|
| Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News
|
Sorry No
User ID: 79696
4/13/2006 9:11 PM
Report abusive post | I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News
| Quote |
I worked for General Dynamics for several years on the Tomahawk project. We worked closely with McDonnell Douglas on the system back then. We worked with a Rear Admiral. Stephen J. Hostettler on the project. He ran the show for the most part. Then in came Rear Admiral. Larry E. Blose, who was a real asshole if you ask me.
We've worked on several variants obviously, and I won't get into details about myself. I am probably going to get in some trouble for this. But since I am a patriot, what I have learned and worked on the past couple years has pushed me beyond any capabiity of keeping shut. I keep hearing those words spoken about the Military Industrial Complex, but I never believed it because I worked closely with many people for so many years. It couldn't be true. Well. It is.
We have been working on an extremely secret project with the Tomahawks. I won't tell you exactly how they work, but they could be considered "bunker busters" for short. They are not like your conventional bombs that penetrate deep into the ground before detonating. Our variant is well beyond the capabilities of any bunker buster, and even some of the nuclear bunker busters we already have.
We recently ran Tactical Tomahawk tests in 02 and 4 highly successful TECHEVAL flights.
This paved the way for our latest technology which we tested in Florida a couple months back. I heard you guys here had a post about people seeing the cruise missile.
Well lets cut right to the chase. We've develeped and produced more systems in the last 2 years for a large scale military offensive. It has been in the pipeline for a long time. Our successful tests of our latest secret model were so successful, that the militart has ordered mass production of these units.
They are nuclear, but beyond anything you could imagine. They detonate underground without any radioactive spillage at all. The technique uses several variants of missiles all working in tandem with redundancy built in. The guidance systems already are accurate to 1 ft, which is all we need. We only need about 10ft for this to be effective.
What I'm trying to say is that we have a massive "RUSH" Order on these new systems, and they need 300 of the new models retrofitted by the end of May. We have been working round the clock and even hired more people on. 16hr shifts usually.
I don't know what the target is, but I can assure you this. There will be nuclear detonations on foreign soil soon.
God help us all. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80828
4/13/2006 9:16 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
Well, if what you say is true, a good way to verify it, is to observe the amount of employees that enter and leave this manufacturing complex. If their numbers exceed a normal employment measure for what is a documented budget, then that would be a good indication of supporting your statement. |
|
Yikes
User ID: 81214
4/13/2006 9:16 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
  |
|
Victor
User ID: 81025
4/13/2006 9:17 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
 |
|
DaJavoo 
Forum Barkeep
User ID: 73855
4/13/2006 9:18 PM
 | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
Things that make you go Hhhmmmmm.
 |
|
D. Bunker 
Senior Forum Moderator
User ID: 79287
4/13/2006 9:19 PM
 | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
"Rear Admiral. Larry E. Blose, who was a real asshole if you ask me. "
Only true statement in the post. |
|
D. Bunker
Senior Forum Moderator
User ID: 79287
4/13/2006 9:22 PM
| | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
Also here is the page he got most of the background information to bunk you with [link to www.strikenet.js.mil] |
|
Sorry No
User ID: 79696 (OP)
4/13/2006 9:24 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
Believe what you want to believe. I am only doing my duty. I really fear that humanity has finally hit the wall. We will be seeing nuclear detonations again, that actually kill people.
This new system is so effective, we'll be able to take out one site at a time. Don't believe what the media is telling you about our capabilities. We are always 10-20 years ahead of what the public sees. We know exactly where their nuclear sites are located. We have sats in space that can hear and see any uranium getting enriched, because of the high spin off particles. I'm not a nuclear technician, but I've seen the diagnostics from the sat. We have technology beyond what you think. They can track lead shielded trucks moving anywhere in the world.
But now, we'll be picking off their sites one at a time, and taking our time doing it. There will be major diversionary tactics first though. Thats just speculation on my part.
We have 2 or 3 missiles that break up and shoot off projectiles that catch the attention of any AAA trying to shoot down the other incoming. Its a variation of a common magician's trick. They fly around liek drones keeping their sites occupied while the stealth versions sneak in and burrow.. well I won't get into any more details. |
|
DaJavoo
Forum Barkeep
User ID: 73855
4/13/2006 9:24 PM
| | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
Google brings up nothing newer than 2004.
|
|
Sorry No
User ID: 79696 (OP)
4/13/2006 9:27 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
I don't need any website to post what I know here. I work for the company. You don't. Why I fear for our country and people like you, I'll never know.
There is plenty of information on the web about the Tomahawk. What you don't know is material I can give you. But I am not about to throw away national secrets. The fact I've told you that we have developed, tested and are now filling an order for special nuclear missiles, aimed at penetrating deep, and I mean DEEP into the ground, within a month, should tell you something. |
|
Omega
User ID: 79330
4/13/2006 9:28 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
Sorry boys and girls, I know enough about this sort of stuff to say the OP has credibility. Unfortunately, he'll be getting a knock on the door from the heat soon.
Real soon.
Handguns are a skill; shotguns an art; rifles a science.
_____________________________________
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on whats for dinner.
Disarmament is the precursor to Genocide.
Better to take action now rather than chances later. Your choice. |
|
Yikes
User ID: 81214
4/13/2006 9:28 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
Anyone else notice what time this was posted?
|
|
Victor
User ID: 81025
4/13/2006 9:29 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
Hmm I still smell a rat, but the F117 was in duty in the 70's 10 years before it was even shown to the public!!
You never know.. |
|
SCREAMMMMMM
User ID: 41685
4/13/2006 9:29 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
YES I DO!
SCREAMMMMMMMMM OH THE HORROR OF IT ALL!
SCREAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM |
|
Poetic Terrorist
User ID: 78140
4/13/2006 9:29 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
_________________________________________
We know exactly where their nuclear sites are located. We have sats in space that can hear and see any uranium getting enriched, because of the high spin off particles.
________________________________________
But we cant find Osama bin Laden... LOL... someone is lying, dont know who *wink 8wink |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74271
4/13/2006 9:29 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
Still, if this is fake, it is the best one I’ve seen yet! :)
The only technical thing I would add would be "CONVENTIAL bunker buster" before the nukes are mentioned.
Still...
If real...
ONLY 300? They’ll need more... |
|
Sorry No
User ID: 79696 (OP)
4/13/2006 9:30 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
Well I've made my point, and quite frankly I hope you never verify it because then I'll be exposed. I am posting via a proxy, to proxy to proxy, so I hope I'm covered.
I'd prepare soon, who knows what sort of backlash we'll get after this goes down.
Good luck all. |
|
Victor
User ID: 81025
4/13/2006 9:31 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
is that 300 of the burrowing ones or 300 of the nukes?
If thats 300 nukes.. then holy hell..
thik about it. 300 NUCLEAR DETONATIONS IN IRAN... |
|
DaJavoo
Forum Barkeep
User ID: 73855
4/13/2006 9:32 PM
| | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
Well, IF the Opie is legit...let's hope he's at least posting from Starbucks or something...
|
|
D. Bunker
Senior Forum Moderator
User ID: 79287
4/13/2006 9:36 PM
| | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
Opie is  |
|
Victor
User ID: 81219
4/13/2006 9:38 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
Well consider this.. 300 in a month, that seems lke an insane production rate... wonder how many they can do per month.. ?
Then once they are done, they need to be moved into the theatre, and that takes time too.
Maybe June the earliest they'd be able to lauch an attack.
Anyone got a link to that cruise missile over florida post? I remember it getting pinned. |
|
Victor
User ID: 81219
4/13/2006 9:39 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
I used to think there were no such thing as paid posters... but dbunker I think you are the first I believe are actually just a shill |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78887
4/13/2006 9:42 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
So it detects spinning particles underground and is able to decipher sounds of uranium enrichment from all of the other global vibrations.
 |
|
DaJavoo
Forum Barkeep
User ID: 73855
4/13/2006 9:43 PM
| | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
This is the 3rd 'new' Birdie Thread this week...
|
|
D. Bunker
Senior Forum Moderator
User ID: 79287
4/13/2006 9:46 PM
| | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
"..dbunker I think you are the first I believe are actually just a shill"
Believe what you wish Victor. |
|
Victor
User ID: 81219
4/13/2006 9:46 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
If I remember correctly, I always believed we could see nukes from space. I read that basically they had gamma ray burst detectors, to detect detonations, but they took one and turned it out into space to detect GRB's then they worked on a newer tech that allowed them to see uranium on the planet in motion anywhere.
Here is a link to a story I remember reading.
US Satellite Detection Of
Portable Nuclear Weapons
"If an internal nuclear attack ever occurs in this country without a
major failure of our satellite assets...perhaps we should rethink just who the
enemy really is..."
From Robert (name protected)
11-7-1
As you have probably heard from the major news networks, there is some concern about the so-called portable nuclear devices developed by the old USSR. Their former head of the KGB has confirmed the existence of 150 portable devices: 100 of which are presently unaccounted for.
First of all, portable refers to a low yield device with casing that would require an 18 wheeler to transport! "Suitcase device" is a misnomer. Second, none of these devices are missing; We know exactly where these devices are located at any given point in time.
This is how we know: During the 1980's I worked as a Senior Systems Engineer for several DOD companies in San Diego (Advanced Digital Systems and SAIC). While in this position I was tasked with developing a "Fleet Satellite Catastrophic Restoral Plan" for the Joint Chiefs of Staff. My group was to develop a method for satellite intelligence restoral in the event of a space born nuclear strike by the Soviet Union. In the course of this study, we had to review all satellite capabilities and characteristics: both current and projected through the early ninety's.
A series of satellites planned to begin deployment in 1989 (temporarily delayed by the Shuttle explosion) are now aloft (2nd phase of the MILSTAR Program) They carry special sensor devices (Developed by SAIC) that can detect high-velocity spin-off particles from enriched uranium (necessary for nuclear devices). Due to the small size and velocity of these particles, no amount of shielding can block them: not lead, not earth (sub-terrainian). Radiation hazards from these particles are minimal due to limited quantity. Our satellites are fool-proof in detecting and pin-pointing the locations of enriched uranium throughout the world.
The nuclear verification process employed in monitoring Iraq and other nations via NATO and the United Nations uses these satellite joint detection systems (the NSA controls and tracks the data). Many articles concerning these satellites have already been written in specialty magazines (Defense Science and Electronics-for one). Any attempt to bring a nuclear device into our country would be instantly detected (not to mention the track of its mobile transport).
Once again, the major US media resorts to half-truths for the benefit of ratings: "Stay tuned for more on our impending annihilation!" their unspoken headlines read,
If an internal nuclear attack ever occurs in this country without a major failure of our satellite assets...perhaps we should rethink just who the enemy really is...
While at SAIC, I worked special projects for Dick Egger (heir-apparent to Bob Beyster). As SAIC is now the top think tank for DOD, Admiral Poindexter (I worked for him as an NSO officer) has replaced Egger. The "Black Ops" for SAIC are under Poindexter's control and include PSYOPS developed in the San Diego area. Former pres. Bush Senior is STILL IN CHARGE of the old CIA ops group Poindexter represents. Just as in IRAN/CONTRA, the funding is private! I believe our capabilities to detect nukes is "With Intent" being hushed by the special interest group from the Bush Presidency (there really is a World Order crowd!) - now operating through Bush Jr.
I am known to these people (I worked within their organization for almost 10 years...til' I woke up). You can verify with Oliver North. He will not admit, but say to him: "The meeting at Pacer Systems in 1982 was taped and remains with the other documents bearing Bush Senior's signature - you only retrieved what I set aside for retrieval"...you can gauge his reaction for yourself... |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79718
4/13/2006 9:46 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
I didn't find anything he said to be incredible. I mean, it may be a hoax but if it is, it's a good hoax. We do know that supposedly one of the plans going to the presidents desk is the nuclear option...that's why generals are threatening to resign unless that gets taken off the table.
so if you see resignations (other than Rumsfeld) that means the nuclear option is still on the table which means this could be true. |
|
Victor
User ID: 81219
4/13/2006 9:47 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
Damn right I'll believe what I want. This is still a free country!! Not for long, but for now it is!!! |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80507
4/13/2006 9:48 PM | | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
"Retrofiting" 300 would certainly be doable in that time frame.
Transporting to theater not very time consuming.
I would not put this post in the same category as birdie |
|
DaJavoo
Forum Barkeep
User ID: 73855
4/13/2006 9:49 PM
| | Re: I've Worked on the Tomahawk Program since '82. I Have Some Alarming News | Quote |
Golly, Victor...
and I thought SDI was just warm and fuzzy smoke up the Soviet's tailpipe!
|
|
D. Bunker
Senior Forum Moderator
User ID: 79287
4/13/2006 9:52 PM
| |
| Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
|
