Weird Manetic Filaments outbreak all over Sun, No sunspots, kaboom coming

Do you think the whole globe would be affected? Or only the part facing the sun at the time of the event? What, exactly have you heard? Grid goes down? Ice caps melting? What?

I dont think most of you understand how serious this MAY be.

Mass extinction, changes in the composition of the atmosphere, breakdown of the magnetosphere, solar radiation storm effects magnified in intensity(these are already concurring) , collapse of general infrastructure and probably repeated 'kill shots' (these are in the near future).

Yep, It looks to me like it is "shedding its skin" so to speak!

Wow. Doesn't sound very survivable. Or perhaps people will have to only come out at night for awhile.

Mass extinction, changes in the composition of the atmosphere, breakdown of the magnetosphere, solar radiation storm effects magnified in intensity(these are already concurring) , collapse of general infrastructure and probably repeated 'kill shots' (these are in the near future).

Uh huh.




I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been exposed?





Ah, yes. Your claim that we've lost 67,000 species in the last year, and your inability to name any of them.





I admit I know little about the chemtrail debate, but given your track record on so many other subjects, I will remain doubtful of your position.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.




Has this been discovered? You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.





Um... it's been called the electromagnetic force for quite some time.




You very well may have correctly predicted that Global Warming would occur faster than expected -- while citing no sources and giving no way to test your theory. That certainly sounds like something you'd do. So I'll give you that one. Stopped clock, twice daily.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. Also I have yet to see any data pointing toward your claimed radical increase -- indeed, in the one link you have made prior in attempting to support your claim, the link itself said the rate of severe earthquakes has remained roughly static.





You can, of course, cite evidence for this claimed link of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.





You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Where was this disproved? What was the experiment that did it? Why are relativistic formula still used today, including on things as mundane as the GPS system? What about Gravity B, and other experiments still proving the weirder predictions of relativity?





Alas, I cannot help but notice that he still seems to find a lot more airtime than you do. Must be a kick in the ass that he is so much better known (see how pointless those quips are?) and respected.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been discovered? What was the experiment confirming this remarkable finding?




You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.




I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.

Oh, and why were there two #16s?



To what weather systems are you referring? Be specific. Also, mainstream science has been predicting such weather "worsening" for decades.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof.




Sure. Quantum Hall effect, cosmic inflation, Bose–Einstein condensate found by Wolfgang Ketterle, the Top quark found, the accelerating expansion of universe found, Slow light experimentally demonstrated by Lene Vestergaard Hau, the Tau neutrino found, WMAP observations of Cosmic microwave background radiation, the Higgs Boson found...

Sure has been a slow decade or two.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Strangely your concrete prediction confirming this idea proved to be utterly false -- leading you to not make such concrete predictions anymore. A strange choice, but given your predilections, perhaps not so strange.




I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. And you can please cite sources where such happenings are increasing 'exponentially.'




The only persecution I have seen is people disagreeing with you on a conspiracy message board (since it seems to be the only place you can air your ideas without *totally* being laughed out of the room), and making outlandish demands, such as evidence from other sources.

How *terrible.*

You'll be exonerated if 90 percent of the population is wiped out before the end of the current Solar Max. You'll forgive me for not rooting for you.




Your old double standard again. If no one criticizes your ideas, you must be right! If anyone criticizes your idea, you must be right!

The evidence, and your specific predictions failing, demonstrates you are wrong quite often. Your solution? You stop making specific predictions. The height of intellectual dishonesty.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been found, other than your accusations? And your accusations are not evidence.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Where's this consensus?




My List of your failures is *quite* a lot longer.



Because there are a bunch where this is the case...



(Just did!)



True. The only person who can correct their ideas in the light of better evidence or failed experimentation is you.

But you just don't *do* that, do you IDW/A.A?

So every time you do repost it, I suppose I should repost these innocuous questions that will show any passersby reasonableness in the face of your furious, repetitive hilarity -- and demonstrate that you cannot provide the least bit of evidence to back up your claims. And I see you corrected the #16 problem. Only took you, what, twelve reposts to actually proof your own stuff?

any evidence for this? Radiation storms increasing in intensity? Really? Or is this yet another attempt to deceive honest folk?

Mass extinction, changes in the composition of the atmosphere, breakdown of the magnetosphere, solar radiation storm effects magnified in intensity(these are already concurring) , collapse of general infrastructure and probably repeated 'kill shots' (these are in the near future).

As somewhat of a self-proclaimed suntard myself, I can see that it is quite unusual to see this many filaments on that many parts of the sun at the same time. Who knows, we might just be in for a little

:sun_doooom:

Yeah, I don't see much of this happening. Thanks for your thoughts though...I think.

Yeah, I don't see much of this happening. Thanks for your thoughts though...I think.

This is odd
[link to www.spaceweather.com]
Big black cock on the sun

Yes. The evidence is clearly evident in the solar data archives. What once caused only minor disturbances in the geomagnetic field is now causing exaggerated effects across the board.

Are you going to hijack this tread?

Interesting

*Astrophysicist

*Astrophysicist

Only in his own, deluded mind.

My screen identity is banned. I have to leave a letter out to get past an auto ban currently in effect.

You would not believe the time and money they spend attempting silence me. If you look at my treads here you will see what I mean. There are two main ones and one has had most of the content removed.

:bringinplants:

Only the fittest will survive, and it won't be a whole lot.

Just a guess, but I'd say a half a billion, maybe less.

It will be people with both intelligence and an ability to cope with a lack of social and technological infrastructure

I usually only come here on Sundays.

Thread: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED! (Page 530)

Try this thread of his.....he hates *Jews* (although exactly who and what he means by that is a mystery) and anyone who disagrees.