Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,638 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 214,960
Pageviews Today: 324,719Threads Today: 121Posts Today: 1,770
02:39 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Why Is Obama Still In Office?

 
JenJen
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 39260863
United States
05/16/2013 01:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Why Is Obama Still In Office?
I'm sorry, I'm not racist, so don't even go there, but Obama should be Impeached due to INCOMPETENCE!!
For those who don't know what Incompetence is:

Incompetence is the inability to perform; lack of competence; ineptitude. Administrative incompetence, dysfunctional administrative behaviors that hinder ...


He can't seem to do anything right, our country is falling apart and going to HELL IN A HANDBASKET!!!!

1dunno1
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 39943325
Portugal
05/16/2013 01:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Is Obama Still In Office?
Presiding over a corrupt system makes possible.
justajoke
User ID: 39740519
United States
05/16/2013 01:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Is Obama Still In Office?
such an ( | )...Did you know his mother use to carry him upside down for the longest of times, thinking he was one eyed?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4135473
United States
05/16/2013 01:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Is Obama Still In Office?
racist

jk but thats why

african
Desert FoxModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 8786935
United States
05/16/2013 01:54 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Is Obama Still In Office?
african
TOMABANEFOX
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7042495
United States
05/16/2013 01:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Is Obama Still In Office?
There is no grounds for impeachment and there is no money for wasteful public displays because Republican have gutted the Governments budget.
Desert FoxModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 8786935
United States
05/16/2013 01:55 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Is Obama Still In Office?
There is no grounds for impeachment and there is no money for wasteful public displays because Republican have gutted the Governments budget.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7042495


iamwith
TOMABANEFOX
Loreak

User ID: 39265130
United States
05/16/2013 01:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Is Obama Still In Office?
And what is the ideal example of competence? Bush?
Indysmindy

User ID: 2731277
United States
05/16/2013 01:56 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Is Obama Still In Office?
As he says about himself "Eye Candy" ???

lmao
**The first step to salvation is to realize that we are all sinners:
Romans 3:10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:
Romans 3:23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Romans 6:23
23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Resister

User ID: 36421936
United States
05/16/2013 01:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Is Obama Still In Office?
Complicit mass media + easily misdirected public + spineless congress = no accountability for incompetence, fraud, and criminal neglect resulting in the death of American citizens.
"God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all, & always, well informed... If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty... Let them take arms... What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. " - Thomas Jefferson in 1787
[link to line-in-the-sand.spam]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20093181
United States
05/16/2013 02:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Is Obama Still In Office?
why the Obama administration may come out smelling like a rose, on the only real issue of the current three "scandals".

the confiscation of telephone records is a serious charge that could be a death knell, if it can be proven to be done w/o merit. now consider this, the purpose of the confiscation was in order to determine where national security leaks were transpiring. the punishment for such leaks are very punitive. now in determining the source of the leaks, the DOJ had a very limited number of suspects to investigate. the list includes the Presidents national security staff and the Senates intelligence committee. now if through an investigation none of the NS staff came up as having no contact with any AP reporters, then the focus would be turned on the Senate Intelligence committee. this is now getting into an investigation of some very powerful people. its a tight wire investigation.

at this point the WH has refused to submit any pertinent email contents to the Senate intelligence committee. the only thing the Intelligence committee has received are emails whose contents have been redacted to reveal only the name of the senders and the receivers. what the email contents reveal is a mystery. again, we get into a scenario where revealing anything but the parties involved might tip the hand of the investigation as to whom are/is the suspected leaker/leakers.

what would a very powerful individual do to obstruct an investigation if he/she felt they were the focus of an investigation? the obvious answer is to muddy the water with allegations of improprieties of the investigator. again this is only a possible scenario, but it does fall into the distinct possibilities presented so far.

the fact that the administration is playing this one so closely to the chest requires a deep examination as to why.
why sweat the Senate intelligence committee, unless, there was some suspicion of guilt for leaking classified intelligence?

if proof can be obtained to indict a suspect, I would seriously doubt that charges would be brought. what I would expect is a retirement of a high placed committee member/members followed by the dropping of any mention of wrong doing by the Obama administration.

leaking national security information can be viewed as treason. the SCOTUS, would look upon such an offense by an individual or enterprise within a very narrow confine of the 1st Amendment.