|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Simple yet profound question for Freemasons...
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
...
I'm looking for someone to actually explain the answer to my question in the original post or if my logic is wrong in the statement below then show me how and why it's wrong and I'll happily go do something else.
If you can refute this then I'll stop posting in this thread:
You don't know what anything is above you in Freemasonry until you get there because it's a secret.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12615535 Well, the only answer on that would be: yes, you don't know. The basics of freemasonry is to search yourself with the help of other freemasons to eventually ascend and think and feel on a higher scale instead of just your own individual self and help others by all means... So, maybe there are secrets further up the ladder, maybe there aren't. If the basics are something you belief it's good, your 'dark ally' could also be an enlightened path from which you do not know where it's heading or the secrets it contains, if it contains any to begin with. Don't you see the contradiction in what you're saying? Unless you're at the top degree of Freemasonry you don't know the true "basics of Freemasonry" because the whole thing could be turned on its head at the end and according to researchers like Bill Cooper, that's exactly what happens. There's no contradiction there, you are making it a contradiction by assuming it will be 'turned on its head', and all because a researcher said it 'could be turned on its head'. The perspective from where your question comes from is not balanced: your cup is already full and you assume too much. How can you say I made an assumption? I wrote "the whole thing could be turned on its head", I wasn't making an assumption. You have to admit that's a possibility right?
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
