The sun IS CHANGING..HAS changed..and will grow WORSE.... | |
HeaT User ID: 23363348 United States 07/10/2013 03:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No one worried about the sun in the 60s and 70s..it was normal then..warm friendly yellow..none of this stinging blinding white you have now. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17273375 Back then there was no big deal about being in the sun..to be tanned took hours and hours in the sun. Then in about 1981 things began to change..because the sun began to change about then as well. All we saw on TV was add after add about sun protection..wear hats..t shirts..ect..its ramped up bigtime ever since as the suns grown worse. Thats when they upped the SPF factors on sunscreens from 8 to 15 plus and ts stayed that way till about 1989...all the while the campaign went on about sun safety. Then in 1989 they upped the spf factor to 30+..and even admitted then the sun was growing more intense and thus the need for stronger protection. So up the SPF factors went..the sun was no longer a nice yellow..it was now whitish..but not as strong as it is now.. It took about 2 hours in the sun to get a burn between 1989 aqnd 1995..I know...I spent a lot of time outdoors at the beach. Then in about 1996 things ramped up again with the introduction of 40+...and then in 2004 60+...the sun kept getting whiter..moving steadily over a periad of years into the higher ultra violet spectrum. Now its a blast furace...there is no actual HEAT as such from it..more like standing under a UV lamp. They dont WANT it "Widley" reporeted....they want to blame the weather changes on global warming..NOT the sun. If they went fully public and said "OUR SUN is getting stronger" in terms of UV output..the world would panic..and THEY would have no cashcow. They did let it slip..like I said..in 1989..it was on a science show explaining the change in colour of the sun. IT WAS known then..but maybe only to us in Aus..I dont know if ya saw it in Meka. but WE saw it. then..just after that they squashed ANY more mention of it..and instead went ALL OUT on the"Global warming" facade..and the sceince report was buried under a mass campaign of bullshit. But I remembered it. In the early 80s it was all blamed on the ozone layer and choloroflurocarbons. That soon wore thin..as things kept getting worse DESPITE their banning them worldwide. Then in 1989 just AFTER the report in Aus about the SUN being the cause..they ramped up the global warming shit. But thats worn out now too, as things keep getting gradually worse despite their cutting right back on pollution. So now they call it "Climate change"...and blame carbon dioxide. So..meantime..they keep upping the SPF factors..the sun gets feircer..and all the sheep go BAAAAAA..and pay for the very air they breathe now in the form of carbon tax..and the stupid frogs with their eyes shut boil merrily away in the pot..and call all those who have PAID ATTENTION to the changes..like myself and so many others..FOOLS. The last laugh will be ours..as you sheep swallow the crap..and beleive the lies. And burn to death under a yellow star than has now left main sequence..and heading into something you really dont want to know about...so they will keep coming up with excuses and media campaigns..and scare you with skin cacer..and keep you flouridated and bullshitted to..and rake in a fortune at the same time. This was a good read, well done OP. |
Hydra User ID: 43105544 Germany 07/10/2013 04:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wasn't asking you noNuts. We already know you're an idiot. Now I just want to have some fun with Sethead, who also might actually rival you for biggest idiot on this forum, believe it or not. Ad hominem. You forfeit the argument. Thanks. Why is it that you are always trying to lull people into a false sense of security claiming everything is normal when it obviously isn't.What are you being paid to lie? do you think te people who pay you value your life? [they don't!] Idiot. Why do you believe they would trust or have use for a person who has sold out his own ? You're not down or you wouldn't be here. Te evil ackers ave acked AA/IDWs keyboard again and stole is "h" key. LOL Since you abandoned the solar data and the "Realtivity" threads, I guess you admit that you have lost your cases there. . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Hydra User ID: 43105544 Germany 07/10/2013 04:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Setheory 36555423 It makes no difference to me……I was just curious. I thought you might want to look like something other than foolish. Your choice. Okie dokie, since you asked nicely. Let's start with real basic toddler stuff. Why do planets go around the sun? <laughing> Is this where I talk about Roche Spheres and General Relativity and then you come back and say that I (along with the rest of “mainstream science”) are mistaken? You then go on about EU models? Again, have a look at your posts in this thread. You still have not said anything of substance. That being said, go on and tell us about your theory of orbital mechanics. This should be good. Since relativity ala Einstein has been disproved, it is intellectually dishonest to act as if it hasn't. Or is it just stupidity, as in adherence to a religious dogma? How about building a high-precision (< 1 meter accuracy) GPS receiver without taking into account relativistic corrections. . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Hydra User ID: 43105544 Germany 07/10/2013 04:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's not a very convincing argument. Explain to us how the sun has changed and why you think this is so. You know, like grown-ups do. 1000 degree change in photosphere temperature over 40 years -Check Radical increase in UV output- Check change in electromagnetic spectrum- Check Shrinking heliosphere- Check increase in temperatures on ALL planets-check I could go on , let's start here transitioning out of main sequence- Check Now show me evidence of all these claims you are posting. I want to see evidence for each claim you posted. I'll give you all the time you need to come up with the information. Geo, did you ever see the Incredible Dim Astrophysicist giving some evidence. It's always only hot air out of his ass. . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
#Geomagnetic_Storm# User ID: 36140692 United States 07/10/2013 04:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Setheory 41894184 That's not a very convincing argument. Explain to us how the sun has changed and why you think this is so. You know, like grown-ups do. 1000 degree change in photosphere temperature over 40 years -Check Radical increase in UV output- Check change in electromagnetic spectrum- Check Shrinking heliosphere- Check increase in temperatures on ALL planets-check I could go on , let's start here transitioning out of main sequence- Check Now show me evidence of all these claims you are posting. I want to see evidence for each claim you posted. I'll give you all the time you need to come up with the information. Geo, did you ever see the Incredible Dim Astrophysicist giving some evidence. It's always only hot air out of his ass. . No. Probably won't. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 33360181 United States 07/10/2013 08:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wasn't asking you noNuts. We already know you're an idiot. Now I just want to have some fun with Sethead, who also might actually rival you for biggest idiot on this forum, believe it or not. Ad hominem. You forfeit the argument. Thanks. Why is it that you are always trying to lull people into a false sense of security claiming everything is normal when it obviously isn't.What are you being paid to lie? do you think te people who pay you value your life? [they don't!] Idiot. Why do you believe they would trust or have use for a person who has sold out his own ? You're not down or you wouldn't be here. Cart before the horse and ad hominem. I'm not paid to lie, you're paranoid and need to seek professional help. |
Elemental User ID: 13461811 United Kingdom 07/10/2013 08:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But then it will be like the "rapture" and the ones supposed to go to the 5th dimension will go there, and the ones who are supposed to stay on the 3rd dimension will go to another planet of 3rd dimension. IF the Sun has something like a huge explosion of light. (as it seems to be going in that direction now... But it might quiet down next year. We are on the max this year.) What this New Sun will do is to expose the THROUGH STUPIDITY of the choices that these ciminals are doing. It is very obvious that they lie. And it is very obvious that they lie for the stupiedest reasons. The old reason: money and/or desire to belong to a corrupt brotherhood to have it "made" in this phisical life. OR so the Luciferians tell them! And we know how much those Luciferians value every word that they say, don't we?? ;) There is nothing that they can do about it. It is ALREADY here. It might be a good idea to understand the third dimension before mentioning the fifth....although if you can explain the fifth dimension I'd be very interested to learn as I've not come across anyone who can actually tell me what it is. energy cannot be destroyed, it can only be transformed. Nothing is so potent as the silent influence of a good example. Illegitimi non carborundum Alea iacta est. Dum vivimus vivamus |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17230 Germany 07/10/2013 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Setheory User ID: 22372062 United States 07/10/2013 10:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is it that you are always trying to lull people into a false sense of security claiming everything is normal when it obviously isn't.What are you being paid to lie? do you think te people who pay you value your life? [they don't!] Idiot. Why do you believe they would trust or have use for a person who has sold out his own ? You're not down or you wouldn't be here. While they do lie unashamedly, there is no danger from the Sun. It is a new phase. And perhaps we will all "die". Is it just me or does that seem like somewhat of a contradiction? |
Elemental User ID: 13461811 United Kingdom 07/10/2013 10:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is it that you are always trying to lull people into a false sense of security claiming everything is normal when it obviously isn't.What are you being paid to lie? do you think te people who pay you value your life? [they don't!] Idiot. Why do you believe they would trust or have use for a person who has sold out his own ? You're not down or you wouldn't be here. While they do lie unashamedly, there is no danger from the Sun. It is a new phase. And perhaps we will all "die". Is it just me or does that seem like somewhat of a contradiction? No, it's not just you. Unfortunately the dull-witted seem to thrive on the idea of some sort of salvation. energy cannot be destroyed, it can only be transformed. Nothing is so potent as the silent influence of a good example. Illegitimi non carborundum Alea iacta est. Dum vivimus vivamus |
Setheory User ID: 22372062 United States 07/10/2013 10:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | IF the Sun has something like a huge explosion of light. (as it seems to be going in that direction now... But it might quiet down next year. We are on the max this year.) Quoting: TruthMinion What this New Sun will do is to expose the THROUGH STUPIDITY of the choices that these ciminals are doing. It is very obvious that they lie. And it is very obvious that they lie for the stupiedest reasons. The old reason: money and/or desire to belong to a corrupt brotherhood to have it "made" in this phisical life. OR so the Luciferians tell them! And we know how much those Luciferians value every word that they say, don't we?? ;) There is nothing that they can do about it. It is ALREADY here. What is a Luciferian in your opinion? If I am approached by said being, how will I recognize them as such? What is the “IT” that is already here? |
Elemental User ID: 13461811 United Kingdom 07/10/2013 11:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: TruthMinion While they do lie unashamedly, there is no danger from the Sun. It is a new phase. And perhaps we will all "die". Is it just me or does that seem like somewhat of a contradiction? No, it's not just you. Unfortunately the dull-witted seem to thrive on the idea of some sort of salvation. It is because you both are ignorant and cannot understand the meaning of quotes in a sentence. Good grief, if you're going to purport a cause at least have some intelligence with which to support it. You can't really be this stupid......can you? Surely not..... Last Edited by Elemental on 07/10/2013 11:38 AM energy cannot be destroyed, it can only be transformed. Nothing is so potent as the silent influence of a good example. Illegitimi non carborundum Alea iacta est. Dum vivimus vivamus |
Setheory User ID: 22372062 United States 07/10/2013 11:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | IF the Sun has something like a huge explosion of light. (as it seems to be going in that direction now... But it might quiet down next year. We are on the max this year.) Quoting: TruthMinion What this New Sun will do is to expose the THROUGH STUPIDITY of the choices that these ciminals are doing. It is very obvious that they lie. And it is very obvious that they lie for the stupiedest reasons. The old reason: money and/or desire to belong to a corrupt brotherhood to have it "made" in this phisical life. OR so the Luciferians tell them! And we know how much those Luciferians value every word that they say, don't we?? ;) There is nothing that they can do about it. It is ALREADY here. What is a Luciferian in your opinion? If I am approached by said being, how will I recognize them as such? What is the “IT” that is already here? You are not able to understand what I wrote?? Unfortunately not. That is why I asked for clarification. I’m not sure anyone is sure of what you mean, so if you want to be understood than you might want to explain yourself better. |
74444 User ID: 74444 United States 07/10/2013 12:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Setheory 36555423 It makes no difference to me……I was just curious. I thought you might want to look like something other than foolish. Your choice. Okie dokie, since you asked nicely. Let's start with real basic toddler stuff. Why do planets go around the sun? <laughing> Is this where I talk about Roche Spheres and General Relativity and then you come back and say that I (along with the rest of “mainstream science”) are mistaken? You then go on about EU models? Again, have a look at your posts in this thread. You still have not said anything of substance. That being said, go on and tell us about your theory of orbital mechanics. This should be good. Since relativity ala Einstein has been disproved, it is intellectually dishonest to act as if it hasn't. Or is it just stupidity, as in adherence to a religious dogma? Well, nice to see IDW/A.A is all right after his attempted dramatic "disappearance." So much for that. Don't worry. Whether you are posting here as yourself or not, I will still be noting and commenting on your upcoming prediction dates and their accuracy (or lack thereof) -- about ISON, the Winter Solstice, and in January. The List goes on. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18133084 United States 07/10/2013 01:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18133084 Okie dokie, since you asked nicely. Let's start with real basic toddler stuff. Why do planets go around the sun? <laughing> Is this where I talk about Roche Spheres and General Relativity and then you come back and say that I (along with the rest of “mainstream science”) are mistaken? You then go on about EU models? Again, have a look at your posts in this thread. You still have not said anything of substance. That being said, go on and tell us about your theory of orbital mechanics. This should be good. Since relativity ala Einstein has been disproved, it is intellectually dishonest to act as if it hasn't. Or is it just stupidity, as in adherence to a religious dogma? Well, nice to see IDW/A.A is all right after his attempted dramatic "disappearance." So much for that. Don't worry. Whether you are posting here as yourself or not, I will still be noting and commenting on your upcoming prediction dates and their accuracy (or lack thereof) -- about ISON, the Winter Solstice, and in January. The List goes on. We wouldn't expect anything different from you. Everybody has to have a purpose for their lives. |
74444 User ID: 74444 United States 07/10/2013 01:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Setheory 41894184 <laughing> Is this where I talk about Roche Spheres and General Relativity and then you come back and say that I (along with the rest of “mainstream science”) are mistaken? You then go on about EU models? Again, have a look at your posts in this thread. You still have not said anything of substance. That being said, go on and tell us about your theory of orbital mechanics. This should be good. Since relativity ala Einstein has been disproved, it is intellectually dishonest to act as if it hasn't. Or is it just stupidity, as in adherence to a religious dogma? Well, nice to see IDW/A.A is all right after his attempted dramatic "disappearance." So much for that. Don't worry. Whether you are posting here as yourself or not, I will still be noting and commenting on your upcoming prediction dates and their accuracy (or lack thereof) -- about ISON, the Winter Solstice, and in January. The List goes on. We wouldn't expect anything different from you. Everybody has to have a purpose for their lives. More a hobby than a purpose. And as I have said before -- I'm nothing if not predictable. Speaking of predictable: Two days to Manhattanhenge. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43185286 United States 07/11/2013 01:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18133084 Wasn't asking you noNuts. We already know you're an idiot. Now I just want to have some fun with Sethead, who also might actually rival you for biggest idiot on this forum, believe it or not. Ad hominem. You forfeit the argument. Thanks. Why is it that you are always trying to lull people into a false sense of security claiming everything is normal when it obviously isn't.What are you being paid to lie? do you think te people who pay you value your life? [they don't!] Idiot. Why do you believe they would trust or have use for a person who has sold out his own ? You're not down or you wouldn't be here. Te evil ackers ave acked AA/IDWs keyboard again and stole is "h" key. LOL Since you abandoned the solar data and the "Realtivity" threads, I guess you admit that you have lost your cases there. . Don't blow your own horn little boy blue. You got your asses handed to you. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43185286 United States 07/11/2013 02:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Setheory 41894184 <laughing> Is this where I talk about Roche Spheres and General Relativity and then you come back and say that I (along with the rest of “mainstream science”) are mistaken? You then go on about EU models? Again, have a look at your posts in this thread. You still have not said anything of substance. That being said, go on and tell us about your theory of orbital mechanics. This should be good. Since relativity ala Einstein has been disproved, it is intellectually dishonest to act as if it hasn't. Or is it just stupidity, as in adherence to a religious dogma? Well, nice to see IDW/A.A is all right after his attempted dramatic "disappearance." So much for that. Don't worry. Whether you are posting here as yourself or not, I will still be noting and commenting on your upcoming prediction dates and their accuracy (or lack thereof) -- about ISON, the Winter Solstice, and in January. The List goes on. We wouldn't expect anything different from you. Everybody has to have a purpose for their lives. Seems to me it should be demeaning to anyone with any personal pride to make his whole life's purpose to attempt to cover up the truth coming from one man, and to do it so poorly. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17230 Germany 07/11/2013 03:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
74444 User ID: 74444 United States 07/11/2013 03:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is it that you are always trying to lull people into a false sense of security claiming everything is normal when it obviously isn't.What are you being paid to lie? do you think te people who pay you value your life? [they don't!] Idiot. Why do you believe they would trust or have use for a person who has sold out his own ? You're not down or you wouldn't be here. Te evil ackers ave acked AA/IDWs keyboard again and stole is "h" key. LOL Since you abandoned the solar data and the "Realtivity" threads, I guess you admit that you have lost your cases there. . Don't blow your own horn little boy blue. You got your asses handed to you. Uh huh. When was that again? December 21st, 2012, perhaps? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43227175 United States 07/12/2013 12:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | On the other hand, there is plenty of evidence to indicate the color of the Sun is white. Here are three articles describing the color of the Sun as white: Cordeiro, F. J. B., Color-Perception. II., Popular Astronomy, vol. 17, pp.23-28 (1909) Lockyer, J. Norman, Spectroscopic Observation of the Sun, No. II., Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Volume 17, pp. 131-132 (1868) Isaac Newton, Mr. Newton’s Answer to the Foregoing Letter Further Explaining His Theory of Light and Colors, and Particularly That of Whiteness; together with His Continued Hopes of Perfecting Telescopes by Reflections Rather than Refractions, Philosophical Transactions (1665-1678), Volume 8, pp. 6087-6092 (1673) Note the years, 1909, 1868, and 1673. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43227175 United States 07/12/2013 12:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1000 degree change in photosphere temperature over 40 years -Check Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43125754 Radical increase in UV output- Check change in electromagnetic spectrum- Check Shrinking heliosphere- Check increase in temperatures on ALL planets-check I could go on , let's start here transitioning out of main sequence- Check None of those statements are true. |
Elemental User ID: 13461811 United Kingdom 07/12/2013 01:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | On the other hand, there is plenty of evidence to indicate the color of the Sun is white. Here are three articles describing the color of the Sun as white: Cordeiro, F. J. B., Color-Perception. II., Popular Astronomy, vol. 17, pp.23-28 (1909) Lockyer, J. Norman, Spectroscopic Observation of the Sun, No. II., Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Volume 17, pp. 131-132 (1868) Isaac Newton, Mr. Newton’s Answer to the Foregoing Letter Further Explaining His Theory of Light and Colors, and Particularly That of Whiteness; together with His Continued Hopes of Perfecting Telescopes by Reflections Rather than Refractions, Philosophical Transactions (1665-1678), Volume 8, pp. 6087-6092 (1673) Note the years, 1909, 1868, and 1673. Barycentric motion...grand minimum? Last Edited by Elemental on 07/12/2013 01:43 PM energy cannot be destroyed, it can only be transformed. Nothing is so potent as the silent influence of a good example. Illegitimi non carborundum Alea iacta est. Dum vivimus vivamus |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43227175 United States 07/12/2013 02:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | On the other hand, there is plenty of evidence to indicate the color of the Sun is white. Here are three articles describing the color of the Sun as white: Cordeiro, F. J. B., Color-Perception. II., Popular Astronomy, vol. 17, pp.23-28 (1909) Lockyer, J. Norman, Spectroscopic Observation of the Sun, No. II., Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Volume 17, pp. 131-132 (1868) Isaac Newton, Mr. Newton’s Answer to the Foregoing Letter Further Explaining His Theory of Light and Colors, and Particularly That of Whiteness; together with His Continued Hopes of Perfecting Telescopes by Reflections Rather than Refractions, Philosophical Transactions (1665-1678), Volume 8, pp. 6087-6092 (1673) Note the years, 1909, 1868, and 1673. Barycentric motion...grand minimum? Huh? Barycentric motion is the motion of all the objects about the solar systems center of mass. The main influences are the Sun and Jupiter. The barycenter is just outside the surface of the Sun. Since the orbital period of Jupiter is about 12 years, the Sun orbits the barycenter once every 12 years. The grand solar minimum is a hypothesized future minimum in solar activity similar to the Maunder Minimum around 1650 - 1700. It represents a disruption of the sunspot cycle. Since total solar irradiance measures show that since 1975 the sunspot cycle represents a 1 W/m^2 variation in the total solar irradiance out of a mean of 1366 W/m^2. This is a 0.07% variation between solar min and solar max. We cannot perceive with our eyes a 0.07% variation. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43227175 United States 07/12/2013 09:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | On the other hand, there is plenty of evidence to indicate the color of the Sun is white. Here are three articles describing the color of the Sun as white: Cordeiro, F. J. B., Color-Perception. II., Popular Astronomy, vol. 17, pp.23-28 (1909) Lockyer, J. Norman, Spectroscopic Observation of the Sun, No. II., Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Volume 17, pp. 131-132 (1868) Isaac Newton, Mr. Newton’s Answer to the Foregoing Letter Further Explaining His Theory of Light and Colors, and Particularly That of Whiteness; together with His Continued Hopes of Perfecting Telescopes by Reflections Rather than Refractions, Philosophical Transactions (1665-1678), Volume 8, pp. 6087-6092 (1673) Note the years, 1909, 1868, and 1673. If you didn't notice, the "scientific" articles say that while the Sun is white it is known as a Yellow Star. Because it APPEARS to us as yellow. THAT is, until a few years ago. It then changed to WHITE. And since 21st of December of 2012, BRIGHT SHINNY WHITE. Like NEVER before. (At least while I am alive. From yellow to white to super bright white.) This isn't difficult. The clause "while the Sun is white" means the Sun is white. The clause "it is known as a Yellow Star" means even though it is white, we call it a yellow star. The Sun is a G type main sequence star and G type main sequence stars go by the general name yellow dwarf. There is a variation in temperature in the G class from 5000K to 6000K degrees and the color varies from yellow to white. The Sun is on the white end of the spectral type with an effective temperature of 5778K. Any object glowing at 5778K will appear white. It would help if you spent time learning the spectral classes of stars. Actually, all you have done is confirm what we have been trying to say, the Sun is white and has been known as white. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43227175 United States 07/12/2013 09:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43227175 On the other hand, there is plenty of evidence to indicate the color of the Sun is white. Here are three articles describing the color of the Sun as white: Cordeiro, F. J. B., Color-Perception. II., Popular Astronomy, vol. 17, pp.23-28 (1909) Lockyer, J. Norman, Spectroscopic Observation of the Sun, No. II., Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Volume 17, pp. 131-132 (1868) Isaac Newton, Mr. Newton’s Answer to the Foregoing Letter Further Explaining His Theory of Light and Colors, and Particularly That of Whiteness; together with His Continued Hopes of Perfecting Telescopes by Reflections Rather than Refractions, Philosophical Transactions (1665-1678), Volume 8, pp. 6087-6092 (1673) Note the years, 1909, 1868, and 1673. If you didn't notice, the "scientific" articles say that while the Sun is white it is known as a Yellow Star. Because it APPEARS to us as yellow. THAT is, until a few years ago. It then changed to WHITE. And since 21st of December of 2012, BRIGHT SHINNY WHITE. Like NEVER before. (At least while I am alive. From yellow to white to super bright white.) This isn't difficult. The clause "while the Sun is white" means the Sun is white. The clause "it is known as a Yellow Star" means even though it is white, we call it a yellow star. The Sun is a G type main sequence star and G type main sequence stars go by the general name yellow dwarf. There is a variation in temperature in the G class from 5000K to 6000K degrees and the color varies from yellow to white. The Sun is on the white end of the spectral type with an effective temperature of 5778K. Any object glowing at 5778K will appear white. It would help if you spent time learning the spectral classes of stars. Actually, all you have done is confirm what we have been trying to say, the Sun is white and has been known as white. No. It has been known as YELLOW. NOW it is WHITE. But not only white, very bright. Before the yellow wasn't as BRIGHT. To you, logic and evidence is something that other people engage in, isn't it? Your claims are just your claims, they have no basis in reality. They have been demonstrated to be wrong on numerous occasions. Your tantrums will not change that. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43227175 United States 07/12/2013 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | To you, logic and evidence is something that other people engage in, isn't it? Your claims are just your claims, they have no basis in reality. They have been demonstrated to be wrong on numerous occasions. Your tantrums will not change that. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43227175 Which numerous occasions? I don't make many claims. I think you are lying. Name call still doesn't make you right. I just showed you are wrong. Astro showed you are wrong. Geo showed you are wrong. And learn the definition of words. Saying "the Sun is now white when it used to be yellow" IS a claim. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43227175 United States 07/12/2013 09:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | To you, logic and evidence is something that other people engage in, isn't it? Your claims are just your claims, they have no basis in reality. They have been demonstrated to be wrong on numerous occasions. Your tantrums will not change that. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43227175 Which numerous occasions? I don't make many claims. I think you are lying. Name call still doesn't make you right. I just showed you are wrong. Astro showed you are wrong. Geo showed you are wrong. And learn the definition of words. Saying "the Sun is now white when it used to be yellow" IS a claim. Who are you? These people didn't show anything. I am STILL waiting for the WHITE sunflower. THEY claimed that the Sun was never KNOWN as YELLOW. I PROVED THEM WRONG. You do realize that the name sunflower doesn't really prove anything about the Sun don't you? This is a purple sunflower [link to www.highhopesgardens.com] A red sunflower [link to www.hdwallpapers.in] A black sunflower [link to elizasmom.com] And here is a white sunflower [link to img.stillgalaxy.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43227175 United States 07/12/2013 09:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | To you, logic and evidence is something that other people engage in, isn't it? Your claims are just your claims, they have no basis in reality. They have been demonstrated to be wrong on numerous occasions. Your tantrums will not change that. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43227175 Which numerous occasions? I don't make many claims. I think you are lying. Name call still doesn't make you right. I just showed you are wrong. Astro showed you are wrong. Geo showed you are wrong. And learn the definition of words. Saying "the Sun is now white when it used to be yellow" IS a claim. Who are you? These people didn't show anything. I am STILL waiting for the WHITE sunflower. THEY claimed that the Sun was never KNOWN as YELLOW. I PROVED THEM WRONG. And you proved nothing. You cursed and threw a tantrum and tried to bully people into accepting what you say. Tactics that may have worked when you were six, but don't work now. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43227175 United States 07/12/2013 10:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43227175 Name call still doesn't make you right. I just showed you are wrong. Astro showed you are wrong. Geo showed you are wrong. And learn the definition of words. Saying "the Sun is now white when it used to be yellow" IS a claim. Who are you? These people didn't show anything. I am STILL waiting for the WHITE sunflower. THEY claimed that the Sun was never KNOWN as YELLOW. I PROVED THEM WRONG. You do realize that the name sunflower doesn't really prove anything about the Sun don't you? This is a purple sunflower [link to www.highhopesgardens.com] A red sunflower [link to www.hdwallpapers.in] A black sunflower [link to elizasmom.com] And here is a white sunflower [link to img.stillgalaxy.com] The really true one that could be considered a sunflower would be the black one. But you do realize that what I am getting at is that the sunflower USED to symbolise the COLOR of the OLD Sun don't you? Now we are in the NEW 6th Sun. The Age of Flowers. SHINE WHITE AND BRIGHT LIKE NEVER BEFORE. Before YELLOW: [link to t3.gstatic.com] [link to www.defraudingamerica.com] NOW it is more like this: [link to www.dontveter.com] [link to www.ladatco.com] The term sunflower comes from the mistaken belief that people had that the flower turned its head to follow the Sun. In 1597 they were call the flower of the Sun or Marigold of Peru. As far as the pictures, so what? Atmospheric scattering will cause the image of the Sun to appear yellow, then red, and even green, as in the green flash. [link to 4.bp.blogspot.com] The last two images are overexposed images taken with a CCD camera that do not have the same dynamic range as film nor was any great care taken to not overexpose, technically saturate, the image. |