Users Online Now: 1,760 (Who's On?) Visitors Today: 358,156 Pageviews Today: 476,046 Threads Today: 130 Posts Today: 1,906 03:30 AM

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing

# REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!

nomuse (NLI)
User ID: 2380183
United States
09/22/2013 09:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
"Einstein reportedly got the inspiration for this imaginative leap in understanding of gravity by contemplating a man falling off a building. Such a falling man would not experience any force while he is falling"

If he is not experiencing any force, then what pray tell is accelerating him? is acceleration is matching that of the constant G.
he's not perceiving the force, that doesn't mean it isn't there. If you close your eyes traveling 500 mph on an airplane not encountering any rough atmospheric conditions, your sensation of moving isn't there either, BUT YOU ARE. Just not in your own frame of reference. The earth is moving beneath you in your frame of reference, but you cannot detect it without looking.

Quoting: AA 47216577

Yes, that's exactly what the except says.

Perhaps you should have dealt with the problem identified when you scored so low in English.
AA
User ID: 47216577
United States
09/22/2013 09:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Wrong> The ratio of diameter to circumference is PI and that is a constant. Mass /energy is not a constant

NEXT

No, Right> The RATIO of energy to matter, E/M, is C^2, just as the RATIO of circumference to diameter, C/D, is PI.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12581626

Coulda fooled me

E=1/2 M x V^2

Mass and velocity can be ANY value in this equation. It does not majikally change because a jew says so.

E/M is NOT a constant.

You're fucking dumbed down retard
AA
User ID: 47216577
United States
09/22/2013 10:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Yes, that's exactly what the except says.

Perhaps you should have dealt with the problem identified when you scored so low in English.
Quoting: nomuse (NLI) 2380183

Dumb fuckin' jew. one thing you never do is criticize another while revealing your own shortcomings concerning te criticism. Too bad for you you can't edit it, isn't it.

Whats an 'except'?? Never read one of those before
AA
User ID: 47216577
United States
09/22/2013 10:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Cause all he ever does is solve for Jew?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47214963

It's not the only thing I resolve, but it's the first thing. Saves a lot of hassle and wasted time in the long run.

AA
User ID: 47216577
United States
09/22/2013 10:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
"different wavelengths of light have different kinetic energy levels. This is not debatable. Different wavelengths of light are deflected by gravity at different rates of deflection because of this difference in KE, This is not debatable.

The observation of the discrepancy involved with Mercury's orbit can be and is explained succinctly and rationally simply by applying the facts as we now understand them. What gravity actually is is another matter. Just because relativity gives one explanation of gravity , it does not automatically imply it is correct."

- From and earlier post made 12 years ago by myself
Quoting: AA 47216577

Cripes.

GRAVITY doesn't work that way. Or do you think objects that are moving faster get lighter (or heavier, you haven't said which and I don't care).

And gravitational lensing isn't frequency-dependent. There is no chromatic aberration in lensed images.
Quoting: nomuse (NLI) 2380183

Gravity DOES work that way! If two objects traveling the same distance in a gravitational field are moving at different velocities, the one moving faster is deflected less because the gravitational force is acting on it a shorter period of time over the same distance. AG is a constant.

Golly gee where do they get you tards and how do you imagine you're playing yourself off as having brains in excess of that of a slug?
AA
User ID: 47216577
United States
09/22/2013 11:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!

As observed on Earth, light from a distant star/planet (such

as Mercury) bends when it passes near another star (such as

the Sun). For some reason that I have been unable toderive

from his 'theory', it is said Einstein’s theory predicts

4GM/c2R , or double the bending as predicted

2GM/c2R by conventional Newtonian mechanics.

It personally baffles me why Eisteintards fail to mention

that unfortunately, the actual observed bending of light

cannot be derived from either equation logically , since

light is moving on two axis simultaneously. The logical

conclusion is that Einstein FUDGED the formula to match the

observation to use this ONE observational anomaly as

confirmation of his theory. Unfortunately, 4GM/c2R doesn't

work either, because the position the '4' is in the

equation couldn't possibly be an integer with his

irrational theory.

The likelihood of that is infinite against.

My assertion is that 4GM/c2R was dropped out of Einsteins

ass and it cannot be derived from other formula involved

with his theory. It's just a matter of cooking the books to

make it appear correct. his formula is Newtons, modified.

Newtons formula doesn't work with light simply because it

is moving faster than it is appearing to linearly .

I have made great effort to explain how and why this

must be
.

I am working on incorporating the frequency and mass of

light (assuming a mass equal to that of an electron) into

the basic Newtonian formula to predict the bending of

light precisely in a gravitational field. As any physicist

knows, gravity and te four forces are the most difficult

phenomenon to incorporate into a unified theory. That's why

Einstein just pulled formula out of is ass.

Before I die , I hope to release a unified theory. I may

fail. I will probably fail. But what I have already shared

is the basis for a new unified theory based in reality and

not the supposition that things fundamentally change when

scaled down . I see no evidence of this in nature.
AA
User ID: 47216577
United States
09/22/2013 11:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
The particle that is light moves very much faster than C.

Light is vibrating on an axis perpendicular to its linear

motion.

It is most frequently illustrated as a wavy line in a sine

wave pattern, a diagram that is essentially correct to

describe it's motion. As anyone with any visually perceptive

skills can see, if it moves 1 unit linearly , it is moving

much further than that distance overall. This is why light

APPEARS to defy Newton
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12581626
United States
09/22/2013 11:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Wrong> The ratio of diameter to circumference is PI and that is a constant. Mass /energy is not a constant

NEXT
Quoting: AA 47216577

No, Right> The RATIO of energy to matter, E/M, is C^2, just as the RATIO of circumference to diameter, C/D, is PI.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12581626

Coulda fooled me

E=1/2 M x V^2

Mass and velocity can be ANY value in this equation. It does not majikally change because a jew says so.

E/M is NOT a constant.

You're fucking dumbed down retard
Quoting: AA 47216577

Ha. Obscene and anti-Semitic. You left out homophobic. Unless you are saying I'm having sex with a retarded male. With your poor grammar, it's hard to tell.

Yes, mass and velocity can be any value in the equation

E=1/2 M x V^2

So what? This equation gives the kinetic energy of a specific mass M, measured in units like grams, moving at a specific velocity V, measured in units like centimeters/second.

The equation E=M C^2 gives the amount of energy E, measured in units like ergs, equivalent to a mass M measured in units like grams. In theory, if you convert the given mass M into energy, that's how much you'd get.

These are two different equations, giving the amount of energy present in two entirely different situations:
- a mass in motion and
- a mass converted to energy

I did not say E/M was a constant. I said that E/M as defined by the equation

E/M = C^2

is the ratio of the amount of energy E measured in units like ergs, equivalent to a mass M measured in units like grams.

Change M and you change E, because E = M C^2.

You really don't have a clue as to what these equations actually mean, do you.

And what about G = a R^2 / M? You haven't answered that one.
nomuse (not logged in)
User ID: 2380183
United States
09/23/2013 12:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
"different wavelengths of light have different kinetic energy levels. This is not debatable. Different wavelengths of light are deflected by gravity at different rates of deflection because of this difference in KE, This is not debatable.

The observation of the discrepancy involved with Mercury's orbit can be and is explained succinctly and rationally simply by applying the facts as we now understand them. What gravity actually is is another matter. Just because relativity gives one explanation of gravity , it does not automatically imply it is correct."

- From and earlier post made 12 years ago by myself
Quoting: AA 47216577

Cripes.

GRAVITY doesn't work that way. Or do you think objects that are moving faster get lighter (or heavier, you haven't said which and I don't care).

And gravitational lensing isn't frequency-dependent. There is no chromatic aberration in lensed images.
Quoting: nomuse (NLI) 2380183

Gravity DOES work that way! If two objects traveling the same distance in a gravitational field are moving at different velocities, the one moving faster is deflected less because the gravitational force is acting on it a shorter period of time over the same distance. AG is a constant.

Golly gee where do they get you tards and how do you imagine you're playing yourself off as having brains in excess of that of a slug?
Quoting: AA 47216577

You are confusing force with resulting vector.

The force is the same. The acceleration is the same. The time over which it is applied may be less, leading to a smaller change in velocity.

See, that's the problem in trying to do physics in word pictures. You forget which terms you are trying to include. Use math. It works better.
AA
User ID: 47286061
United States
09/23/2013 12:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
"different wavelengths of light have different kinetic energy levels. This is not debatable. Different wavelengths of light are deflected by gravity at different rates of deflection because of this difference in KE, This is not debatable.

The observation of the discrepancy involved with Mercury's orbit can be and is explained succinctly and rationally simply by applying the facts as we now understand them. What gravity actually is is another matter. Just because relativity gives one explanation of gravity , it does not automatically imply it is correct."

- From and earlier post made 12 years ago by myself
Quoting: AA 47216577

Cripes.

GRAVITY doesn't work that way. Or do you think objects that are moving faster get lighter (or heavier, you haven't said which and I don't care).

And gravitational lensing isn't frequency-dependent. There is no chromatic aberration in lensed images.
Quoting: nomuse (NLI) 2380183

Gravity DOES work that way! If two objects traveling the same distance in a gravitational field are moving at different velocities, the one moving faster is deflected less because the gravitational force is acting on it a shorter period of time over the same distance. AG is a constant.

Golly gee where do they get you tards and how do you imagine you're playing yourself off as having brains in excess of that of a slug?
Quoting: AA 47216577

You are confusing force with resulting vector.

The force is the same. The acceleration is the same. The time over which it is applied may be less, leading to a smaller change in velocity.

See, that's the problem in trying to do physics in word pictures. You forget which terms you are trying to include. Use math. It works better.
Quoting: nomuse (not logged in) 2380183

Actually I am using words to describe visualizations that are beyond your ability to comprehend, apparently. Until you ca get a picture in your mind what is going on, math isn't going to help much. Math is used to measure and quantify, not define
AA
User ID: 47286061
United States
09/23/2013 01:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
I did not say E/M was a constant. I said that E/M as defined by the equation

E/M = C^2

is the ratio of the amount of energy E measured in units like ergs, equivalent to a mass M measured in units like grams.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12581626

You're arguing with yourself.. Earlier when I pointed out E=Mc2 was an equality that was invalid and showed why, you defended it by saying it was a constant.

The bottom line is that energy cannot be quantified with a constant as a velocity and mass does not and cannot equate with energy. Mass is only one component of energy, a part cannot be equal to a whole if the other component is an actual measurable value.

What E=Mc2 tends to insinuate is that mass or matter at rest is moving at the speed of light on a atomic/subatomic level when the majority of it's not moving anywhere near the speed of light at all. It is not possible to obtain this kind of energy from any process involving mass unless it is accelerated to C, including obliteration by anti matter.

Science needs to return to it's roots of logic , experiment and empiricism. One of my oldest critics suggested i apply math to solve problems before visualize and describe them. WTF?
Hypertiger

User ID: 42750318
09/23/2013 01:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
hot an cold have a power struggle trying to become each other and become one.

hot runs from cold...cold chases hot.

cold is absolute zero...and it wants to become absolute one.

Which is GOD.

The tops of waves are collapses down into the reverse or expansions.

the zero line is time...above is absolute 1 or infinite something and below is absolute zero or infinite nothing.

nothing is always trying to become something.

but can not.

the battle between matter an anti matter with matter being the victor.

Is always happening.

It's why what you all are experiencing is constantly changing so fast that you all are mesmerized by it.

Like you would need to construct a device more powerful than infinity to conquer it.

and you would need to know infinity to see it.

That which has no beginning or end and which everything that has ever happened without end and ever will happen without end happens in an instant that is infinitely impossible to perceive.

Like trying to kill GOD.

fighting against Truth.

that is what lies are trying to do...become Truth.

it is why lies or anti matter exists after the batter between Truth and lies is resolved.

the death of the lie you believed was Truth becomes the new lie you believe is Truth.

you think what does not matter...does matter.

and call it Truth.

if what matters or Truth can not be created or destroyed.

then you would not see anything moving or even existing.

non existence is is alllwed to exist by existence or something.

something powers the existence of nothing or zero.

1 which matters powers the existence of what does not matter.

but which you all think does matter.

this power you can not see powers the existence of the word Truth.

which is dependant upon this invisible power.

lies...are dependant upon Truth to sustain their existence as Truth.

Lies take more power than they give to sustain their existence.

lies take more power than they give from Truth.

Which takes more power than it gives...from itself.

Truth is infinite and indestructible and is the supply of power.

lies are finite and fragile and are the demand for power.

the Universe is antimatter and GOD is matter.

the Universe is constantly trying to defeat GOD and become GOD and failing.

over and over again like a big bang so fast.

that you can not even perceive it except due to the knowledge that your awareness is powered by that which is infinite and indestructible.

You all become aware of lies when the yare revealed.

and see the revelation as Truth.

but you are just seeing what is left over after the battle is resolved.

the defeat of Satan by GOD.

the defeat of lies by Truth.

since GOD is love...before nothing can cease to exist.

it is saved from eternal damnation.

Satan is ignorant...It is why the word ignorant exists.

like a rock is ignorant of Truth...It is a dumb thing I can use an abuse how I see fit.

until a rock...that decides to try to find GOD and kill GOD and obtain ever lasting life begins following the path of lest resistance to the logical conclusion of the reasonable assumption or lie.

and falls on the top of my head and manipulates a dumb thing how it sees fit.

Or my body...and without that...I doubt I could post on the Internet.

Think of the connection to GOD you have as the gate of heaven you do not know you have...because you are ignorant.

and you open it up and connect it to the logic gates of hell.

Inside you computer is an invisible place you can not see that is your connection to the world wide web of lies where the horror of babble on rules.

basically all the technological advancements are not Truth.

just better lies...like knives are powerful lies...but guns are more powerful lies.

so science is like religion...or all belief.

a search for something you do not want to find.

knowing you are wrong...requires knowledge.

as soon as you began existing.

there was only what you were exposed to and you embraced that as truth before you ever were taught by lies and liars what to believe Truth is.
AA
User ID: 47286061
United States
09/23/2013 01:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
You left out homophobic. Unless you are saying I'm having sex with a retarded male.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12581626

I shouldn't answer this but I couldn't resist.

I certainly wouldn't be at all surprised. One thing that's a given is if anyone is having sex with you, they're having sex with a retarded male.

74444

User ID: 74444
United States
09/23/2013 01:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
See, that's the problem in trying to do physics in word pictures. You forget which terms you are trying to include. Use math. It works better.
Quoting: nomuse (not logged in) 2380183

Alas, despite his protests, I have yet to evidence IDW/A.A *can* use math.
AA
User ID: 47286061
United States
09/23/2013 01:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
hot an cold have a power struggle trying to become each other and become one.

hot runs from cold...cold chases hot.

cold is absolute zero...and it wants to become absolute one.

Which is GOD.

.............................................................​........

so science is like religion...or all belief.

a search for something you do not want to find.

knowing you are wrong...requires knowledge.

as soon as you began existing.

there was only what you were exposed to and you embraced that as truth before you ever were taught by lies and liars what to believe Truth is.
Quoting: Hypertiger

I'm not deep into philosophy and even less so into religion but one thing you said really rings true to me. We are always just in varying states of not knowing or ignorance, and we will never realize out goal of understanding the universe. We were never meant to. Science as failed to explain the most basic, fundamental aspects of it.
Only fools think otherwise and the halls of academia are full of fools

But what I believe we can do is learn enough about it to better our existence and I believe our creator intended we try or we wouldn't have been instilled with such a strong desire to do so.

I strongly believe that we are engaged in a constant struggle between truth and lies/good and evil as your soliloquy suggests, some are on one side and some on the other. My only goal is to understand. I have no agenda to deceive anyone.
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
09/23/2013 01:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!

As observed on Earth, light from a distant star/planet (such

as Mercury) bends when it passes near another star (such as

the Sun). For some reason that I have been unable toderive

from his 'theory', it is said Einstein’s theory predicts

4GM/c2R , or double the bending as predicted

2GM/c2R by conventional Newtonian mechanics.

It personally baffles me why Eisteintards fail to mention

that unfortunately, the actual observed bending of light

cannot be derived from either equation logically , since

light is moving on two axis simultaneously. The logical

conclusion is that Einstein FUDGED the formula to match the

observation to use this ONE observational anomaly as

confirmation of his theory. Unfortunately, 4GM/c2R doesn't

work either, because the position the '4' is in the

equation couldn't possibly be an integer with his

irrational theory.

Quoting: AA 47216577

And it continues to baffle me that all your armwaving here *is not addressing the problem.*

Mercury's *precession.* Show how your idea *quantifies* this observed aberration. Your work shown so far (HA!) does not. Do you even know what precession *is?*

And, by the by, if Einstein cooked the books to look correct, wasn't it *kind* of nature to exactly match his predictions from *years* earlier?

After all, Sir Eddington's 1919 expedition in which he confirmed Einstein's prediction for the deflection of light by the Sun during the total solar eclipse May 29th helped cement the status of general relativity as a likely true theory. It has been confirmed countless times since. I suppose nature was just being kind to the jew.

Before I die , I hope to release a unified theory. I may

fail. I will probably fail.
Quoting: IDW

First absolutely true statement from you in a *long* time. And is certainly in keeping with your track record this year.
AA
User ID: 47286061
United States
09/23/2013 01:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Opinions have a lot in common with assholes, they both have a tendency to stink. The opinion of an asshole has a particularly offensive odor
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47286061
United States
09/23/2013 01:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
hot an cold have a power struggle trying to become each other and become one.

hot runs from cold...cold chases hot.

cold is absolute zero...and it wants to become absolute one.

Which is GOD.

.............................................................​........

so science is like religion...or all belief.

a search for something you do not want to find.

knowing you are wrong...requires knowledge.

as soon as you began existing.

there was only what you were exposed to and you embraced that as truth before you ever were taught by lies and liars what to believe Truth is.
Quoting: Hypertiger

I'm not deep into philosophy and even less so into religion but one thing you said really rings true to me. We are always just in varying states of not knowing or ignorance, and we will never realize out goal of understanding the universe. We were never meant to. Science as failed to explain the most basic, fundamental aspects of it.
Only fools think otherwise and the halls of academia are full of fools

But what I believe we can do is learn enough about it to better our existence and I believe our creator intended we try or we wouldn't have been instilled with such a strong desire to do so.

I strongly believe that we are engaged in a constant struggle between truth and lies/good and evil as your soliloquy suggests, some are on one side and some on the other. My only goal is to understand. I have no agenda to deceive anyone.
Quoting: AA 47286061
AA
User ID: 47286061
United States
09/23/2013 01:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
I realize with some folks calling them an asshole is like pinning a badge of honor on them

All people bring happiness. Some by living, and others by dying
Hypertiger

User ID: 42750318
09/23/2013 02:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
becaue you all are absolute capitalistic.

you chop down trees faster than they grow to supply your desire to share power equally.

and when you run out of power...you cut back on the power you share.

while at the same time all the others do as well.

and you begin dividing and conquering down into individuls.

that of course seek safty in numbers.

like the KKK and the Black panthers.

both trying to take more power than they give from each other.

rise the price of gasoline...and they will become friends until it becomes cheap enough to go back to killing each other.

so makes sure when you are supplying both sides...to not let them figure it out.

and you power your comfort from their discomfort.

the invisible hand.

I went searching for dark matter and I looked deeper and deeper into the fabric of space and time.

and saw the back of my head...but I pretending to not see myself...and I pretended I was a scientist...and real smart one that was stealing money out of my wallet.

and then I figured out why dark matter is so hard to see.

juts keep on supplying us with money and we will keep trying to find something we do not want to find...

all the discoveries are found by searching for something you do not want to find.

proof that you are wrong.

you all are looking for proof that you are right.

looking for proof you are wrong.

would be like looking for where punches are going to land with you face.

you want to not prove yourself wrong.

you want victory.

you want to take more power than you give and be victorious.

not be forced to give more power than you take and be defeated.

You want to live.

you do not want to die.

so you will fight to the death to remain asleep to continue to enjoy the dream you are awake.

taking more power than you give...which is what lies do.

to sustain existence as truth.

Is the same as chopping down trees faster than they regrow to prove yourself right.

as long as you can chop a tree down to supply the demand of the lie you are powering to appear as truth.

ignorance is bliss...will be proven right.

but when the Trees run out.

ignorance is bliss will be proven to be wrong by knowledge which is misery in relation to the positive phase of the lie.

the inflationary or positive phase of the lie you believe is Truth.

at the maximum potential the lie you believed to be Truth is revealed as a lie.

and you see it's death.

and you think that is truth.

of course at the other side of the black hole where the trees ran out...they begin to grow back and the survivors spit out the other side.

do not even have a clue how they got there really...and they start chopping down trees again.

since they are still ignorant of Truth.

until the trees run out again...and they see the positive turn negative.

when the lie they thought was Truth...dies

and they call what they see...deflation or negative.

in relation to what came before or inflation of positive.

but it is inflation which is the cause of the deflation.

the supply of power and the demand for it.

your demand for power to escape from lack of it creates lack of supply of power.

like chopping down trees faster than they regrow until they run out to prove how right you are.

I try to share power as equally as possible.

I chop down trees as fast as or slower than they regrow to prove how wrong you are.

you demand yes from me.

I supply no.

You will not take no or defeat to your demand for yes of victory.

until you choose to accept defeat...or are forced to.

that is what buddy did...spent his whole life trying to prove himself right until he jumped into a black hole and found GOD and demanded to be proven right.

and GOD said no and proved him wrong...and sent him to square 1, after reaching square zero where the trees run out, back to where he came from all screwed up and crying about it on youtube.

he's perplexed.

He is ignorant of Truth.

you take an orange planet rich in a mineral called vitamin C and you drop it into your black hole and it travels through the singularity...and sprays out the other side.

That is how 7 Billion black holes on Earth operate basically.
nomuse (NLI)
User ID: 2380183
United States
09/23/2013 02:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
...

Cripes.

GRAVITY doesn't work that way. Or do you think objects that are moving faster get lighter (or heavier, you haven't said which and I don't care).

And gravitational lensing isn't frequency-dependent. There is no chromatic aberration in lensed images.
Quoting: nomuse (NLI) 2380183

Gravity DOES work that way! If two objects traveling the same distance in a gravitational field are moving at different velocities, the one moving faster is deflected less because the gravitational force is acting on it a shorter period of time over the same distance. AG is a constant.

Golly gee where do they get you tards and how do you imagine you're playing yourself off as having brains in excess of that of a slug?
Quoting: AA 47216577

You are confusing force with resulting vector.

The force is the same. The acceleration is the same. The time over which it is applied may be less, leading to a smaller change in velocity.

See, that's the problem in trying to do physics in word pictures. You forget which terms you are trying to include. Use math. It works better.
Quoting: nomuse (not logged in) 2380183

Actually I am using words to describe visualizations that are beyond your ability to comprehend, apparently. Until you ca get a picture in your mind what is going on, math isn't going to help much. Math is used to measure and quantify, not define
Quoting: AA 47286061

And this is why you fail.

Without math, you are unable to put your ideas clearly enough for others to follow. It is likely -- though not certain -- that you can't even see them clearly enough yourself to see where they work and where they NEED work.
Hypertiger

User ID: 42750318
09/23/2013 02:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Yes I guess assholes...are like black holes that are picky.

they like badge of honor band toilet paper to wipe with.

Their asses are tender from all the vile matter that spews out all over the cosmos.

another singularity?

the new economy was set up in 1971.

the world trade centers were built and the Nasdaq was turned on.

and in 2000 the new economy or nasdaq hit the singularity or point of infinity.

like where you use all the power in the Universe you have access to in order to punch GOD in the face.

and are annihilated...which is where the new economy that was set up in 1971...began collapsing...and in 2001 the world trade centers collapsed.

the son finished the war with Saddam post 2000.

we traveled through a singularity in 2000.

Basically because our future is tied to the past.

there is a gradual rise up to the collapse of the wave.

Look at the Nasdaq 1971 to now and the twin towers and the times and the new economy lie.

it was told leading into 1971 and people believed it was Truth.

and supplied it with more and more power...to sustain it's existence as Truth.

until it demanded infinite power in 2000...or the lie had to defeat Truth to obtain absolute power over all and everything.

and it imploded...along with the world trades centers.

the lights did not go out but they have been getting darker ever since they reached their maximum brightness back then.

but the world trade centers were a staged effect promoted as a cause...a new lie to believe is Truth to cover the implosion of the old new economy lie all believed was Truth.

when it ran out of power to fight Truth.

and the veil was lifted on the apocalypse of bliss.

the cremation of care.

and acceptance of the new lie instead...the war on Terror.

The war on Truth.

Deception...

The war on Truth with lies...you all are constantly feared into believing are Truth.

Last Edited by Hypertiger on 09/23/2013 02:43 AM
nomuse (NLI)
User ID: 2380183
United States
09/23/2013 03:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Then, again, show how you can explain Mercury's precession strictly in nothing but Newtonian physics, or how a 'pull on light' would explain precession.

You claim you can do the math and handle it. So handle it. Or I can merely add this to the long List of bogus claims you've made over the years.
Quoting: 74444

Wait until he finds out the phrase "Problem of Mercury's Precession of the Equinox" has one incorrect qualification in it -- one that makes almost all of his remarks on the subject non-starters.
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
09/23/2013 03:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Then, again, show how you can explain Mercury's precession strictly in nothing but Newtonian physics, or how a 'pull on light' would explain precession.

You claim you can do the math and handle it. So handle it. Or I can merely add this to the long List of bogus claims you've made over the years.
Quoting: 74444

Wait until he finds out the phrase "Problem of Mercury's Precession of the Equinox" has one incorrect qualification in it -- one that makes almost all of his remarks on the subject non-starters.
Quoting: nomuse (NLI) 2380183

Heh. Indeed. But I am *certain* his supra-intelligentship can suss it out.

Or not.
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
09/23/2013 03:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Opinions have a lot in common with assholes, they both have a tendency to stink. The opinion of an asshole has a particularly offensive odor
Quoting: AA 47286061

Your idea is terribly weak, or you'd be able to address criticisms. As it stands, a fairly average guy is able to take apart your ideas and your critiques and your predictions virtually without effort.

No wonder you only trot out your ideas here at GLP. They obviously can't stand the least bit of informed criticisms at all.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12581626
United States
09/23/2013 09:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
I did not say E/M was a constant. I said that E/M as defined by the equation

E/M = C^2

is the ratio of the amount of energy E measured in units like ergs, equivalent to a mass M measured in units like grams.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12581626

You're arguing with yourself.. Earlier when I pointed out E=Mc2 was an equality that was invalid and showed why, you defended it by saying it was a constant.

The bottom line is that energy cannot be quantified with a constant as a velocity and mass does not and cannot equate with energy. Mass is only one component of energy, a part cannot be equal to a whole if the other component is an actual measurable value.

What E=Mc2 tends to insinuate is that mass or matter at rest is moving at the speed of light on a atomic/subatomic level when the majority of it's not moving anywhere near the speed of light at all. It is not possible to obtain this kind of energy from any process involving mass unless it is accelerated to C, including obliteration by anti matter.

Science needs to return to it's roots of logic , experiment and empiricism. One of my oldest critics suggested i apply math to solve problems before visualize and describe them. WTF?
Quoting: AA 47286061

Where did I say E=M C^2 was a constant? A constant is a value such as PI. This is an equation that contains a constant.

What about G = a R^2 / M? Still waiting for an answer.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12581626
United States
09/23/2013 09:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
You left out homophobic. Unless you are saying I'm having sex with a retarded male.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12581626

I shouldn't answer this but I couldn't resist.

I certainly wouldn't be at all surprised. One thing that's a given is if anyone is having sex with you, they're having sex with a retarded male.

Quoting: AA 47286061

Of course you couldn't resist. Along with your other problems, you have an immature fascination with obscenity.

You're like a kid in a schoolyard who has no reply but "You're a poo-poo head!"
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47214963
United States
09/23/2013 10:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!
Opinions have a lot in common with assholes, they both have a tendency to stink. The opinion of an asshole has a particularly offensive odor
Quoting: AA 47286061

And that is ALL you have.......ludicrous opinions first and foremost formed by whether or not the person presenting information is Jewish which for you automatically makes that information wrong.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47214963
United States
09/23/2013 10:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Re: REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!

As observed on Earth, light from a distant star/planet (such

as Mercury) bends when it passes near another star (such as

the Sun). For some reason that I have been unable toderive

from his 'theory', it is said Einstein’s theory predicts

4GM/c2R , or double the bending as predicted

2GM/c2R by conventional Newtonian mechanics.

It personally baffles me why Eisteintards fail to mention

that unfortunately, the actual observed bending of light

cannot be derived from either equation logically , since

light is moving on two axis simultaneously. The logical

conclusion is that Einstein FUDGED the formula to match the

observation to use this ONE observational anomaly as

confirmation of his theory. Unfortunately, 4GM/c2R doesn't

work either, because the position the '4' is in the

equation couldn't possibly be an integer with his

irrational theory.

Quoting: AA 47216577

And it continues to baffle me that all your armwaving here *is not addressing the problem.*

Mercury's *precession.* Show how your idea *quantifies* this observed aberration. Your work shown so far (HA!) does not. Do you even know what precession *is?*

And, by the by, if Einstein cooked the books to look correct, wasn't it *kind* of nature to exactly match his predictions from *years* earlier?

After all, Sir Eddington's 1919 expedition in which he confirmed Einstein's prediction for the deflection of light by the Sun during the total solar eclipse May 29th helped cement the status of general relativity as a likely true theory. It has been confirmed countless times since. I suppose nature was just being kind to the jew.

Before I die , I hope to release a unified theory. I may

fail. I will probably fail.
Quoting: IDW

First absolutely true statement from you in a *long* time. And is certainly in keeping with your track record this year.
Quoting: 74444

Hmmmmmmm I see a support of the Jews being the chosen of god in there somewhere.......

Elemental

User ID: 13461811
United Kingdom
09/23/2013 10:50 AM
Report Abusive Post