Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,041 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 800,534
Pageviews Today: 1,096,107Threads Today: 228Posts Today: 5,506
10:59 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!

 
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
09/22/2013 12:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
I didn't see any intelligent rebuttals when Einstein was proved to be a fraud,
 Quoting: AA 47216577


That's because no such thing has happened, as you have yet to prove any of your assertions. On the other hand, several things you have claimed without proof and predicted to pass have turned out to be utterly wrong.

Ignoring the truth doesn't make it go away
 Quoting: AA 47216577


Don't you know that, yet?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47214963
United States
09/22/2013 12:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
I didn't see any intelligent rebuttals when Einstein was proved to be a fraud,
 Quoting: AA 47216577


That's because no such thing has happened, as you have yet to prove any of your assertions. On the other hand, several things you have claimed without proof and predicted to pass have turned out to be utterly wrong.

Ignoring the truth doesn't make it go away
 Quoting: AA 47216577


Don't you know that, yet?
 Quoting: 74444


Of course not.......

chuckle

Mr Moronium is nothing more than a politician staying "on message"

And his message is "Jew science" is WRONG
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
09/22/2013 12:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
When Sir Issac Newton did his studies and recorded his ideas for posterity, ,he had a very good grasp of the relationship between energy, mass ,gravity ,and inertia.

his conclusions have stood the test of time and it is irrational and jewish to use one problematic observation that couldn't be explained at the time to attempt to disqualify all of what he accomplished in describing relationships between gravity, motion and mass simply because he was not jewish.

And that is exactly what you're doing when you claim his formulas don't work for Mercury but Einsteins do. They do, They work for all other bodies in the universe as well.

What he did not know or understand is the nature of light.

No one did at the time. It wasn't within Newton's grasp at the time technologically to find and prove that light possessed mass and gravity could deflect light.

Obviously we now know it can and does!! So why all of a sudden is Newton wrong when in fact his formulas explain how light is deflected by gravity in the first place?


The fact that he didn't know why light was deflected at the time is irrelevant!

Look , we can make me the center of controversy all you want but at the end of the day, Einstein was still an arrogant thieving fraud and a lying jew just like I've said all along and what I am or am not is irrelevant to that reality.
his contribution to science is nothing. All he really did was steal other peoples ideas and claim them as his own, and had he not been jewish you would never have heard of him.

Live with it.This charade cannot and will not continue.
 Quoting: AA 47216577


So you are tacitly discussing things with me again.

Explain, using nothing but Newtonian physics, Mercury's precession. Explain how 'light being deflected' explains Mercury's precession. Include the math.

You will fail to do this. Newton himself did, too.
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
09/22/2013 12:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
so much more knowledgable than anyone else, why do you keep making basic and fundamental mistakes?
 Quoting: Elemental


Failing an accurate description of the functional description of magnetic resonance imaging is not by anyone's standards or reasoning a fundamental mistake.

What you're doing is simply presenting an irrelevant failure in one very specific area as a fundamental error when no such error has been made. It's a dishonest tactic and it's all you do
 Quoting: AA 47216577


Bull. List upon list of your failures have been posted.
 Quoting: Elemental


And there will be a new repost of it, complete with additional failures, posted soon! The next solstice isn't too far away.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47214963
United States
09/22/2013 12:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
When Sir Issac Newton did his studies and recorded his ideas for posterity, ,he had a very good grasp of the relationship between energy, mass ,gravity ,and inertia.

his conclusions have stood the test of time and it is irrational and jewish to use one problematic observation that couldn't be explained at the time to attempt to disqualify all of what he accomplished in describing relationships between gravity, motion and mass simply because he was not jewish.

And that is exactly what you're doing when you claim his formulas don't work for Mercury but Einsteins do. They do, They work for all other bodies in the universe as well.

What he did not know or understand is the nature of light.

No one did at the time. It wasn't within Newton's grasp at the time technologically to find and prove that light possessed mass and gravity could deflect light.

Obviously we now know it can and does!! So why all of a sudden is Newton wrong when in fact his formulas explain how light is deflected by gravity in the first place?


The fact that he didn't know why light was deflected at the time is irrelevant!

Look , we can make me the center of controversy all you want but at the end of the day, Einstein was still an arrogant thieving fraud and a lying jew just like I've said all along and what I am or am not is irrelevant to that reality.
his contribution to science is nothing. All he really did was steal other peoples ideas and claim them as his own, and had he not been jewish you would never have heard of him.

Live with it.This charade cannot and will not continue.
 Quoting: AA 47216577


So you are tacitly discussing things with me again.

Explain, using nothing but Newtonian physics, Mercury's precession. Explain how 'light being deflected' explains Mercury's precession. Include the math.

You will fail to do this. Newton himself did, too.
 Quoting: 74444


He and this Dullard fellow are saying the time discrepancy is a trick of the light.

1rof1
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8200299
Canada
09/22/2013 12:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Infact, what incalculable fudge are you referring to in your previous statement, please enlighten it to me.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8200299


the ether drift as measured by Miller made it not fit with any of the numbers

I thought you knew the stuff Dullard is blathering about
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47214963


Whose numbers?

I don't read to much into theoretical physicists because i find they ave a tendency to create diversions in my own thought processes. I started with a solid foundation of fact and built on it, if that makes sense. I don't believe building on theories of others or creating new ones to explain dependencies in the theories of others is a solid scientific approach, You have to start some were with solid grounding in facts tat are not in question and build on tem logically

That's not to say I discount Dollard. he makes more sense than Einstein. All of the "aetherists" do.

Einstein was not a genius and he did not propose any new ideas, What he did was take what he thought were the best ideas of others and plagiarize them. I have proved that with solid references on this thread.

The jewish god of science is dethroned, whether his rabid poser proponents want to take his stinking body off of it or not..it's stinking up the house that is science
 Quoting: AA 47216577


OF course you do......you will support anyone who agrees with your denigration of Einstein.

Dullard doesn't know mush more about Teslas work than you do Mr Moronium
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47214963


You haven't shown me that you are any better especially considering Eric Dollards explanation of Tesla's radio is the same as how Tesla explained it's operation*. That's a pretty bold claim saying you have a better understanding of Tesla than Dollard, take into consideration his background is Navy and RCA. I'd like to see you take a stab at this. I still have not found any information on your previous claims on Tesla, and you can't back them up.

* [link to www.tuks.nl]
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
09/22/2013 12:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
so much more knowledgable than anyone else, why do you keep making basic and fundamental mistakes?
 Quoting: Elemental


Failing an accurate description of the functional description of magnetic resonance imaging is not by anyone's standards or reasoning a fundamental mistake.

What you're doing is simply presenting an irrelevant failure in one very specific area as a fundamental error when no such error has been made. It's a dishonest tactic and it's all you do
 Quoting: AA 47216577


Bull. List upon list of your failures have been posted.
 Quoting: Elemental


There seems to be a bit of a problem with the credibility of the person who complied this list, and some question as to the motivation
 Quoting: AA 47216577


My motivation is obvious. When people deal with you, I want them to know exactly what they are dealing with. So, over time, I have watched you and jotted down your more outrageous claims, and compiled them. I have explained, many times, what behavioral modifications you could make to slow and stop me from doing this simple thing. You refuse, therefore the List goes on.


, and whether much of the material has been disproved .
 Quoting: AA 47216577


It has not, even using your own unique standards of logic.


I can state with complete honesty that much of it was fabricated , twisted or taken out of context.. There is no sourced references made.
 Quoting: AA 47216577


You complaining about lacking sourced references is the height of irony. And be specific as to which lines of the List are taken out of context, and we can discuss it. And when I provide the link to exactly where the List is correct, what will you do in return?

Last Edited by 74444 on 09/22/2013 12:36 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47214963
United States
09/22/2013 12:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
...


the ether drift as measured by Miller made it not fit with any of the numbers

I thought you knew the stuff Dullard is blathering about
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47214963


Whose numbers?

I don't read to much into theoretical physicists because i find they ave a tendency to create diversions in my own thought processes. I started with a solid foundation of fact and built on it, if that makes sense. I don't believe building on theories of others or creating new ones to explain dependencies in the theories of others is a solid scientific approach, You have to start some were with solid grounding in facts tat are not in question and build on tem logically

That's not to say I discount Dollard. he makes more sense than Einstein. All of the "aetherists" do.

Einstein was not a genius and he did not propose any new ideas, What he did was take what he thought were the best ideas of others and plagiarize them. I have proved that with solid references on this thread.

The jewish god of science is dethroned, whether his rabid poser proponents want to take his stinking body off of it or not..it's stinking up the house that is science
 Quoting: AA 47216577


OF course you do......you will support anyone who agrees with your denigration of Einstein.

Dullard doesn't know mush more about Teslas work than you do Mr Moronium
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47214963


You haven't shown me that you are any better especially considering Eric Dollards explanation of Tesla's radio is the same as how Tesla explained it's operation*. That's a pretty bold claim saying you have a better understanding of Tesla than Dollard, take into consideration his background is Navy and RCA. I'd like to see you take a stab at this. I still have not found any information on your previous claims on Tesla, and you can't back them up.

* [link to www.tuks.nl]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8200299


Not my problem

Believe what you want but Dullard knows nothing about how a Tesla transmitter works and he proved that with his "It is a homopolar generator" screw up.

You do understand that Teslas teminology was of his time and everything that he did has been understood now for years do you not?

Dullard does not but I am hoping that you realize it.

Tesla was mistaken when he thought that he had "corpuscles" which was the term of that time traveling faster than the speed of light as what he was observing was in fact higher frequencies which always contain more energy.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47214963
United States
09/22/2013 01:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Hey Moronium

"Tesla found his progress slow until he developed his oscillating
current (O.C.) transformer, known as the Tesla Transformer"

The name that Tesla used......

1rof1
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8200299
Canada
09/22/2013 01:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Hey Moronium

"Tesla found his progress slow until he developed his oscillating
current (O.C.) transformer, known as the Tesla Transformer"

The name that Tesla used......

1rof1
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47214963


You are a joke, it is commonly known as the Tesla Transformer nowadays.
Hypertiger

User ID: 42750318
Canada
09/22/2013 01:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Relativity exists.

You all are as bad as Atheists that claim that GOD does not exist.

Or liars that claim that Truth does not exist.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47214963
United States
09/22/2013 01:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Hey Moronium

"Tesla found his progress slow until he developed his oscillating
current (O.C.) transformer, known as the Tesla Transformer"

The name that Tesla used......

1rof1
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47214963


You are a joke, it is commonly known as the Tesla Transformer nowadays.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8200299


Of course it is.......Mr Moronium is the OP aka AA aka IDW aka dumbass

So when you see Mr Moronium I am addressing the OP of this thread and many other equally hilarious threads.
nomuse (not logged in)
User ID: 2380183
United States
09/22/2013 01:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Meh.

So am I understanding this right? In IDWtronics, magnetism only exists in a piece of iron? If you build an air-core transformer or electromagnet or a big 'ol MRI machine, it only makes "fakematism" until you slip a piece of iron inside?

Fakematism being something that allows transformers and inductors to work but isn't actually magnetism, because that would be against IDWtronics for some reason.

Or is this just a poorly though-out waffle to allow air core transformers to work and explain what is actually happening inside an MRI (aka, it works by fakematism, but if you attempt to measure the field you do so by sticking an iron probe into it -- or drop a pin -- and then and only then real magnetism occurs)?

IDW keeps adding conditionals and exceptions and levels of subtlety and from here it looks like not even he knows what his theory actually predicts.



And why is it so important that only iron be ferromagnetic? Is this important to IDWtronics, or is this just a case of not wanting to admit when he's wrong?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47214963
United States
09/22/2013 01:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
...

pgs 20-25, apparent mass due to momentum of an electric field

here is an interesting article on the subject of relativity, even if you don`t agree with it atleast read it with an open mind...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8200299

whoops forgot link

[link to www.gestaltreality.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8200299


He is just as ridiculous and clueless as AA

there are ALREADY terms that he makes up new names for

Let _______ denote _________

Nonsense
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47214963


Rofl, so you are calling all the pioneers of the art of Electrical Engineering clueless? Mr.Dollard knows his stuff and all his work is refrenced to the greats...What about the late great Nikola Tesla, what did he accomplish in his life and what did he have to say about Relativity?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8200299


Perhaps you can show us verifiable evidence that Dollard is a pioneer and just what he has "pioneered"
Elemental
Mostly harmless.....

User ID: 13461811
United Kingdom
09/22/2013 01:19 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Relativity exists.

You all are as bad as Atheists that claim that GOD does not exist.

Or liars that claim that Truth does not exist.
 Quoting: Hypertiger


I'm sorry, I don't understand what your point is.
energy cannot be destroyed, it can only be transformed.
Nothing is so potent as the silence of a good example.
Illegitimi non carborundum
Alea iacta est.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47214963
United States
09/22/2013 01:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Meh.

So am I understanding this right? In IDWtronics, magnetism only exists in a piece of iron? If you build an air-core transformer or electromagnet or a big 'ol MRI machine, it only makes "fakematism" until you slip a piece of iron inside?

Fakematism being something that allows transformers and inductors to work but isn't actually magnetism, because that would be against IDWtronics for some reason.

Or is this just a poorly though-out waffle to allow air core transformers to work and explain what is actually happening inside an MRI (aka, it works by fakematism, but if you attempt to measure the field you do so by sticking an iron probe into it -- or drop a pin -- and then and only then real magnetism occurs)?

IDW keeps adding conditionals and exceptions and levels of subtlety and from here it looks like not even he knows what his theory actually predicts.



And why is it so important that only iron be ferromagnetic? Is this important to IDWtronics, or is this just a case of not wanting to admit when he's wrong?
 Quoting: nomuse (not logged in) 2380183


Occam is the guy to fall back on here

The latter it appears.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8200299
Canada
09/22/2013 01:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
...


Whose numbers?

I don't read to much into theoretical physicists because i find they ave a tendency to create diversions in my own thought processes. I started with a solid foundation of fact and built on it, if that makes sense. I don't believe building on theories of others or creating new ones to explain dependencies in the theories of others is a solid scientific approach, You have to start some were with solid grounding in facts tat are not in question and build on tem logically

That's not to say I discount Dollard. he makes more sense than Einstein. All of the "aetherists" do.

Einstein was not a genius and he did not propose any new ideas, What he did was take what he thought were the best ideas of others and plagiarize them. I have proved that with solid references on this thread.

The jewish god of science is dethroned, whether his rabid poser proponents want to take his stinking body off of it or not..it's stinking up the house that is science
 Quoting: AA 47216577


OF course you do......you will support anyone who agrees with your denigration of Einstein.

Dullard doesn't know mush more about Teslas work than you do Mr Moronium
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47214963


You haven't shown me that you are any better especially considering Eric Dollards explanation of Tesla's radio is the same as how Tesla explained it's operation*. That's a pretty bold claim saying you have a better understanding of Tesla than Dollard, take into consideration his background is Navy and RCA. I'd like to see you take a stab at this. I still have not found any information on your previous claims on Tesla, and you can't back them up.

* [link to www.tuks.nl]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8200299


Not my problem

Believe what you want but Dullard knows nothing about how a Tesla transmitter works and he proved that with his "It is a homopolar generator" screw up.

You do understand that Teslas teminology was of his time and everything that he did has been understood now for years do you not?

Dullard does not but I am hoping that you realize it.

Tesla was mistaken when he thought that he had "corpuscles" which was the term of that time traveling faster than the speed of light as what he was observing was in fact higher frequencies which always contain more energy.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47214963


It would be considered alternative explanation to modern interpretation. The idea is that we can transmit Electricity other than in a Electro-Magnetic configuration. The whole point of Eric Dollards work is to explain it as how Tesla would have understood it, the idea is that Tesla knew exactly what he was doing and his device works exactly as he said.

On the subject of Tesla and Einstein; I still have not found where Tesla retracted his statements about Relativity. Infact, one of Tesla`s most scathing attacks on Relativity was given when he was 82. Tesla died when he was 86, where is the retraction?

` I have worked out a dynamic theory of gravity in all details and hope to give his to the world very soon. It explains the causes of this force and the motions of heavenly bodies under its influence so satisfactorily that it will put an end to idle speculations and false conceptions, as that of curved space. According to the relativists, space has a tendency to curvature owing to an inherent property or resence of celestial bodies.

"Granting a semblance of reality to this fantastic idea, it is still very self-contradictory. Every action is accompanied by an equivalent reaction and he effects of the latter are directly opposite to those of the former. Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curvature of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies and, producing the opposite effects, straighten out the curves.

"Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible - However, even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for them and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion."`
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8200299
Canada
09/22/2013 01:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
...

whoops forgot link

[link to www.gestaltreality.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8200299


He is just as ridiculous and clueless as AA

there are ALREADY terms that he makes up new names for

Let _______ denote _________

Nonsense
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47214963


Rofl, so you are calling all the pioneers of the art of Electrical Engineering clueless? Mr.Dollard knows his stuff and all his work is refrenced to the greats...What about the late great Nikola Tesla, what did he accomplish in his life and what did he have to say about Relativity?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8200299


Perhaps you can show us verifiable evidence that Dollard is a pioneer and just what he has "pioneered"
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47214963

The guy is an Electrical Engineer, he uses the standard formula that all EEs use, which have been around for over a hundred years and sometimes even more, and these formula do not need Relativity, as majority of them predate this theory. His work is based on that of Tesla, Steinmetz, Heaviside, Maxwell, etc all pioneers of EE. When I say you are calling the pioneers clueless this is what I am referring to.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8200299
Canada
09/22/2013 01:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
I am open to all discussion though, I haven`t ever really studied astrophysics in general, so I`ll have to look into the discussion of Mercury precession. Obviously Tesla had some alternative explanation but he died before he ever released information on his theory of gravity...anyways.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47214963
United States
09/22/2013 01:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
...


He is just as ridiculous and clueless as AA

there are ALREADY terms that he makes up new names for

Let _______ denote _________

Nonsense
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47214963


Rofl, so you are calling all the pioneers of the art of Electrical Engineering clueless? Mr.Dollard knows his stuff and all his work is refrenced to the greats...What about the late great Nikola Tesla, what did he accomplish in his life and what did he have to say about Relativity?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8200299


Perhaps you can show us verifiable evidence that Dollard is a pioneer and just what he has "pioneered"
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47214963

The guy is an Electrical Engineer, he uses the standard formula that all EEs use, which have been around for over a hundred years and sometimes even more, and these formula do not need Relativity, as majority of them predate this theory. His work is based on that of Tesla, Steinmetz, Heaviside, Maxwell, etc all pioneers of EE. When I say you are calling the pioneers clueless this is what I am referring to.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8200299


He is NOT an EE he is a Navy radio man who was taught only as much as he needed to do his job.

And Teslas transmission of power IS EM waves.....

putin

Indeed relativity is not needed within this realm however it does come into play the closer one gets to the speed of light or how small one chooses to divide the quanta
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47214963
United States
09/22/2013 01:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Canada look up "surface waves"
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8200299
Canada
09/22/2013 01:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
...


Rofl, so you are calling all the pioneers of the art of Electrical Engineering clueless? Mr.Dollard knows his stuff and all his work is refrenced to the greats...What about the late great Nikola Tesla, what did he accomplish in his life and what did he have to say about Relativity?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8200299


Perhaps you can show us verifiable evidence that Dollard is a pioneer and just what he has "pioneered"
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47214963

The guy is an Electrical Engineer, he uses the standard formula that all EEs use, which have been around for over a hundred years and sometimes even more, and these formula do not need Relativity, as majority of them predate this theory. His work is based on that of Tesla, Steinmetz, Heaviside, Maxwell, etc all pioneers of EE. When I say you are calling the pioneers clueless this is what I am referring to.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8200299


He is NOT an EE he is a Navy radio man who was taught only as much as he needed to do his job.

And Teslas transmission of power IS EM waves.....

putin

Indeed relativity is not needed within this realm however it does come into play the closer one gets to the speed of light or how small one chooses to divide the quanta
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47214963


And what transmission of power are you referring to, his polyphase induction generator, because yes this utilizes transverse electro-magnetic waves. I was refering to Tesla`s wireless radio transmission, Tesla himself says many times that it is the diametric opposite to the hertzian waves, which are electro-magnetic.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47214963
United States
09/22/2013 01:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
...


Perhaps you can show us verifiable evidence that Dollard is a pioneer and just what he has "pioneered"
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47214963

The guy is an Electrical Engineer, he uses the standard formula that all EEs use, which have been around for over a hundred years and sometimes even more, and these formula do not need Relativity, as majority of them predate this theory. His work is based on that of Tesla, Steinmetz, Heaviside, Maxwell, etc all pioneers of EE. When I say you are calling the pioneers clueless this is what I am referring to.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8200299


He is NOT an EE he is a Navy radio man who was taught only as much as he needed to do his job.

And Teslas transmission of power IS EM waves.....

putin

Indeed relativity is not needed within this realm however it does come into play the closer one gets to the speed of light or how small one chooses to divide the quanta
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47214963


And what transmission of power are you referring to, his polyphase induction generator, because yes this utilizes transverse electro-magnetic waves. I was refering to Tesla`s wireless radio transmission, Tesla himself says many times that it is the diametric opposite to the hertzian waves, which are electro-magnetic.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8200299


He did not understand the properties of long wave EM radiation so he assumed they were electrostatic waves.

Look up surface waves.

I will give you another hint on that picture now.

They were both in the picture because they were involved in the first submarine transmitter which is what Dullard completely misunderstands.

You can find the stuff by digging through RCA historical archives but you still do run into information that remains classified.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8200299
Canada
09/22/2013 01:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Sure I`ll look into that stuff later tonight, I am off for now.
AA
User ID: 47216577
United States
09/22/2013 01:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!



I have worked out a dynamic theory of gravity in all details and hope to give his to the world very soon. It explains the causes of this force and the motions of heavenly bodies under its influence so satisfactorily that it will put an end to idle speculations and false conceptions, as that of curved space. According to the relativists, space has a tendency to curvature owing to an inherent property or resence of celestial bodies.

"Granting a semblance of reality to this fantastic idea, it is still very self-contradictory. Every action is accompanied by an equivalent reaction and he effects of the latter are directly opposite to those of the former. Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curvature of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies and, producing the opposite effects, straighten out the curves.

"Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible - However, even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for them and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion."`
{/quote]

Does anyone else but myself wonder why we have never heard Tesla's theory of gravity?

It occurs to me there are probably many other things we've not heard as well, simply because they defy the atheist religion of pseudoscience.

how the nuclear forces, the forces of gravity , electromagnetism and electrostatics are precisely the same mechanism .

The way the two 'Einstein" relativity explain gravity is so contrary to observations it puzzles me how anyone could possibly promote these ideas when faced with the observations.

It can be shown using simple mathematical formulas that they have exactly the same inverse proportionality over distance and have electromagnetism as their commonality
AA
User ID: 47216577
United States
09/22/2013 01:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
I have worked out a dynamic theory of gravity in all details and hope to give his to the world very soon. It explains the causes of this force and the motions of heavenly bodies under its influence so satisfactorily that it will put an end to idle speculations and false conceptions, as that of curved space. According to the relativists, space has a tendency to curvature owing to an inherent property or resence of celestial bodies.

"Granting a semblance of reality to this fantastic idea, it is still very self-contradictory. Every action is accompanied by an equivalent reaction and he effects of the latter are directly opposite to those of the former. Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curvature of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies and, producing the opposite effects, straighten out the curves.

"Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible - However, even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for them and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion."`
 Quoting: Nicola Tesla


Does anyone else but myself wonder why we have never heard Tesla's theory of gravity?

It occurs to me there are probably many other things we've not heard as well, simply because they defy the atheist religion of pseudoscience.

how the nuclear forces, the forces of gravity , electromagnetism and electrostatics are precisely the same mechanism .

The way the two 'Einstein" relativity explain gravity is so contrary to observations it puzzles me how anyone could possibly promote these ideas when faced with the observations.

It can be shown using simple mathematical formulas that they have exactly the same inverse proportionality over distance and have electromagnetism as their commonality
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47214963
United States
09/22/2013 01:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!

I have worked out a dynamic theory of gravity in all details and hope to give his to the world very soon. It explains the causes of this force and the motions of heavenly bodies under its influence so satisfactorily that it will put an end to idle speculations and false conceptions, as that of curved space. According to the relativists, space has a tendency to curvature owing to an inherent property or resence of celestial bodies.

"Granting a semblance of reality to this fantastic idea, it is still very self-contradictory. Every action is accompanied by an equivalent reaction and he effects of the latter are directly opposite to those of the former. Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curvature of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies and, producing the opposite effects, straighten out the curves.

"Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible - However, even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for them and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion."`
{/quote]

Does anyone else but myself wonder why we have never heard Tesla's theory of gravity?

It occurs to me there are probably many other things we've not heard as well, simply because they defy the atheist religion of pseudoscience.

how the nuclear forces, the forces of gravity , electromagnetism and electrostatics are precisely the same mechanism .

The way the two 'Einstein" relativity explain gravity is so contrary to observations it puzzles me how anyone could possibly promote these ideas when faced with the observations.

It can be shown using simple mathematical formulas that they have exactly the same inverse proportionality over distance and have electromagnetism as their commonality
 Quoting: Nicola Tesla


Neither of the theories of relativity say what gravity is

GOD you are a jackassogen junkie
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47214963
United States
09/22/2013 01:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
[link to www.theblaze.com]
AA
User ID: 47216577
United States
09/22/2013 01:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Relativity exists.

You all are as bad as Atheists that claim that GOD does not exist.

Or liars that claim that Truth does not exist.
 Quoting: Hypertiger


I'm sorry, I don't understand what your point is.
 Quoting: Elemental


LMAO, it looks to me like Darwin's monkey is biting it's own tail
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47214963
United States
09/22/2013 02:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
I had no idea Darwin was an organ grinder on the side........

News








Proud Member Of The Angry Mob