Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,848 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,644,081
Pageviews Today: 3,437,019Threads Today: 954Posts Today: 16,038
11:49 PM

Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
Message Subject I can't figure Aldous Huxley out. Was he an Illuminati disinformation agent or a speaker of the truth?
Poster Handle ANHEDONIC
Post Content
Neither. He was simply planting the seed, so that the tree could sprout later.

TPTB don't actually have any power whatsoever, they operate by co-opting OUR power! By feeding us with their thoughts, they manage to get the human collective to manifest what THEY desire.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 300884

So, he was planting these ideas of society that they would then implement later?

I don't get it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21743671

From a psychological standpoint, it can have a desensitizing effect on the recipient. If a person starts to believe that some process/event will play out at some a point in the 'future', he/she will become more acclimated, more emotionally passive, and thus more accepting of this process/event when it actually transpires. So there is real value in divulging the information in advance.

There is less likely to be an emotional reaction of shock, surprise, and thus resistance, if the individual has (even on a subconscious level) already acknowledged that something is likely to occur. The emotional reactions are played out (expressed) before it's even been implemented. If no one had any inkling that such an outcome could even transpire, when the outcome actually plays out, there would be quite a different psychological reaction than if that forewarning (foreknowledge) had not been presented.

A clear example of this would be the modern day interpretation of the biblical 'end times' events as it relates to the actions of the 'NWO'. Look at how many have already accepted that these 'events' will play out - accepted them as 'fact', as a 'done deal'. There is no resistance being displayed, no call to action to thwart such an outcome. Just passive acceptance that it will come to be. If there was any shock, anger, dismay to be felt over such knowledge, it has already been reconciled by the individual who now believes this to be a future certainty.

I don't know of this author/individual in question but if there is a purpose/function to be served by presenting this type of information in advance to actually further the agenda itself - my comments above explain how it would work on a pyschological and subconscious level.

Did the individual present any viable method or means for people to thwart such plans or such an outcome? Or merely just inform the reader that this is what would happen? What was the context?

Please verify you're human:

Reason for reporting: