The only way that you can argue that homosexuality is "natural" is by looking to the animal kingdom? My dog attempts to hump the sofa and every little child that comes his way, but yet, you want to JUSTIFY human behaviour based on those facts? My dog is an UNREASONING ANIMAL who only seeks to perform his biological drive, yet you somehow use this to prove that it is "natural" among man? By denying creation you deny that man has been given reason and a conscience - unlike the animal kingdom. We are witnessing society that has been indoctrinated by those whose "holy book" - the Talmud - states that we, non-Jews - are no better than unreasoning beasts. Don't you get it? Unreasoning beasts do things based on pleasure, even if it means doing things that harm others. Unreasoning beasts categorise behaviour based on what feels good and what feels bad. They do the former and avoid the latter. But no distinction is made at any higher level. By arguing based on the animal kingdom, you have merely lowered yourself to what those who produce your daily dose of media poison have brought you too. It is clearly EVIDENT that an anus was designed for excrement, pure and simple. Therefore, any higher reasoning based upon what is clearly creation, must conclude that desiring to stick a penis up that orifice comes from beast like desire and lust - not creation. Our Creator has made everything evident to us, yet, because we want to do these these things, we look elsewhere to justify the behaviour. This is why it is stated that people will fully ignore evidence of creation in order to do the things that should not be done. In other words, you look to the animal beast kingdom to justify sticking a penis up an anus because creation shows you that it is nothing but a lust of sexual desire.

Those who justify based on the animal kingdom are mere victims of Talmudic thinking.