REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
Message Subject
|
NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
Post Content
|
[ link to twitter.com] NYT: Some of the public language from #ROK gov't suggests Seoul & Washington may not agree on how far any retaliation should go.
NYT quotes unnamed senior U.S. official: "Overreaction by South Korea is a real risk — and we’re working on that problem.”Overreaction = striking back. I'm sure Obama only want new BS sanctions on North Korea or some other meaningless shit. SHUT THE FUCK UP OBAMA. South Korea is gonna retaliate the way the fuck they want. America fucking invaded 2 countries over 3000 dead... so shut the fuck up about ``overreacting``... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36482247 If he had any intelligence whatsoever he'd be urging SK to surrender any planned military action against NK. The sanctions should be lifted and the whole thing will be over with. No potentially worldwide conflict, no one gets nuked, everyone can move on. There's no logical reason for there to be conflict on the Korean peninsula(or anywhere else for that matter). People need to stop living in this dream land that somehow the "allies" will always come out on top. If history has taught us anything it's that Empires fall, HARD. Quoting: MuslimAmerican South Korea surrender to North Korea. Like they would ever do that. Would you relinquish your freedom and way of life that easily?
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|