Evidence of .pdf tampering with transcripts from Dzokhar Tsarnaev's arraignment hearing! May have been authored in 2006!

Since you are going to keep bumping it anyway, do you really think that Zubeidat is that important to the Boston bombing?

I was only going to bump until 11:30 tonight. I don't think she's that important. But there has to be some motivation to frame these two. Who else would write this .pdf at home? For what reason. This is only a theory anyway

I don't know, hadn't really thought of that. Maybe Zubidat is a key to this whole thing?

Keep in mind that the supposed immense hatred that Uncle Ruslan has for Zubeidat is a major leap.

It's just a feeling I've had, since I've seen in-laws taking it out on their own brother/sisters kids because they don't like who they married.

There seems to be a concerted effort to make Zubeidat look bad in the media. In Rolling Stone, DT's best friend's mom trashed her, his best friend even added to the "striver" narrative of Zubeidat. I watched the video of the press conference, and all of the bizarre gestures were just pictures of her talking relatively normally and caught mid motion.
On the local news here in Boston, they interviewed her by phone after the trial, and her demeanor was pretty nice, she seemed kinda sweet, but they had a picture of her looking crazy on the screeen. They could have used a bunch of other pictures.

Why else would an uncle do this to his own nephews? I think this is something Graham Fuller came up with, and maybe uncle Ruslan volunteered his nephews for the frame?

I feel like he didn't care about the brothers. If he was so concerned about DT, he could have had him come down to live with him in DC right?

Sometimes I wonder though if DT and TT are just in some underground lair in Chechnya. Their parents didn't seem to sad that one of their children was dead. Everyone grieves differently, but who knows?

Last Edited by Screamer on 08/22/2013 07:24 PM

It is possible that Zubeidat looks bad in the media because she is bad though. If people are saying these things about her there may be a reason.
Hard bitten looking woman and sweet is not a word that comes to mind. Certainly not someone you'd want to have coffee with. Anyone can empathize with her loss and frustration though. Have no reason to believe that anyone did anything to their nephews, but maybe Zubeidat does.

There's plenty of reasons to believe Uncle Ruslan did this to his nephews!

He has worked for Halliburton and USAID (a CIA front organization posing as a charity but really interferes with country's politics). He was married to Graham Fuller's daughter. Graham Fuller was the head of the CIA in the early 80's and the mastermind of the Iran Contra affair. Uncle Ruslan even operated his first bunk charity out of Graham Fullers house!

She has not mentioned Uncle Ruslan. Many other people believe Uncle Ruslan had something to do with it. The .pdf made in 2006 on a Windows XP home pc sounds like something he would feasibly do.

Here's the interview on the local news. She isn't bad, but they show wierd pictures of her. She also had told people Boston reporters that she was coming to the trial, but then she was told it would make her son's situation worse, not simply because of the shoplifting.




Also, the letters that she was replied to her son's supporters she sounds very maternal.

The media can control a person's image you know. DT's best friend's mom just doesn't like her because she's Daegestani. I definitely don't think these two kids did it. She does seem like a striver, but not an evil person.

Last Edited by Screamer on 08/22/2013 07:25 PM

last bump tonight

That's an interesting word, STRIVER. I do think they did the Boston bombing and I definitely wouldn't call the older brother a kid but he would be to the parents or sisters.

Come on! 700 views and 20 responses? Can anyone who is more computer savvy give me a reason why the document properties would display a 2006 creation date but no modification date if this was just an electronic error?

Also, I did this on poltico, their copy has a different file name, but the same creation date, and no modification date.

Then I went to the LA times, it had a creation date of April 22,2013, made on a MAC OS using pdffactory (which is not needed if you have a recent version of Microsoft word), as well as a different file name.

Shouldn't this all be the same file made on the same computer?

The other .pdfs of this case don't have the same inconsistencies in the document properties.