More evidence that Woolwich England killing was staged false flag PHOTOS

Good post, mate!

Why are you trashing the Queen Mother that way, what have she done to you? You sound bitter and jealous to me, it's not her falt that you were born a peasant. And she didn't choose to be born royalty. Don't hate participate!

She's not the Queen Mother, she's the Queen.

This hoax is the launch pad to WW3. People do not yet realise how significant this event is. All that remains for the NWO to kickstart this war is a massive false flag and the masses will simply say that they have had enough. Even though this event was faked, the false flag wont be. It will be so real people will simply cave in under the deception being played..

I have gone to great lengths to explain how this event is a hoax in my thread, now blocked - Thread: Woolwich beheading is a staged event.

Below is enough information to provide reasonable doubt of the official story.


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


I figured that many people were numb to the odd events presented to them on TV concerning this supposed beheading or knife attack. For example, a lady (in fact, many ladies) passing with absolutely no care in the world beside this attacker, a young lady feeling the pulse of a headless man or even if the guy wasn't beheaded (as the MSM reported by changing their story the next day because their report was inconsistent with what people saw on TV i.e. a lady caressing or feeling the pulse of a headless man), but now knifed, as new reports now say, and still alive on the final spot he layed, it still didn't account for the lack of blood on that spot and the lack of blood on the clothing of the woman who lay next to him "feeling his pulse". If victim is still alive, he would be bleeding but why isn't there blood on the road? The changes in the reports even brought up many more questions. In the end, this thing is a hoax. Yet, in spite of the so many mind fuck scenarios, people still bought the official story and the changes made to the story in the days after.

The cops got on the scene and attended to the attackers first leaving the victim to die a slow death, assuming the newly released reports are true that he was still alive on the road. How did the cops know that he is dead? Is this a ready made/prepared script? Why didn't they attend to him first?

Why is there no CCTV footage of this assault? Why is there only an account of supposed eye witnesses, no actual footage of this event and only one angle of 2 cameras giving an interview to the supposed attacker?

Well, I would tell you why. It is because for you to buy this story, you have to believe the narrative. To believe the narrative, they have to ensure you have no further means of questioning the official story presented to you. For you to have no further means of questioning the official story, you have to have no further evidence other than what you are presented with. The trick is that of elimination of evidence. The fewer they are, the better it is for them to sell their official story.

The chances of things happening in real life just the way they told you it did is very marginal. Only in a Hollywood studio do things happen exactly the way they want them to. A multi-angle CCTV footage would reveal so many things about this story and this is why none is shown to the public because the event didn't happen (at least not in the way you were told it did). Multi angle CCTV footage will reveal live action from many angles and if this incident did happen live, chances are that a member of the public could have intervened on reflex or the victim himself could escape the assault also on acting on reflex. No one in their right frame of mind would stand by and watch a car run him over. Chances are that he would make a move to evade the threat. These are things Multi camera angles will reveal. And it is so difficult to get everything right when you have only ONE TAKE ON A ROAD BEING USED BY THE PUBLIC. They obviously wouldn't also have time to do several takes on the scene because by then, more people would be passing by to witness the oddities or staging.

If they did several takes, the timecode on the CCTV cameras would reveal edits and lapses which people can use to tear the official story apart. And because it is so difficult to stage an event or conceal evidence in many video angles, this is the reason why none is shown to you because events didn't happen as you were told. If they did show you a footage, and there are discrepancies in the video, you won't buy the propaganda. If you don't buy the propaganda, their agenda fails.

It is very difficult to put a person that isn't there on a left view of a scene in the right view of same scene. This is why they ensured they gave you only a narrative in the form of eye witness account, a ready made scene in the form of a car crash and a person lying in the road and a recording of a confession from a supposed "person going for a job interview". From their point of view, this would do for the sheep.

If you'd like to know more, please read this....... [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]



This event is staged. For those that say its not staged, please answer this question:

The attacker said a series of things on the scene amongst which are....

"When we start busting our guns do you think David Cameron is going to be the one caught in the street? It's going to be the average guys like you....."

So, it is clear that it wasn't only the soldier he had a grudge with, he also wanted to assault the public who didn't see his viewpoint nor did anything about his demands.

Since this is the case and he had so many of the members of the public to choose from to drive this point home, but didnt, what do you think is going on here? What point is there in killing the soldier and leaving civilians alive both of whom he and his "comrades" want to assault? Do "Real" terrorists display this level of rationale?

Is he at war with the army or the public? If his comrades all behave this way, then I think the public is safe, don't you? I think we can also assume that if any attack is made against the public in the very near future, blamed on lone terrorists, that it is for propaganda purposes because it shows that this guy and his comrades could show some civility in executing terrorist acts against the public or just maybe.....maybe he is just following a script the people that sent him asked him to deliver. I put it to you that no terrorist, had there been one one in Woolwich that day, would behave the way this guy did on that day allowing members of the public to walk around him like that. No REAL terrorist could talk the talk and not walk the walk.

A soldier may or may not have died but those supposed attackers killed no soldier or anyone for that matter in Woolwich which is why he couldn't assault any other person or you didn't see him do so even when people were in close proximity to him. Those guys are innocent and are no terrorist which is why the MSM cover story changed from a beheading to knife assault because that cover story was inconsistent with real time events.


Please Read This Thread: Woolwich beheading is a staged event. (Page 10)

.....and then this.

Consider these very strong emotional, religious, ethnic and political points that came out of this event. In fact, this event cut across so many spectrums its is unimaginable the investment that went into the execution from the characters of victims to the attackers and the possible gains that could be derived from it.

1. Supposed victim was a soldier and wearing a "support for heroes" shirt. This emphasis goes far beyond people can imagine. It affects soldiers, affects their supporters, affects the general masses and goes far beyond people can think of.

2. The attackers were black, indigenous, with a christian background but converted to islam and became radicalised. I mean, how much fuckstantic can this story get? This will leave the sheeples scratching there heads and the officials tell them anyone can now be radicalized. You don't have to be born a muslim. This is a vital aspect of this hoax.

3. Attacker left strong political message of his Gun trotting comrades attacking everyone all over asking what people would do, Forceful Removal of Government and very strong religious viewpoints etc. He says people will be the ones to pay for the government's wrong doings - he had a handful of people to choose from to prove this point but attacked only one soldier. I mean common! Seems like strange behaviour coming from a crazed person.

Its claimed he acted alone but how come he speaks for and knows the mindset of other, up to this date, unknown peace loving muslims and other religious people? Is there an infectious extremist virus flying around that has infected him and has the potential of infecting others? That seems to be how he knows others will follow in his footsteps. Or maybe he's a mind reader! LOL!

In any case, these are messages coming from the NWO Production Studios that they wanted the public to hear to make sense of for their future agenda.

Now remember that brave woman that stood with the axe wielding attackers?

That's seems to be the cover story. On a further inspection, it seems she's the undercover MI5 handler...

From [link to news.nationalpost.com]

Mrs Loyau-Kennett was on her way home from visiting family in France when she ended up in Woolwich. She was born in Brittany, but her family is British – her great-grandfather worked for MI5 and her grandfather was awarded the Defence Flying Cross by George V for his efforts in the First World War. She came to England as a teenager and, after living briefly in New Zealand, has been here since.

Very Interesting. Wanna bet she followed in her family's footsteps? I'll leave you to be the judge of that.

This has NWO written all over it.

Last Edited by Ohwell on 06/01/2013 11:13 AM

I love the way you guys take leaps. If this had been the broad jump, you would have cleared the pit by a thousand miles.

.