REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!

May as well cut to the chase since he can't figure out the tip after lunch so he jut tells the person paying the bil the waitress is a jew lesbian

Jews are just a very dangerous subspecies of human wit reptilian dominant DNA. Dangerous animals don't belong in control of humanity.. I am not advocating 'ethnic cleansing", I am advocating removing a dangerous and deadly parasite from our system by isolating it..
The only way I would advocate killing any animal is if it made it necessary in self defense.

It could be argued rationally that we are at that point.

I think isolation of the parasite and imprisonment is the answer. I am not a jew. I don't think like jews. That's your mistake in assuming I have some rabid desire to murder them..

I wouldn't do that for the same reason i wouldn't kill a snake, mosquito, leech, baboon or a tiger unless it were harming someone i n a way that threatened their assistance..


The answer to solving the jewish problem is not in killing them. You cannot kill an idea, and that's what the Talmud is. The solution is in waking up the host to the presence of the parasite.

It was for me

Not the movie, but the phrase.


You would have to know my history and have lived in Jew York to understand.

The jewish empire state

You might want to read it before you blather bullshit from whack job websites about it.
[link to www.contemporaryworks.net]

Moronium ........

Well, he will consider my challenge irrelevant simply because it comes from me. He doesn't understand how it undermines his physics claims *utterly.* But that's all right. Newton was a *true* genius and couldn't figure it out either. So IDW/A.A doesn't stand a chance.

It's funny how when you replace the letter "n" with a "j" in certain phrases and words that represent controversial subjects with conspiracy written all over them, they suddenly take on a whole new and more accurate meaning.
a few for instances, feel free to add to the list:


Jew York

The evening Jews

The jewspapers

Jew world order

Why do you think new york is called the empire state?

whose EMPIRE?


how does that makes sense in a constitutional republic?

Sigh.

So your entire argument and objection to Relativity repeatedly returns to little more than a jew thought up/popularized the idea therefore it must be wrong?

You do realize that your whole line of reasoning is, therefore, based on a classic logical fallacy?

If it were suddenly discovered that Sir Isaac Newton were of Jewish descent, would that suddenly invalidate all of Newtonian Mechanics, in your worldview?

Three guesses and the first four don't count

"different wavelengths of light have different kinetic energy levels. This is not debatable. Different wavelengths of light are deflected by gravity at different rates of deflection because of this difference in KE, This is not debatable.

The observation of the discrepancy involved with Mercury's orbit can be and is explained succinctly and rationally simply by applying the facts as we now understand them. What gravity actually is is another matter. Just because relativity gives one explanation of gravity , it does not automatically imply it is correct."


- From and earlier post made 12 years ago by myself

And just as stupid a statement now as it was then.

Light doesn't have kinetic energy

And please point out just where either relativity theory explains what gravity is?

I missed it as did the rest of the world

I haven't yet been confronted with that hypothetical problem in any idea that is proved science. Is that not in of itself revealing?

Again............

goddamned you are one dumb cocksucking jew!!

[link to www.einsteins-theory-of-relativity-4engineers.com]

[snip]

Einstein later worked out how the force of gravity is not quite a force, but rather an artifact of the natural movement of objects through curved four-dimensional spacetime. Einstein reportedly got the inspiration for this imaginative leap in understanding of gravity by contemplating a man falling off a building. Such a falling man would not experience any force while he is falling, at least not before hitting the ground and suffering severe forces.

Einstein's Gravity (1916)

In his monumental 1916 work 'The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity', Albert Einstein unified his own Special relativity, Newton's law of universal gravitation, and the crucial insight that the effects of gravity can be described by the curvature of space and time, usually just called 'space-time' curvature.

It is reasonably easy to accept that space can be curved – after all, we all know that a disk has a curved edge, but how can time be 'curved'? The secret lurks in the way that space and time is combined into space-time. Normally, a space-time diagram is drawn with a straight horizontal spatial axis and a straight vertical time axis. Just bend the two straight axes a little and we have curved space-time.
[/snip]




What a fucking retard

What is most hilarious is ow i can so easily visulaize your comrades sitting back nodding saying, "yeah, that IS exactly what he is".

"It would have been nice if we could have popped the question 'what is gravity' to the 'gravity-giants' like Kepler, Newton and Einstein. Maybe they could explain the characteristics and effects of this phenomenon properly and we could then (perhaps) answer the question. "

AGAIN.........

Yes......yes he does........

"Einstein reportedly got the inspiration for this imaginative leap in understanding of gravity by contemplating a man falling off a building. Such a falling man would not experience any force while he is falling"




If he is not experiencing any force, then what pray tell is accelerating him? is acceleration is matching that of the constant G.
he's not perceiving the force, that doesn't mean it isn't there. If you close your eyes traveling 500 mph on an airplane not encountering any rough atmospheric conditions, your sensation of moving isn't there either, BUT YOU ARE. Just not in your own frame of reference. The earth is moving beneath you in your frame of reference, but you cannot detect it without looking.

Which is exactly what Einstein said.

You are a complete moran Mr Moronium

The stupidium is building up

It's too bad Einstein didn't experiment with this idea himself. Perhaps this conversation wouldn't be necessary


Be like a bag of shit hitting the ground at 200 mph.

which reminds me, a man falling off of a building is a very poor example because he would experience g forces because of atmospheric drag.

Even Einsteins examples and is so called inspirations were unintelligent.

So in your airplane are you experiencing any force?

Now we are once again at the place where you claim you never said what you just said and blame the government jews for putting words in your computer.

Nothing can accelerate instantaneously no matter how great the force.

If the acceleration matches that of the acceleration constant of gravity of the force, no acceleration will be perceived and no force will either. To me this seems intuitively logical but let me expand on the idea a bit more.

It simply because our senses are tuned to detect changes, not things remaining constant in our frame of reference. Since the force of gravity is capable of accelerating mass it must be a force. So long as a falling body is equaling te acceleration constant of the force, forces appear to be in balance in that frame of reference. You won't experience any sensation of force or acceleration, but both are there. Take te example of an orbit. The force of gravity and centripetal acceleration are balanced, they're both there, but they are impossible to perceive in the orbiting masses frame of reference. But if another mass is acted on by the orbiting bodies gravity it experiences a detectable force

like spoonfeedin' a 'tard

So you agree with relativity and Einstein said the same thing as you much more simply.

You are so screwed in the head.

Seriously........take a mental holiday because you are making less and less sense.