BRKNG: Pentagon Report Says North Korea Likely Has Nuclear Armed Missiles!!! Intel Was "Mistakenly" Declassified...

I'm with the new guy.. :)

You do realize missiles can be launched 24/7, right?

Reuters back on.... Tokyo

YOu mean the same China that came out today and criticized the US for moving assets into the reason to defend their citizens and interests?

That China?

Yah, no I didn't know that (sincerely) and absolutely do thank you for noting that - their hypocrisy trumped only by their ability to lie their asses off.

Sounds great. Double spaced, 3 pages worth.
That should do it

a) Maybe NK scientists are very smart and with just 3 tests archived same what USA scientists archived with 1054 tests.
b) China/Russia gave them high tech nuke.
c) Pentagram needz more fear. Fear == control
Chose yourself. I think c.

North Korea likely has nuclear weapons that can be delivered by ballistic weapons, according to a classified report by the Defense Intelligence Agency. The assessment comes amid escalating rhetoric by Kim Jong-un threatening nuclear strikes on the United States. It’s the clearest statement yet that the boy leader poses a legitimate and imminent nuclear threat.


According to the report, “DIA assesses with moderate confidence the North currently has nuclear weapons capable of delivery by ballistic missiles however the reliability will be low.” That line was read aloud by Rep. Doug Lamborn, a Republican from Colorado, on Thursday during a House Armed Services Committee hearing. Lamborn was questioning Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, who seemed taken aback and declined to answer the question, saying, “I haven’t seen it and you said it’s not publicly released so I choose not to comment on it.”

The reliability of "what" will be low?

The reliability of the missile delivery system, like it might fizzle out at launch, or spin off course?

The reliability of the nuclear payload to actually "go nuclear"?

The reliability of the intelligence about the missile delivery system, or the nuclear payload?

Btw. North Korea most likely has enough plutonium for 30 of your usual bombs...

Yet another fear mongering thread title.

Rep. Doug Lamborn, a Republican from Colorado, it would appear has a difficult time writing without all those hedge words and half statements.

Hell, maybe it really is time to bring in the Grammar and Spelling nazis.

Rep Lamborn was reading aloud from the report.
Dumbass.

Dude, the point is they're nuke and missile program is progressing... 10 years from now it's unacceptable for them to have 100+ nuclear ICBM's threatening the whole world with nuclear armageddon if we don't feed the fuckers... Think where this would go long-term...

So, feed them. It's a small country. It wouldn't hurt the US economically to do so if the US abandoned its military first policy and ended needless wars and cut military spending. Hell, the US economy would improve at the same time. The people of the United States are suffering from the military first policy.

That's what got us into this mess in the first place. If we hadn't fed them they would not have been able to put what money they did have into nuclear weapons.

Feeding them won't stop them from further developing their nuclear agenda and threatening nuclear annihilation anyway.
This is not about a little bit of food. It's way more involved than that.

It will only make things worse.

you know what we should all do, we should look up information about north korea and put it on this thread,that would really help

that would be cheating, i think

cheating on what?