Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,677 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 939,129
Pageviews Today: 1,392,745Threads Today: 379Posts Today: 7,766
01:21 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6765994
Switzerland
04/13/2013 06:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order

Mother Russia is a much different country from the Stalin gulags. With all the faults of a long tradition of authoritarian rule, it is natural for observers in the West to be suspect of the latest would be Czar. The remnants of the cold war linger with concerns of the true motives and goals of a second Vladimir Putin era. By most reliable accounts, he never left the power circle prior to his return as President. Upon his latest election, The Guardian published an article Putin's election victory is a headache for the west. "Nobody is any doubt that the Putin who returns to the Kremlin in May is the same Putin who has effectively run Russia for the past 12 years – prickly, uncompromising, suspicious and fond of snide remarks about western hypocrisy and double standards."

The context for any serious discussion on foreign affairs must start with the admission that the New World Order is the dominant controller of political power, especially in western countries. The NeoCon/NeoLib cabal dictates worldwide compliance. Nations conform to the financial supremacy of banksters, administered by handpicked political stooges. Global governance is the end game destined for all states. Individual nations slated for extinction are doomed as long as the NWO advances their worldwide imperium.

Putin provided a vision that conflicted with the cabal. Eurasian Project a Threat to New World Order provides an alternative to the West.

"One might be tempted to regard Russian premier V. Putin’s paper "A new integration project for Eurasia: The future in the making", which saw the light of day in Izvestia on October 3, 2011, as the presidential front-runner’s sketchily laid out program, but upon scrutiny that appears to be only one part of a wider picture. The opinion piece momentarily ignited wide-scale controversy in and outside of Russia and highlighted the ongoing clash of positions on global development…

Regardless of interpretation details, the reaction of the Western media to the integration project unveiled by the Russian premier was uniformly negative and reflected with utmost clarity an a priori hostility towards Russia and any initiatives it floats. Mao Zedong, though, used to say that facing pressure from your enemies is better than being in such a condition that they do not bother to keep you under pressure."

The assessment for opposition and push back concludes:

"The West’s allergy to Putin’s plan is therefore explainable, but, regardless of the opposition the project is bound to run into, of the weakness of some of its elements, and of the potential difficulty of putting it into practice, the Eurasian integration project grew out of the life of the post-Soviet geopolitical and cultural space and is consonant with current global trends."

[link to www.youtube.com]

The point is that much of the humanity recognizes that the New World Order is the ultimate demonic force. It is on the path to establish planetary unification of despotism. Look to the Pepo Escobar video for context in Putin not part of NWO, labelled evil by elites.

The concerted effort from the "Sub Rosa" fraternity to use their intelligence community skills and nation regime change, poses the greatest danger to any government that defies the dictates or delays the designs of the master plan. Surely, it must be just a coincidence, that the unfolding of the NWO resembles segments in The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. So how should one view Putin?
The provocative Brother Nathanael (view his videos on BATR) provides this assessment about Putin some five years ago.

Russia’s President Vladimir Putin is an Orthodox Christian. Putin has publicly stated that he is a Christian — his continual Church appearances are proof of it. Recently the BBC published a major article complete with pictures of Vladimir Putin’s Orthodox Christian affiliations here and here.


finish the rest of the article below to be in compliance with GLPs copyright 50% posting rule with link to source



[link to batr.org]

Last Edited by Phennommennonn on 05/15/2013 12:24 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12434275
Switzerland
04/13/2013 06:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
Escobar: Putin not part of NWO, labelled evil by elites



hf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12434275
Switzerland
04/13/2013 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18723832
United States
04/13/2013 10:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
Very interesting.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37968164
United States
04/13/2013 10:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
lol

yeah , the cossack kgb runt shirtless boy is a hero

lol

crap ass cossack
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12434275
Switzerland
04/13/2013 06:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
Putin, a thorn in Washington’s flesh

by F. William Engdahl

Vladimir Putin is one of the few world leaders capable of rattling the foundations of U.S. hegemony: military dominance and the dollar’s supremacy as reserve currency. Engdahl shows that the recent election protests in Russia were orchestrated by Washington-sponsored NGOs and their domestic agents in an unsuccessful attempt to destabilize the country. With the rapid erosion of U.S. global dominance, Engdahl warns that the neutralization of Russia and other recalcitrant states will again be on the agenda of the next White House occupant.

VOLTAIRE NETWORK | FRANKFURT (GERMANY) | 9 JANUARY 2012

2011 election billboard in St. Petersburg.
Washington clearly wants ‘finito’ with Russia’s Putin as in basta! or as they said in Egypt last spring, Kefaya—enough! Hillary Clinton and friends have apparently decided Russia’s prospective next president, Vladimir Putin, is a major obstacle to their plans. Few however understand why. Russia today, in tandem with China and to a significant degree Iran, form the spine, however shaky, of the only effective global axis of resistance to a world dominated by one sole superpower.

On December 8 several days after election results for Russia’s parliamentary elections were announced, showing a sharp drop in popularity for Prime Minister Putin’s United Russia party, Putin accused the United States and specifically Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of fuelling the Russian opposition protesters and their election protests. Putin stated, “The (US) Secretary of State was quick to evaluate the elections, saying that they are unfair and unjust even before she received materials from the Office of Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (the OSCE international election monitors-w.e.) observers.” [1]

Putin went on to claim that Clinton’s premature comments were the necessary signal to the waiting opposition groups that the US Government would back their protests. Clinton’s comments, the seasoned Russian intelligence pro stated, became a “signal for our activists who began active work with the US Department of State.” [2]

Major western media chose either to downplay the Putin statement or to focus almost entirely on the claims of an emerging Russian opposition movement. A little research shows that, if anything, Putin was downplaying the degree of brazen US Government interference into the political processes of his country. In this case the country is not Tunisia or Yemen or even Egypt. It is the world’s second nuclear superpower, even if it might still be an economic lesser power. Hillary is playing with thermonuclear fire.

Democracy or something else?

No mistake, Putin is not a world champion practitioner of what most consider democracy. His announcement some months back that he and current President Medvedev had agreed to switch jobs after Russia’s March 4 Presidential vote struck even many Russians as crass power politics and backroom deal-making. That being said, what Washington is doing to interfere with that regime change is more than brazen and interventionist. The same Obama Administration which just signed into law measures effectively ripping to shreds the Bill of Rights of the US Constitution for American citizens [3] is posing as world supreme judge of others’ adherence to what they define as democracy.

Let’s examine closely Putin’s charge of US interference in the election process. If we look, we find openly stated in their August 2011 Annual Report that a Washington-based NGO with the innocuous name, National Endowment for Democracy (NED), is all over the place inside Russia. The NED is financing an International Press Center in Moscow where some 80 international NGOs can hold press briefings on whatever they choose. They fund numerous “youth advocacy” and leadership workshops to “help youth engage in political activism.” In fact, officially they spent more than $2,783,000 in 2010 on dozens of such programs across Russia. Spending for 2011 won’t be published until later in 2012. [4]


The NED is also financing key parts of the Russian “independent” polling and election monitoring, a crucial part of being able to claim election fraud. They finance in part the Regional Civic Organization in Defense of Democratic Rights and Liberties “GOLOS.” According to the NED Annual Report the funds went “to carry out a detailed analysis of the autumn 2010 and spring 2011 election cycles in Russia, which will include press monitoring, monitoring of political agitation, activity of electoral commissions, and other aspects of the application of electoral legislation in the long-term run-up to the elections.” [5]

In September 2011, a few weeks before the December elections the NED financed a Washington invitation-only conference featuring the Russian “independent” polling organization, the Levada Center. According to NED’s own website Levada, another recipient of NED money, [6] had done a series of opinion polls, a standard method used in the West to analyze the feelings of citizens. The polls profiled “the mood of the electorate in the run up to the Duma and presidential elections, perceptions of candidates and parties, and voter confidence in the system of ‘managed democracy’ that has been established over the last decade.”


Vladimir V. Kara-Murza, born 7 September 1981 in Moscow.
One of the featured speakers at that Washington conference was Vladimir Kara-Murza, member of the federal council of Solidarnost (“Solidarity”), Russia’s democratic opposition movement. He is also “advisor to Duma opposition leader Boris Nemtsov” according to NED. Another speaker came from the right-wing neo-conservative Hudson Institute. [7]

Nemtsov, one of the most prominent of the Putin opposition today is also co-chairman of Solidarnost, a name curiously enough imitated from the Cold War days when the CIA financed the Polish Solidarnosc workers’ opposition of Lech Walesa. More on Nemtsov later.


Dr. Tamirlan Kurbanov, currently a Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellow.
And on December 15, 2011, again in Washington, just as the series of US-supported protests were being launched against Putin, led by Solidarnost and other organizations, the NED held another conference titled, Youth Activism in Russia: Can a New Generation Make a Difference? The featured speaker was Tamirlan Kurbanov, who according to the NED, “most recently served as a program officer at the Moscow office of the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, where he was involved in developing and expanding the capacities of political and civic organizations; promoting citizen participation in public life, youth engagement in particular.” [8] The National Democratic Institute is an arm of the NED.

The shady history of NED

Helping youth engage in political activism is precisely what the same NED did in Egypt over the past several years in the lead up to the toppling of Mubarak. The same NED was instrumental by informed accounts in the US-backed “Color Revolutions” in 2003-2004 in Ukraine and Georgia that brought US-backed pro-NATO surrogates to power. The same NED has been active in promoting “human rights” in Myanmar, in Tibet, and China’s oil-rich Xinjiang province. [9]

As careful analysts of the 2004 Ukraine “Orange revolution” and the numerous other US-financed color revolutions discovered, control of polling and ability to dominate international media perceptions, especially major TV such as CNN or BBC is an essential component of the Washington destabilization agenda. The Levada Center would likely be in a crucial position in this regard to issue polls showing discontent with the regime.

By their description, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is a “private, nonprofit foundation dedicated to the growth and strengthening of democratic institutions around the world. Each year, with funding from the US Congress, NED supports more than 1,000 projects of non-governmental groups abroad who are working for democratic goals in more than 90 countries.” [10]

It couldn’t sound more noble or high-minded. However, they prefer to leave out their own true history. In the early 1980’s CIA director Bill Casey convinced President Ronald Reagan to create a plausibly private NGO, the NED, to advance Washington’s global agenda via other means than direct CIA action. It was a part of the process of “privatizing” US intelligence to make their work more “effective.” Allen Weinstein, who helped draft the legislation establishing NED, said in a Washington Post interview in 1991, “A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.” [11] Interesting. The majority of funds for NED come from US taxpayers through Congress. It is in every way, shape and form a US Government intelligence community asset.

The NED was created during the Reagan Administration to function as a de facto CIA, privatized so as to allow it more freedom of action. NED board members are typically drawn from the Penta see link

Last Edited by Desert Fox on 05/15/2013 01:49 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 36563366
Argentina
04/13/2013 07:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
Putin kicks ass
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37695564
United States
04/13/2013 07:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
Putin for President!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37971414
Egypt
04/13/2013 07:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
Everytime MSM is demonizing someone, take a closer look. Might be they're just afraid of them...I saw many good men eliminated for working against their evil schemes and in the interest of humanity. Therefore, although I don't know Putin, if I had to trust someone, I'd confide in him before any US/UK/western european leader.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37912679
Norway
04/13/2013 07:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
Russia has finally admitted that Westeners will never continue running Communist systems.... Our world has evolved and Asia has not.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37912679
Norway
04/13/2013 07:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
Keep your eyes on the sobs of bitches with their finger still on the trigger....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35012719
United States
04/13/2013 07:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
sobs of bitches
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 37912679
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37971414
Egypt
04/13/2013 07:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
sobs of bitches
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 37912679

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35012719


rivotears


chuckle those bots suck
THE WORDSMITH

User ID: 37584498
United States
04/13/2013 07:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
bullshit
"Psychopaths derive their power from the complicity of the populous..."


www.thepagg.weebly.com
Nobody ... :)
User ID: 37997310
United Kingdom
04/13/2013 07:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
I like Putin he can play :) but you know the nobody can play better lol ... :)

[link to www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37971414
Egypt
04/13/2013 07:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
bullshit
 Quoting: THE WORDSMITH


Why? Counter the argument.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37977806
Brazil
04/13/2013 07:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
I have news for you OP: even those who are demonized by the MSM are ALSO part of the NWO


The NWO controls the "good guys" hailed by the MSM and ALSO the "bad guys" demonized by the MSM.


The NWO controls every single leader of every single country.


They have achieved total global control since at least the decade of the 1920's

90 years of total global control
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37971414
Egypt
04/13/2013 07:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
I like Putin he can play :) but you know the nobody can play better lol ... :)

[link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: Nobody ... :) 37997310


angel4
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12434275
Switzerland
04/13/2013 07:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
Putin’s Geopolitical Chess Game with Washington in Syria and Eurasia

by F. William Engdahl

For blocking a UN resolution that could have led to military intervention in Syria, Russia has been accused by the Orwellian West of putting its national interests ahead of the lives of millions of Syrians. By scrutinizing Vladimir Putin’s actions since his reelection, William Engdahl shows that Russia is indeed pursuing her national interests which are best served by fostering a just and peaceful world environment and by thwarting the US-Israeli agenda for a Greater Middle East.

VOLTAIRE NETWORK | 23 JULY 2012

Since reassuming his post as Russia’s President, Vladimir Putin has lost no minute in addressing the most urgent geopolitical threats to Russia internationally. Not surprisingly, at the center of his agenda is the explosive situation in the Middle East, above all Syria. Here Putin is engaging every imaginable means of preventing a further deterioration of the situation into what easily could become another “world war by miscalculation.” His activities in recent weeks involve active personal diplomacy with Syria’s government as well as the so-called opposition “Syrian National Council.” It involves intense diplomacy with Erdogan’s Turkey regime. It involves closed door diplomacy with Obama. It involves direct diplomacy with Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu.

Syria itself, contrary to what most western media portray, is a long-standing multi-ethnic and religiously tolerant secular state with an Alawite Muslim President Bashar Al-Assad, married to a Sunni wife. The Alawite sect is an offshoot of Shia Islam which doesn’t force their women to wear head scarves and are liberal by Sunni standards, especially in the fundamentalist places like Saudi Arabia where women are forbidden to even hold a driver’s license. The overall Syrian population is a diverse mix of Alawites, Druze and Kurds, Sunnis, and Armenian Orthodox Christians. Were the minority regime of Al-Assad to fall, experts estimate that, like in Egypt, the murky Sunni (as in Saudi Arabia) Muslim Brotherhood organization would emerge as the dominant organized political force, something certainly not welcome in Tel Aviv and certainly not in either Russia or China. [1]

According to an informed assessment by Gajendra Singh, retired Indian diplomat with decades of service in the Middle East and a deep familiarity with the ethnic mix inside Syria, were the minority Alawite regime of Al-Assad to fall, the country would rapidly descend into a bloodbath that would make estimates of 17,000 killed to date a mere prelude. Singh estimates, “A defeat of Assad led regime will lead to slaughter of Alawites, Shias, Christians, even Kurds and Druzes. In all, 20 % of a population of 20 Million.” [2]

That would be some 4 million Syrians. That ought to be food for thought for those in the West cheering on a murky dubious opposition “Syrian National Council” that is dominated by the ominous Muslim Brotherhood, and an armed opposition “Free Syrian Army” that has been reported even by the New York Times as rife with factional armed splits. Moreover the conflict were it to descend into a Libya-like internal bloodbath, would spill over across the Syrian border into Turkey. Syrian coastal area has a significant Alawite population and a large number of Alawites live in the adjoining Turkish provinces of Hatay and Antakya.


BBC illegally used image of Iraqi victims as propaganda against the Syrian government.
Photo: Marco Di Lauro, 2003
To sort out fact from fiction inside Syria is daunting as media are limited and opposition spokesmen have been repeatedly caught lying about events. [3] In one recent instance, a UK journalist claimed he was deliberately led into a potential death trap by rebel opposition forces to score propaganda against the Damascus regime. The UK Channel 4 News’s chief correspondent, Alex Thomson, told AP that Syrian rebels set him up to die in no man’s land near the Lebanese border, saying they wanted to use his death at the hands of government forces to score propaganda points. [4] And in one brazen example of political manipulation, BBC was recently caught publishing a photograph it claimed was of a massacre at Al-Houla on 25 May 2012, in which 108 persons are known to have died including 49 children. It turned out the picture had been taken by Italian photo journalist, Marco Di Lauro in Iraq in 2003. [5]

The stakes in this geopolitical chess game are nothing less than survival first of Syria as a sovereign nation, whatever its flaws and defects. More, it ultimately involves the survival of Iran, Russia and China as sovereign nations together with the other BRIC states Brazil, India and South Africa. Longer term, it involves the matter of survival of civilization as we know it and avoidance of a world war that would decimate the world population not by tens of millions as seventy years ago but likely this time by billions.

The Syria stakes for Moscow

Russia’s Putin has drawn a deep hard line in the sand around the survival of Al-Assad and Syria as a stable state. Few ask why Russia is warning of possible world war if Washington persists to demand immediate regime change in Syria as Hillary Clinton is doing. It is not because Russia is intent on advancing its own imperialist agenda in the Middle East. It’s in little shape militarily and economically to do so even if it had wanted. Rather, it is about preserving port rights to Russia’s only Mediterranean naval port at Tartus, the only remaining Russian military base outside the former Soviet Union, and its only Mediterranean fueling spot. In event of a showdown with NATO the base becomes strategic to Russia.

Yet there is more at stake for Russia. Putin and Russia’s foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, have made clear were NATO and the USA to launch military action against Assad’s Syria, the consequences would be staggering. Reliable sources in Damascus have reported the presence of at least 100,000 Russian “technical advisers” in the country. That’s a lot, and a Russian freighter carrying rebuilt Russian Mi-25 attack helicopters is reportedly bound for Syria, while several days earlier a Russian naval flotilla sailed for Tartus led by the Russian destroyer, Admiral Chabanenko.


A group of Russian army vessels with "Admiral Chabanenko" multipurpose destroyer are setting course for Syrian port Tartus where the only Mediterranean Russian naval base is located.
An earlier attempt to send the rebuilt helicopters back to Syria which had earlier purchased them, was blocked in June off Scotland’s coast when it sailed under a non-Russian freighter flag. Now Moscow has made clear it will tolerate no interference in its traffic with Damascus. Russian Defense Ministry spokesman, Vyacheslav Dzirkaln, announced that “The fleet will be sent on task to guarantee the safety of our ships, to prevent anyone interfering with them in the event of a blockade. I remind you there are no limits,” he soberly added. [6] In so many words, what Moscow is announcing is that it is willing to face a 21st Century version of the 1962 Cuba Missile Crisis if NATO foolishly persists in pressing regime change in Damascus.

As it has openly emerged that the so-called democratic opposition in Syria is being dominated by the shadowy Muslim Brotherhood, hardly an organization renowned for multi-ethnic democratic tendencies, a victory for a US-backed Muslim Brotherhood regime in Syria, Moscow also believes, would unleash a wave of Muslim-led destabilizations across Central Asia into republics of the former Soviet Union. China is also extremely sensitive about such a danger, only recently confronted with bloody riots of Muslim organization in its oil-rich Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Province, quietly sponsored by the US Government. [7]

Russia has joined firmly with China since both nations fell into a catastrophic trap over abstaining in the UN Security Council from vetoing the US Resolution. That US resolution opened the door to NATO destruction of not only Mohammar Ghaddafi, but of Libya itself as a functioning country. This author has spoken personally in Moscow and in Beijing since the Libya debacle asking well-informed persons in both places how in effect they could have been so short-sighted on Libya. They both clearly have since concluded that further advance of Washington’s agenda for what George W. Bush called the Greater Middle East Project is diametrically opposed to the national interest of both China and Russia, hence the iron opposition to the NATO agenda in Syria for regime change. To date Russia and China, Permanent veto members of the UN Security Council, have three times exercised their veto over new US-sponsored sanctions against Syria, the latest on July 19.

Putin and his Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov insist on a strict adherence to the proposed peace plan of former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan. Unlike what Washington prefers to generously read into it, the Six Point Annan Plan calls for no regime change, rather for a negotiated settlement and end to the fighting on both sides, a ceasefire.

Washington’s Janus-faced duplicity

Aligned on the side of violent regime change in Syria are a bizarre coalition that includes, in addition to Washington and its European “vassal states” (as Zbigniew Brzezinski called European NATO members), [8] most prominently Saudi Arabia, hardly a regime anyone would accuse of being a paragon of democracy. Another lead role against Damascus is being played by Qatar, home to US military as well as the blatantly pro-NATO propaganda channel Al-Jazeera. In addition, the Turkish government of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, is providing training and space to prepare armed mercenaries and others to flow over the border into neighboring Syria.

An attempt by the Erdogan government to send a Turkish Phantom air force fighter jet into Syrian airspace flying provocatively low, apparently in order to incite a “Gulf of Tonkin” incident to fan flames of NATO intervention a la Libya two weeks ago, fell flat when Turkey’s general staff issued a statement saying: "No traces of explosives or flammable products were found on the debris recovered from the sea." Erdogan was forced to shift his line to cover face, no longer using the phrase, "shot down by Syria" and instead referring to "our plane that Syria claimed to have destroyed." [9] NATO has established a command and control center in Iskenderun, in Turkey’s Hatay province, near the Syrian border months ago to organize, train and arm the “anything but” Free Syrian Army. [10] The Obama Administration, not wanting a full Syria war before US elections in November, reportedly also told Erdogan to “cool it” for now.

Most westerners who take their knowledge of world affairs religiously from the pages of the Washington Post or CNN or BBC are convinced the Syrian mess is a clear cut case of “good guys” (the so-named Syrian National Council and its rag-tag makeshift “Free Syrian Army”) versus the “bad guys” (the Al-Assad dictatorship with its armed forces). For more than a year western media has run footage, some as noted, not even filmed in Syria, claiming that innocent, unarmed opposition civilian pro-democracy populations are being massacred ruthlessly in a one-sided butchery by the regime.

They never explain how it would serve Assad to alienate his strongest asset to survival, namely the support of a majority of Syrians against what he has accurately named foreign intervention into sovereign Syrian affairs.

Indeed numerous eyewitness journalist accounts from inside Turkey and Syria, including RT, have alleged that from the beginning the “peaceful democratic opposition” had secretly been provided with arms and training, often inside camps across on the Turkish side. Professor Ibrahim Alloush from Zaytouneh University in Jordan told RT:

“Weaponry is being smuggled into Syria in large quantities from all over the place. It is pretty clear that the rebels have been receiving arms from abroad and Syrian television has been showing almost daily shipments of arms being smuggled into Syria via Lebanon, Turkey and other border crossings. Since the rebels are being supported by the GCC [Gulf Cooperation Council] and by NATO it is safe to assume that they are getting their financing and weaponry from the same sources that are offering them political cover and financial backing.” [11]

One veteran Turkish journalist whom this author interviewed in Ankara in April, just back from an extensive tour of Syria, gave his eyewitness account of the capture of a small band of “opposition” fighters. The journalist, fluent in Arabic, was astonished as he witnessed the head of the rebels demand to know why their military captors spoke Arabic. When told that was their native language, the rebel leader blurted out, “But you should speak Hebrew, you’re with the Israeli Army aren’t you?”

In short, the mercenaries had been blitz-trained across the border in Turkey, given Kalashnikovs and a fistful of dollars and told they were making a jihad against the Israeli Army. They did not even know who they were fighting. In other instances, mercenaries recruited from Afghanistan and elsewhere and financed by Saudi money, including alleged members of Al Qaeda, make up the “democratic opposition” to the established regime of Al-Assad.

Even the ultimate US establishment newspaper, The New York Times, has been forced to admit that the CIA has been pouring arms into the Syrian opposition. They reported, “C.I.A. officers are operating secretly in southern Turkey, helping allies decide which Syrian opposition fighters across the border will receive arms to fight the Syrian government, according to American officials and Arab intelligence officers. The weapons, including automatic rifles, rocket-propelled grenades, ammunition and some antitank weapons, are being funneled mostly across the Turkish border by way of a shadowy network of intermediaries including Syria’s Muslim Brotherhood and paid for by Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the officials said.” [12]

The International Committee for the Red Cross now classifies the conflict as a civil war. [13] Peter Wallensteen, a leading peace researcher at the University of Uppsala and the director of the Uppsala Conflict Data Program, stated that, "It’s increasingly an internationalized civil war, and as we know from previous history, the more internationalized, the longer the conflict will be…there is a civil war, but now so many weapons are coming from the outside, that there is actually an internationalized civil war." [14]

According to Mary Ellen O’Connell, a respected legal scholar and professor of law and international dispute resolution at the University of Notre Dame, "The International Committee of the Red Cross statement means that the Assad regime is facing an organized armed opposition engaging in military force, and it has the legal right to respond in kind. The Syrian military will have more authority to kill persons based on their being part of the armed opposition than when Assad was restricted to using force under peacetime rules." [15] The rebel opposition groups claim it means just the opposite.

While the US State Department makes pious pronouncements of their supporting “democracy” and demanding Al-Assad step down and recognize the dubious and factionalized opposition of the Syrian National Council, an exile group dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood, Russia is working skillfully on the diplomatic front to weaken the Western march to war.

Continue to read:
[link to www.voltairenet.org]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10966642
Switzerland
04/14/2013 02:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
bump
El_Duderino

User ID: 36994774
United Kingdom
04/14/2013 02:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order

Mother Russia is a much different country from the Stalin gulags. With all the faults of a long tradition of authoritarian rule, it is natural for observers in the West to be suspect of the latest would be Czar. The remnants of the cold war linger with concerns of the true motives and goals of a second Vladimir Putin era. By most reliable accounts, he never left the power circle prior to his return as President. Upon his latest election, The Guardian published an article Putin's election victory is a headache for the west. "Nobody is any doubt that the Putin who returns to the Kremlin in May is the same Putin who has effectively run Russia for the past 12 years – prickly, uncompromising, suspicious and fond of snide remarks about western hypocrisy and double standards."

The context for any serious discussion on foreign affairs must start with the admission that the New World Order is the dominant controller of political power, especially in western countries. The NeoCon/NeoLib cabal dictates worldwide compliance. Nations conform to the financial supremacy of banksters, administered by handpicked political stooges. Global governance is the end game destined for all states. Individual nations slated for extinction are doomed as long as the NWO advances their worldwide imperium.

Putin provided a vision that conflicted with the cabal. Eurasian Project a Threat to New World Order provides an alternative to the West.

"One might be tempted to regard Russian premier V. Putin’s paper "A new integration project for Eurasia: The future in the making", which saw the light of day in Izvestia on October 3, 2011, as the presidential front-runner’s sketchily laid out program, but upon scrutiny that appears to be only one part of a wider picture. The opinion piece momentarily ignited wide-scale controversy in and outside of Russia and highlighted the ongoing clash of positions on global development…

Regardless of interpretation details, the reaction of the Western media to the integration project unveiled by the Russian premier was uniformly negative and reflected with utmost clarity an a priori hostility towards Russia and any initiatives it floats. Mao Zedong, though, used to say that facing pressure from your enemies is better than being in such a condition that they do not bother to keep you under pressure."

The assessment for opposition and push back concludes:

"The West’s allergy to Putin’s plan is therefore explainable, but, regardless of the opposition the project is bound to run into, of the weakness of some of its elements, and of the potential difficulty of putting it into practice, the Eurasian integration project grew out of the life of the post-Soviet geopolitical and cultural space and is consonant with current global trends."

[link to www.youtube.com]

The point is that much of the humanity recognizes that the New World Order is the ultimate demonic force. It is on the path to establish planetary unification of despotism. Look to the Pepo Escobar video for context in Putin not part of NWO, labelled evil by elites.

The concerted effort from the "Sub Rosa" fraternity to use their intelligence community skills and nation regime change, poses the greatest danger to any government that defies the dictates or delays the designs of the master plan. Surely, it must be just a coincidence, that the unfolding of the NWO resembles segments in The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. So how should one view Putin?
The provocative Brother Nathanael (view his videos on BATR) provides this assessment about Putin some five years ago.

Russia’s President Vladimir Putin is an Orthodox Christian. Putin has publicly stated that he is a Christian — his continual Church appearances are proof of it. Recently the BBC published a major article complete with pictures of Vladimir Putin’s Orthodox Christian affiliations here and here.

Because the Jews fear Vladimir Putin they are now publishing anti-Putin articles in their Jewish-controlled Press in order to bias public opinion against him such as in a 2007 Wall Street Journal article, The Perils of Putinism.
The Trilateral Commission, The Council on Foreign Relations, and The Bilderberg Group, all have a lot in common - Jewish membership. These 3 Groups also share a hatred of nations that oppose their "multiculturalism" which translates into "multi-religions" with no monolithic opposition against them.

[link to www.youtube.com]

The example of the latest trumped up humanitarian excuse to intervene in Syria has all the signs for the next false flag drama. Brother Nathanael chimes in on the Putin Trumps Zionist Plan For Syria YouTube.The Moscow Times adds this evaluation in Putin Has a Responsibility to Protect Syrians.
"Articulating his anti-intervention policy, President Vladimir Putin wrote in his Feb. 27 Moskovskiye Novosti article that the global community should not pick sides in the Syrian conflict and that the problem should be solved "without foreign intervention and should respect [Syria's] sovereignty. … We are against accepting Security Council resolutions that would be interpreted as a green light toward military intervention in internal Syrian affairs." What's more, in his May 7 foreign policy decree, Putin wrote that Russia "will oppose attempts to use the concept of human rights as an instrument of political pressure and to intervene in the internal affairs of other countries."

Putin playing the role of the peacemaker or is he posed to deploy military muscle? After the fiasco of the way NATO handled the ant-missile system on Polish soil, it is not much of a stretch (from the Russian perspective) to sense the popular support behind Putin’s hard line rhetoric.

Even a Polish born card carrying member of the New World Order’s academic chapter, Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski recognizes the risks involved with the "global political awakening". He makes the following points in Brzezinski: Don’t be emotional about Syria

"I don’t think it’s a foregone conclusion at this stage that the majority of Syrians don’t want the [Bashar] Assad government to stay in power. I think it’s much more complicated than that, In fact the evidence of a national uprising against Assad is relatively limited," Brzezinski said on MSNBC’s Morning Joe program.

On Moscow’s firm and consistent opposition to the Western countries' stance on Syria, Brzezinski said, "I think Russians have a stake in larger cooperation with us, but not on terms dictated by us. That’s a very significant difference."

The essential question that has existential consequences is whether Russia (or much of the non-NWO governance bodies) is willing to revert to their serfdom heritage and accept a technocratic subservient peasantry.

Putin, the KGB operative is no saint. Anyone who achieves and maintains prolonged political influence knows how to navigate the dark side. However, his strong stand represents opposition. Keep in mind that thus far, no effective counterforce to the New World Order has emerged from the assembly of nations.

In the article, China Warns Russia of Coming Armageddon Initiated by the United States and its Allies, the prospects for eternal joy from apostate Christian-Zionists deceivers rises.
"Fearing Western aggression, Syria's President warned this week that if his nation was attacked by NATO he would fire hundreds of missiles into Israel’s most populated city of Tel Aviv within six hours, which would, of course, bring about a catastrophic nuclear response."

From a flagship NeoCon publication, World Net Daily, the Zionist smear advances against anyone who might defy or resist the New World Order false religion. Olivier Melnick writes in The Dejudaization of Jerusalem?

"And now the world appears to be uniting as 20 countries are joining hands and marching toward Israel under the banner of the "Global march to Jerusalem" to "unoccupy" the city on March 30, 2012, as they all converge on the capital. A million people are expected to invade Israel’s borders."

Just image when the legions of the Russia Bear march into the region and cries of Armageddon pour out of the NWO controlled media. The unholy alliance of Israeli Zionist politics and perverted dispensational biblical scripture provides the satanic justification, for the false claims, that GOD will save the New World Order heretics.

Putin’s hostility to the NWO is the basic reason why Russia is so dangerous to the financial masters of the universe. Fundamentalist Christian worshipers who buy into the newspeak of the mass dinosaur media and delusional ministers will be praying for victory for the New World Order during the end time’s apocalypse.

The Putin administration is no Millennium Kingdom. Nevertheless, the continuous tribulations coming from the NWO dictators, the minions of the devil, are the cause of human suffering. Who is the true nemesis of the almighty?

Political redemption through global governance is an absurd nightmare. Only the Second Coming can provide the salvation from the fiendish New World Order. Beware of false prophets and heretical doctrine. The demise of this world, rapidly headed for a cosmic collision, is inevitable. Most Americans continue to serve the principality of darkness. Know your enemy well, before you leap into the hell fires, out of ignorance.

Will you stand against the New World Order? Or will you, continue to accept the lies and evils that are continually committed in your name?

[link to batr.org]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6765994


N.W.O.1
Luckily I'm adhering to a pretty strict, uh, drug regiment to keep my mind limber.
:Dudeism:
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10966642
Switzerland
04/14/2013 02:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin & the Eurasian Empire of the End Times

December 13, 2008 By davidjones
By PHILIP COPPENS—

Russia has always perceived of itself as a Eurasian country.
– President V.V. Putin, November 2000

…an epochal, grandiose revolutionary admission, which, in general, changes everything. The prophecy of [French conspiratologist] Jean Parvulesco has come to pass… There will be a Eurasian millennium.
– Alexandre Dugin, Russian thinker and author

The French visionary writer Jean Parvulesco’s main agent – if not hope – for world change rests with Vladimir Putin. Parvulesco argues that – whether we are aware of it or not – we find ourselves at the crossroads of “great history,” where a totally new era is about to be born.

For such a new period to begin, the old needs to die first. For Parvulesco, this is the old “democratic system” of political correctness, which he feels has now reached its limits and is no longer supportable. It has become “a permanent and total nightmare.” Many will wonder how the “new world” is to come about. The best example of what appeared to be a sudden, almost instantaneous collapse is seen in the fall of the Soviet Union, two decades ago. It illustrates that powerful empires can, from one day to the next, completely disappear, requiring a new society and structure to be built from the ground upwards.

When news of the collapse of the Soviet Union appeared on television screens, the system had already imploded. It was just the public revelation of its death; the disintegration of the communist system had already occurred. According to Parvulesco, the collapse of “democratic Europe” has already taken place too, and we are now in the years between its collapse and the public acceptance of its demise – and the start of a new Europe.

For Parvulesco, the evidence of the collapse of this system is apparent in the recent political history of Italy and Germany, and to some extent that of France and Great Britain. But in each case he feels the same dire situation has transpired: an “immense empty desert,” the wasteland of “social democracy.” A local version of what he sees as a “worldwide conspiracy,” but one that has failed and will soon be sent back to the “black hole” from where it came.

Parvulesco knows what to write on the death certificate; but he also feels he knows what the New Europe will be: the “Eurasian Empire of the End Times.” He labels our timeframe an interregnum where what happened to Russia is actually evidence that dramatic political change is possible. The Soviet Union was the first domino to fall, with the others in Europe soon to follow.

Could he be right? In 1976, Parvulesco published “La ligne géopolitique de l’URSS et le ‘projet océanique fondamental’ de l’Amiral G.S. Gorchkov” (The geopolitical line of the USSR and the ‘fundamental oceanographic project’ of Admiral G.S. Gorchkov), which he labelled “political-revolutionary research.” In it he wrote that the Soviet Union would end up changing the course of history. And changing the course of history is, for Parvulesco, the only true goal politics should have.

Parvulesco therefore provides an interesting type of prophecy. Whereas most prophets predict the end of the world at a given time, his type of prophecy brings more detail about the type of change and how. As to its timeframe, it is very much like “when the time is right.”

So, what is meant to happen? Parvulesco argues that across Europe there are geopolitical groups at work – often clandestinely – laying the groundwork for the Eurasian agenda. Like the Project for a New American Century, there are other think tanks hard at work – and judging from the amount of newspaper headlines they don’t get, much more secretly – to bring about a new Eurasia. Despite their secrecy, Parvulesco was able to lay his hands on one article titled “The Imperial Eurasian Pact.” Similar to the idea put into action by the Neocons after 9/11 (an agenda that claimed to want to bring peace to the world by using the power of America’s military might), this group states that, “It is the confrontation of our imperial and catholic [universal] doctrines with the current political-historical reality […] which will see the final emergence of the catholic Great Empire which constitutes our ultimate objective, the Imperium Ultimum, the Regnum Sanctum, which should comport, in principle, three operational stages […].”

Continue to read:
[link to www.newdawnmagazine.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10153246
United States
04/14/2013 02:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
putin is christian? name one U.S. president that the same claim was not made? they are all puppets.... all work for tptb.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10966642
Switzerland
04/14/2013 03:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
putin is christian? name one U.S. president that the same claim was not made? they are all puppets.... all work for tptb.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10153246


Putin is definitively no puppet. Believe it or not.

In nature and therefore in our world, one-sided action is always naturally balanced out.

Therefore it doesn't matter what religion Putin is into, it even doesn't really matter if he meets up with jewish people wearing a kippa himself and all this nonsense, its much more about a natural balance of the rich and peaceful BRICS states (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, Iran, Syria, Pakistan, Egypt, ... and Germany soon) to challenge and counter balance the bankrupt Axis of pure evil and alliance of rogue states and state terrorists US/UK/NATO/EU/ISNOTREAL financed by the U.S. Federal Reserve via fiat currency ...

hf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10966642
Switzerland
04/14/2013 05:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26860321
United States
04/14/2013 05:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

Then I guess I could call Putin my friend.....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5793653
Switzerland
04/17/2013 12:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4765539
Switzerland
05/14/2013 07:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
bumpbumpbump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 36033489
United States
05/14/2013 07:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
I am married to a Russian woman. They laugh at you fucking idiots who call Russia "Mother Russia" You fucking morons need to turn off Rocky. The only people that call it Mother Russia are stupid fucking Americans.
The Tauremini

User ID: 39432837
Australia
05/14/2013 07:57 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
There is some very simple reasons that Putin will defeat the NWO.

The NWO relies on three things to exist in earnest.


1. An international energy/financial monopoly

2. An international political monopoly

3. An international military monopoly



Putin's Russia has cock-blocked all three of these desires by the NWO by carefully moving its chess pieces on the global board and obstructing the progress of the NWO.

Below are some relevant examples:

*Russia + China setting up alternative global reserve currency
*Russia's preemptive move on Caspian + Arctic energy deposits
*The annexation of western Georgia (on the Caspian basin)
*The rise of the Shanghai Cooperation Group and OSCE.
*Russia's re-building of bases in Cuba, Vietnam and Belarus.



All of these serve to obstruct - if not indefinitely cripple - the Anglo-American global order.

The U.S and Britain are in rapid economic decline and are struggling to maintain their fading empires. In contrast, Russia and China are building theirs on the back of a seemingly infinite flow of energy-driven (and arms trade) cash and reserves.

The world will be extremely different in 10 years from now.

Last Edited by The Tauremini on 05/14/2013 07:58 PM
"Who Dares Wins"
...
User ID: 1097823
United Kingdom
05/14/2013 08:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
....

News