REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
Message Subject
|
UNDERWATER FOREST DISCOVERED: Yet more hard evidence against an Old Earth
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
Post Content
|
I don't even know where to begin with this one. If radiocarbon dating is so far off, how come every dinosaur fossil from the Jurassic period dates to about the same age? If it was highly flawed, the results wouldn't be repeatable thousands of times over on fossils found all over the world. It's the same with trilobite fossils. How about amber? It's all been dated much further back as well. How about fluted points, made by Native Americans and most date to 8-10,000 years ago. I can't figure out who's dumber, the young earth tards or the flat earth tards.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18355462 It's clearly a training issue. If a radiocarbon dating procedure comes back with dates in excess of 6,000 years - i.e. older than the earth itself, as has been told - then the results are clearly wrong and the procedure is not being performed correctly. Perhaps if they calibrated their equipment we wouldn't be having such an inane discussion. The earth is 6,000 years old.
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|