Obama Birth credentials fraudulently and criminally fabricated! Biggest FRAUD in US History!

Put them in Default... then start liening on there properties...

Its truly amazing,I have never seen any president go through so many changes and questions about who and what our president is or was..I have gathered so much information on this man,that I seem to be rewritting the Manchurinen Candidate.Yet,he became our president.Makes you wonder,HOW!”You may say to yourself,or to others,did he buy off the electorial college?”He didn’t get the popular vote.Hilliary did,by several million.Was there some other reason that no one will offer a remark to what he realy is.What ever he is,is a question you should ask yourself every day.The man,is destroying this country within,Devide and conquer.Devide the parties so that either side can’t comprimise on anything.Refuse to make an actual budget,to curtail spending,destroy the economic structor of our great country,while looking down his nose and lying to everyone that he is doing his best to make things better,Place the blame on everyone,the past president,the republicans and the best is,that Americans are lazy.Well who made us that way.Who wants to work when the democrats pass another unemployment act of 99 weeks and then an extension after that of 40 more,then a third tier.It all sounds like Socialisim in the making.A third of the country works and the rest of it sits around and reaps the benifits.Lets blame the rich,bankrupt them,tax them so much that they no longer can afford to keep their companies working,down size,better yet,move your company to another country and fire all your faithful employies to add to the debt of our country.No one paying taxes,homless people and Vets standing on the corner begging…I say no!”Thats why I have thrown my hat in the ring for the Presidency.I will not let our,my country die by the way side.Dump the electorial college and let the people speak.Let our vote count for something!”

in default???

are you a bank???

Many affirmative action graduates are not required to take licensing exams. I know both Obamas were affirmative action students but Michelle Obama was a legitimate bright honors student. Her husband was excused from his requirements and exams. (We got the wrong Obama as president).

That said, both Obamas have multiple social security numbers and Barack Obama used the name Barry Soetoro for many years including his school years. When he applied for his law license he denied having gone by another name. This itself could cause his license to be suspended, but I’m sure there are plenty more snakes in his past. I don’t think he could pass the Bar Exam!

The law was changed several months after his multiple social security numbers were discovered by a thorough private eye. This was either one or two years ago. The law now says using another person’s social security number is only a misdemeanor if one uses one’s own name with that number. Previously this was a felony. The SS number Barack Obama currently uses originated in CT over 100 years ago!

Why is there no one to enforce the few laws we still have on the books to protect us?

This shyte again?

An Obama conspiracy theorist is 'shocked' and dismisses Obama's birth certificate. What's shocking about that?

The issue is so settled, the president's birth place so overwhelmingly affirmed that this birther nonsense is stuff the *democrats* bring up to make conservative look like raving lunatics.

Even the republican ex-governor of Hawaii rolls her eyes at this idiocy, affirming that Obama was born in Hawaii. With republican appointed officials affirming Obama's natural born citizenship *and* his birth in Hawaii. Obama's place of birth has been affirmed more completely than any President in US history.

And some conspiracy theorist ignores it all...and just rolls it into the conspiracy.

So what?

It’s documented that the Obamas have several SSNs. Google it, whine-boy. Second, the President’s SSN waqs issued in Connecticut (where he’s never lived) and is issued to a man over 102 years old. That’s plain evidence of a major discrepancy right there. Your failure to recognize this simple discrepancy is either (and I’m being charitable here) evidence of either (a) chronic alcohol use on your part, (b) chronic drug use on your part, or (c) cranial-rectal subluxation on your part. None of it is evidence of idiocy on our part. Third, Snopes is run by lefties funded by George Soros. It’s more compliocated than that, but I’m sure your poor widdle head is hurting from your night of alcohol-fueld trolling, and you need your sleep. The post is on the blog. Look it up, dimwit.

That all you got, Imbecile?

Facts cannot be denied.If you are up front and are not afraid of the truth, than you have nothing to hide.Then, Why did Obama hide everything he is and keep the public from delving into his past.It seems that,we as a people have the constitutional right to look into Obama’s past and see exactly who and what he is,under the freedom of information act.Why.because Obama has lied to everyone in this country and his job is to take down America from within.Look up U tube,Obama admits he is a muslim and while you are in that area,his wife admits he was born in Kenya,in front of an audiance.I can’t make this up.It comes from their own lips…Remember,READ MY LIPS…WELL READ HIS!”

I know that its a big thing to say,the Obama’s do not have a law licence.The fact of the matter is and I hate to say anything good about those people,but you do not have to have a licence to be President.I myself,don’t have one,but I do have 2 PhD’s,one of which is in criminal and Constitunal law.The other is in forensic science.I am a presidential candidate and can see everyones point and agree with everyone of why would you volentary give it up.After all those years of hard work and determination to become an attorney,Makes no sence to me,unless it was for a specific reason,or face judicial repromand and maybe face time and the loss of your licence forever…its your guess.Thats why all his records are sealed and why is the government allowing this.Under the freedom of information act,it should not be sealed,or is it a mark of national security.After he is no longer he has to allow it to be expelled and int the lime light.Either way,he must have a reason to be afraid of his past and the democracts are in it with him….

Is anyone really surprised? What would surprise me is to find out that any 2 consecutive sentences that either Michelle or BO has ever spouted – is/was actually true. Some folks simply cannot speak without telling whoppers

I am Bondservant to Prime... there is no higher office on this planet.

Michelle Obama “voluntarily surrendered” her law license in 1993. after a Federal Judge gave her the choice between surrendering her license or STAND TRIAL FOR insurance FRAUD. 3. So, we have the first black President and First “Lady” – who don’t actually have licenses to practice law. Facts. Source: [link to jdlong.wordpress.com] [...]

Is anyone surprised? The man is a pathological liar and Trojan Horse. HE took advantage of his performance in 2004 at the DNC and people who are all to eager to push affirmative action chose a man who never would have been chosen on his merits -he had none. All he had were associations with the most anti-American people there are and a vacant history. It was insane to elect this man. It would be mind-boggling to REELECT him now that we know all the stuff people refused to believe is actually true

great!!!

let the liening begin!!!

You 'know', huh? I think you're mistaking knowledge for the ability to type any random accusation. What's your evidence that Obama was excused from his 'requirements and exams'?



His 'school years'? You mean when he was a kid?



Says you. Can you show us anyone in Illionis that was stripped of their law license because they may have used a different last name as a kid?

Again, your ability to type random shyte doesn't translate into the law. Or anyone having their law license stripped from them. As you don't know what you're talking about.



Um, dipshyte....there were no social security numbers over 100 years ago. The Social Security Act wasn't even passed until 1935. How then could a SSN 'originate over 100 years ago' when none existed before 1935?

And was a blue police box somehow involved?

You're mixing your conspiracy theories, by the way. The Jean Paul Ludwig conspiracy(the one that supposedly dates back to 1890) has nothing to do with Connecticut. And of course, has been thoroughly debunked.

But then, its not like any one here is actually going to fact check your claims. So what need do you have for accuracy...or even a story that makes the slightest sense?

What troubles me most of all is, that our mainstream media seems to ignore anything and everything about the Obamas that is negative and the truth. It is absolutely deplorable that it is not ‘We the People” who elect a president, it is OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA. There ought to be a supervisory agency who would put journalism on the right page again

This is old news. Andy Martin discovered that they both had relinquished their law licenses when researching his book “Obama: The Man Behind The Mask”, which was published in 2008. He also pointed out that this is something that a lawyer would never do, unless about to be subject to disciplinary action. He wasn’t able to find the reasons behind it though, as they, like many other things regarding Obama, are well hidden

I knew they had both lost their law license, but I didn’t know why until I read this. This is 100% legit. I check it out at [link to www.iardc.org (secure)] Stands for Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Committee. It’s the official arm of lawyer discipline in Illinois ; and they are very strict. (Talk about irony.) Even I, at the advanced age of almost 65, maintain (at the cost of approximately $600/year) my law license that I worked so hard and long to earn. Big surprise. Former Constitutional Law Lecturer and U.S. President Makes Up Constitutional Quotes During State Of The Union (SOTU) Address. Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application. A “Voluntary Surrender” is not something where you decide “Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?” and forget to renew your license. No, a “Voluntary Surrender” is something you do when you’ve been accused of something, and you ‘voluntarily surrender” your license before the state suspends you. 2 Michelle Obama “voluntarily surrendered” her law license in 1993, after a Federal Judge gave her the choice between surrendering her license or standing trial for Insurance fraud! 3. Facts.Source: [link to jdlong.wordpress.com] 4. A senior lecturer is one thing; a fully ranked law professor is another. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law Professor at the University of Chicago . 5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) “served as a professor” in the law school-but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008. 6. “He did not hold the title of Professor of Law,” said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University Of Chicago School Of Law . Source: [link to blogs.suntimes.com] 7. The former Constitutional Senior Lecturer (Obama) cited the U.S. Constitution during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence … not the Constitution. 8. The B-Cast posted the video: [link to www.breitbart.tv] 9. Free Republic : In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: “We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal. 10. Um, wrong citing, wrong founding document there Champ, I mean Mr. President. By the way, the promises are not a notion; our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. 11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech? When you are a phony it’s hard to keep facts straight. Keep this moving — educate others TCC: YOU BETTER WAKE UP AMERICA! This entry was posted in Keep the "Change". Bookmark the permalink. ← Remember THIS next time you’re stretching YOUR budget!

Oh, the *accusation* certainly exists. But the evidence doesn't. While birthers may accept their accusations as irrefutable evidence...the law doesn't. Which is why this claim has been laughed out of court every time its been made.




What's the man's name? Specifically. And backed with what evidence. The nonsense you idiots repeat to each other means nothing to me. Its the *evidence* I want to see.

And SSN's aren't assigned by where you *live*. They're assigned the zipcode of where the application is sent from. Obama's zipcode in Hawaii is ONE digit off of the zip used for Danbury Conneticut. Replace a 9 for a 0 and your mystery is solved.

But no....you'd rather imagine some grand, ridiculously complicated 50 year long plot involving the State of Hawaii, the governor of Hawaii, newspapers, the entire media, and the Social Security Administration instead.

Occam's Razor....ain't it a bytch?



Or I, like every court to ever hear these nonsense claims recognize that accusations are not evidence. That you can *imagine* a ridiculously complicated, fantaastically complex batshyte conspiracy doen't make it so.

Its the evidence that establishes the veracity of claims. And the evidence just doesn't match your claims.



Third, Snopes is run by lefties funded by George Soros.[/qutoe]

Ah, the old conspiracy standby. Anything that doesn't ape the conspiracy must be part of it. Snopes disassembles your silly claims with vastly superior evidence and a much more plausible explaination must be ignored because (gasp) you've imagined yet another conspiracy.

And backing this that Snopes is run by George Soros? You've got jackshyte. Just your ability to type the claim.

Try again. This time backing your claims with more than your ability to type them.

Obama won in 2008 by 10,000,000 votes. And in 2012 by 6,000,000. Just because you don't like a president doesn't mean he wasn't elected.

But why would he lie and use fake documents??

I just don't believe he is simply a con man if that is the case. Why the seemingly deep plodded agenda of assaulting the constitution and destroying the economy and the dollar. ..It seems like he would most likely be a pawn of a larger agenda.

...but why would he go along or sacrifice his lifes work to these lies as if some great destiny he is trying to fullfil perhaps as an act of martyrdom or as some planted part of an extremist(possibly muslim) organization.

..as I watched CNN announce the winner of the last election(early) ...the display of tallied votes on the large score board behind them actually had Romney ahead in the vote count.... they immediately reconized the error and went into damage control... they couldn't do a good job though, it was awesome..

I would not make "the claims"...

unless I could prove it...

the fact of the matter is...

you don't and never intend to believe the facts...

as they have been presented...

and you have been found wanting!!!

Oh, the *accusation* certainly exists. But the evidence doesn't. While birthers may accept their accusations as irrefutable evidence...the law doesn't. Which is why this claim has been laughed out of court every time its been made.




What's the man's name? Specifically. And backed with what evidence. The nonsense you idiots repeat to each other means nothing to me. Its the *evidence* I want to see.

And SSN's aren't assigned by where you *live*. They're assigned the zipcode of where the application is sent from. Obama's zipcode in Hawaii is ONE digit off of the zip used for Danbury Conneticut. Replace a 9 for a 0 and your mystery is solved.

But no....you'd rather imagine some grand, ridiculously complicated 50 year long plot involving the State of Hawaii, the governor of Hawaii, newspapers, the entire media, and the Social Security Administration instead.

Occam's Razor....ain't it a bytch?



Or I, like every court to ever hear these nonsense claims recognize that accusations are not evidence. That you can *imagine* a ridiculously complicated, fantaastically complex batshyte conspiracy doen't make it so.

Its the evidence that establishes the veracity of claims. And the evidence just doesn't match your claims.





I don't think your really interested in proof...

you have your own agenda!!!

Two phds huh?......allow me

the way you spelt sense is all the proof I need doctor

true to form...

rigged election did not seem to interest you..

I hope you'll get paid well for your support!!!

I sure "the little dictator"...

likes your comments in support...

one thing is for sure...

when he done...

you will be the first one shot...

proof...

look no further than all the other communistic revolutions!!!

I have just arrived. Membership will come with every donation $175.00 or more.

[link to recuser.weebly.com]

Good question about Michelle. Has anyone seen her pictures of her in earlier years, i.e. from high school or college???

She's a man!!!!

There's no pictures of her earlier years as a girl or woman!!!!