|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
PIN!!! Cop Enraged As Citizen Attempts To Defy Independence Day DUI Checkpoint [Video]
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
“Stop and identify” statutes are laws in the United States that allow police[1] to detain persons and request such persons to identify themselves, and arrest them if they do not.
The authority to detain on reasonable suspicion was established in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), and does not depend on the existence of a law that specifically authorizes such a detention, so that authority exists in all jurisdictions in the United States. The name disclosure was considered by the U.S. Supreme Court in Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, 542 U.S. 177 (2004), which held that the name disclosure did not violate the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures. The Hiibel Court also held that, because Hiibel had no reasonable belief that his name would be used to incriminate him, the name disclosure did not violate the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination; however, the Court left open the possibility that Fifth Amendment right might apply in situations where there was a reasonable belief that giving a name could be incriminating.[2] [ link to en.wikipedia.org] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42856861 In which case, pleading the fifth would be self-incriminating, and thus give probable cause to the police.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
