REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS! | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist (OP) User ID: 41840266 United States 06/17/2013 01:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What's wrong? It's not going to go away. Now maybe we can start calling cosmic radiation what it is instead of "rays". Maybe we can finally get down to the business of working through the electric universe/intelligent design REALITY instead of this science-is-a-faith-based-religion and Einstein is god horseshit. It makes me want to hurl every time I look at that thieving idiot |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38757792 United States 06/17/2013 01:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dace User ID: 945543 Puerto Rico 06/17/2013 01:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 41215595 United States 06/17/2013 01:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist (OP) User ID: 41840266 United States 06/17/2013 01:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yep, for every paradox they make up a new fairy tale to cover it up. The fiction became so complex no one even claims to understand it any more. NO ONE. I have presented SUCCINCT and comprehensible theories of light, gravity and electromagnetism that are solid , logical and stand up to the scrutiny of the best they have to offer against me, and all they do is ignore me or heckle me , or as you will see as this thread develops, bombard me with a shitstorm of shills. Science today has one underlying goal, to deny creation. It as become nothing more or less than a atheist religion. That is the very reason why it has leaned upon complex fictions which no one can possibly understand because they are self contradictory and full of an endless vicious circle of paradoxes, all created by the need to it reality into a fiction. They offer as proof only 'experiments' which none of us can independently reproduce OR OBSERVE OURSELVES. Competing theories such as the electric universe/intelligent design are not funded and even declare ILLEGAL to teach! Why is science so bent on denying the creator when no truly intelligent individual could possible look at the complexities of our universe and the incredible order to it and the interdependent 'coincidences' and come to the conclusion it was the result of some fucking big-bang-boom! It sounds RETARDED |
Anonymous Astrophysicist (OP) User ID: 41840266 United States 06/17/2013 01:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29308957 United States 06/17/2013 01:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist (OP) User ID: 41840266 United States 06/17/2013 01:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist (OP) User ID: 41840266 United States 06/17/2013 01:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Tensor User ID: 3524262 United States 06/17/2013 01:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist (OP) User ID: 41840266 United States 06/17/2013 01:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist (OP) User ID: 41840266 United States 06/17/2013 02:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No shit. Is this Kaka's shpeil? If so, I'm not buying the bullshit until the idea is vetted. The video explains quite adequately, logically and succinctly why relativity cannot possibly be a valid theory and is fundamentally flawed in its very foundation. I am sorry if YOU are incapable;e of understanding why, I was when I was 10 |
Anonymous Astrophysicist (OP) User ID: 41840266 United States 06/17/2013 02:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I do agree with you, he does have that for sale shill air to him, but when their own sills are finally admitting something like this, it means they're ready to discard an idea IMO. I think they will try to say only parts of it are wrong myself. They will NEVER capitulate to intelligent design unless it is by physical force. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30033905 United Kingdom 06/17/2013 02:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The vortex has never been fully understood. Be it a tornado or a feeding black hole, My take on it, is that our Current physics works - just as soon as the ' missing' factors enter the equation. Perhaps these factors can be found within the relationship of spin with absolute zero (temp) Someone will know why I ponder on this thought... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 41215595 United States 06/17/2013 02:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist (OP) User ID: 41840266 United States 06/17/2013 02:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No shit. Is this Kaka's shpeil? If so, I'm not buying the bullshit until the idea is vetted. The video explains quite adequately, logically and succinctly why relativity cannot possibly be a valid theory and is fundamentally flawed in its very foundation. I am sorry if YOU are incapable;e of understanding why, I was when I was 10 What I mean to say is I was aware the theory was fundamentally flawed at age ten to clarify my statement. my problem with it was that it conflicted with known laws of physics which were never questioned such as the definition of kinetic energy, conservation of energy and mass and so on. Realty states that mass IS kinetic energy and this is impossible, since mass is only one component of the kinetic energy construct. A part cannot be equal to the whole. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 41215595 United States 06/17/2013 02:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist (OP) User ID: 41840266 United States 06/17/2013 02:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 41215595 United States 06/17/2013 02:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 41215595 United States 06/17/2013 02:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist (OP) User ID: 41840266 United States 06/17/2013 02:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Please be specific. Is what I wrote about gravity to complicated? My intent was to show it WASN'T complicated/ A bit complicated....could you say it again? Is there a holografic component? No! It is simply electrostatics. Like a nylon comb ran through your hair on a dry day picks up a negative charge and yet it will attract uncharged particles such a pieces of paper. |
Anonymous Astrophysicist (OP) User ID: 41840266 United States 06/17/2013 02:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Can we use this to stop the resource wars? Find a replacement for oil? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 41215595 YES, it's about oppression and controlling the masses .And I think that is why the truth is being suppressed. The people who fund sceintific research also run the resource selling game, and energy is king. They write the checks demanding specific outcomes. YEP! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30033905 United Kingdom 06/17/2013 02:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In fact, let me spell it out: when the spin of electrons is in harmony with the vibration of the atom, then relativity works. When spin (motion) of a massive body is no longer relating with this same harmony , the equation must alter. |
catsscratchfever User ID: 33747838 Canada 06/17/2013 02:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Intelligent design.....You may call him God.....But i refer to him as the programmer....What are you thought's on the double slit paradox....Or how partials observe us observing them and alter their movements with your theory.....Can it be tied together???? |
Anonymous Astrophysicist (OP) User ID: 41840266 United States 06/17/2013 02:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Tell me how I should use this information? In my life? What does this mean to you?In your life? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 41215595 I cannot answer that question for you, but for me it means the end of a dark age Could you flesh this out a bit? well, perhaps. What I am saying is that since we have allowed science to deny the existence of the creator and intelligent design, it has went off the deep end on an atheist bent thats only real goal is to suppress the advancement of human society and keep it in chains to it's overlords. Knowing your creator us all empowering. |
Anonymous Astrophysicist (OP) User ID: 41840266 United States 06/17/2013 02:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Intelligent design.....You may call him God.....But i refer to him as the programmer....What are you thought's on the double slit paradox....Or how partials observe us observing them and alter their movements with your theory.....Can it be tied together???? Quoting: catsscratchfever I prefer the term 'creator" and reject the idea of a man like god. I think the creator, creation and all of parts of it including ourselves are integral, the real 'divine trinity'. The double slit experiment seems to indicate that we are capable of manifesting waveform energy into matter through observation, an idea I do not completely discount. however, I think it's in the apparatus detecting the particle in the experiment causing the difference in interference patterns, Just MO. |
Anonymous Astrophysicist (OP) User ID: 41840266 United States 06/17/2013 02:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In fact, let me spell it out: when the spin of electrons is in harmony with the vibration of the atom, then relativity works. When spin (motion) of a massive body is no longer relating with this same harmony , the equation must alter. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30033905 It is my opinion that pre Einstein relativity makes sense and post does not. Einstein was fond of saying logic did not exist at his level of understanding, which is a fine way of saying , hey, I'm NOT a scientist! |
KonspiracyKitty User ID: 1295140 United States 06/17/2013 02:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Dark matter is the biggest crock of shit I've ever heard of in my life. If your equations and simulations according to your model don't work out and your model is disproved, you're supposed to change the model, not make up shit in such a way to make your model work. They're no longer inventing a model to explain the universe. They're inventing a universe to explain a model. If you say 2+2=5 and discover you are wrong, you fix the equation. You don't claim the value of 2 is really 3/2 to make your flawed equation work. But that's pretty much what they're doing with dark matter to explain away the flaw. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 41840266 United States 06/17/2013 02:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist (OP) User ID: 41840266 United States 06/17/2013 03:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Dark matter is the biggest crock of shit I've ever heard of in my life. If your equations and simulations according to your model don't work out and your model is disproved, you're supposed to change the model, not make up shit in such a way to make your model work. They're no longer inventing a model to explain the universe. They're inventing a universe to explain a model. If you say 2+2=5 and discover you are wrong, you fix the equation. You don't claim the value of 2 is really 3/2 to make your flawed equation work. But that's pretty much what they're doing with dark matter to explain away the flaw. Nice explaination |