...
Whose numbers?
I don't read to much into theoretical physicists because i find they ave a tendency to create diversions in my own thought processes. I started with a solid foundation of fact and built on it, if that makes sense. I don't believe building on theories of others or creating new ones to explain dependencies in the theories of others is a solid scientific approach, You have to start some were with solid grounding in facts tat are not in question and build on tem logically
That's not to say I discount Dollard. he makes more sense than Einstein. All of the "aetherists" do.
Einstein was not a genius and he did not propose any new ideas, What he did was take what he thought were the best ideas of others and plagiarize them. I have proved that with solid references on this thread.
The jewish god of science is dethroned, whether his rabid poser proponents want to take his stinking body off of it or not..it's stinking up the house that is science
Quoting: AA 47216577 OF course you do......you will support anyone who agrees with your denigration of Einstein.
Dullard doesn't know mush more about Teslas work than you do Mr Moronium
You haven't shown me that you are any better especially considering Eric Dollards explanation of Tesla's radio is the same as how Tesla explained it's operation*. That's a pretty bold claim saying you have a better understanding of Tesla than Dollard, take into consideration his background is Navy and RCA. I'd like to see you take a stab at this. I still have not found any information on your previous claims on Tesla, and you can't back them up.
* [
link to www.tuks.nl]
Not my problem
Believe what you want but Dullard knows nothing about how a Tesla transmitter works and he proved that with his "It is a homopolar generator" screw up.
You do understand that Teslas teminology was of his time and everything that he did has been understood now for years do you not?
Dullard does not but I am hoping that you realize it.
Tesla was mistaken when he thought that he had "corpuscles" which was the term of that time traveling faster than the speed of light as what he was observing was in fact higher frequencies which always contain more energy.
It would be considered alternative explanation to modern interpretation. The idea is that we can transmit Electricity other than in a Electro-Magnetic configuration. The whole point of Eric Dollards work is to explain it as how Tesla would have understood it, the idea is that Tesla knew exactly what he was doing and his device works exactly as he said.
On the subject of Tesla and Einstein; I still have not found where Tesla retracted his statements about Relativity. Infact, one of Tesla`s most scathing attacks on Relativity was given when he was 82. Tesla died when he was 86, where is the retraction?
` I have worked out a dynamic theory of gravity in all details and hope to give his to the world very soon. It explains the causes of this force and the motions of heavenly bodies under its influence so satisfactorily that it will put an end to idle speculations and false conceptions, as that of curved space. According to the relativists, space has a tendency to curvature owing to an inherent property or resence of celestial bodies.
"Granting a semblance of reality to this fantastic idea, it is still very self-contradictory. Every action is accompanied by an equivalent reaction and he effects of the latter are directly opposite to those of the former. Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curvature of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies and, producing the opposite effects, straighten out the curves.
"Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible - However, even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for them and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion."`
