory such as "aomebas must be extinct" are a valid representation of the theory of evolution.

4. You refuse to even discuss evolution in a sensible manner, you simply resort to ridicule and stupidity over and over again.

5. You somehow think that you being stupid reflects badly on evolution, but it doesn't, it just makes you look stupid.


If you want to discuss evolution, how about you ACTUALLY FIND OUT ANYTHING that an "evolutionist" says, and DISCUSS THAT??? ANYTHING AT ALL!!!

Instead you'll probably continue making up wacky fake 'theories' and pretending that "evolutionists" said it, when in reality, the wacky theories you argue against were only said by YOU. You are arguing with yourself, not with the theory of evolution. Your threads about "evolution" are utterly pointless, because YOU DON'T EVEN UNDERSTAND THE THEORY, and NOTHING you post is anything an evolutionist would actually say!


- Find out what "evolutionists" say about "evolution".

- Argue about THAT.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35567878
Canada
04/11/2013 10:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
Hey DGN, I heard you fail so I put some fail in your fail.
Anonymous_Hero

User ID: 32212857
United States
04/11/2013 10:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
ufo56
 Quoting: DGN


you are reaching so bad it's not even funny anymore. actually quite sad. obviously the ramblings of a panic stricken christetard who can see the writing on the wall for his god who continues to take a back seat to logic and reason. if heaven is such a great place, do us all a favor and kill yourself.
***Anonymous Hero***
bringing truth to the masses
NightWisp

User ID: 33367381
United States
04/11/2013 11:06 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
The angels were before the amoebas and the humans.

Thank you for asking.

C.C.
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 34798113
United States
04/11/2013 11:24 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
...


BillyBob her y'all, an i jis gotta tip ma hat to ya cuz ifn that dont provide proof positive evillution is true, i dont kno what would. Evn the good Lord gotta admit ta that. If anybody stil dont git it just git yurself some colored pencils. Draw an omeba, than a fish, than a mud skipper, a lizard, a mouse, a monkey and finlly draw a man standing tall n ya got yurself all the proof a inteligent person needs. Lemme sho y'all;
 Quoting: DGN


You'll note that I didn't say anything about "proof positive that evillution is true". I simply pointed out that YOUR "theory of evolution" is not the one that biologists promote.

Also your reply seems to be quite retarded, weren't you saying earlier in the thread that you wanted some type of sensible discussion? Shouldn't you as OP lead the way and make some attempt at sensible discussion? Or do you think that by crayoning all over your thread you prove anything about evolution? It only shows people something about you.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35710099


Contesting the theory of NON-intelligent design does not put the burden of proof on me, but on advocates of NON-intelligence. When a child sees sticks woven into a nest he instinctively knows it was deliberately arranged, but due to arrogant brain washing in 'school' it becomes fashionable to deny accountability to the creator. No sin, no guilt, no accountability, and 'we are not the generation consequence'.
 Quoting: DGN


"Burden of proof" is just something people say when they can't prove their claims. They say "oh YOU have the burden of proof, not me!!". It's a cop-out.

The simple facts which are apparent from reading your messages are:

1. You do not understand the theory of evolution.

2. You stubbornly resist any attempts by anybody to explain it to you.

3. You think that your ignorant assumptions about the theory such as "aomebas must be extinct" are a valid representation of the theory of evolution.

4. You refuse to even discuss evolution in a sensible manner, you simply resort to ridicule and stupidity over and over again.

5. You somehow think that you being stupid reflects badly on evolution, but it doesn't, it just makes you look stupid.


If you want to discuss evolution, how about you ACTUALLY FIND OUT ANYTHING that an "evolutionist" says, and DISCUSS THAT??? ANYTHING AT ALL!!!

Instead you'll probably continue making up wacky fake 'theories' and pretending that "evolutionists" said it, when in reality, the wacky theories you argue against were only said by YOU. You are arguing with yourself, not with the theory of evolution. Your threads about "evolution" are utterly pointless, because YOU DON'T EVEN UNDERSTAND THE THEORY, and NOTHING you post is anything an evolutionist would actually say!


- Find out what "evolutionists" say about "evolution".

- Argue about THAT.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35710099


Right.... the theory of mutation = sophistication x millions more replication glitches = perfection is truly the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
Present something even stupider.
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 34798113
United States
04/13/2013 03:43 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So Mr Darwin... if aomebas turned into humans, and are extinct .... where did angels come from from..... mutated humans ChuckyChump?
The angels were before the amoebas and the humans.

Thank you for asking.

C.C.
 Quoting: NightWisp


Yep

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!