Catholic priest calls on Catholics to kill Evangelicals

SAD state of affairs on this planet

You are correct.

It's all about P.C

Unless you are a white, heterosexual, christian male, then you're fair game.

As all my Sunni relatives know, Shiites are all Shit.
Wahhabi is the only way to fly.

Actually, if a Catholic priest had done that, he'd be put away in an insane asylum or exorcised. It's just beyond my imagination - couldn't happen.

Or he'd be in jail
This PC stuff is bullshit.

Well, that too I guess. LOL! I just think of the priests aty my parish and how holy they are. I'm sure there are times throughout the day that the pastor would like to strangle some people because he isn't one who likes to let any moss grow under his feet, so you gotta keep things moving along, you know? But to call for anyone's death - it's just beyond my comprehension.

They used to say that. But that was before the internet or mass media.

When protestants first came around they were considered a "cult", or were "evil".

The history of most organized religions is very bloody.

Catholocism is no different.

Go ahead, google it.

Last Edited by Forgotten on 05/01/2013 02:00 PM

That was in the past...this is now.

There is no waay you could compare modern day Catholicism or christianity to islam when it comes to violence

[link to jesus-is-lord.com]

Here is article about how Roman Catholics are allowed to kill protestants.

[link to atheism.about.com]

More info.

Revelation 17:6
And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints,.... To see a woman drunk is a shameful sight; but to see one drunk, not with wine, but with blood, is monstrous, cruel, and shocking; the sword, when it devours, and is satiate, is said to be drunk with blood, Jer_46:10 but for a woman to be so is unexampled; and not with her own blood, as she will be, Isa_49:26 but with the blood of others; and not with the blood of wicked men, but with the blood of saints; such as God the Father has set apart from everlasting, and chosen to be holy; whom Christ has sanctified by his blood, or whose sins he has expiated, and to whom he is made sanctification; and who have principles of grace and holiness wrought in them by the Spirit of God, and live holy lives and conversations:

and of the martyrs of Jesus; the saints, whose blood is shed by antichrist, are martyrs also; but they seem to design the common people, and these the ministers of the Gospel, who are the martyrs of Jesus, both in life and death; they are his martyrs or witnesses, by their doctrine and ministry, bearing testimony to him as Jesus, a Saviour; testifying that he is the only Saviour, that there is salvation in no other, in opposition to the antichristian doctrines of merit, penance, purgatory, &c. for which they have been cruelly put to death, and in great numbers, and so have sealed their doctrine by their blood. Now the woman being drunk with their blood, denotes the blood thirstiness of the church of Rome, her greedy aud insatiable desire after the blood of the saints, and her delight in it, being exceeding mad against them; and the multitude of it shed by her, as the slaughters of the Waldenses and Albigenses, the butcheries of the duke d'Alva in the Low Countries, the massacres in France, Ireland, and other places, the burning of the martyrs in Queen Mary's days here, with numerous other instances, show.

And when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration; not at the sight of the beast, which he had seen before, but at the sight of the woman, as, upon the beast; he wondered that one of her sex, generally timorous and fearful, should ride on such a monstrous creature; he was amazed at her dress, and grand appearance, whereas the church in his time consisted of poor persons, meanly arrayed; it was astonishing to him that one bearing the name of a Christian church should rise to such grandeur; and he wondered at the name upon her forehead, what the whole of that inscription should mean; but, above all, at her drunkenness with the blood of the saints; at her inhumanity and cruelty, being as savage as the beast she rode on; and also at God's forbearance of her, that he, who is a pure and holy Being, a lover of his saints, an avenger of his elect, should suffer such a brutish, barbarous, and blood thirsty creature, to live upon earth; see Hab_1:13.

Under Roman Catholic law, protestants were not to be buried...therefore these exist all over the world.. Here is a sample:

Roman Catholic Skull church - Prague
Bones are of the massacred Protestant Hussites

[link to search.aol.com]

Massacred Protestant Hugonauts -Paris Catacombs under Notre Dame
(they dont call it a MASSacre for nothing)

[link to search.aol.com]

Rwanda -Roman Catholic Skull churches built after the Roman Catholic Hutu massacred the Protestant Tutusis in 1993

[link to search.aol.com]

Oh, so just forget about history? Eventually Muslim hatred for each other will be in the "past", so it is ok too?

Edit: The amount of blood spilled by catholics and protestants over religious reasons is on par with anything currently going on with muslims.

Last Edited by Forgotten on 05/01/2013 02:05 PM

The Op's thread is based specifically on the political correctness of TODAY.

Not the activities of the catholic church in the past.

I know, and I was providing a counter argument as to why this topic is silly. At best.

He who is without sin....
[link to www.keyway.ca]

Last Edited by Forgotten on 05/01/2013 02:07 PM

[link to ivarfjeld.com]


Rome does NOT change.. Rwanda was 1993 and the decorated skulls continue

I believe....I can't speak for OP, but I believe he is highlighting the political correctness involved, more than the religious aspect.

Just the fact that there is a blackout if a muslim says it, outrage if a non muslim says it.

You are focusing on the wrong aspect of the thread.

Northern Ireland


and


Croatia



what you say?

Read all about evil organizations here:

[link to one-evil.org]

On August 29, 1942, a friar from themonastery of Siroki Brijeg, named Petar Brzica, won first place forkilling the most Serbs in the shortest time, boasting 1,350 throatsslit in one night.

Historian Carl Savich quotes an AP report stating that "a priest from Petricevac led Croat fascists, armed with hatchets and knives, to anearby village. In the 1942 attack, they butchered 2,300 Serbs."Testimony from a survivor of that February 7 massacre, Selo Drakulic,reads: "Prior to killing the adults, unborn children were violently cutfrom their mothers' womb and slaughtered. Of the remaining childrenin the village, all under the age of 12, the Ustashas brutally removedarms, legs, noses, ears and genitals. Young girls were raped andkilled, while their families were forced to witness the violation andcarnage. The most grotesque torture of all was the decapitation ofchildren, their heads thrown into the laps of their mothers, who werethemselves then killed."


Archive photos of sadism that would make horror filmmakers blushsurvive today: Ustashas displaying an Orthodox priest's head; aneyeless peasant woman; Serbs and Jews being pushed off a cliff; a Serbwith a saw to his neck; and a smiling Ustasha holding the still-beatingheart of prominent industrialist Milos Teslitch, who had beencastrated, disemboweled and his ears and lips cut off.


Italian writer Curzio Malaparte in his 1944 book Kaputtoffers this detail: "While [Pavelic] spoke, I gazed at a wicker basketon the Poglavnik's desk [which] seemed to be filled with mussels, orshelled oysters... 'Are they Dalmatian oysters?' I asked. [Pavelic]said smiling, 'It is a present from my loyal Ustashas... Forty poundsof human eyes.'"


In their 1991 book Unholy Trinity: The Vatican, the Nazis and the Swiss Banks, reporter Mark Aarons and former Justice Department attorney John Loftus corroborate the grisly Croatian crimes, as does Genocide in Satellite Croatia 1941-1945 by Edmond Paris: "The Italians photographed an Ustasha wearing two chains of human tongues and ears around his neck."


It has been 60 years, and the world still doesn't know the story ofwartime Croatia, where not only did the Vatican not speak out againstcrimes, not only was it complicit in the genocide of a million people,but it subsequently never expressed remorse for the spilled Orthodoxblood as it's done for Jewish blood. Because the world never demandedit. Which points to the same apprehensions that have dogged Jewishgroups about the Vatican's genuineness, especially with its reluctanceto open archives about Pius's World War II conduct



[link to www.youtube.com]



[link to www.ithaca.edu]
Priests and monks, usually Franciscans, took a leading part in the massacres, and left a multitude of photographs proving their involvement.[32] In order to impress Pavelic, and be awarded medals or singled out for “heroism,” the killers would frequently take pictures with their dead or dying victims.[33] Captured photographs show Ustasha members beheading a Serb with an axe, driving a saw through the neck of another, and carrying the head of a Serbian Orthodox priest through the streets of Zagreb. In all of them, the Ustasha are smiling and crowding into the picture, as if to prove they had a role in the atrocity.[34] Some Ustasha collected the eyes of the Serbs they had killed, sending them to Pavelic for his inspection, or proudly displaying them and other human organs in the cafes of Zagreb

[link to documentary-reality.blogspot.com]

[link to bogihrvati.webs.com]

Mat_23:27 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness

Of course they are. It's called distraction.

you bet:
[link to www.angelfire.com]
[link to www.youtube.com]

Probably first and foremost is The Vatican.

Shhh! Dont confuse them with facts. I suppose 50 years ago is "ancient history" to some folks.

You are thick headed eh?

Again, the point I was TRYING to make to you, is that the thread is more about P.C than religion.

You are purposefully going off topic to promote your own agenda.

You are becoming more transparent the more you post.

"...that muslims are subhuman scum to which he is greatly superior..."

Please point out where ND is mistaken?

well, the level of his and your mentality is certainly self-evident. you're true christians, for sure.

HAHAHAHAAA This post made my day LOLZZ

I am very transparent. Matter of fact, I will tell you exactly what I am doing.

I think it is hysterical that 2 "man-made" religions argue over which is better.

When they both have done the same "crimes" time and time again.

Organized religion makes no sense. My god is better then yours! Uh uh, my god is the real god, and you are going to hell while I get virgins.

Uh uh, I am gong to heaven to sit by Jesus, while you burn in hell!

Do you see how silly this all sounds.

I do not like organized religion. I think the "back and forth" and name calling is silly, at best.

I come to these threads to call out the hypocrisy of both religions.

Last Edited by Forgotten on 05/01/2013 04:24 PM