Do you really think man walked on the moon/???

What vid?

I agree.

It was a farce, from start, to finish.

You fucking delusional 'tard!

This is you --->

Commie Russia and the USA were always in cahoots!

Rothschilds funded everything!

Absolutely not. Man never set foot on the moon.

in holland the moon rocks were found to be petrified wood.

Where is Astroshill, Shillcyon Dayz and shillmuse-nli?

We didnt walk on any goddam moon.

They couldnt do it today let alone then.

Nah mate, was a link I posted to probably one of the best 'we never went there' sites.

- does have pics...

[link to davesweb.cnchost.com]

I believe we did during that era and were told not to go back there. Review the astronauts testimonies on video, the eyes don't lie.

Most of them were engineers and scientists and very rarely do these types make good actors.

Says the American patriot who watches too much Zionist TV.

Can't prove a negative.

OK, a perspective I havent heard before about this debate.

Some folks believe the moon is a watching platform, or controlling platform, that monitors the Earth. Some think its very existance, size, placement (for eclipses, to mask interstellar travel) is such that it physically controls us, or at the least limits us.

So why fake a landing?

Now I am one of those who doesnt think we went there, so saying that it was about tech' ego, or being ahead of the Ruskies ideologically etc doesnt cut it.

If it is a control centre/mechanism, might a faked landing be a message to the 'owners' that we can shape Men's minds and make them believe anything WE want them to believe, beyond your control.

i.e. the jigs up, we know what you're doing.

In that scenario, the astronauts and the program are still heros, and the feat extraordinary.

We went there purists wont like it, but it might make some on the border line feel a bit more comfy with the idea.

My Dad met Armstrong, if only for a few seconds, and a hand shake, and told me of an innate sadness in the man, despite the fact it was a motivational speech.

The new orbiters, from countries other than the US and Russia, and outside the scope of influence could certainly use the lack of evidence up there as a bargaining tool.

Might be why the US economy is in the toilet. Seemed to coincide with the Chinese orbiters.

Those tiny, shiney, blurry images that 'prove' we landed, apparently showing the landing site.... c'mon, we can read a digital watch from our orbit, and we have an atmosphere to contend with, and all that noise.

It makes sense that we went to the moon with all the info available and if it didn't make sense it probably wouldn't be true.

The question all should ask is, what really happened and why haven't we been back?

You are all blithering fucking idiots!!

A personal friend of mine who I have known for years worked on the Apollo project.

I have discussed this issue with him and you can almost see his blood boiling when I tell him there are people who think we never put a man on the moon.

He was involved in the project where the astronauts put a special mirror on the moon that is used to this day to bounce laser beams off of to measure the distance to the moon. That measurement does change over time.

So how the fuck did the mirror get there and get placed properly if the astronauts didn't put it there??

You stupid fucking bastards aren't worth one drop of sweat off his balls and are an insult to the thousands of people who worked their ass off accomplishing one of the crowning achievements of mankind!!

No wonder the country is going down the toilet, the schools are putting out whole fucking generations of kids with not enough sense to keep their pants up high enough to cover their sorry lazy asses.

Agreed! If the story makes sense it's most likely true.

The Apollo Program was a pack of lies, from start to finish.

Absolute propaganda, with Russia as a willing culprit!

It's impossible to win an intelligent argument with the uninformed that can't comprehend all of the facts at once. It's like trying to startle a horse that has blinders on.

The Australian movie “the Dish” is very subtle in the way it points out how they faked the moon landing. The ABC tv Archives discovered the original NASA moon landing footage of the landing and gave it back to NASA in the 80`s. the original moon landing film was played from Australia and beamed around the world. The hitch in transmission is where they changed from low Orbit transmission to local albeit Australian transmission.

Dont forget the coke bottle......

Here are the remnants


[link to www.bing.com]

Well...if we were there, then we would've went back, or some other country would've.

So? Why haven't they?


I think John Lear is right with this one.

Wrong. In Holland, a rock, suspected to be a Moon rock, owned by a private citizen and never verified was immediately recognized as not a Moon rock the first time anyone slightly familiar with geology looked at it. It had been in the possession of a the former prime minister and was supposedly given to him by the US ambassador. However, this supposedly happened in 1969 when no rocks were given out at all. It was also supposedly given to a former prime minister when the royal family at the time received nothing. The card with it does not identify it as a Moon rock. It isn't even clear if the card should be with the rock at all. There are two far more likely scenarios.

1. the ambassador gave the former prime minister the rock and the former prime minister, who was said by his family to be hard of hearing, misunderstood what it was.

or

2. The card was not associated with the rock at all and after his death when his family went through his stuff they assumed it was a Moon rock.

the only reason it can't be done today is nobody wants to pay for it. If somebody was willing to put up the money then we'd be up there. Since Apollo's budget was cut back before it was even over there was no reason to keep building the Saturn V so we don't currently have a heavy lifting booster to get us there. But there is no technical reason that one could not be built if we had the money and political will.

Read it now, wow, 100% confirms we didnt..

Good for humor but not much else. Dave proves constantly that he doesn't understand orbital mechanics, spaceflight, thermal dynamics, etc. Lots of begging the question, lots of argument from incredulity, and lots of "If I ran the zoo" type arguments but not much of substance.

Show real proof we didnt.. and I dont mean going to youtube and pull up some wack job GLPers post.. real proof..

The NRO, CIA, and NSA would love for you to believe that we can read a digital watch from orbit but we can't. Resolution is based on the Dawes limit which is directly related to the size of the main lens. We know the max size of the satellites that are up there based on the launch vehicles used. Simple math shows that the ability to read a digital watch from orbit is still a fantasy.

We did go back. We landed 6 times total. But Congress cut funding and has kept NASA's budget low ever since. Russia tried to go and had an active program until 1974 but couldn't keep their heavy lifting booster, the N-1, from exploding on liftoff. No other country has yet had the infrastructure or the desire to get there. China is approaching that point but they aren't there yet.

No