Hello. I posted these comments in the other thread but I figured they are pretty important to consider for many different reasons, including reinforcing that people shouldn't be fearful and also just reiterate the fact that it's impossible to predict any event with so much info.

To the original poster, I'd like to say thank you for posting a lot of our stuff. I've seen you posting on many different forums and we really appreciate you helping to get the word out! Please keep it up and much love.

Post 1 (from the other thread)

Thank you for the kind comments. My thoughts on the possibility of an event at DIA?? Well, it's kind of complicated.

In 2011 they ran Operation Mountain Guardian here in Denver. The situations included movie theaters and school shootings. All events that day were simply drills. However with that info combined with the UN Gun Ban and other anti-gun legislation, we were able to accurately predict in May 2012 that from the summer of 2012 through at least January of 2013, we would see shootings almost on a weekly basis, and we even went so far as to say that we'd see school and movie theater shootings too.

With that in mind, it's hard to say whether the event at DIA is another Mountain Guardian style dry run with a real event following at a different location months later. Or, if it's an actual event.

Drills were simultaneously being ran on 9-11, 7-7, all the way to the recent shooting at Santa Monica College. A lot of people don't know but on that very same day there was a drill at another University on the east coast. However most people know the LAPD was conducting a terrorist drill the day before the shooting at the exact same location.

So here is my analysis. They run a series of drills throughout the United States and one of them turns out to be live. We don't know which one until the story breaks of course but in the meantime they are constantly running drills so it's impossible to even point to a drill and say it will turn into a "live" event.

The reason they recruit crisis actors is to control the scene and flow of information better. They had to do a lot of cleanup work after most of their events, like getting rid of Beverly Eckhart, (9-11 victims families). Oklahoma City, they made John Doe 2 disappear and started killing off other witnesses or throwing them in jail. After Columbine, they started killing the kids who wouldn't shut up. A 17 year old couple were killed just down the street from here at a Subway sandwich shop. Forensics reports said it was "sniper bullets" that killed them. The police would not enter the scene for approx 8 hours after the shooting, stating they couldn't because they "did not have a warrant".

So why would they use Crisis Actors? It's obvious when you investigate the after math and the slaughter that's taken place after the fact. I'm not saying that people weren't hurt at the Boston Marathon for example (most likely no one died at Sandy Hoax though), but the people we see on TV are actors. It's easier to control the information that way.

As far as predicting a false flag: As you can see, it's become such a tangled mess of information that it remains a guessing game.

POST 2:



Here is another interesting piece of info to consider. The TSA is removing the body scanners in many locations but also allowing people to bypass security. There is a catch though, you have to let the bomb sniffing dogs sniff ya!

So Sheree just mentioned to me that they are implementing this at the Denver International Airport RIGHT NOW. While I don't agree with ANY of their security measures, I find this drop in security at this particular moment in time, coupled with all of the other information, sounds like a foundation for problem, reaction solution.

1. They lax the security measures at DIA
2. A bomb, bio-weapon or other "attack" happens there.
3. They scream about how they have to UP the security even more evasively than before because the moment they relaxed it, something happened.

Something to think about.