Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,733 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 683,072
Pageviews Today: 915,121Threads Today: 230Posts Today: 3,676
11:10 AM

Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing

Pentagon Strike: Why didn't the show us the wreckage?

Offer Upgrade

User ID: 78039
United States
04/17/2006 03:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Pentagon Strike: Why didn't the show us the wreckage?
The 9/11 Pentagon Attack: Planes Simply Do Not Vaporize - Why Didnít They Show Us the Wreckage?

As each day passes, more and more Americans are becoming aware of the startling evidence that clearly contradicts the official explanation of Sept.11th, 2001 offered by the Bush administration. In fact, as more and more evidence comes to light, incongruities in the official explanation become increasingly and undeniably apparent.

Ironically, the growing number of people new to these unexplained discrepancies poses a new problem for those of us who have been researching 9/11 for many months or years. We will have to find a way to explain the many complexities related to the attacks to those who now doubt the official version of events. We are faced with the overwhelming task helping great numbers of people understand the many contradictions in the 9/11 story they were fed by their government.

Obviously, that is not an easy assignment, even when the great majority of truth seekers agree that the official explanation is little more than a pre-written cover story designed to herd the American public into supporting an agenda that would otherwise horrify and outrage them. However, it becomes far more complicated in light of a topic that causes a great deal of confusion within the research community itself. That disparity relates to the strike on the Pentagon.

Many questions still remain about what actually took place at the Pentagon on September 11th 2001. Thatís fine, because the goal of the 9/11 truth community is to raise these questions for further investigation. The problem arises when researchers feel that it is their responsibility to explain what happened at the Pentagon. It is NOT. Rather, it is their charge to highlight the doubts that have been legitimately raised regarding what exactly hit that building.

Some researchers claim that a 110,000 ton Boeing 757 hit the building, leaving only a 16 foot hole in the facade (prior to its collapse some 22 minutes after the initial impact.) Others claim that an A-3 Skywarrior fighter jet was the actual aircraft. Some say it was an unmanned Global Hawk armed with depleted uranium missiles, and still others claim that the Pentagon was hit by another type of military missile. We can argue each of these theories forever, and accomplish absolutely nothing.

We really have to put and end the internal dispute that is getting us nowhere and work together to bring information rather than more uncertainty to the public that is now just entering the 9/11 discussion. To that end, I am posing ONE pertinent question about the strike on the Pentagon: Why didnít they show us the wreckage?

Planes do not simply vaporize. Never in the history of aviation disasters has an aircraft ever totally disintegrated. Even exploding space shuttles did not vanish into thin air. Therefore, it stands to reason that whatever hit the Pentagon had to leave some recoverable debris in its wake. Surely, there had be enough identifiable rubble remaining from a 110,000 ton aircraft to satisfy the skeptics?

Read the full blog here:

[link to tvnewslies.org]
Mr. Nirum

User ID: 771
United States
04/17/2006 04:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Pentagon Strike: Why didn't the show us the wreckage?
they know we are stupid enough to believe anything they say, think about it, all the lies, and we the sheeple believe.