|
| Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 |
Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 84505
 United States
5/4/2006 1:52 PM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
i wonder why Science Only never told us about the images in his telescope? |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 60460
United States
5/4/2006 2:16 PM | |
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 84505
United States
5/4/2006 2:18 PM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
thanks for that info
i will definitely be watching for it |
|
asan
User ID: 75343
 Guatemala
5/5/2006 8:10 AM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
more info, regarding Roche Limit: Why Do Comets Break Up?
[link to www.asterism.org]
www.asterism.org/tutorials/tut25-1.htm
a REAL scenario/NO SCI-FI:
Quoted.....
"a comet may head directly towards Earth at 20 km/s. As it approaches our Roche limit (approximately 28,300 km from the surface), it begins to break up 23.6 minutes before impact. At about 120 km above the ground the pieces encounter a tenuous atmosphere. In the next few seconds before impact many more pieces are created from atmospheric shock. The impact area would cover many square kilometers, destroying everything within hundreds of miles."
end quoted... |
|
asan
User ID: 75343
Guatemala
5/5/2006 9:09 AM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
quoted:
"Observations of Comet 73P/Schwassman-Wachmann 3
Observations by Carl Hergenrother (Lunar and Planetary Lab [LPL], University of Arizona & Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory [SAO]), Gil Esquerdo (Planetary Science Institute [PSI] and SAO), Kyle Smalley (SAO) and John Keller (LPL).
Latest News (Updated 2006 May 4, 22:00 UT):
Images of 73P-B and G from May 4 UT are now up.
Gil Esquerdo (SAO and PSI) kindly observed 73P-B and G last night with the SAO 1.2-m.
The central condensation of 73P-B is once again stretched into a bar elongated towards the anti-solar (or tailward) direction. This appearance has been seen twice before in the past month and suggets that the main nucleus of 73P-B has experienced a splitting or shedding event. Material shedded from the material is now fallen behind the main nucleus. If current events follow what has happened during prior episodes, this new material should slowly detach and fall away from the nucleus.
The remnants from an earlier splitting event are still visible to the southwest (lower right in my images) of the main nucleus. At least a dozen components are visible. Note that the SAO 1.2-m is a smaller telescope at a sight with inferior seeing to the Vatican 1.8-m on Mount Graham. The 1.2-m should not be expected to see as much detail as the 1.8-m.
Other than a single bright component and perhaps a few fainter ones, there is not much to see at 73P-G. Again it is possible that the 1.2-m telescope is just not able to detect all of the components that the 1.8-m detected.
The latest images are posted below. "
end quoted
[link to www.lpl.arizona.edu]
www.lpl.arizona.edu/~chergen/73P.html
 |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 85727
United States
5/5/2006 11:10 PM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
BUMP>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
|
Emperor Kenton
User ID: 87536
United States
5/6/2006 6:33 AM
 | |
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 84505
United States
5/6/2006 2:46 PM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
science only?
you there? |
|
F.B. Nyte
User ID: 18229
United States
5/6/2006 2:55 PM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
When and where to look. (Local times.)
scroll down
[link to www.skyhound.com] |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 85727
United States
5/7/2006 1:00 AM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
BUMP.............................. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 84505
United States
5/7/2006 9:17 AM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
science only
it's not like you to abandon threads
we should still be watching this comet
it won't even be totally "past" us until June |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 85727
United States
5/7/2006 10:49 AM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
Hey, Let's keep this going! Instead of 50 thousand other threads, alot easier to read through. |
|
ScienceOnly
User ID: 86799
United States
5/9/2006 7:34 AM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
Hey you cyber-astronomers out there in cyber-space! (pardon the pun - LOL)
I have been laying low for several days getting "my ducks in a row" as they say.
It is interesting how the disinfo works over the Internet, and there's no better place in cyber-space to study disinfo that good ol' GLP!
The comet fragment BD, is a super example of this. This fragment has no chance in hell of coming anywhere near Earth, as it lies along the "String of pearls" trajectory. All the chatter about it is a MISDIRECTION, that I am sure about.
Just look at the NASA site, where they have posted the 11:11 bullshit. Come'on guys, someone's having the belly-laugh of the century!
I had already input the BD fragment in last week, and this week its trajectory is almost exactly the same, meaning that it isn't drifting from its original estimated orbit.
The position of this fragment is NOT where we should be looking. Where we need to look is to the South and further behind the original 73P orbit.
Looking into the night sky from the northern hemisphere, this would be to the right of the apparently-vertical line of fragments.
peace. |
|
ScienceOnly
User ID: 86799
United States
5/9/2006 7:37 AM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
BTW-
I have ordered and received my new telescope. I have been looking at the stars for years through beginner scopes and binoculars...I even had a chance to buy an 8 inch refractor a few years ago but let it slip through my fingers. But now the deal is done and there is a new Orion telescope sitting in my living room just waiting for a clear night. It has been raining for the past three days but I may get a chance to look tonight. Of course I'll report anything interesting to the group here.
It has a seperate scope to align to Polaris, a finder scope, and the main scope is six inches. It has an equatorial mount.
After achieving a perfect Polaris alignment, I will slew over to known stars to confirm that I am calibrated and aligned properly, afterwitch I will begin to look for comet fragments...focusing on fragments that are not along the "String of pearls" trajectory.
I will be able to report the exact Right Assention (RA) and Declination, if there is anything to report. Of course, my scope is not too big, so I won't be able to see anything too small...but that's ok, because it's the bigger and closer stuff I want to see anyway.
Cheers! |
|
ScienceOnly
User ID: 86799
United States
5/9/2006 7:50 AM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
Back to the conspiracy angle.
I wanted to mention that it is possible that someone at NASA has posted the BD fragment trajectory as a message to those tuned into the activities of the illuminati.
Fragment BD is so far away from hitting the Earth that this is the only other plausible explanation.
The 11:11 tag is the key, because of the enormous statistically impossible odds of this happening.
What is going on with the data simply, is that a data field has been left "null" in the database, or some divide by zero error. This has produced a value of zero in the field everyone is "wigging-out" over.
However, to also have the time data marked-up so that 11:11 on May 11...that is the part that is not statistically possible.
The odds of a field being left blank are remote, because none of the other fields are left blank on other fragment data. Add to this the date of May 11, out of 365 days a year, and add to this the hour of 11, which has the odds of 1 in 24, and add to that the odds of the minute 11, with odds of 1 in 60...
I would estimate the odds of the data being entered accidentally or by some mechanical glitch as extremely remote...oh, let's say about as remote as getting hit by a comet...LOL!
So, either the erroneous data was entered as a means of distraction, or a means of communication. There is no other plausible explination...but if you have one, please let us know about it! |
|
ScienceOnly
User ID: 86799
United States
5/9/2006 8:00 AM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
I took a look at the newest JPL information on BD, and they have updated the minimum miss distance field where it now has a value. To me, this lends itself towards the "communication" possibility.
If I were to want to give out a message that the illuminati have something to do with this comet...the data about the comet, the trajectory, or even why it is fragmenting...taking the opportunity to insert the time "11:11" on May 11 would be the PERFECT means to do this.
It doesn't mean a comet will hit us on that date, imo, it is only a message that the illumaniti are involved in some aspect. It could be a message to us to NOT BELIEVE the data.
Whatever it is, it is not by accident. |
|
Dee
User ID: 536
United States
5/9/2006 8:07 AM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
 |
|
Nerak
User ID: 89589
United States
5/9/2006 8:17 AM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
That 11 11 on May 11 caught my eye too. Science only you sound like you think its some kind of trick, maybe it a message to those we wish to know? |
|
ScienceOnly
User ID: 86799
United States
5/9/2006 8:21 AM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
Mornin' Dee 
I added tonight's view of the comet fragments to the photo section:
[link to pg.photos.yahoo.com]
The photos are may9-1 and may9-2.
The first photo is about 8PM, and you can see the horizon. The second photo is about 5 hours later, when the comets are higher in the sky due to Earth's rotation.
Take a look at the constellations and major stars in the background. If it is a clear night, you might be able to see one of the fragments with a pair of good binoculars held steady against something sturdy.
Notice how the comets line up in a somewhat vertical line. The ones to watch for are any that appear to the right of the vertical configuration, which means they are farther South that the main group.
Remember (refer to the first few posts of this thread), the comet fragments are passing over us and slightly ahead, so if a comet is farther South, that means LOWER. If the comet is farther right and higher in the sky, it means LOWER and FARTHER BACK. The farther back, the less lower the fragment needs to be to cause concern, and visa-versa. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 86931
 Spain
5/9/2006 8:56 AM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
 |
|
Nerak
User ID: 89589
United States
5/9/2006 9:03 AM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
Sorry Science I see my question was already anwsered. |
|
Adam
User ID: 90839
 Australia
5/9/2006 9:12 AM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
So, erm, in a few words or less, what's your conclusions so far, ScienceOnly? :) |
|
waaaaahhhhhhh
User ID: 91869
 Austria
5/10/2006 7:52 PM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
is it going to hit us? |
|
ST2136
User ID: 91873
United States
5/10/2006 8:02 PM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
SO what do you think will be the outcome?? |
|
Some1
User ID: 87932
United States
5/10/2006 8:55 PM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
>It is interesting how the disinfo works over the Internet
And YOU, psuedo-science, are certainly an expert THERE.
Too bad you know NOTHING about real science.
IS the Moon still 'out of place',  ?? |
|
Some1
User ID: 87932
United States
5/10/2006 8:57 PM | | Re: Schwassmann-Wachmann 73P; Here's what I learned about its trajectory | Quote |
>I wanted to mention that it is possible that someone at NASA has posted the
>BD fragment trajectory as a message to those tuned into the activities of the illuminati
Bullshit, dumbass.
YOU made a HUGE mistake in reading and understanding the NASA data, AS was pointed out to you EARLY in this thread, and multiple times.
JUST like your previous threads about your paranoid 'Moon out of place' and 'Sun the wrong color' and so many others. |
|
| Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 |
|
